Europeans drop watt in favour of lumen

T

The Real Andy

Guest
Seems the europeans have finally had the bright idea of using lumens
instead of watts for the classification of light bulbs.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1187175/So-watts-lumen-The-EUs-bright-idea-rename-light-bulbs.html
 
On Wed, 27 May 2009 18:28:00 +1000, The Real Andy wrote:

Seems the europeans have finally had the bright idea of using lumens
instead of watts for the classification of light bulbs.
So we go from something we can measure to something we can not with all
the credibility of a Standard and Poors credit rating. Brilliant, just
brilliant.
 
"The Real Andy" <therealandy@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:u5up151r8rmafl5pb8s8vpl5v8piflsk3d@4ax.com...
Seems the europeans have finally had the bright idea of using lumens
instead of watts for the classification of light bulbs.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1187175/So-watts-lumen-The-EUs-bright-idea-rename-light-bulbs.html
That does it! - I'm voting UKIP at the MEP elections on the 4th of next
month.
 
terryc wrote:
On Wed, 27 May 2009 18:28:00 +1000, The Real Andy wrote:

Seems the europeans have finally had the bright idea of using lumens
instead of watts for the classification of light bulbs.

So we go from something we can measure to something we can not with all
the credibility of a Standard and Poors credit rating. Brilliant, just
brilliant.
Although in the context of light bulbs, the quantity you could measure
wasn't terribly useful. At least lumens is a measure of how bright the
bulb will appear to be.

Anyway, it's not impossible to measure lumens.

Sylvia.
 
The Real Andy wrote:

Seems the europeans have finally had the bright idea of using lumens
instead of watts for the classification of light bulbs.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1187175/So-watts-lumen-The-EUs-bright-idea-rename-light-bulbs.html
By law AIUI, watts must still be stated.

This means consumers can see see the TRUE efficiency of lightbulbs.

I'm well aware of the Daily Mail article which started off last week claiming we had to use 'European lumens'
not realising that it's the international measure of light intensity. I made a highly critical comment on the
initial article and the original article was withdrawn.

The replacement still stinks of 'little Britain' and I will give it a clout again.

The funny thing is that most bulbs already have both watts and lumens printed on them ALREADY which
illustrates that CFLs aren't the panacea they're made out to be.

Look out for new high-efficiency halogen bulbs from Philips and GE in the next few years btw and LEDs are
getting better too. See OSRAM's TOPLED - plus for example.

Graham


--
due to the hugely increased level of spam please make the obvious adjustment to my email address
 
terryc wrote:

On Wed, 27 May 2009 18:28:00 +1000, The Real Andy wrote:

Seems the europeans have finally had the bright idea of using lumens
instead of watts for the classification of light bulbs.

So we go from something we can measure to something we can not with all
the credibility of a Standard and Poors credit rating. Brilliant, just
brilliant.
Lumens of light output are what matter. The power INPUT in watts is a
worthless measure aside from judging your electricity bill.

Graham


--
due to the hugely increased level of spam please make the obvious
adjustment to my email address
 
ian field wrote:

"The Real Andy" <therealandy@nospam.com> wrote

Seems the europeans have finally had the bright idea of using lumens
instead of watts for the classification of light bulbs.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1187175/So-watts-lumen-The-EUs-bright-idea-rename-light-bulbs.html

That does it! - I'm voting UKIP at the MEP elections on the 4th of next
month.
Lumens are are a UK ( SI ) measurement. Lumens actually tell you how bright the light is.

Find a better reason to vote UKIP, it's not hard.

Graham
 
"The Real Andy" <therealandy@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:u5up151r8rmafl5pb8s8vpl5v8piflsk3d@4ax.com...
Seems the europeans have finally had the bright idea of using lumens
instead of watts for the classification of light bulbs.
Surely BOTH are important measures of completely different properties.

MrT.
 
Mr.T wrote:
"The Real Andy" <therealandy@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:u5up151r8rmafl5pb8s8vpl5v8piflsk3d@4ax.com...
Seems the europeans have finally had the bright idea of using lumens
instead of watts for the classification of light bulbs.

Surely BOTH are important measures of completely different properties.

MrT.


Both measurements are handy so you can compare efficiency with other brands
 
"The Real Andy" <therealandy@nospam.com> schreef in bericht
news:u5up151r8rmafl5pb8s8vpl5v8piflsk3d@4ax.com...
Seems the europeans have finally had the bright idea of using lumens
instead of watts for the classification of light bulbs.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1187175/So-watts-lumen-The-EUs-bright-idea-rename-light-bulbs.html
I want to see both Watts and lumens on the label as I want to know the light
and the costs.

petrus bitbyter
 
"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@notmail.com> wrote in message
news:4A1DE82B.D632C80E@notmail.com...
ian field wrote:

"The Real Andy" <therealandy@nospam.com> wrote

Seems the europeans have finally had the bright idea of using lumens
instead of watts for the classification of light bulbs.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1187175/So-watts-lumen-The-EUs-bright-idea-rename-light-bulbs.html

That does it! - I'm voting UKIP at the MEP elections on the 4th of next
month.

