I've dumped Linux and moved to Windows XP.

chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> says...

tholen@antispam.ham wrote:

James Brown <Godfather@Of.Soul> writes:

Non sequitur.

PAPA'S GOT A BRAND NEW BAG !

Also non sequitur.

Amazing.

Baby Ducks! Plasma! Affection!!!

 

chrisv writes:

James Brown <Godfather@Of.Soul> writes:

Non sequitur.

PAPA'S GOT A BRAND NEW BAG !

Also non sequitur.

Amazing.

What is allegedly so amazing about Brown's non sequitur, chrisv?

 

In <10f8hq3n5hasmc7@corp.supernews.com>, <@.> writes:

chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> says...

I wrote:

James Brown <Godfather@Of.Soul> writes:

Non sequitur.

PAPA'S GOT A BRAND NEW BAG !

Also non sequitur.

Amazing.

Baby Ducks! Plasma! Affection!!!

What does that have to do with OS/2, @.?

 

[tholen@antispam.ham, the]

tholen@antispam.ham wrote:

What is allegedly so amazing about Brown's non sequitur, chrisv?

Brown doesn't have non sequiturs. He has cows.

 

In <rLabYx1iiM0c675AB94C8WqChOJacqZs@alt.binaries.nude.celebrities.female>, "tholen@antispam.ham, the shit-stained, hurling penile wart" <Tt5H7OXi68BA@alt.binaries.nude.celebrities.female> writes:

What is allegedly so amazing about Brown's non sequitur, chrisv?

Brown doesn't have non sequiturs. He has cows.

Non sequitur. Still faking someone else's identity, eh?

 

[chrisv]

tholen@antispam.ham wrote:

chrisv writes:

James Brown <Godfather@Of.Soul> writes:

Non sequitur.

PAPA'S GOT A BRAND NEW BAG !

Also non sequitur.

Amazing.

What is allegedly so amazing about Brown's non sequitur, chrisv?

You are erroneously presupposing that my "amazing" referred to Brown's
non sequitur, Tholen.

 

chrisv writes:

James Brown <Godfather@Of.Soul> writes:

Non sequitur.

PAPA'S GOT A BRAND NEW BAG !

Also non sequitur.

Amazing.

What is allegedly so amazing about Brown's non sequitur, chrisv?

You are erroneously presupposing that my "amazing" referred to Brown's
non sequitur, Tholen.

Illogical, chrisv; what else could it be?

 

[tholen@antispam.ham, the]

tholen@antispam.ham wrote:

chrisv writes:

James Brown <Godfather@Of.Soul> writes:

Non sequitur.

PAPA'S GOT A BRAND NEW BAG !

Also non sequitur.

Amazing.

What is allegedly so amazing about Brown's non sequitur, chrisv?

You are erroneously presupposing that my "amazing" referred to
Brown's non sequitur, Tholen.

Illogical

Frogery.

 

In <az8tA46bjEN0ACABF0D7wicuoStr3DYp@alt.binaries.nospam.denim.shorts>, "tholen@antispam.ham, the pig drover" <bD3tH0fGdnhs@alt.binaries.nospam.denim.shorts> writes:

chrisv writes:

James Brown <Godfather@Of.Soul> writes:

Non sequitur.

PAPA'S GOT A BRAND NEW BAG !

Also non sequitur.

Amazing.

What is allegedly so amazing about Brown's non sequitur, chrisv?

You are erroneously presupposing that my "amazing" referred to
Brown's non sequitur, Tholen.

Illogical

Frogery.

Non sequitur. Still faking your identity, eh?

 

[chrisv]

tholen@antispam.ham wrote:

chrisv writes:

James Brown <Godfather@Of.Soul> writes:

Non sequitur.

PAPA'S GOT A BRAND NEW BAG !

Also non sequitur.

Amazing.

What is allegedly so amazing about Brown's non sequitur, chrisv?

You are erroneously presupposing that my "amazing" referred to Brown's
non sequitur, Tholen.

Illogical, chrisv;

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

what else could it be?

It could be that I think that you are amazing, Tholen.

 

chrisv writes:

James Brown <Godfather@Of.Soul> writes:

Non sequitur.

PAPA'S GOT A BRAND NEW BAG !

Also non sequitur.

Amazing.

What is allegedly so amazing about Brown's non sequitur, chrisv?

You are erroneously presupposing that my "amazing" referred to Brown's
non sequitur, Tholen.

Illogical, chrisv;

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, chrisv.

what else could it be?

It could be that I think that you are amazing, Tholen.

Illogical, given that that would be non sequitur, chrisv.

 

[tholen@antispam.ham, the]

tholen@antispam.ham wrote:

chrisv writes:

It could be that I think that you are

Illogical

Snipped for accuracy.

 

In <H9GISGAb45VL1F9F1A8Ac0nWuKXwlbOU@alt.binaries.pictures.alley-baggett>, "tholen@antispam.ham, the sneaking, improving airhead" <QR2v2h8m0UK8@alt.binaries.pictures.alley-baggett> writes:

chrisv writes:

It could be that I think that you are

Illogical

Snipped for accuracy.

Still faking someone else's identity for deceit.

 

[chrisv]

tholen@antispam.ham wrote:

chrisv writes:

James Brown <Godfather@Of.Soul> writes:

Non sequitur.

PAPA'S GOT A BRAND NEW BAG !

Also non sequitur.

Amazing.

What is allegedly so amazing about Brown's non sequitur, chrisv?

You are erroneously presupposing that my "amazing" referred to Brown's
non sequitur, Tholen.

Illogical, chrisv;

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, chrisv.

Illogical, Tolen.

what else could it be?

It could be that I think that you are amazing, Tholen.

Illogical, given that that would be non sequitur, chrisv.

