Jihad needs scientists

[Jim Thompson]

On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 22:12:27 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
<mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 18:17:20 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

No one east of Missouri knows how to drive ;-)


You would have trouble driving some of the roads I was on in Alaska.
If you drove like you do in the desert, you would have killed yourself
in a couple days, tops.

Not hardly. You forget that I'm originally a West Virginia c'untry
boy. I can drive mountain roads fast enough to ensure that you dirty
your panties ;-)


You haven't done it on those Alaska roads with over a foot of ice and
going around a mountain with a drop on one side that seasoned drivers
have gone over. High speed on that road was about 12 miles an hour. Any
faster and you didn't make the turns. The military shuttle bus went over
the side two weeks after I left Alaska, and that man had driven the road
for over ten years.

Yup. I've driven black ice on North Mountain (US33 from Harrisonburg,
VA to Franklin, WV)... you tip-toe, then you hit fog and you crawl ;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.

 

[T Wake]

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:udpdi21ic0sp4ahoef9tvofdtogpbjv6aq@4ax.com...

On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 20:19:43 +0100, "T Wake"
usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> wrote:

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news5hci2h69upvfidaqka5f2s0cejfigk9k7@4ax.com...
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 23:48:43 GMT, "Homer J Simpson"
nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:


"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:ckd8i2d471ak7j75nlcnugpbk8j5th89v6@4ax.com...

Because America has the wherewithal and the will to do whatever it
wants to, and all the little guys resent that.

Bullies are generally resented except by toadies.

---
That didn't seem to bother England back in her salad days, but now
that we have to kick a little butt every now and then it's not OK
for us?

Are you implying America is defending / building its empire?

---
Yes.

Ok, I have seen lots of messages on this thread saying how America has no
empire, nor any intention to get one and wasn't sure where you stood on the
issue.

Thanks.

You sound a little hypocritical to me, Homer.

Not at all. Here is an example, Person X used to beat his wife. After she
finally reported him, he went to jail and learned from his mistakes.

Now Person X says to Person Y "Don't hit your wife" - Person Y responds
"You
used to do it, you hypocrite, why shouldn't I?"

Oh look, we [tinw] never learn.

---
The part you failed to recount was when Person X related his
experiences in prison to Person Y.

Yes, but it was only an analogy and didn't need to be perfect. If Homer
recounted the UK's experiences with the way the country learned from its
mistakes in the days of Empire would it be better?

?

Sorry, it means "there is no we" - although I cant remember when or how, I
developed a habit of writing it after I used the term "we." Ideally it was
to show that when I said "we," there isnt really anyone else I can speak for
so it is a misuse of the word.

In the example, it would be churlish of me to use "we" meaning you and I
never learn - as I have no idea if you have or have not and can not speak
for you. Not sure if I have explained this very well but it is late and I am
slightly tipsy.

 

[JoeBloe]

On Fri, 06 Oct 06 11:34:09 GMT, lparker@emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) Gave
us:

In article <pabbi21hj1om31j3avpn3mm32vdur9mo0n@4ax.com>,
JoeBloe <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 13:22:17 -0400, Keith <krw@att.bizzzz> Gave us:

In article <eg335h$5l0$10@leto.cc.emory.edu>, lparker@emory.edu
says...
In article <eg2od9$8qk_004@s829.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>,
jmfbahciv@aol.com wrote:
In article <VAVUg.13310$7I1.3298@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>,
lucasea@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:452415BE.DB0DBC1E@hotmail.com...


Keith wrote:

rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com says...

And you think you can defeat 'radical Islam' with bombs and bullets
?

I know there is no choice. Perhaps you want to submit?

There is no need to 'submit'

You're living in a perversely stupid fantasy paranoid world.

It comes from the constant bombardment by Bush's fear-mongering--it's
his
way of keeping power over people.

I think you should start to listen to Bush instead of listening
to other people supposedly repeating what Bush said. I would
suggest you start with his January, 2006 TV speech.

People start to lose perspective on what
is happening and why. It really is a very powerful narcotic.

People can also lose perspective if they assume that Bush
is always wrong

So what has he been right about?

and is the cause of all ills which is the
only thing you hear from his political opposition.

This causes a lot of people to overlook the fact that these
same politicians do not intend to deal with the threat
to the nation.


Bush has increased the threat. His own NIE says so.

You're in a fantasy land. ONE SENTENCE of the NIE report was
leaked by the Democrats to try to discredit Bush. The four pages
around that one sentence, later released, say exactly the opposite.
Please get your "news" from someone other than Franken.

Good one.
Yes, as good as Iraq had WMD.

They did, you ditzo.

 

[JoeBloe]

On Fri, 06 Oct 06 11:38:20 GMT, lparker@emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) Gave
us:

LEOs cannot. Except, as in time of
war,

Which Congress has not declared.

The constitution declares it.

They can come and commandeer your house too. Get a clue.

