Electrical certification for imported goods

[Rob Singers]

Don Hills startled all and sundry by ejaculating the following words of
wisdom

Apparently? Google will give you all the evidence you need to be
certain. He's a legend in his own lunchtime. Drop him in the same bit
bucket as Roger and Redbaiter and move on, there's nothing to see (or
learn) here.

Roger is simply pathetic and not worth writing a filter for his multiple
ids. Redbaiter had odd patches of lucidity and so hasn't been assigned to
the Boozo bin for the second time. Rod Speed is probably worth having
ToSed since he's actually being culturally\racially offensive.

--
rob singers
pull finger to reply

 

[Rod Speed]

"Rob Singers" <rsingers@finger.hotmail.com> wrote in message news:Xns9479C8B75EEB3rsingers@IP-Hidden...

Don Hills startled all and sundry by ejaculating the following words of
wisdom

Apparently? Google will give you all the evidence you need to be
certain. He's a legend in his own lunchtime. Drop him in the same bit
bucket as Roger and Redbaiter and move on, there's nothing to see (or
learn) here.

Roger is simply pathetic and not worth writing a filter for his multiple
ids. Redbaiter had odd patches of lucidity and so hasn't been assigned to
the Boozo bin for the second time. Rod Speed is probably worth having
ToSed since he's actually being culturally\racially offensive.

Sheep rapers aint a race, fuckwit.

 

[harry]

On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 06:30:48 +1300, Lennier wrote:

On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 19:40:46 +1300, Richard Hector wrote:

Well - I was speaking of the exclusive right to copy my certificate.

The _exclusive_ right to copy is different again. If that exists, it
would rest with the copyright holder. However the copyright holder can
also grant permission to copy to others - as Linus T. did with the Linux
kernel. He still retains the copyright (well, to bits of it anyway).

I possess the original of my certificate. Only I CAN copy it.

The Polytechnic would have to issue another original - and no I'm not
talking of the template that the Polytechnic uses.

The copy you make would be a forgery if you tried to pass it off as the
original one issued by the Polytechnic.
It would also be identifiable as a forgery.

 

[~misfit~]

Rod Speed wrote:

Sheep rapers aint a race, fuckwit.

But if it was, you'd win every time.
--
~misfit~

 

[Don Hills]

In article <buqjl2$kv8u5$1@ID-69072.news.uni-berlin.de>,
"Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote:
|
|Sheep rapers aint a race, fuckwit.

Obviously. Here's a picture of you out on a date:

http://www.cs.utah.edu/~dahart/images/aussie.jpg

--
Don Hills (dmhills at attglobaldotnet) Wellington, New Zealand

 

[Lennier]

On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 06:16:28 +1100, Rod Speed wrote:

It is JUST evidence that you PASSED.

That's what I said!


Lennier

--
The above reply is in response to a person who can be only described as a
knuckle-dragger.

 

[Lennier]

On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 06:23:16 +1100, Rod Speed wrote:

You simply do not know what was the
agreement between myself and the Polytechnic

Has no relevance what so ever to who owns
the copyright to that certificate you received.

Bullshit!


Lennier

--
The above reply is in response to a person who can be only described as a
knuckle-dragger.

 

[Lennier]

On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 21:00:37 +1300, harry wrote:

The copy you make would be a forgery if you tried to pass it off as the
original one issued by the Polytechnic.
It would also be identifiable as a forgery.

I didn't suggest for one second that I would be trying to pass it off as
an original.

I merely said that I have the RIGHT to make COPIES - the copyright!

I have *never* for one second suggested that I have the right to issue
new original certificates that have the Polytechnic's insignia on them.

Lennier


--
Newsman - on CD piracy: "Entertainment meets Geekery meets Vengeance. It's
unstoppable. A match made in Heaven."

 

[jerm]

On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 18:41:31 +1100, "Phil Allison"
<philallison@optusnet.com.au> said

"Lennier" = autistic.


Nah, he's not that bright.

 

[Rod Speed]

Lennier <notanyspam@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
newsan.2004.01.23.23.15.11.456222@TRACKER...

Rod Speed wrote
Lennier <notanyspam@nospam.invalid> wrote
Craig Hart wrote

But the Publisher didn't write the article. The Article
even has the Journalist's name in the byline.

See "works for hire" - if you're paid by others to create
it as an employee, others own it when you're done.

And how is that any different from the work for hire that I purchased
when I payed-for, attended, completed and passed the course?

Completely off with the fairys now.

Has no relevance what so ever on who owns the copyright to the
certificate you received with your name on it. Read the legislation, child.

The certificate is, in a manner of speaking, the receipt
indicating that I have received the education that I paid for.

