S
Spehro Pefhany
Guest
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:48:26 -0700 (PDT), George Herold
<gherold@teachspin.com> wrote:
Yup.. even though the value of the supply voltage cancels out (if
stable), any noise or other variations in the reference/charging
voltage during a cycle will result in shorter (usually the problem) or
longer time. So you usually will want to use the same regulated
voltage for both RC charging and for the voltage reference.
It's tempting to try to coax a bit more time out of a given value of
(expensive) film cap by pushing further out on the RC curve, but that
increases noise sensitivity, so it's probably best to stick to around
one time constant unless you've carefully designed around that kind of
requirement.
<gherold@teachspin.com> wrote:
Nice thanks, I've been sorta penciling tantalums out of my design brain. Though I did use a big one ~100uF for a triangle wave thingie years ago.
The one 'gotcha' you left out was a clean voltage reference for the comparator. I semi-screwed up the above triangle wave generator and used the positive supply rail as the reference. There was this little occasional 'hick-up' in the frequency when a 'bang-bang' heater circuit in the same instrument would turn on and drop the positive rail by some ~10's of mV.
George H.
Yup.. even though the value of the supply voltage cancels out (if
stable), any noise or other variations in the reference/charging
voltage during a cycle will result in shorter (usually the problem) or
longer time. So you usually will want to use the same regulated
voltage for both RC charging and for the voltage reference.
It's tempting to try to coax a bit more time out of a given value of
(expensive) film cap by pushing further out on the RC curve, but that
increases noise sensitivity, so it's probably best to stick to around
one time constant unless you've carefully designed around that kind of
requirement.