Jihad needs scientists

"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:aasdi21rrd3aj4cj4va9rh5vtdn25lgb9n@4ax.com...

Yes, as good as Iraq had WMD.

They did, you ditzo.

Uhh...no...not since 1991. You really do need to get yourself educated, and
not just listen to Bush soundbites.

Eric Lucas

 

"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:4csdi2h069iud7p41ccvi77f40v0ilfki0@4ax.com...

On Fri, 06 Oct 06 11:38:20 GMT, lparker@emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) Gave
us:

LEOs cannot. Except, as in time of
war,

Which Congress has not declared.

The constitution declares it.

Uhh...no...the Constitution (note capital C) gives Congress the right to
declare it. Or is that a difference that's too subtle for you to
understand? You might want to try reading it sometime.

Eric Lucas

 

"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:4esdi2lpi9c8dvn3rdhmu14d4n7ur1j6tk@4ax.com...

On Fri, 06 Oct 06 11:38:20 GMT, lparker@emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) Gave
us:

we have situational rules which govern the behavior of our
country's national security agencies.

Where in the constitution does it allow parts of itself to be ignored?


The parts governing wartime, and martial law.

Well, since neither war nor martial law has been declared, that would be
irrelevant, now wouldn't it? Do try to think things through before you say
them.

Eric Lucas

 

"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:ctsdi21ngmunjqjmkp3kig2no1e0srm0ol@4ax.com...

On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 13:17:35 +0000 (UTC), kensmith@green.rahul.net (Ken
Smith) Gave us:

In article <fu8bi2h0pfrimp5kfqphg8g8ner12tb8vg@4ax.com>,
JoeBloe <joebloe@nosuchplace.org> wrote:
[...]
ESPECIALLY in time of war.


No, no .... are we at war! When did this war get declared? I must have
missed the debate in congress and the vote. When was it? What country is
our enemy?

Grow up, dolt.

Watch out, Ken, he's got you in the steely grip of his logic now. Nah, just
kidding. You're fine.

Eric Lucas

 

"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:ektdi2dc2einrnp4vb8lhcc3b81qhljmdq@4ax.com...

On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 16:46:19 +0100, "T Wake"
usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:

Do you deliberately conform to stereotypes? Are you infact a plant for the
left wingers to create ridicule?

You're a goddamned retard, boy.

T Wake, I would say the answer to your first question is "invariably", and
the answer to your second is "of course not, he's dumber than a tree". Oh,
sorry, you didn't mean that type of plant. Never mind.

Eric Lucas

 

"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
newsotdi29rl7eu6355m807o0m51aombh1ppg@4ax.com...

On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 17:01:41 +0100, "T Wake"
usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:


"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:7fcbi2t7o8chj90omrt9n69qg4jqjiejq8@4ax.com...
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 18:16:44 GMT, "Homer J Simpson"
nobody@nowhere.com> Gave us:


"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:ros9i2tlko096r3d7cr9usjfl8f0kg25oe@4ax.com...

Going from discussion to trying to find personal identification?
Pretty
much
the definition.

This is Usenet, dumbass. "Finger" and many other trace utilities
have been around for decades as well as the right to utilize them.

If you were any more clueless, you'd be the definition of
something... RETARDEDNESS.

Many people write letters to the editor of the local paper. Few try to
go
to
the address of the writers. Those few are stalkers.


You're an idiot. People don't stalk idiots. You prove that one
*can* be wrong *all* the time.

Doing a lookup on *your* IP address is NOT stalking, dipshit.

Do you type one handed?

I, in fact, used to develop database apps for OLTP handling, and I
could stand over the shoulder of one of my data entry girls and type
with either hand to show them how to use the screen entry form(s).

How *did* you get so talented???

So, yes, I can type one handed quite well. The brain knows where
all the keys are.

Do you have a point, dipshit?

"Typing one-handed" usually implies you have another of your body parts in
your other hand. But then that's an insult that's far too subtle for you to
get.

Eric Lucas

 

"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:n2udi2picq4il5hq3564ir031a0r97lnud@4ax.com...

On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 17:39:51 +0100, "T Wake"
usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:

what the voices in your head are saying without
any processing


You're a goddamned loon.

See, even the voices in JoeBlows head are telling him that he's a goddamned
loon.

Eric Lucas

 

"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:hfudi2hp2m6cmqq78q5itha8c4qd3c0fdi@4ax.com...

On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 19:16:32 +0100, "T Wake"
usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:


"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:n3hbi2t6cgbhv45958p3tgd8o2snitarrh@4ax.com...
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 20:59:52 +0100, "T Wake"
usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:


lucasea@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:6d%Ug.9902$e66.1245@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com...

