Driver to drive?

[GregS]

In article <58c8de2d-d513-4b2d-9130-28c4bc047c59@e19g2000prn.googlegroups.com>, Rich Grise on Google groups <richardgrise@yahoo.com> wrote:

So, I'm going on a camping trip, and I plan to bring along some
reading material for
the time between sundown and the time when I get bored watching the
stars and
listening to the wildlife until I'm tired enough to sleep.

So, I need some kind of lamp that's handier to operate than an
ordinary flashlight,
but will illuminate a page of print brightly enough to read
"normally." And I specifically
want a white LED (or LEDs), for battery life - that's another problem
with an incandescent
flashlight, even with fresh alkalines, notwithstanding that stupid
spot - I need more of
a flood, so I don't have to keep pointing the light at the passage I'm
reading.

I've heard tell of LED bike headlights and the like; what I want is
some wide-angle
"flood" light, that could illuminate an ordinary 8 1/2 x 11 page from
about two feet
(2/3M) away, while I'm at a normal reading distance (18-24" (1/2 -
2/3M)), brightly
enough that I don't get eyestrain.

Does anyone have any recommendations, or need more info?

Thanks,
Rich

Just had the power off for 3 days last week, I was sort of camping.
You didn't say what type ofcamping, backpacking ?

There is one lamp everyone should have . Its great around the house,
camping, garage, etc. Kmart had them for $10.

http://scoutmaster.typepad.com/my_weblog/2006/01/innovage_20led_.html

 

[GregS]

In article <hlbn90$jff$2@usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu>, zekfrivo@zekfrivolous.com (GregS) wrote:

In article <58c8de2d-d513-4b2d-9130-28c4bc047c59@e19g2000prn.googlegroups.com>,
Rich Grise on Google groups <richardgrise@yahoo.com> wrote:
So, I'm going on a camping trip, and I plan to bring along some
reading material for
the time between sundown and the time when I get bored watching the
stars and
listening to the wildlife until I'm tired enough to sleep.

So, I need some kind of lamp that's handier to operate than an
ordinary flashlight,
but will illuminate a page of print brightly enough to read
"normally." And I specifically
want a white LED (or LEDs), for battery life - that's another problem
with an incandescent
flashlight, even with fresh alkalines, notwithstanding that stupid
spot - I need more of
a flood, so I don't have to keep pointing the light at the passage I'm
reading.

I've heard tell of LED bike headlights and the like; what I want is
some wide-angle
"flood" light, that could illuminate an ordinary 8 1/2 x 11 page from
about two feet
(2/3M) away, while I'm at a normal reading distance (18-24" (1/2 -
2/3M)), brightly
enough that I don't get eyestrain.

Does anyone have any recommendations, or need more info?

Thanks,
Rich

Just had the power off for 3 days last week, I was sort of camping.
You didn't say what type ofcamping, backpacking ?

There is one lamp everyone should have . Its great around the house,
camping, garage, etc. Kmart had them for $10.

http://scoutmaster.typepad.com/my_weblog/2006/01/innovage_20led_.html

Yes, its bluish. I do hate that color, especially for camping. I'm still working on
making some more Crei warm white lamps for portable use. I got
them on around the house, inside and out.

greg

 

On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:16:28 +0000 (GMT), "Dave Plowman (News)"
<dave@davenoise.co.uk>wrote:

In article <c6kin55l7rfbqkrvtjitqd3d1l86g275f4@4ax.com>,
life imitates life <pasticcio@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:
Cutting nails shouldn't worry a decent pair of cutters.


Nice try, troll.

But obviously
smaller ones could bend if trying to cut a large nail. Small electronic
cutters should only be used for that purpose. Larger electrician's type
will survive lots of abuse if of good quality.

There are no cutters that should be used on ANY fucking steel wire,
much less nails.

If like you, they're bought from the pound shop, yes.

A test for *any* decent cutter is piano wire. Properly hardened jaws won't
be damaged by this.

Your fucking name fits, Plowtard.

Very witty. From one who hides behind a pseudonym.

I can't believe these nattering nitwitted nincompoops from
alt.engineering.electrical, sci.electronics.basics,
sci.electronics.design are still bleating about these fucking cutters
like a flock of sheeple.

 

[Nobody]

On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:42:26 -0800, osr wrote:

No joke: South Carolina now requires ’subversives’ to register

Steve

By Daniel Tencer
Friday, February 5th, 2010 -- 11:49 am

Terrorists who want to overthrow the United States government must now
register with South Carolina's Secretary of State and declare their
intentions -- or face a $25,000 fine and up to 10 years in prison.

