interviewing...

On Thursday, April 14, 2022 at 3:05:59 AM UTC-7, Clive Arthur wrote:
> Write a bit of generic code to calculate a square root.

int i=1,root=0; while (input > 0) { input -= i; i += 2; root++; }

Well, you didn\'t say it had to be FAST...

-- john, KE5FX
 
On 4/14/2022 7:10 PM, RichD wrote:

Write a bit of generic code to calculate a square root.

That\'s what I have in mind.

Probably the applicant has never done this, now he\'s on his own,
he has to think his way through a problem. That\'s what you
watch - not the answer, but his thinking.

The typical sort of \"test\" for \"programmers\" would be a sort.
As this is a well-baked issue, the test is geared at noting
if the applicant knows the different types of sort algorithms
and the tradeoffs/execution times of each.

The \"red flag\" being the applicant who doesn\'t look for more
clarification on the number of items being sorted, their
characteristics, the nature of the list *before* the sort,
how it will be used *after* the sort, etc.

Because it is a relatively *simple* problem, you don\'t have to
worry about \"test averse\" applicants \"choking\" in the process.

Of course, if you are looking for \"niche\" applications, one
might ask the applicant to describe scenarios where deadlock
can occur, livelock, priority inversion, etc. Or, issues
regarding specific protocol stacks, etc.

And, if the programmer will have to interface to hardware,
there are a variety of simple challenges that will tell you
if he knows the issues that are pertinent, there (and how
reality can defy his code\'s assumptions -- in delightfully
clever ways!)

But, \"process\" is always paramount. Is he a defensive coder, etc.?
 
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 19:10:26 -0700 (PDT), RichD
<r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> wrote:

On April 14, Clive Arthur wrote:
When you interview job candidates, you pose standard
problems, of circuits, PSpice, maybe Mathcad, etc.
Textbook stuff, you expect he knows,
Microsoft and Google are famous for posing brain twisters,
stuff \"outside the book\" (if any exists, nowadays with the net).
Do you do this? The obvious idea is to test for originality.
How much weight do you place on the responses?

Write a bit of generic code to calculate a square root.

For an integer, just binary search the bits, like an SAR ADC.

--

If a man will begin with certainties, he shall end with doubts,
but if he will be content to begin with doubts he shall end in certainties.
Francis Bacon
 
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 19:10:26 -0700 (PDT), RichD
<r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> wrote:

On April 14, Clive Arthur wrote:
When you interview job candidates, you pose standard
problems, of circuits, PSpice, maybe Mathcad, etc.
Textbook stuff, you expect he knows,
Microsoft and Google are famous for posing brain twisters,
stuff \"outside the book\" (if any exists, nowadays with the net).
Do you do this? The obvious idea is to test for originality.
How much weight do you place on the responses?

Write a bit of generic code to calculate a square root.

That\'s what I have in mind.

Probably the applicant has never done this, now he\'s on his own,
he has to think his way through a problem. That\'s what you
watch - not the answer, but his thinking.

What temperature does solder melt at? This one\'s interesting, most
don\'t know of course, but some can\'t even make a guess, and even if the
guess is wildly wrong the reasoning can be good.

OK, I\'ll bite - how does one \'reason\' one\'s way to a melting point?
Mentally solve Schrodinger\'s equation, given the molecular structure of solder?

They showed me a small PCB and asked me what it was.
From the 741 op-amp and the fairly large value capacitors I deduced
that it was probably a low power audio amplifier. Their notes just said
\"circuit board\".
They then handed me a resistor which I told them was a
4k7 5% 1/4 watt resistor. Their notes just said \"resistor\".

hmmm... did any candidate fail this exam?

What I usually do is to give the candidate a sheet of paper and ask
him to draw a block diagram and describe their favorite project in
great detail. This generally flushes the poseurs out - the know none
of the expected details.

There was one time when I was screening June grads in EE, and asked
this kind of question, and got nowhere. Long story short, I
eventually asked him to state and explain Ohm\'s Law. Total blank.

