Drone Attack

[John Larkin]

On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 09:00:51 -0700 (PDT), trader4@optonline.net wrote:

Irrelevant, of course. The US and UN demanded that Gaddafi end his WMD
programs, end his nuke program, he agreed, he fell for it, he complied.
Then OBama and Hillary helped kill him and gloated. Iran, NK noticed
and learned. Trump just followed through on the same lesson, by reneging
on the nuclear deal with Iran and going to war with them.

Probably not. He's already President, whereas Hillary had things to
prove. That was clever of him, to call off an attack because it would
kill innocent people.

The horrible humanitarian mess in northern africa and europe resulted
from Hillary's positioning, and it didn't even get her elected.



--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc

lunatic fringe electronics

 

On Wednesday, June 26, 2019 at 12:16:52 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:

On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 09:00:51 -0700 (PDT), trader4@optonline.net wrote:

Irrelevant, of course. The US and UN demanded that Gaddafi end his WMD
programs, end his nuke program, he agreed, he fell for it, he complied.
Then OBama and Hillary helped kill him and gloated. Iran, NK noticed
and learned. Trump just followed through on the same lesson, by reneging
on the nuclear deal with Iran and going to war with them.



Probably not. He's already President, whereas Hillary had things to
prove. That was clever of him, to call off an attack because it would
kill innocent people.

Yes, how very clever. After ordering air strikes, when the planes were
in the air, ten minutes from bombs away, only then did Trump ask about casualties.
What does that tell you about Trump and his fitness? And if true, it
also tells you that something is seriously wrong in the chain of command,
when a president gets briefed for an op like this and that briefing
doesn't include casualty estimates. But then the chain of command is in
constant chaos, we have no permanent sec of defense. The acting who Trump
picked and who was going to be permanent, just withdrew after it was learned
there was a 911 domestic violence call for trouble between him and his wife
and another incident where his kid hit his mother with a bat. Another fine
vetting job by team Trump.

The horrible humanitarian mess in northern africa and europe resulted
from Hillary's positioning, and it didn't even get her elected.

And yet Trump is in the process of making an even worse mistake,
reneging on the nuclear deal agreed to by 6 countries, that Iran
was complying with and waging war on Iran and I don't see you complaining
about that.

--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc

lunatic fringe electronics

 

[John Larkin]

On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 09:33:19 -0700 (PDT), trader4@optonline.net wrote:

On Wednesday, June 26, 2019 at 12:16:52 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 09:00:51 -0700 (PDT), trader4@optonline.net wrote:

Irrelevant, of course. The US and UN demanded that Gaddafi end his WMD
programs, end his nuke program, he agreed, he fell for it, he complied.
Then OBama and Hillary helped kill him and gloated. Iran, NK noticed
and learned. Trump just followed through on the same lesson, by reneging
on the nuclear deal with Iran and going to war with them.



Probably not. He's already President, whereas Hillary had things to
prove. That was clever of him, to call off an attack because it would
kill innocent people.

Yes, how very clever. After ordering air strikes, when the planes were
in the air, ten minutes from bombs away, only then did Trump ask about casualties.
What does that tell you about Trump and his fitness?

Like I said, that he's clever. And that he's not a war monger or a
murderer.

The challenge to not being a war monger is to not default to being a
doormat.


--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
picosecond timing precision measurement

jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Wednesday, June 26, 2019 at 7:08:11 PM UTC+2, John Larkin wrote:

On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 09:33:19 -0700 (PDT), trader4@optonline.net wrote:

On Wednesday, June 26, 2019 at 12:16:52 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 09:00:51 -0700 (PDT), trader4@optonline.net wrote:

Irrelevant, of course. The US and UN demanded that Gaddafi end his WMD
programs, end his nuke program, he agreed, he fell for it, he complied.
Then OBama and Hillary helped kill him and gloated. Iran, NK noticed
and learned. Trump just followed through on the same lesson, by reneging
on the nuclear deal with Iran and going to war with them.



Probably not. He's already President, whereas Hillary had things to
prove. That was clever of him, to call off an attack because it would
kill innocent people.

Yes, how very clever. After ordering air strikes, when the planes were
in the air, ten minutes from bombs away, only then did Trump ask about casualties.
What does that tell you about Trump and his fitness?

Like I said, that he's clever. And that he's not a war monger or a
murderer.

He's not clever enough to listen to good advice. And he certainly has sounded more like a war monger than any of his predecessors. He may not be a murderer, but he does seem to have been a money launderer for some decidedly murderous regimes, and he does come across as amoral imbecile.