The state's "Subversive Activities Registration Act," passed last year

According to Eugene Volokh (one of the few right-of-centre bloggers worth
the time of day), it was actually passed in 1951 (i.e. red-menace era,
aimed at communists).

Apparently they've been trying to repeal it since 1993, but never manage
to get it to a vote (probably not a high priority since it's basically
unconstitutional on its face).

 

[Paul Keinanen]

On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 03:43:14 -0800, Robert Baer
<robertbaer@localnet.com> wrote:

Ghaa..lumens, candela, lux, candlepower, percent efficiency, and who
knows what else (watts per steradian?)!
Seems every maker uses a different "standard" not only for different
LEDs they make, but also different than other makers.
What are the relationships and the conversions?
My basic questions concerning a given LED would be how bright is it -
can i depend on the number given to tell one is brighter than another at
the same drive (seems the answer is NO).

This is very much the situation, when the spectrum can be practically
anything. If the spectrum would be linear or even black body shaped,
you could calculate it.

However, having a light source with some odd spectral distribution and
trying to read a text printed of non-black ink on non-white paper
would cause quite unreliable results .

 

[life imitates life]

On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 10:18:28 -0500, Plowtard wrote:

On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:16:28 +0000 (GMT), "Dave Plowman (News)"
dave@davenoise.co.uk>wrote:

In article <c6kin55l7rfbqkrvtjitqd3d1l86g275f4@4ax.com>,
life imitates life <pasticcio@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:
Cutting nails shouldn't worry a decent pair of cutters.


Nice try, troll.

But obviously
smaller ones could bend if trying to cut a large nail. Small electronic
cutters should only be used for that purpose. Larger electrician's type
will survive lots of abuse if of good quality.

There are no cutters that should be used on ANY fucking steel wire,
much less nails.

If like you, they're bought from the pound shop, yes.

A test for *any* decent cutter is piano wire. Properly hardened jaws won't
be damaged by this.

Your fucking name fits, Plowtard.

Very witty. From one who hides behind a pseudonym.

I can't believe these nattering nitwitted nincompoops from
alt.engineering.electrical, sci.electronics.basics,
sci.electronics.design are still bleating about these fucking cutters
like a flock of sheeple.

I responded to YOUR horseshit, dumbfuck.

So, Mr. nattering, nitwitted nincompoop, you are also a sheeple member
by your criteria...


...and an ass... by ours.

Goddamned follow up editing retard.

 

[Jim Thompson]

On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:34:28 GMT, mzenier@eskimo.com (Mark Zenier)
wrote:

In article <tlldn5loej2crsq8uk1rppgj79k0gttnr3@4ax.com>,
Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@My-Web-Site.com> wrote:
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 23:01:14 GMT, mzenier@eskimo.com (Mark Zenier)
wrote:

In article <09d9n5t2okq0d950cccpm4o0l5ejn6drlj@4ax.com>,
John Larkin <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

I think a million people should rally in Washington DC and hold up
their hands with SARAH written on their palms.

The Mark of the Beast...

Whatsa matter, Mark, afraid of aggressive woman?

How do you feel about supporting a fundamentalist Pentecostal Christian
who, (according to McCain's staffers who were wondering about her degree
of calmness after her selection to run for Vice President), says that it
was "God's plan". (Heard on 60 Minutes when they were pimping that
"tell all" book about the 2008 election, a couple of weeks ago).

She's geographically and culturally isolated. She wouldn't know what
it takes to rebuild American industry, and she doesn't have the backup
Brain Trust needed to chop Wall Street down to size. And she's on the
make to rake in as many bucks as possible. Combined with her kind of
self-righteousness, I predict a level of corruption that would make the
Bush Administration look open and honest.

Right wing Populism is dangerous stuff. At best you get some
miserable unintended consequences, at worst ...

Mark Zenier mzenier@eskimo.com
Googleproofaddress(account:mzenier provider:eskimo domain:com)

I'm just finishing Sarah's book, "Going Rogue".

Has Mark read it? Not a chance, he's a watermelon.

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, CTO | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

Leftist weenies are like watermelons...
GREEN on the outside, RED on the inside.
Test them as done in "Day of the Jackal"

 

[Glen Walpert]

On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 03:43:14 -0800, Robert Baer wrote:

<clip>

Ghaa..lumens, candela, lux, candlepower, percent efficiency, and who
knows what else (watts per steradian?)!
Seems every maker uses a different "standard" not only for different
LEDs they make, but also different than other makers.
What are the relationships and the conversions? My basic questions
concerning a given LED would be how bright is it -
can i depend on the number given to tell one is brighter than another at
the same drive (seems the answer is NO).