It developed that he was on the Varsity Football Team. Hmm. Probably
never attended a single class. I do not know whose idea it was to
grant an EE degree, because there is no way he could ever fake it in
an EE job.

Joe Gwinn
 
I was interviewed for the job of well logging engineer. Besides answering common engineering questions, I was asked to solve the problems written on a whiteboard behind my back. The usual stuff, like \"what is the next number in this sequence\".
Anyway, I got the job.

Wim Ton
 
On 16/4/22 3:06 am, John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 19:10:26 -0700 (PDT), RichD
r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> wrote:

On April 14, Clive Arthur wrote:
When you interview job candidates, you pose standard
problems, of circuits, PSpice, maybe Mathcad, etc.
Textbook stuff, you expect he knows,
Microsoft and Google are famous for posing brain twisters,
stuff \"outside the book\" (if any exists, nowadays with the net).
Do you do this? The obvious idea is to test for originality.
How much weight do you place on the responses?

Write a bit of generic code to calculate a square root.

For an integer, just binary search the bits, like an SAR ADC.

Quicker to start by finding the highest 1 (number of significant bits).
This is a single opcode in many architectures. The square root will have
half as many significant bits, or one fewer than that. Instantly narrows
the search space by a *lot*.

CH
 
On 14/04/2022 15:35, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 08:51:50 +0100, Martin Brown
\'\'\'newspam\'\'\'@nonad.co.uk> wrote:

On 13/04/2022 21:02, RichD wrote:
When you interview job candidates, you pose standard
problems, of circuits, PSpice, maybe Mathcad, etc.
Textbook stuff, you expect he knows, reviewing his resume.

Microsoft and Google are famous for posing brain twisters,
stuff \"outside the book\" (if any exists, nowadays with the net).
Do you do this? The obvious idea is to test for originality.

Most regular interviewers have their own favourite pet questions.

Discussing the right answers online would defeat the object so they
don\'t stay useable for long in this age of everything on social media.

How many zeroes does 100! have in its decimal representation is one such
that has been popular in recent years.

How much weight do you place on the responses?

Watching how they approach an unfamiliar problem can be a sufficient
guide to do they have what it takes. Engineering can get away with an
answer that whilst not exactly right is \"good enough\" for practical
purposes.

A pure mathematics course would expect the right answer (and quickly).

You have to know what characteristics you are recruiting for to pick the
right test question(s) for the position if you are playing this game.

Whether the individual will fit in with the team is often much more
important than technical prowess (provided that is adequate).

Unless that is you enjoy herding cats (something software engineering
management has been compared with - more than our fair share of divas).


Puzzles, especially math puzzles, tell a small part about a person\'s
prospect as a design engineer. Puzzles are an easy thing for HR folks
to use.

The open ended puzzle tests are not particularly useful when used by HR.
Anyway they prefer multiple choice off the shelf standardised
personality tests - so much easier to mark.

> To find out how someone will work with your design team, just do it.

Although I draw the line at the nasty modern practice of tasking some
bunch of poor unfortunate would be recruits with solving one of your
tricky real world problems for nothing in an attempt to win the job.

You can generally tell pretty quickly whether or not someone really
knows their stuff as claimed on the CV or has mugged it up from \"Ace the
technical interview for Dummies\" or even done no prep at all.

\"What would you like to ask me about the job?\" can be informative too.

We had a couple of short test pieces of code ~20 lines for each language
and the test was to explain what the code does. Much like you would with
a circuit diagram in hardware. Quite a few had no real understanding of
the language(s) that they claimed to know fluently. Saved a lot of time.

One of the key requirements is to have a balanced team.

You need the odd completer finisher to ensure that the last remaining
uninteresting bits do get done when the people who break new ground are
off doing the next interesting big project. Resource is always finite.

--
Regards,
Martin Brown
 
On Sat, 16 Apr 2022 11:37:50 +0100, Martin Brown
<\'\'\'newspam\'\'\'@nonad.co.uk> wrote:

On 14/04/2022 15:35, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 08:51:50 +0100, Martin Brown
\'\'\'newspam\'\'\'@nonad.co.uk> wrote:

On 13/04/2022 21:02, RichD wrote:
When you interview job candidates, you pose standard
problems, of circuits, PSpice, maybe Mathcad, etc.
Textbook stuff, you expect he knows, reviewing his resume.

