Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The ignorance of a poster is not your responsibility. You do not haveThere has to be a reason why you've posted this on
alt.g-w, surely?
He doesn't feel like he exists if someone is not giving
him sh*t about his ideas. Plenty of that being flung in
alt.g-w.
You were against high jerk aircraft and now it appears
you oppose low jerk vehicles.
Newsgroups have charters.
Newsgroups have recommended guidelines for
posting. The first guideline, is post to only one newsgroup.
Unless ignorance of a poster needs to be exposed.
Why would you want to do this, in front of God and everybody? AndIn that case your only hope is to proffer some calculations or
reasoning or everyone will be able to see you can't do 2nd
year level engineering.
Which has fuck-all to do with accel/decel control sytems on buses etThe
second guideline is if the topic of discussion is really
also germaine to another newsgroup, then add another
one.
AGND (ain't got no data) climate change deniers are a
staple on alt.global warming.
And are you naive enough to believe your crossposting to unrelatedClimate scientists need to know that there are also
have AGNC (ain't got no calculations) technology deniers.
I've been studying it casually for decades, and
it is based upon atotally faulty model,
essentailly the Mercator projection,
where the poles are singularities. now,
go to your space science dept., and
they're all about the poles.
give you a for-instance:
how many "holes" in the ozonosphere are there, and
when was the biggest one first discovered (not in the '70s
by the TOMS) ??
AGND (ain't got no data) climate change deniers are a staple on
It's not merey a right but a duty:There has to be a reason why you've posted this on
alt.g-w, surely?
He doesn't feel like he exists if someone is not giving
him sh*t about his ideas. Plenty of that being flung in
alt.g-w.
You were against high jerk aircraft and now it appears
you oppose low jerk vehicles.
Newsgroups have charters.
Newsgroups have recommended guidelines for
posting. The first guideline, is post to only one newsgroup.
Unless ignorance of a poster needs to be exposed.
The ignorance of a poster is not your responsibility.
Buses get 200 passenger miles / gallon.You do not have
a big red S on your chest. In this case, from post #1, you posted to
off topic newsgroups, namely alt.g-w.
If you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen.In that case your only hope is to proffer some calculations or
reasoning or everyone will be able to see you can't do 2nd
year level engineering.
Why would you want to do this, in front of God and everybody?
You are endarkening them. You have no real ideas. You have no factsThere has to be a reason why you've posted this on
alt.g-w, surely?
He doesn't feel like he exists if someone is not giving
him sh*t about his ideas. Plenty of that being flung in
alt.g-w.
You were against high jerk aircraft and now it appears
you oppose low jerk vehicles.
Newsgroups have charters.
Newsgroups have recommended guidelines for
posting. The first guideline, is post to only one newsgroup.
Unless ignorance of a poster needs to be exposed.
The ignorance of a poster is not your responsibility.
It's not merey a right but a duty:
"Enlighten the public generally . . ."
-- Jefferson
A "standard" passenger car with 1 occupant managed to get 100 milesYou do not have
a big red S on your chest. In this case, from post #1,
you posted to off topic newsgroups, namely alt.g-w.
Buses get 200 passenger miles / gallon.
In the Universe I live in, and gallon of "gasoline" weighs in at a tadRight now that "gallon" represents over 8 lbs of carbon,
29 lbs CO2.
Has nothing to do with this thread you started.A bus is 4X better than a new Prius with one occupant.
No point in discussing accel/decel control strategies in alt.g-w.Moreover, the outspoken poster who originally complained
about the cross posting, "Dawlish," has tacitly admitted I
was correct by STFU on the new thread on alt.global-warming
No Point In Discussing Climate Change w/o Discussing
Solutions
Your clothing is on fire, and it is funny as hell. Recommend you lookIn that case your only hope is to proffer some calculations or
reasoning or everyone will be able to see you can't do 2nd
year level engineering.
Why would you want to do this, in front of God and everybody?
If you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen.
Just because you AGNC (ain't got no calculations) and AGNR (ain't gotThere has to be a reason why you've posted this on
alt.g-w, surely?
He doesn't feel like he exists if someone is not giving
him sh*t about his ideas. Plenty of that being flung in
alt.g-w.
You were against high jerk aircraft and now it appears
you oppose low jerk vehicles.
Newsgroups have charters.
Newsgroups have recommended guidelines for
posting. The first guideline, is post to only one newsgroup.
Unless ignorance of a poster needs to be exposed.
The ignorance of a poster is not your responsibility.
It's not merey a right but a duty:
"Enlighten the public generally . . ."
-- Jefferson
You are endarkening them.
You are starting to project almost as much as a "libertarian."You have no real ideas.
Why isn't it commercially available like public buses?Buses get 200 passenger miles / gallon.
A "standard" passenger car with 1 occupant managed to get 100 miles
per gallon.