The challenge to not being a war monger is to not default to being a
doormat.

For somebody whose grasp of detail is as sketchy as Donald Trump's. There are almost always a lot more than two choices, if you know enough to recognise them.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Rick C]

On Wednesday, June 26, 2019 at 1:08:11 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:

On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 09:33:19 -0700 (PDT), trader4@optonline.net wrote:

On Wednesday, June 26, 2019 at 12:16:52 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 09:00:51 -0700 (PDT), trader4@optonline.net wrote:

Irrelevant, of course. The US and UN demanded that Gaddafi end his WMD
programs, end his nuke program, he agreed, he fell for it, he complied.
Then OBama and Hillary helped kill him and gloated. Iran, NK noticed
and learned. Trump just followed through on the same lesson, by reneging
on the nuclear deal with Iran and going to war with them.



Probably not. He's already President, whereas Hillary had things to
prove. That was clever of him, to call off an attack because it would
kill innocent people.

Yes, how very clever. After ordering air strikes, when the planes were
in the air, ten minutes from bombs away, only then did Trump ask about casualties.
What does that tell you about Trump and his fitness?

Like I said, that he's clever. And that he's not a war monger or a
murderer.

The challenge to not being a war monger is to not default to being a
doormat.

Trump reminds me of the movie, "Being There", but with the color controls set to orange.

--

Rick C.

+-++ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+-++ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

 

[Tom Gardner]

On 26/06/19 22:24, Rick C wrote:

On Wednesday, June 26, 2019 at 1:08:11 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 09:33:19 -0700 (PDT), trader4@optonline.net wrote:

On Wednesday, June 26, 2019 at 12:16:52 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 09:00:51 -0700 (PDT), trader4@optonline.net wrote:

Irrelevant, of course. The US and UN demanded that Gaddafi end his WMD
programs, end his nuke program, he agreed, he fell for it, he complied.
Then OBama and Hillary helped kill him and gloated. Iran, NK noticed
and learned. Trump just followed through on the same lesson, by reneging
on the nuclear deal with Iran and going to war with them.



Probably not. He's already President, whereas Hillary had things to
prove. That was clever of him, to call off an attack because it would
kill innocent people.

Yes, how very clever. After ordering air strikes, when the planes were
in the air, ten minutes from bombs away, only then did Trump ask about casualties.
What does that tell you about Trump and his fitness?

Like I said, that he's clever. And that he's not a war monger or a
murderer.

The challenge to not being a war monger is to not default to being a
doormat.

Trump reminds me of the movie, "Being There", but with the color controls set to orange.

Neat

 

[whit3rd]

On Wednesday, June 26, 2019 at 9:16:52 AM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:

That was clever of him, to call off an attack because it would
kill innocent people.

Oh, he publicized the call-off of the attack, in time to occlude the news
reports that his administration has failed to perform in other ways
(notably, the inadequacy of federal facilities in handling baby-sitting chores).

He's the showman-in-chief.

 

[whit3rd]

On Wednesday, June 26, 2019 at 7:26:23 AM UTC-7, tra...@optonline.net wrote:

On Wednesday, June 26, 2019 at 9:29:15 AM UTC-4, Rick C wrote:
On Wednesday, June 26, 2019 at 7:21:09 AM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
trader4@optonline.net wrote in
news:1e670973-f429-4f37-955f-c20e33a08d76@googlegroups.com:

When you not only cut off US trade with Iran, but force much of
the world to do the same against their will, over an agreement
that Iran was complying with,...

No one here remembers the reason Japan decided to attack the US?

How well did that work out for them?

Irrelevant, of course. How well did it work out for the USA?
And note there was a huge difference. Prior to that embargo, Japan
had invaded China and signed an alliance with Hitler.

Japan had a military overthrow of the civilian government, and attacked
Pearl Harbor over a treaty limitation on battleships (in the military logic, US
two-oceans-worth count of allowed battleships was a 'threat' to Japan dominating
the entire Pacific). Sinking battleships was a way of breaking the treaty.

The US entry into that war was the result of the failure of an agreement, because one
of the parties acted rashly, impulsively, agressively. One might almost say, imfamously.
Cutting off trade wasn't an immediate issue.

 

trader4@optonline.net wrote in
news:f005cfc5-d876-48f6-90ac-ebb179d5170d@googlegroups.com:

We don't tell you how to hump kangaroos, why do you persist in
trying to tell us what we should do? The founding fathers knew
exactly what they were doing with the electoral college process
and it works fine. It's just that libs like you don't like one
result, where they lost, so now any excuse will do, let's change
the rules, etc.