Microsoft and Google are famous for posing brain twisters,
stuff \"outside the book\" (if any exists, nowadays with the net).
Do you do this? The obvious idea is to test for originality.

Most regular interviewers have their own favourite pet questions.

Discussing the right answers online would defeat the object so they
don\'t stay useable for long in this age of everything on social media.

How many zeroes does 100! have in its decimal representation is one such
that has been popular in recent years.

How much weight do you place on the responses?

Watching how they approach an unfamiliar problem can be a sufficient
guide to do they have what it takes. Engineering can get away with an
answer that whilst not exactly right is \"good enough\" for practical
purposes.

A pure mathematics course would expect the right answer (and quickly).

You have to know what characteristics you are recruiting for to pick the
right test question(s) for the position if you are playing this game.

Whether the individual will fit in with the team is often much more
important than technical prowess (provided that is adequate).

Unless that is you enjoy herding cats (something software engineering
management has been compared with - more than our fair share of divas).


Puzzles, especially math puzzles, tell a small part about a person\'s
prospect as a design engineer. Puzzles are an easy thing for HR folks
to use.

The open ended puzzle tests are not particularly useful when used by HR.
Anyway they prefer multiple choice off the shelf standardised
personality tests - so much easier to mark.

To find out how someone will work with your design team, just do it.

Although I draw the line at the nasty modern practice of tasking some
bunch of poor unfortunate would be recruits with solving one of your
tricky real world problems for nothing in an attempt to win the job.

You can generally tell pretty quickly whether or not someone really
knows their stuff as claimed on the CV or has mugged it up from \"Ace the
technical interview for Dummies\" or even done no prep at all.

\"What would you like to ask me about the job?\" can be informative too.

We had a couple of short test pieces of code ~20 lines for each language
and the test was to explain what the code does. Much like you would with
a circuit diagram in hardware. Quite a few had no real understanding of
the language(s) that they claimed to know fluently. Saved a lot of time.

One of the key requirements is to have a balanced team.

You need the odd completer finisher to ensure that the last remaining
uninteresting bits do get done when the people who break new ground are
off doing the next interesting big project. Resource is always finite.

We did a job interview yesterday. The guy arrived at 11 AM and left
just after 6 PM. I walked him over the I80 footbridge back to his car.

We brainstormed the architecture and details of a planned product
line, including things that we haven\'t yet resolved. Free consulting.

I taught him a few things about pcb traces and grounding in picosecond
circuits. He hadn\'t done any fast wideband stuff and had some
conventionally silly ideas about return currents, but he is sound on
grounding. Looks good at thermals and packaging too.

It was interesting to see not just his intelligence and technical
range, but how he generated ideas and reacted to other peoples\' ideas.
Perhaps a tad dogmatic, but I guess people are stressed in interviews.

He also cooks, and bakes bread, so we took him for Thai lunch outdoors
and then walked to Tartine and bought him a gigantic sourdough country
loaf. All that sort of stuff suggests how people might work together.

He admits to being autistic, which is if anything an asset in our
business. Another guy that we zoom interviewed this week is autistic
too. Visibly so.

We agreed that if we hire him, it will be as a virtual intern, in
other words we\'d try it for few months to see how it works and part
friends if not. That was his suggestion, and I like it.



--

I yam what I yam - Popeye
 
On April 15, wim...@gmail.com wrote:
I was interviewed for the job of well logging engineer. Besides answering
common engineering questions, I was asked to solve the problems written
on a whiteboard behind my back. The usual stuff, like \"what is the next
number in this sequence\".

77, 49, 36, 18, ... ?


--
Rich
 
RichD wrote:
On April 15, wim...@gmail.com wrote:
I was interviewed for the job of well logging engineer. Besides answering
common engineering questions, I was asked to solve the problems written
on a whiteboard behind my back. The usual stuff, like \"what is the next
number in this sequence\".

77, 49, 36, 18, ... ?


