Guest
On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 04:56:50 -0400, rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> wrote:
Not sure where you going with your comment that "they" prefer NiCad in
power tools. "They" (manufacturers) make almost[*] 100% LiIon tools
these days. LiIon is a hands-down winner in this application, even
though they scare you.
[*] Someone might still make NiCd, still.
Jan Panteltje wrote on 10/20/2017 3:48 AM:
On a sunny day (Thu, 19 Oct 2017 18:34:47 -0400) it happened rickman
gnuarm@gmail.com> wrote in <osb9a9$v5o$1@dont-email.me>:
Interesting. Both videos use a lot more battery than I will use and the bag
is barely closed. I would be essentially rolling the bag up and depending
on the size I use I would be folding the sides over before rolling.
You have to leave some opening so the smoke can escape and the pressure can
be prevented to build up to a point where the bag tares.
Yes, but some opening is not the gaping holes in these bags. The other
video with a bunch of batteries in a latched and sealed ammo case is pretty
instructive. Before it broke the seal it actually dented the can with the
pressure. But like I said earlier, one cell of Lipo is not nearly as much
energy as the videos show.
If I could find similar products to the power bank boards that worked with
NiMH, I'd go that route. I believe they actually prefer NiCad in power
tools because of the high current. NiMH has too much internal impedance.
But this will only draw a couple hundred mA most likely, so it would be a
good fit. I would have to roll my own design for the whole thing.
Not sure where you going with your comment that "they" prefer NiCad in
power tools. "They" (manufacturers) make almost[*] 100% LiIon tools
these days. LiIon is a hands-down winner in this application, even
though they scare you.
[*] Someone might still make NiCd, still.