R
Richard Crowley
Guest
"clubsprint" wrote (many times) ...
It is not necessary to post individual messages of
"thanks" to each person. A single message will be
read and appreciated by everyone.
It is also undesirable to quote the entire message
back to the newsgroup, particularly if your response
is brief or only dialogs with one or two points within
the message.
We are all very happy to help you, but please
don't return the favor by posting lots of duplicate
content back to the newsgroup.
If you could reveal a bit more information about
what you are doing, it would make it easier for us
to recommend things like how to make tradeoff
decisions between programmable pots and the
more expensive alternatives (for example). Or
whether solid-state switches or traditional relays
would be better for a particular application. A
description of the salient parts of the circuit would
likely sufficice if you don't want to reveal the overall
product, etc.
Point of Usenet etiquitte ("netiquitte"):Thanks
It is not necessary to post individual messages of
"thanks" to each person. A single message will be
read and appreciated by everyone.
It is also undesirable to quote the entire message
back to the newsgroup, particularly if your response
is brief or only dialogs with one or two points within
the message.
We are all very happy to help you, but please
don't return the favor by posting lots of duplicate
content back to the newsgroup.
If you could reveal a bit more information about
what you are doing, it would make it easier for us
to recommend things like how to make tradeoff
decisions between programmable pots and the
more expensive alternatives (for example). Or
whether solid-state switches or traditional relays
would be better for a particular application. A
description of the salient parts of the circuit would
likely sufficice if you don't want to reveal the overall
product, etc.