--
Rich

8, 0, 0, 0, 0,....

Cheers

Phil Hobbs
 
jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

==================================
It was interesting to see not just his intelligence and technical
range, but how he generated ideas and reacted to other peoples\' ideas.
Perhaps a tad dogmatic,

** So in reality a whole lot and exactly like JL - another autistic.

> but I guess people are stressed in interviews.

** Nope - that is how most autistics permanently ARE.


He also cooks, and bakes bread, so we took him for Thai lunch outdoors
and then walked to Tartine and bought him a gigantic sourdough country
loaf. All that sort of stuff suggests how people might work together.

** No it does not.

> He admits to being autistic, which is if anything an asset in our business.

** My god, what a shitty business you are in.

But I guess being socially awkward and obsessed with tiny details is some sort advantage when doing PCBs.

> Another guy that we zoom interviewed this week is autistic too.

** So PCB design is one step below code scribbling ?

> Visibly so.

** Wonder what that means.

Hesitant speech, makes no eye contact and looks plain odd?
Met more than a few of them.
Otherwise know as \" useful idiots \".


> We agreed that if we hire him, it will be as a virtual intern,

** So he is gonna be employing AI?



....... Phil
 
On Thursday, April 14, 2022 at 7:40:42 PM UTC-7, John Miles, KE5FX wrote:
On Thursday, April 14, 2022 at 3:05:59 AM UTC-7, Clive Arthur wrote:
Write a bit of generic code to calculate a square root.
int i=1,root=0; while (input > 0) { input -= i; i += 2; root++; }

Well, you didn\'t say it had to be FAST...

Isn\'t FORTRAN generic? Statement function would do it

squareroot(x) = exp(alog(0.5 * x) )
 
On April 16, Phil Hobbs wrote:
Besides answering common engineering questions, I was asked to solve the
problems written on a whiteboard behind my back. The usual stuff, like \"what
is the next number in this sequence\".

77, 49, 36, 18, ... ?

8, 0, 0, 0 ....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yscaDkzHqek

Given a Tom Collins glass, 4\" high, 6\" circumference.
A spider sits on the outside, 1\" from the bottom.
A fly lands on the inside, 1\" from the top, on the opposite side.
The spider, who aced the calculus of variations, takes the shortest
route and pounces.
What route, what distance?

--
Rich
 
On Saturday, April 16, 2022 at 1:42:48 PM UTC-7, Phil Hobbs wrote:
RichD wrote:
On April 15, wim...@gmail.com wrote:
...I was asked to solve the problems written
on a whiteboard behind my back. The usual stuff, like \"what is the next
number in this sequence\".

77, 49, 36, 18, ... ?

8, 0, 0, 0, 0,....

OEIS.org lists the 8, 8, 8, 8 variant only; you might want to submit yours for inclusion
 
On Sat, 16 Apr 2022 14:16:01 -0700 (PDT), Phil Allison
<pallison49@gmail.com> wrote:

jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

==================================

It was interesting to see not just his intelligence and technical
range, but how he generated ideas and reacted to other peoples\' ideas.
Perhaps a tad dogmatic,

** So in reality a whole lot and exactly like JL - another autistic.

No, quite different. It\'s called a \"spectrum\" for good reason.

but I guess people are stressed in interviews.

** Nope - that is how most autistics permanently ARE.

No, quite the opposite. All sorts of things that other people worry
about, I absolutely ignore.


He also cooks, and bakes bread, so we took him for Thai lunch outdoors
and then walked to Tartine and bought him a gigantic sourdough country
loaf. All that sort of stuff suggests how people might work together.

** No it does not.

He admits to being autistic, which is if anything an asset in our business.

** My god, what a shitty business you are in.

Thinking objectively, inventing things that work. It\'s fun and pays
well.

But I guess being socially awkward and obsessed with tiny details is some sort advantage when doing PCBs.

The tiny details matter. There are thousands of possible mistakes on a
complex board, and it takes some obsession to get every one right. As
it takes some dedication to be really good at most anything.

Another guy that we zoom interviewed this week is autistic too.