Lumens are are a UK ( SI ) measurement. Lumens actually tell you how
bright the light is.
In the long term, lumens is a good idea, especially as emerging technologies
mature. My point is that Joe public has already been misled by comparing a
20W CFL to a 100W "soft tone" - it certainly isn't equal to a standard 100W
incandescent, so there is already widespread mistrust, adding a new measure
will only further muddy the water.
Find a better reason to vote UKIP, it's not hard.
Easy! - we pay the EU Ł40M *A DAY* and all we get in return is a flood of
economic migrants and a steady stream of head up arse legislation who's only
purpose is to justify the existence of the corrupt arseholes passing it!!!
 
Eeyore a écrit :
terryc wrote:

On Wed, 27 May 2009 18:28:00 +1000, The Real Andy wrote:

Seems the europeans have finally had the bright idea of using lumens
instead of watts for the classification of light bulbs.
So we go from something we can measure to something we can not with all
the credibility of a Standard and Poors credit rating. Brilliant, just
brilliant.

Lumens of light output are what matter. The power INPUT in watts is a
worthless measure aside from judging your electricity bill.

Graham


--
due to the hugely increased level of spam please make the obvious
adjustment to my email address


hello,
well, not only! You can have any output of lumens if you input enough
watts, with any light emitting device. What is a really interesting
measure of "merit" is the ratio of lm/W, i.e ouput/input
pom
 
On Thu, 28 May 2009 11:19:28 +1000, Sylvia Else wrote:


Although in the context of light bulbs, the quantity you could measure
wasn't terribly useful. At least lumens is a measure of how bright the
bulb will appear to be.

Anyway, it's not impossible to measure lumens.
Explain exactly which natural unit they are and how you measure them?

< Anyone stupid enough to bet that Sylvia will not, once again, side step
the question?>.
 
On Thu, 28 May 2009 02:24:09 +0100, Eeyore wrote:

Lumens of light output are what matter. The power INPUT in watts is a
worthless measure aside from judging your electricity bill.
Well, you have made the statement. Back it up with exactly whuch natural
unit is a lumen and how do you build a circuit to measure them?
 
On Thu, 28 May 2009 02:26:04 +0100, Eeyore wrote:


Lumens are are a UK ( SI ) measurement.
Apart from being a contrived measure, what are they?

Lumens actually tell you how bright the light is.
Nope, they do not.
 
"terryc" <newssevenspam-spam@woa.com.au> wrote in message
news:4a1ebc25$0$59103$c30e37c6@pit-reader.telstra.net...
On Thu, 28 May 2009 02:26:04 +0100, Eeyore wrote:


Lumens are are a UK ( SI ) measurement.

Apart from being a contrived measure, what are they?
**A measure of the percieved power of the light source.

Lumens actually tell you how bright the light is.

Nope, they do not.
**They kinda do. Naturally, the best way is to provide Lumens/Watt data for
all lamps. Lux might be a better way of specifying light output. What do you
suggest?


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au
 
"ian field" <gangprobing.alien@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:9wxTl.101067$Dx7.28525@newsfe20.ams2...
"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@notmail.com> wrote in message
news:4A1DE82B.D632C80E@notmail.com...


ian field wrote:

"The Real Andy" <therealandy@nospam.com> wrote

Seems the europeans have finally had the bright idea of using lumens
instead of watts for the classification of light bulbs.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1187175/So-watts-lumen-The-EUs-bright-idea-rename-light-bulbs.html

That does it! - I'm voting UKIP at the MEP elections on the 4th of next
month.

Lumens are are a UK ( SI ) measurement. Lumens actually tell you how
bright the light is.

In the long term, lumens is a good idea, especially as emerging
technologies mature. My point is that Joe public has already been misled
by comparing a 20W CFL to a 100W "soft tone" - it certainly isn't equal to
a standard 100W incandescent, so there is already widespread mistrust,
adding a new measure will only further muddy the water.
**Three years ago, I replaced the 75 Watt, mirror back lamps (average life -
6 months) in my bathrooms with 23 Watt CFLs (Philips branded, warm white).
Both CFLs are not only still working perfectly (45 second warm-up in
Winter), but they STILL produce significantly more light in every part of
the bathroom (as measured by my light meter). They get an average of 2 hours
per day useage. I'm smiling. At 6 Bucks each (vs. $3.00 for the
incandescents), I'm ahead after less than 1 year. After 3 years, I'm WAY
ahead. IMO, CFLs cop a bad rap. Quality ones deliver good light, for a long
time and with far less energy consumption. I've put 'em everywhere I can. As
soon as 15 LED downlights hit a reasonable price point, I'll replace all my
halogens too.


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au
 
Eeyore a écrit :
The power INPUT in watts is a
worthless measure aside from judging your electricity bill.
And of course no-one is interested in that are they!

MrT.
 
"terryc"
Sylvia Else
Although in the context of light bulbs, the quantity you could measure
wasn't terribly useful. At least lumens is a measure of how bright the
bulb will appear to be.

Anyway, it's not impossible to measure lumens.

Explain exactly which natural unit they are and how you measure them?

** What a stupid and irrelevant thing to post.

Could easily be taken to be a troll.


Anyone stupid enough to bet that Sylvia will not, once again, side step
the question?>.

** Anyone is wise avoid traps set by fuckwit trolls.



....... Phil
 
"terryc"
Eeyore wrote:
Lumens of light output are what matter.


Well, you have made the statement. Back it up with exactly whuch natural
unit is a lumen and how do you build a circuit to measure them?


** What a stupid and irrelevant thing to post.

Anyone is wise avoid traps set by fuckwit trolls.



....... Phil
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top