Wrong again. Those who pay for the course but dont
pass dont get one, so it aint anything like a receipt.

It is JUST evidence that you PASSED.

That's what I said!

Obvious lie on that JUST, child.

 

[Rod Speed]

Lennier <notanyspam@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
newsan.2004.01.23.23.19.43.863933@TRACKER...

I merely said that I have the RIGHT to make COPIES - the copyright!

And thats where you keep flaunting your complete pig ignorance, child.

Read the legislation. Its nothing like that black and white legally.

 

[Rod Speed]

Lennier <notanyspam@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
newsan.2004.01.23.23.15.33.865606@TRACKER...

Rod Speed wrote

You simply do not know what was the
agreement between myself and the Polytechnic

Has no relevance what so ever to who owns
the copyright to that certificate you received.

Bullshit!

Fraid so.

You have no 'agreement' with them on copyright whatever.

 

[Damon Nomad]

On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 16:46:01 +1100, "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com>
wrote:

Don Hills <dmhills@attglobal.net> wrote in message
news:0OyDAtgaXO7I092yn@attglobal.net...
Rod Speed <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote
Lennier <notanyspam@nospam.invalid> wrote

In my they've all been screwed.

I'm not silly enough to go there.

Why the change?

Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed sheep raper fantasys.

It is you that is the moronic little gin jockey.

 

[harry]

On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 12:19:43 +1300, Lennier wrote:

On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 21:00:37 +1300, harry wrote:

The copy you make would be a forgery if you tried to pass it off as the
original one issued by the Polytechnic.
It would also be identifiable as a forgery.

I didn't suggest for one second that I would be trying to pass it off as
an original.

I merely said that I have the RIGHT to make COPIES

Within the provisions of fair use or with the permission of the copyright
holder.

- the copyright!

No

I have *never* for one second suggested that I have the right to issue
new original certificates that have the Polytechnic's insignia on them.

Thats the copyright that the Polytech holds.

 

[Lennier]

On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 12:47:47 +1300, harry wrote:

I didn't suggest for one second that I would be trying to pass it off as
an original.

I merely said that I have the RIGHT to make COPIES

Within the provisions of fair use or with the permission of the copyright
holder.

- the copyright!

No

Yes.

End of discussion!


Lennier

--
"It is a joy to labor for those you love."

 

[Lennier]

On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 12:47:47 +1300, harry wrote:

I have *never* for one second suggested that I have the right to issue
new original certificates that have the Polytechnic's insignia on them.


Thats the copyright that the Polytech holds.

And I was never discussing THAT copyright.

I was speaking of my right to duplicate (a copyright) my own original
certificate, issued by the Polytechnic.


Lennier

--
"When dealing with the Religious Right one should remember that 'truth'
is not a part of the rules of their game."

 

[harry]

On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 00:01:14 +1300, Lennier wrote:

On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 12:47:47 +1300, harry wrote:

I have *never* for one second suggested that I have the right to issue
new original certificates that have the Polytechnic's insignia on them.


Thats the copyright that the Polytech holds.

And I was never discussing THAT copyright.

I was speaking of my right to duplicate (a copyright) my own original
certificate, issued by the Polytechnic.

Its not a copyright. Its a fair use granted by the copyright holder.

 

[harry]

On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 23:59:15 +1300, Lennier wrote:

On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 12:47:47 +1300, harry wrote:

I didn't suggest for one second that I would be trying to pass it off as
an original.

I merely said that I have the RIGHT to make COPIES

Within the provisions of fair use or with the permission of the copyright
holder.

- the copyright!

No

Yes.

End of discussion!

No the permission to make a copy is not the copyright.

 

[Rod Speed]

"Lennier" <notanyspam@nospam.invalid> wrote in message newsan.2004.01.26.11.01.14.20341@TRACKER...

On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 12:47:47 +1300, harry wrote:

I have *never* for one second suggested that I have the right to issue
new original certificates that have the Polytechnic's insignia on them.


Thats the copyright that the Polytech holds.

And I was never discussing THAT copyright.

Thats the only one there is. Read the legislation, you stupid child.

I was speaking of my right to duplicate (a copyright)

Thats not how copyright is defined legally, cretin.

my own original certificate, issued by the Polytechnic.

Read the legislation, you stupid child.

 

[Rod Speed]

"Lennier" <notanyspam@nospam.invalid> wrote in message newsan.2004.01.26.10.59.15.541490@TRACKER...

On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 12:47:47 +1300, harry wrote:

I didn't suggest for one second that I would be trying to pass it off as
an original.

I merely said that I have the RIGHT to make COPIES

Within the provisions of fair use or with the permission of the copyright
holder.

- the copyright!

No

Yes.

Nope.

End of discussion!

Nope.