 

[T Wake]

"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:aasdi21rrd3aj4cj4va9rh5vtdn25lgb9n@4ax.com...

On Fri, 06 Oct 06 11:34:09 GMT, lparker@emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) Gave
us:

Yes, as good as Iraq had WMD.


They did, you ditzo.

Yeah, all those nukes that were found. And they were connected to ICBMs on
mobile platforms. Good job we took them out eh?

You are stupid.

 

[JoeBloe]

On Fri, 06 Oct 06 11:38:20 GMT, lparker@emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) Gave
us:

we have situational rules which govern the behavior of our
country's national security agencies.

Where in the constitution does it allow parts of itself to be ignored?

The parts governing wartime, and martial law.

 

[JoeBloe]

On Fri, 06 Oct 06 11:38:20 GMT, lparker@emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) Gave
us:

They have followed all such
rules, and are perfectly within their rights in the task of making
this country safe again.


Like Hitler did in 1930s Germany.

You're an idiot.

Tough luck, chucko, that you only kept the parts of the constitution
in mind that you liked.

What parts allow other parts to be ignored?

Read what I wrote again, dipshit. It refers to the fact that YOU
only kept certain parts in YOUR mind. YOU skipped over the parts that
allow them to do what they do, and YOU are the one that doesn't know
what's going on.

 

[JoeBloe]

On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 12:21:27 GMT, Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com>
Gave us:

In article <p3dci29iodgrv27559q0ffvqh29bao5me3@4ax.com>,
JoeBloe <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:

On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 02:58:42 GMT, "Homer J Simpson"
nobody@nowhere.com> Gave us:


"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:fucbi29sjnq3iiboi57rpd4hifvsemhmjc@4ax.com...

Jay Leno: "Which two countries border the United States?"

Girl on the Street: "Ummm, errr, ahhh, Europe and ummm, Paris?"

Yep, that's an American all right. Like those who think Alaska is an
island.


Do you actually think that it was unrehearsed and not intentional,
dumbass?

Obviously it was unrehearsed. Apparently you can't tell the difference
between fact and fiction. Since you clearly can't tell your ass from a hole
in the ground that doesn't surprise anyone.


Idiot! When Leno goes out on the street, it is NOT *DURING* his
show it is prior to it, and the sessions last for hours, and yes
rehearsed bits get filmed, and then the editing department puts
together a little piece for the show. You really can't be that
stupid, can you?

Andit has been going on long enough that most people know it is the
idiots that get the screen time.

Or the staged, and rehearsed "would be idiots".

Got clue?

 

[JoeBloe]

On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 13:17:35 +0000 (UTC), kensmith@green.rahul.net (Ken
Smith) Gave us:

In article <fu8bi2h0pfrimp5kfqphg8g8ner12tb8vg@4ax.com>,
JoeBloe <joebloe@nosuchplace.org> wrote:
[...]
ESPECIALLY in time of war.


No, no .... are we at war! When did this war get declared? I must have
missed the debate in congress and the vote. When was it? What country is
our enemy?

Grow up, dolt.

 

[JoeBloe]

On 06 Oct 2006 13:30:15 GMT, "Daniel Mandic" <daniel_mandic@aon.at>
Gave us:

Eeyore wrote:

You're very silly. I reckon I'd rather have Russia as an ally than
the USA frankly.

Graham



I would have no one (constitutioned State) for ally.... the Nature is
my ally.

Anarchistic baby bullshit won't work.

 

[JoeBloe]

On 06 Oct 2006 13:30:16 GMT, "Daniel Mandic" <daniel_mandic@aon.at>
Gave us:

He never said that he hates something. You say he hates....

You have ZERO powers of comprehension if, while reading his posts
merely through this one thread, you do not feel that he indeed hates.

Try again, chump.

 

[JoeBloe]

On 06 Oct 2006 13:30:16 GMT, "Daniel Mandic" <daniel_mandic@aon.at>
Gave us:

Hmmm :-(, better than actually here :-(, and I thought we could measure
with the swedish-social system. (At least it was so before...
1951-1999).

It's getting better.... 2006. (phhheew, again that 7 years )




Best Regards,

Daniel Mandic

Dude, you are fucking lost.

 

[John Fields]

On 06 Oct 2006 19:23:35 GMT, "Daniel Mandic" <daniel_mandic@aon.at>
wrote:

John Fields wrote:


Try laughing at yourself; everyone else does...


Me not. He angles for compliments

--
Nicely said.
---

(Thanks Graham, I am honoured), strange in the first but with a good
British Heart.

---
Which you'd support unequivocally?
---

John. You... what could I say. You are the perfect example for anti
American Liberty thinking.