Irrelevant, even if true, which it's not, Tholen.

 

chrisv writes:

James Brown <Godfather@Of.Soul> writes:

Non sequitur.

PAPA'S GOT A BRAND NEW BAG !

Also non sequitur.

Amazing.

What is allegedly so amazing about Brown's non sequitur, chrisv?

You are erroneously presupposing that my "amazing" referred to Brown's
non sequitur, Tholen.

Illogical, chrisv;

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, chrisv.

Illogical, Tolen.

Who is "Tolen", chrisv? Suffering from attribution problems?

what else could it be?

It could be that I think that you are amazing, Tholen.

Illogical, given that that would be non sequitur, chrisv.

Irrelevant, even if true, which it's not, Tholen.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

 

[chrisv]

tholen@antispam.ham wrote:

chrisv writes:

James Brown <Godfather@Of.Soul> writes:

Non sequitur.

PAPA'S GOT A BRAND NEW BAG !

Also non sequitur.

Amazing.

What is allegedly so amazing about Brown's non sequitur, chrisv?

You are erroneously presupposing that my "amazing" referred to Brown's
non sequitur, Tholen.

Illogical, chrisv;

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, chrisv.

Illogical, Tholen.

Who is "Tolen", chrisv?

Irrelevant, Tholen.

Suffering from attribution problems?

Obviously not, Tholen.

what else could it be?

It could be that I think that you are amazing, Tholen.

Illogical, given that that would be non sequitur, chrisv.

Irrelevant, even if true, which it's not, Tholen.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, Tholen.

 

chrisv writes:

James Brown <Godfather@Of.Soul> writes:

Non sequitur.

PAPA'S GOT A BRAND NEW BAG !

Also non sequitur.

Amazing.

What is allegedly so amazing about Brown's non sequitur, chrisv?

You are erroneously presupposing that my "amazing" referred to Brown's
non sequitur, Tholen.

Illogical, chrisv;

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, chrisv.

Illogical, Tholen.

Who is "Tolen", chrisv?

Irrelevant, Tholen.

Incorrect, given that you were addressing some "Tolen", chrisv.

Suffering from attribution problems?

Obviously not, Tholen.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim:

"Illogical, Tolen."
--chrisv

what else could it be?

It could be that I think that you are amazing, Tholen.

Illogical, given that that would be non sequitur, chrisv.

Irrelevant, even if true, which it's not, Tholen.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, Tholen.

Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

 

[chrisv]

tholen@antispam.ham wrote:

chrisv writes:

James Brown <Godfather@Of.Soul> writes:

Non sequitur.

PAPA'S GOT A BRAND NEW BAG !

Also non sequitur.

Amazing.

What is allegedly so amazing about Brown's non sequitur, chrisv?

You are erroneously presupposing that my "amazing" referred to Brown's
non sequitur, Tholen.

Illogical, chrisv;

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, chrisv.

Illogical, Tholen.

Who is "Tolen", chrisv?

Irrelevant, Tholen.

Incorrect, given that you were addressing some "Tolen", chrisv.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, and rather ironic, to
boot.

Suffering from attribution problems?

Obviously not, Tholen.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim:

On your part, Tholer.

what else could it be?

It could be that I think that you are amazing, Tholen.

Illogical, given that that would be non sequitur, chrisv.

Irrelevant, even if true, which it's not, Tholen.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, Tholen.

Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, Tholen.

I do think that you are amazing, Tholen.

 

[GreyCloud]

chrisv wrote:

tholen@antispam.ham wrote:


chrisv writes:


James Brown <Godfather@Of.Soul> writes:

Non sequitur.

PAPA'S GOT A BRAND NEW BAG !

Also non sequitur.

Amazing.

What is allegedly so amazing about Brown's non sequitur, chrisv?

You are erroneously presupposing that my "amazing" referred to Brown's
non sequitur, Tholen.

Illogical, chrisv;

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, chrisv.

Illogical, Tholen.

Who is "Tolen", chrisv?

Irrelevant, Tholen.

Incorrect, given that you were addressing some "Tolen", chrisv.


Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, and rather ironic, to
boot.


Suffering from attribution problems?

Obviously not, Tholen.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim:


On your part, Tholer.


what else could it be?

It could be that I think that you are amazing, Tholen.

Illogical, given that that would be non sequitur, chrisv.

Irrelevant, even if true, which it's not, Tholen.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, Tholen.

Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.


On your part, Tholen.

I do think that you are amazing, Tholen.

You may as well give up. This is a bot that has a very limited range
and doesn't stray too far from its path.

--
---------------------------------
My other computer is a VAX.

 

chrisv writes:

James Brown <Godfather@Of.Soul> writes:

Non sequitur.

PAPA'S GOT A BRAND NEW BAG !

Also non sequitur.

Amazing.

What is allegedly so amazing about Brown's non sequitur, chrisv?

You are erroneously presupposing that my "amazing" referred to Brown's
non sequitur, Tholen.

Illogical, chrisv;

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, chrisv.

Illogical, Tholen.

Who is "Tolen", chrisv?

Irrelevant, Tholen.

Incorrect, given that you were addressing some "Tolen", chrisv.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, and rather ironic, to
boot.

On the contrary, I provided the substantiation, chrisv. Of course,
you chose to remove it from your follow-up. No surprise there, really.

Suffering from attribution problems?

Obviously not, Tholen.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim:

On your part, Tholer.

Who is "Tholer", chrisv?

what else could it be?

It could be that I think that you are amazing, Tholen.

Illogical, given that that would be non sequitur, chrisv.

Irrelevant, even if true, which it's not, Tholen.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, Tholen.

Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, Tholen.

Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

I do think that you are amazing, Tholen.

What does your thought have to do with OS/2, chrisv?