What about CFLs and LEDs?Moreover, the outspoken poster who originally complained
about the cross posting, "Dawlish," has tacitly admitted I
was correct by STFU on the new thread on alt.global-warming
No Point In Discussing Climate Change w/o Discussing
Solutions
No point in discussing accel/decel control strategies in alt.g-w.
well, some of that is obvious,
even though I've never thought of it, before;
what do you mean by harmonic motion,
applied to wheels?
If you do this with simple harmonic motion the highest absolute value
of jerk coincides with 0 accelleration and vice versa.
Going from parked [zero accelleration zero velocity] and then trying
to accelerate into traffic while keeping jerk low.
And rule # 1 is to stay off threads which don't interest you oralt.g-w, surely?
He doesn't feel like he exists if someone is not giving
him sh*t about his ideas. Plenty of that being flung in
alt.g-w.
You were against high jerk aircraft and now it appears
you oppose low jerk vehicles.
Newsgroups have charters.
Try googling low jerk and "throttle controller."Some railroad reg. requires a passenger train to decelerate with a
jerk< 2 m/sec^3. Don't how or even if they do it on trains but it's
a good idea to keep the jerk down when passengers are out of their
seats and walking to an exit.
It could be done automatically on public buses to reduce tumbling down
the aisle incidents. It would also reduce the multi tasking load on
bus drivers trying to pull out into heavy traffic before passengers
are seated..
The brake pedal would have an override, i.e., stomping all the way
down, in case a pedestrian stepped out in front of the bus.
The number of elderly will soar along with fuel prices so this will
save a lot of lives.
Bret Cahill
As a Senior Citizen who in-spite of a Berg Balance Score in low-mid
20's actually can walk with 2 canes
*NO* !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I do not believe you have:
1. observed the problem set in the field
2. correctly identified the actual condition of maximum hazard
3. considered "Law of Unintended Consequences"- Hide quoted text -
Poles are points on a polar azimuthal equidistant projection, notthat may be what I'm referring to. the biggest "hole"
was uncovered in the IGY, '57-59, by Dobson and Nicole,
they who first deployed ye olde ozonometers
(units of column of ozone in Dobsons .-)
Fully loaded buses get 200 passenger miles/gallon.Buses get 200 passenger miles / gallon.
A bus is not as good as a fully loaded Prius.Right now that "gallon" represents over 8 lbs of carbon, 29 lbs CO2.
A bus is 4X better than a new Prius with one occupant.
On 9/2/2011 10:59 PM, Bret Cahill wrote:
...
You're building in a bias.
Buses get 200 passenger miles / gallon.
Fully loaded buses get 200 passenger miles/gallon.
Right now that "gallon" represents over 8 lbs of carbon, 29 lbs CO2.
A bus is 4X better than a new Prius with one occupant.
A bus is not as good as a fully loaded Prius.
When was the last time you saw 4 passengers in a Prius?You're building in a bias.
Buses get 200 passenger miles / gallon.
Fully loaded buses get 200 passenger miles/gallon.
Right now that "gallon" represents over 8 lbs of carbon, 29 lbs CO2.
A bus is 4X better than a new Prius with one occupant.
A bus is not as good as a fully loaded Prius.
My son, his wife, their daughter, and me.When was the last time you saw 4 passengers in a Prius?
When was the last time you saw 4 passengers in a Prius?You're building in a bias.
Buses get 200 passenger miles / gallon.
Fully loaded buses get 200 passenger miles/gallon.
Right now that "gallon" represents over 8 lbs of carbon, 29 lbs CO2.
A bus is 4X better than a new Prius with one occupant.
A bus is not as good as a fully loaded Prius.
Now if we can only get that going with every day commuting then aWhen was the last time you saw 4 passengers in a Prius?
My son, his wife, their daughter, and me.
Each one takes up two seats so the 870 passenger mpg figure may be aAnyway by 2015 Freightliner will have a rig that get's 174 ton miles/
gallon. Figure the average bus passenger in the U. S. weighs 0.2 tons
so the newer buses will be able to get 870 passenger mpg.
I know there are a lot of overweight people in the US, but an average of 400
pounds??
Perhaps with a PIDD^2 controller? (proportional, integral, derivative,Some railroad reg. requires a passenger train to decelerate with a
jerk< 2 m/sec^3.
a good idea to keep the jerk down when passengers are out of their
seats and walking to an exit.
It could be done automatically on public buses to reduce tumbling down
the aisle incidents. It would also reduce the multi tasking load on
bus drivers trying to pull out into heavy traffic before passengers
are seated..
The brake pedal would have an override, i.e., stomping all the way
down, in case a pedestrian stepped out in front of the bus.
The number of elderly will soar along with fuel prices so this will
save a lot of lives.
Bret Cahill