---
Pretty perverted idea from your side, it seems to me. I get to say
what I want to and then you get to shut me down because you disagree
with me? What happened to debate? It's unacceptable because you'll
lose? Get used to it, loser.
---

I know the thinking (Liberty) is coming also
from Indian Influence, of course ;-). But let it.... when the US is
such a Big Time/s player, then account the thousand of years of their
culture. No, Not sooo much.. just a bit. (For the first... calm
down man. You cannot rule the world, but otherwise, no one is in the
slightest strong enough, to capture Amerika)

---
The last part was right and the next to the last part was wrong.


--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer

 

[JoeBloe]

On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 16:24:16 +0100, "T Wake"
<usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:

See, everyone can make demands.

Not you, you piece of shit.

 

[JoeBloe]

On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 16:46:19 +0100, "T Wake"
<usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:

"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:kp8bi29dil5b9l2ib6oakv7sn227f8450o@4ax.com...
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 10:49:33 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> Gave us:

On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 20:48:51 +0100, Eeyore
rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:



lucasea@sbcglobal.net wrote:

jmfbahciv@aol.com> wrote in message
lparker@emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote:

Keith Olbermann had a good commentary a week or two ago about Bush
calling
a criticism "unacceptable."

Which criticism was unacceptable?

I don't understand you people; first you complain that he can't
think for himself; then, you object when he expresses his opinion
about
something.

You can't have it both ways.

Calling "criticism" "unacceptable" is not an opinion--it's an
argument-winning tactic that involves tacitly silencing anybody who
disagrees with you.

Criticism was considered unacceptable in 1930s Germany too.

---
If the parallel is valid, expect to hear someone knocking on your
door because of your antics here.

Ooooooohhhh.... That would be so.... R I G H T E O U S !!!

I'd love to see the video on Cops!

Do you deliberately conform to stereotypes? Are you infact a plant for the
left wingers to create ridicule?

You're a goddamned retard, boy.

 

[JoeBloe]

On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 17:01:41 +0100, "T Wake"
<usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:

"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:7fcbi2t7o8chj90omrt9n69qg4jqjiejq8@4ax.com...
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 18:16:44 GMT, "Homer J Simpson"
nobody@nowhere.com> Gave us:


"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:ros9i2tlko096r3d7cr9usjfl8f0kg25oe@4ax.com...

Going from discussion to trying to find personal identification? Pretty
much
the definition.

This is Usenet, dumbass. "Finger" and many other trace utilities
have been around for decades as well as the right to utilize them.

If you were any more clueless, you'd be the definition of
something... RETARDEDNESS.

Many people write letters to the editor of the local paper. Few try to go
to
the address of the writers. Those few are stalkers.


You're an idiot. People don't stalk idiots. You prove that one
*can* be wrong *all* the time.

Doing a lookup on *your* IP address is NOT stalking, dipshit.

Do you type one handed?

I, in fact, used to develop database apps for OLTP handling, and I

could stand over the shoulder of one of my data entry girls and type
with either hand to show them how to use the screen entry form(s).

This was back in the 286/386/2Mb/s coax ethernet days.

So, yes, I can type one handed quite well. The brain knows where
all the keys are.

Do you have a point, dipshit?

 

[JoeBloe]

On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 17:39:51 +0100, "T Wake"
<usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:

what the voices in your head are saying without
any processing

You're a goddamned loon.

 

[JoeBloe]

On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 18:09:56 +0100, "T Wake"
<usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:

You would never know if you had 15 seconds as I very, very much doubt you
can count that high.

I can juggle 15 imaginary numbers around, while you piddle fart
around with counting the digits of one hand.

Try again, asswipe.

 

[JoeBloe]

On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 19:16:32 +0100, "T Wake"
<usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:

"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:n3hbi2t6cgbhv45958p3tgd8o2snitarrh@4ax.com...
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 20:59:52 +0100, "T Wake"
usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:


lucasea@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:6d%Ug.9902$e66.1245@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com...

"T Wake" <usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> wrote in message
news:tOmdnf6_-qawlbnYRVnyiw@pipex.net...

"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4522F755.6FBE3BED@hotmail.com...


T Wake wrote:

"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote

That's not my recollection.

Ok, it is my recollection though.

Fair nuff !

You need to stop reading too much implied criticism where there
isnt
any.

There's been *loads* !

In my posts?

A misunderstanding it seems.

Possibly. The joys of the text based USENET.

Yes, let's do stick to getting offended by the *ex*plicit insults.
There
are way more than enough of those in this thread to go around.

Yes. Easier to not get offended by anything here

It's really difficult to accomplish though, as you keep returning :-]

Aha, and you are forced to read my message how exactly?

I am fairly sure Forte Agent has filters.

I filter nothing. Even pieces of shit like you. That still does

not change the fact that you offend.

 

[JoeBloe]

On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 18:17:06 GMT, <lucasea@sbcglobal.net> Gave us:

Who really cares...the victims are still just as dead. Semantic games is
all that is.

You are so full of shit, you eyes are brown, and there is a foul
stench emanating from your ears.