** So PCB design is one step below code scribbling ?

Visibly so.

** Wonder what that means.

Rocking back and forth into the camera, especially visible with the
close-up cam of a laptop. I let him know so maybe he can try to not do
it in the future.

Mo works with autistics. She suggests he do something out of sight,
like squeeze a rubber ball maybe.

Hesitant speech, makes no eye contact and looks plain odd?

No that guy was great otherwise. Really smart, but wants to do
wireless stuff, which we don\'t do.





--

I yam what I yam - Popeye
 
jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

==================================
It was interesting to see not just his intelligence and technical
range, but how he generated ideas and reacted to other peoples\' ideas.
Perhaps a tad dogmatic,

** So in reality a whole lot and exactly like JL - another autistic.

No, quite different. It\'s called a \"spectrum\" for good reason.

** JL misreads, all the time.

His words \"... a tad dogmatic\" - are clearly an understatement.
So in reality the applicant was a whole lot dogmatic
Like JL is, 100% of the time, including now.


but I guess people are stressed in interviews.

** Nope - that is how most autistics permanently ARE.

No, quite the opposite.

** Fraid that is a totally undeniable fact.


He admits to being autistic, which is if anything an asset in our business.

** My god, what a shitty business you are in.

Thinking objectively,

** Not something JL has ever done.
ASD people cannot be genuinely objective.
Lacking empathy just makes them mean and nasty.

But I guess being socially awkward and obsessed with tiny details is some sort advantage when doing PCBs.

The tiny details matter.

** But there is NO need to be autistic and obsessed to deal with details when needed.

Another guy that we zoom interviewed this week is autistic too.

** So PCB design is one step below code scribbling ?

Visibly so.

** Wonder what that means.

Rocking back and forth into the camera, especially visible with the
close-up cam of a laptop. I let him know so maybe he can try to not do
it in the future.

** LOL - better he not LOOK like a nut case - eh ?


> Mo works with autistics.

** She is one, you fool.


Hesitant speech, makes no eye contact and looks plain odd?

No that guy was great otherwise.

** Blatant lie.

One autistic has no way to evaluate another.
Be like a blind person trying to evaluate someone\'s vision.




...... Phil
 
On 17/4/22 7:39 am, RichD wrote:
On April 16, Phil Hobbs wrote:
Besides answering common engineering questions, I was asked to solve the
problems written on a whiteboard behind my back. The usual stuff, like \"what
is the next number in this sequence\".

77, 49, 36, 18, ... ?

8, 0, 0, 0 ....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yscaDkzHqek

Given a Tom Collins glass, 4\" high, 6\" circumference.
A spider sits on the outside, 1\" from the bottom.
A fly lands on the inside, 1\" from the top, on the opposite side.
The spider, who aced the calculus of variations, takes the shortest
route and pounces.
What route, what distance?

Can it jump across from the opposite lip?
 
On Sat, 16 Apr 2022 15:48:50 -0700 (PDT), Phil Allison
<pallison49@gmail.com> wrote:

jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

==================================

It was interesting to see not just his intelligence and technical
range, but how he generated ideas and reacted to other peoples\' ideas.
Perhaps a tad dogmatic,

** So in reality a whole lot and exactly like JL - another autistic.

No, quite different. It\'s called a \"spectrum\" for good reason.


** JL misreads, all the time.

His words \"... a tad dogmatic\" - are clearly an understatement.
So in reality the applicant was a whole lot dogmatic
Like JL is, 100% of the time, including now.


but I guess people are stressed in interviews.

** Nope - that is how most autistics permanently ARE.

No, quite the opposite.

** Fraid that is a totally undeniable fact.


He admits to being autistic, which is if anything an asset in our business.

** My god, what a shitty business you are in.

Thinking objectively,

** Not something JL has ever done.
ASD people cannot be genuinely objective.
Lacking empathy just makes them mean and nasty.


But I guess being socially awkward and obsessed with tiny details is some sort advantage when doing PCBs.

The tiny details matter.

** But there is NO need to be autistic and obsessed to deal with details when needed.

Another guy that we zoom interviewed this week is autistic too.

