Is this homemade battery charger circuit dangerous?

[John Fields]

On Sat, 27 Jul 2013 22:29:08 +0100, "Ian Field"
<gangprobing.alien@ntlworld.com> wrote:

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:s8d8v8ttbtcs8sueoipoavgc5jqi4cchfm@4ax.com...
On Sat, 27 Jul 2013 21:58:50 +0100, "Ian Field"
gangprobing.alien@ntlworld.com> wrote:



"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:dhc8v8pj4ndbm3qpg26pntp54549knq47c@4ax.com...
On Sat, 27 Jul 2013 21:42:20 +0100, "Ian Field"
gangprobing.alien@ntlworld.com> wrote:



"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:34b8v8hkbcfjqpa0o977tse8nf0ca3mb38@4ax.com...
On Sat, 27 Jul 2013 21:03:14 +0100, "Ian Field"
gangprobing.alien@ntlworld.com> wrote:

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:e288v8l59n01hpb5dh50uub1f1qgegla2a@4ax.com...

On Sat, 27 Jul 2013 16:44:43 +0100, "Ian Field"
gangprobing.alien@ntlworld.com> wrote:


No doubt many have noticed, my "attitude and demeanor" are only
directed
at you - and only when you ask for it (which is most of the time!).

---
Attitude and demeanor can't be "directed" in that they're
characteristics of the person _doing_ the directing.

In your case, your attitude is that you're superior,

You must have one humdinger of an inferiority complex if you think
that!!!

---
Being able to recognize disease doesn't mean being susceptible to it.

If you say so Napoleon.

---
I'm not the one without an exit strategy, and you seem condemned to be
unable to extricate yourself from this Waterloo.

I took pity on you because you're a sad lonely old fart who can only get
attention by picking a quarrel.

---
If, by "picking a quarrel", you meant correcting technical errors made
by you and your ilk, then you're right.

That's only fair after all - you make enough technical errors for the rest
of us to pick up on.

---
And yet you don't, but still you bitch.

If I make an error I usually find it and own up to it, knowing that
it'll never be found out by the likes of you, but that it still needs
to be corrected.

As a consequence, you cry "wolf" when you wouldn't have known the wolf
was there until someone told you.
---

Although you're such an ill tempered cuss, most people walk on by hoping not
to attract your attention!

---
I guess you're British, but you sure don't know much about English,
since: "Although you're such an ill tempered cuss, most people walk on
by hoping not to attract your attention!"

Should read: "Because you're such an ill tempered cuss, most people
walk on by hoping not to attract your attention!"

Can you discern the difference?

--
JF

 

[John Fields]

On Sat, 27 Jul 2013 14:32:01 -0700, Jim Thompson
<To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> wrote:

On Sat, 27 Jul 2013 16:15:30 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Sat, 27 Jul 2013 21:58:50 +0100, "Ian Field"
gangprobing.alien@ntlworld.com> wrote:



"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:dhc8v8pj4ndbm3qpg26pntp54549knq47c@4ax.com...

But, more often than not, the corrections aren't met with refutation
with reasoned dialogue, but with rancor and attempts to dodge by
subterfuge.

Prima donnas seem to be that way >:-}


Consequently, "picking a quarrel" comes from you lot more often than
not.

With Ian you're wasting your time. I've never seen anyone quite so
pompously ignorant.

...Jim Thompson
---

Indeed.

In his case, I think he doesn't know how abjectly ignorant he is and,
as a consequence, feels forced to display his plumage.

--
JF