Decades of collegiate analysis decidedly shows you for the guess-
as-you-go, make-shit-up, know-nothing-asshole we all know you to be.

The reason folks want it gone, and it was long before THIS
election cycle, you putz, is because they have done the analysis,
and have found it to be one of the most corruptable aspects of our
government.

The current cycle is a perfect example thereof.

Get over yourself with your "you are all just crying because you
lost" baby bullshit.

We lost when your slut mother failed to hit the flush handle...
and here you are... The slut shit wad that resulted.

 

trader4@optonline.net wrote in news:986d5755-63c4-40e0-97e4-
5d030144fc93@googlegroups.com:

I'm sure Gaddafi and more importantly Iran, North Korea, etc didn't
see it that way.

Get this, you retarded, zero memory PUNK! HE WAS A TERRORIST.

As far as I am concerned, there was a worldwide open contract on his
ass.

Of course it is a good thing he got dead. And it was also good the
way he got dead.

Get over yourself, twitty, fat assed bitchboy.

 

trader4@optonline.net wrote in news:9e06a39b-7419-40cb-ba13-
3c2987829b38@googlegroups.com:

Why are you addressing that to me, instead of to Rick?

FOAD, fatass.

 

trader4@optonline.net wrote in news:52f1f67a-8d8a-401d-ae66-
ee5adb65f7f5@googlegroups.com:

If any country did to the US what Trump is doing to Iran,
we'd consider it an act of war and even you know it.

You're an idiot.

I do not like Trump, but I do not like "the deal" either. Iran did
not need to be merely slowed down as the deal 'allowed'.

Iran has exactly ZERO business moving toward being a nuclear weapon
'power'. And it is the duty of the entire world to stop them.

Ab-so-fuckin-lutely.

 

Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote in news:1d62c4f8-0714-
471d-b104-aa1a1fb92b6c@googlegroups.com:

How well did that work out for them?

They are one of the most powerful nations in the world right now, and
are sovereign, short of a couple of bases, and control over their
governmental system, and military hardware, etc.

Did not work out for them very well in the moment(s) they were being
aggressive.

I mean even before the bomb droppings of 'the big ones', didn't we
firebomb Tokyo?

I'll bet the Emperor did not like the result of his use of a kitchen
knife to stab at the heart of Gahd-Zirrah... and only cut him on the
thigh a bit.

 

Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote in
news:e2b34b7e-7e15-4b69-ae59-00d62f66bd08@googlegroups.com:

On Wednesday, June 26, 2019 at 1:08:11 PM UTC-4, John Larkin
wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 09:33:19 -0700 (PDT), trader4@optonline.net
wrote:

On Wednesday, June 26, 2019 at 12:16:52 PM UTC-4, John Larkin
wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 09:00:51 -0700 (PDT),
trader4@optonline.net wrote:

Irrelevant, of course. The US and UN demanded that Gaddafi
end his WMD programs, end his nuke program, he agreed, he
fell for it, he complied. Then OBama and Hillary helped kill
him and gloated. Iran, NK noticed and learned. Trump just
followed through on the same lesson, by reneging on the
nuclear deal with Iran and going to war with them.



Probably not. He's already President, whereas Hillary had
things to prove. That was clever of him, to call off an attack
because it would kill innocent people.

Yes, how very clever. After ordering air strikes, when the
planes were in the air, ten minutes from bombs away, only then
did Trump ask about casualties. What does that tell you about
Trump and his fitness?

Like I said, that he's clever. And that he's not a war monger or
a murderer.

The challenge to not being a war monger is to not default to
being a doormat.

Trump reminds me of the movie, "Being There", but with the color
controls set to orange.

Absolutey not. Chauncey Gardner was absolutely innocent.

Donald J. Trump has been absolutely criminal... All of his life.

 

On Wednesday, June 26, 2019 at 11:22:37 PM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

trader4@optonline.net wrote in news:986d5755-63c4-40e0-97e4-
5d030144fc93@googlegroups.com:

I'm sure Gaddafi and more importantly Iran, North Korea, etc didn't
see it that way.


Get this, you retarded, zero memory PUNK! HE WAS A TERRORIST.

Not for many years. The US had taken Libya off the list of state sponsors of terrorism.

As far as I am concerned, there was a worldwide open contract on his
ass.

Which is irrelevant.

Of course it is a good thing he got dead. And it was also good the
way he got dead.

It showed that the USA wasn't be trusted and sent a message to NK and Iran that if you go e up your wmds, end your nuke program, make a deal with the USA, then when you are disarmed, we kill you. If you have nukes, like KJU, then Trump loves you and praises you.