"T Wake" <usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> wrote in message
news:tOmdnf6_-qawlbnYRVnyiw@pipex.net...

"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4522F755.6FBE3BED@hotmail.com...


T Wake wrote:

"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote

That's not my recollection.

Ok, it is my recollection though.

Fair nuff !

You need to stop reading too much implied criticism where there
isnt
any.

There's been *loads* !

In my posts?

A misunderstanding it seems.

Possibly. The joys of the text based USENET.

Yes, let's do stick to getting offended by the *ex*plicit insults.
There
are way more than enough of those in this thread to go around.

Yes. Easier to not get offended by anything here

It's really difficult to accomplish though, as you keep returning :-]

Aha, and you are forced to read my message how exactly?

I am fairly sure Forte Agent has filters.

I filter nothing.

That's obvious...neither on the way in nor on the way out. Nothing you say
is ever filtered through any actual thought processes.

Dang, this really is too easy.

Eric Lucas

 

"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:9hudi2hqq00if9kn5jo0ru9ihhriha1h04@4ax.com...

On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 18:17:06 GMT, <lucasea@sbcglobal.net> Gave us:

Who really cares...the victims are still just as dead. Semantic games is
all that is.


You are so full of shit, you eyes are brown, and there is a foul
stench emanating from your ears.

I know you are, but what am I?

ERic Lucas

 

"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:h1vdi2t5quk2uvbtcogbq0nburnajq4356@4ax.com...

On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 20:09:43 +0100, "T Wake"
usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:


"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
newsabbi21hj1om31j3avpn3mm32vdur9mo0n@4ax.com...
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 13:22:17 -0400, Keith <krw@att.bizzzz> Gave us:

You're in a fantasy land. ONE SENTENCE of the NIE report was
leaked by the Democrats to try to discredit Bush. The four pages
around that one sentence, later released, say exactly the opposite.
Please get your "news" from someone other than Franken.

Good one.

Sycophant.

Agreeing with someone does NOT make me a sycophant, you Usenet total
retard.

Sycophant.

ERic Lucas

 

"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:f7vdi2pcfgnpdem7c3d1auv1jujf9dmald@4ax.com...

On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 20:21:48 +0100, "T Wake"
usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:


"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:vgdci29a8p13kfhhs2i6rnm9b36duq7r72@4ax.com...
On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 03:06:03 GMT, <lucasea@sbcglobal.net> Gave us:


"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:regbi2dpkrf103e4opion58ooto1lmft2c@4ax.com...

It is you, fuckhead, that is incredulous.

Yes, I suspect it is he who is incredulous at your idiocy. I think the
word
you wanted is "incredible", as in "not credible".


No. It was said just fine.

Nothing you say carries any credence either.

Ooh, such a big word. Did you have to look it up? Bet you had a little lie
down afterwards, didn't you?

I'd bet that I used the word many more years ago than you ever did,
and in these groups too.

Great, you're old to go along with being a stupid, redneck Joe-sixpack
sycophant. Whoop-de-doo.

Eric Lucas

 

"Ken Smith" <kensmith@green.rahul.net> wrote in message
news:eg72kt$a4m$4@blue.rahul.net...

In article <FN9Vg.19673$Ij.18806@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>,
lucasea@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

"Ken Smith" <kensmith@green.rahul.net> wrote in message
news:eg32g6$okg$3@blue.rahul.net...
In article <f%jUg.19041$Ij.8532@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>,
lucasea@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

What makes you think nuking Mecca would have anything but a very, very
negative effect on us?

Note that I said "theat". I was suggesting that the threat would work
so
I don't need to respond to this.

Yes you do. Hollow threats are worthless.

Note that I said "treat" not "Hollow threat" so, again I don't need to
respond to this.

Well, again, yeah, you do. The threat is hollow (we would never nuke them,
as you said above) and they know it. What part of the phrase "hollow
threat" do you fail to understand?

They're crazy, not stupid. They know that *we* wouldn't be stupid enough
to
nuke anything, because the threat is too diffuse.

This argument doesn't work. They only need to be convinced that the US
thinks it isn't a stupid idea.

And how exactly would we do that? They know it is a bad idea (that is why
terrorism is so popular--the people doing it know it works because it is so
diffuse and hard to combat), and we're pretty smart people, so they would
know that we know it's a bad idea. How do you convince them otherwise? And
remember, these are the people that got to watch Comical Ali declaring
victory over the infidels, even as the tanks rolled into Baghdad, so they
know a thing or two about propaganda. Like I said, crazy, not stupid.

When you go to war against a country, you
bomb its capital regardless of how large of a land mass the country
covers.