** So PCB design is one step below code scribbling ?

Visibly so.

** Wonder what that means.

Rocking back and forth into the camera, especially visible with the
close-up cam of a laptop. I let him know so maybe he can try to not do
it in the future.

** LOL - better he not LOOK like a nut case - eh ?


Mo works with autistics.

** She is one, you fool.


Hesitant speech, makes no eye contact and looks plain odd?

No that guy was great otherwise.

** Blatant lie.

One autistic has no way to evaluate another.
Be like a blind person trying to evaluate someone\'s vision.

The issue isn\'t personality stuff, it\'s electronics: not in your skill
set.



--

I yam what I yam - Popeye
 
jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

==================================
It was interesting to see not just his intelligence and technical
range, but how he generated ideas and reacted to other peoples\' ideas.
Perhaps a tad dogmatic,

** So in reality a whole lot and exactly like JL - another autistic.

No, quite different. It\'s called a \"spectrum\" for good reason.


** JL misreads, all the time.

His words \"... a tad dogmatic\" - are clearly an understatement.
So in reality the applicant was a whole lot dogmatic
Like JL is, 100% of the time, including now.


but I guess people are stressed in interviews.

** Nope - that is how most autistics permanently ARE.

No, quite the opposite.

** Fraid that is a totally undeniable fact.


He admits to being autistic, which is if anything an asset in our business.

** My god, what a shitty business you are in.

Thinking objectively,

** Not something JL has ever done.
ASD people cannot be genuinely objective.
Lacking empathy just makes them mean and nasty.


But I guess being socially awkward and obsessed with tiny details is some sort advantage when doing PCBs.

The tiny details matter.

** But there is NO need to be autistic and obsessed to deal with details when needed.

Another guy that we zoom interviewed this week is autistic too.

** So PCB design is one step below code scribbling ?

Visibly so.

** Wonder what that means.

Rocking back and forth into the camera, especially visible with the
close-up cam of a laptop. I let him know so maybe he can try to not do
it in the future.

** LOL - better he not LOOK like a nut case - eh ?


Mo works with autistics.

** She is one, you fool.


Hesitant speech, makes no eye contact and looks plain odd?

No that guy was great otherwise.

** Blatant lie.

One autistic has no way to evaluate another.
Be like a blind person trying to evaluate someone\'s vision.

The issue isn\'t personality stuff,

** It is and YOU raised it, in direst relation to \" interviewing\".
FFS READ your own words !!!.

> it\'s electronics:

** Anyone can see \" electronics\" was never even mentioned.

What an absurd lie and pathetic obfuscation.
How typically autistic of JL....



........ Phil
 
On Sunday, April 17, 2022 at 7:16:06 AM UTC+10, palli...@gmail.com wrote:
> jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

<snip>

He admits to being autistic, which is if anything an asset in our business.

** My god, what a shitty business you are in.

Wrong. Electronics is about getting everything right, and some autistic people are good at concentrating on their task, rather than getting distracted by the social interactions they aren\'t all that good at.

But I guess being socially awkward and obsessed with tiny details is some sort advantage when doing PCBs.

Another guy that we zoom interviewed this week is autistic too.

** So PCB design is one step below code scribbling ?

It requires spatial skills, which coding doesn\'t. It used to be easier to get printed circuit layout drafts-people than programmers, but there\'s no reason to suppose that this still true.

Visibly so.

** Wonder what that means.

Hesitant speech, makes no eye contact and looks plain odd?
Met more than a few of them.

Or thinks he has. Somebody talking to Phil would chose his words carefully - you wouldn\'t want to provoke a tantrum.

> Otherwise know as \" useful idiots \".

They aren\'t. Being autistic doesn\'t make you any kind of idiot. Lenin used the term \"useful idiot\" to describe people who believed in democratic socialism and thought that that meant that they ought to support the Communist Party, which claims to be socialist, but isn\'t democratic.

We agreed that if we hire him, it will be as a virtual intern,

** So he is gonna be employing AI?

Sounds more like working remotely. There\'s not a lot of artificial intelligence in that.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top