That would be great, but the terrorists aren't a country, and there is no
capital. They know that we would never nuke them, because they know that in
order to have any sort of substantial effect, we would have to drop so many
nukes that we would kill ourselves from fallout. Since they know this, any
threat we make to use a nuke is hollow. For a threat to work, it must be
credible. This isn't. Like I said, crazy, not stupid.

I strongly disagree. The second example of life in prison, I believe,
would work on many of them.

So how many prisons will we need to build, and what fraction of the GDP
will
go into staffing/supporting/maintaining them, in order to imprison 100
million people?

You don't seem to have a good grasp on the term "deter". You don't have
to lock them all up. You only have to lock up the few that try to break
the law.

We've killed 200,000 Iraqis so far. How well is that deterring them? All I
see it doing is *increasing* the terrorist threat in Iraq. Deterrents that
actually *encourage* the behavior that they are intended to deter aren't
usually considered very effective. And surely death is a far stronger
deterrent than mere imprisonment.

terrorist criminals. Oh, you say you want to hold them for life without a
trial?

No, I never said without trial.

Exactly what fraction of the hundreds (thousands?) of detainees that we are
currently holding have had a trial, or even a hearing? Since 200,000 dead
isn't enough of a deterrent, we're going to have to imprison a helluva lot
more than that. How is the court going to handle this suddenly huge
caseload?

Eric Lucas

 

"Ken Smith" <kensmith@green.rahul.net> wrote in message
news:eg72np$a4m$5@blue.rahul.net...

In article <4525651A.5E36C356@hotmail.com>,
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:


lucasea@sbcglobal.net wrote:

So how many prisons will we need to build, and what fraction of the GDP
will
go into staffing/supporting/maintaining them, in order to imprison 100
million people?

That would most likely sap the entire GDP of the USA.

No, not since it doesn't have to happen. I only spoke of the fear of life
in prison being a deterent. If a crime is detered, it doesn't happen and
the jail isn't needed.

We've killed 200,000 Iraqis, and it hasn't deterred a damn thing. We're
going to have to imprison a helluva lot more than that, if we want to
convince anybody to do anything we want. So, now please go back and answer
the question.

Eric Lucas

 

"jenalyn" <nospam@houston.rr.com> wrote in message
newsKEVg.43727$DU3.32633@tornado.texas.rr.com...

the moderate/westernized are studying fornication, fashion, and liberal
shopping habits.

In a word, typical college students.

Eric Lucas

 

[Daniel Mandic]

Your posting style shows your addiction to Right.

 

[Daniel Mandic]

<lucasea@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

"Typing one-handed" usually implies you have another of your body
parts in your other hand. But then that's an insult that's far too
subtle for you to get.

Eric Lucas

No, he meant 'with six fingers'. Five on the Right and one...



Best Regards,

Daniel Mandic


P.S.: he could also meant his thin piss Beer, holding in his Right and
typing with Right, of course. Then it's totally undebatable for me, ts
ts... what a taste....

 

[Daniel Mandic]

JoeBloe wrote:

You have ZERO powers of comprehension if, while reading his posts
merely through this one thread, you do not feel that he indeed hates.

Try again, chump.

he is much better, attracted attention maybe one or two times.

You suffers from foot-in-mouth disease, on every single post.


Try again, dim-counter.



Best Regards,

Daniel Mandic

 

[jasen]

On 2006-10-02, Homer J Simpson <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:6ln0i296ogmudnj5hhpl3nl9gadkfo6o9c@4ax.com...

Of course. What you don't hear about is the clandestine work that's
being done. You're not supposed to.

And yet the Israelis get what they need done in a far more competent manner
with only a few errors.

do they?

I saw an interesting photo of a tank parked on its "snout", I forget the URL.

Bye.
Jasen

 

[jasen]

On 2006-10-04, <lucasea@sbcglobal.net> <lucasea@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

I don't care. If you're listening to a phone call to which the phone in my
living room is party, then as a citizen of the US, I demand that your
listening be carried out according to my Constitutional rights.

If the tap isn't withing the borders of the US you apparently have no
come-back same as when they want to interrogate you "vigorously" the'll
stick you on a plane to Egypt or somewhere...

Bye.
Jasen

 

[T Wake]

"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:4esdi2lpi9c8dvn3rdhmu14d4n7ur1j6tk@4ax.com...

On Fri, 06 Oct 06 11:38:20 GMT, lparker@emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) Gave
us:

we have situational rules which govern the behavior of our
country's national security agencies.

Where in the constitution does it allow parts of itself to be ignored?


The parts governing wartime, and martial law.

Wow. The US has martial law now. Great. You really do know a lot about your
country don't you. It must be great to live in _your_ land of the free.