The answer is 42. Err, make that:

<http://www.optics.arizona.edu/Palmer/rpfaq/rpfaq.pdf>
<http://www.optics.arizona.edu/Palmer/rpfaq/rpfaq.htm>

This is the most clear and unambiguous measurement of light primer in
existence, with excellent references for more info. IMNSHO.

Regards,
Glen

 

[Don Klipstein]

In <AMednZFqgeF3r-TWnZ2dnUVZ_jqdnZ2d@posted.localnet>, Robert Baer wrote:

Don Klipstein wrote:

(What I wrote including quotation of previously quoted material)

Ghaa..lumens, candela, lux, candlepower, percent efficiency, and who
knows what else (watts per steradian?)!
Seems every maker uses a different "standard" not only for different
LEDs they make, but also different than other makers.
What are the relationships and the conversions?
My basic questions concerning a given LED would be how bright is it -
can i depend on the number given to tell one is brighter than another at
the same drive (seems the answer is NO).

LEDs rated 1 watt or more are normally rated in lumens at specific drive
current, often either 350 mA or more than one drive current including 350
mA.

Most LEDs with maximum current 50 mA or less are rated in millicandela
or candela at a specified drive current, usually 20 mA. A candela is a
lumen per steradian.
(The lumen is defined in terms of the candela and steradian, rather than
a candela being defined as 1 lumen per steradian, but I digress.)

My experience suggests that many LEDs with maximum current 40 to 300 mA
have the manufacturer stating both candela/millicandela and lumens.

In my experience, most LEDs in Digi-Key's online catalog have both
figures listed. It appears to me that if the manufacturer supplies one
and not the other along with a nominal beam width, then the other is
obtained using an equation that oversimplifies by assuming the beam is
uniform and 100% of the light is in the beam - usually not far off for
most LEDs rated *honestly* for beam width and beam width at least 30
degrees.

As for what a lux is: That is candela divided by square of distance in
meters.

- Don Klipstein (don@misty.com)

 

[Robert Baer]

Glen Walpert wrote:

On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 03:43:14 -0800, Robert Baer wrote:

clip

Ghaa..lumens, candela, lux, candlepower, percent efficiency, and who
knows what else (watts per steradian?)!
Seems every maker uses a different "standard" not only for different
LEDs they make, but also different than other makers.
What are the relationships and the conversions? My basic questions
concerning a given LED would be how bright is it -
can i depend on the number given to tell one is brighter than another at
the same drive (seems the answer is NO).

The answer is 42. Err, make that:

http://www.optics.arizona.edu/Palmer/rpfaq/rpfaq.pdf
http://www.optics.arizona.edu/Palmer/rpfaq/rpfaq.htm

This is the most clear and unambiguous measurement of light primer in
existence, with excellent references for more info. IMNSHO.

Regards,
Glen

SUPER!!

Straight-forward, feet on the ground source!
Thank you VERY much!

 

[Robert Baer]

Don Klipstein wrote:

In <AMednZFqgeF3r-TWnZ2dnUVZ_jqdnZ2d@posted.localnet>, Robert Baer wrote:
Don Klipstein wrote:

(What I wrote including quotation of previously quoted material)

Ghaa..lumens, candela, lux, candlepower, percent efficiency, and who
knows what else (watts per steradian?)!
Seems every maker uses a different "standard" not only for different
LEDs they make, but also different than other makers.
What are the relationships and the conversions?
My basic questions concerning a given LED would be how bright is it -
can i depend on the number given to tell one is brighter than another at
the same drive (seems the answer is NO).

LEDs rated 1 watt or more are normally rated in lumens at specific drive
current, often either 350 mA or more than one drive current including 350
mA.

Most LEDs with maximum current 50 mA or less are rated in millicandela
or candela at a specified drive current, usually 20 mA. A candela is a
lumen per steradian.
(The lumen is defined in terms of the candela and steradian, rather than
a candela being defined as 1 lumen per steradian, but I digress.)

My experience suggests that many LEDs with maximum current 40 to 300 mA
have the manufacturer stating both candela/millicandela and lumens.

In my experience, most LEDs in Digi-Key's online catalog have both
figures listed. It appears to me that if the manufacturer supplies one
and not the other along with a nominal beam width, then the other is
obtained using an equation that oversimplifies by assuming the beam is
uniform and 100% of the light is in the beam - usually not far off for
most LEDs rated *honestly* for beam width and beam width at least 30
degrees.

As for what a lux is: That is candela divided by square of distance in
meters.

- Don Klipstein (don@misty.com)
What got me started with the complaint, was seeing a listing from one

maker that used almost every one of the "units" i mentioned, and the
straw that broke this camel's back was percent efficiency (and who in
the h*ll knows what that is _supposed_ to mean)!

 

[Robert Baer]

JosephKK wrote:

On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:11:17 -0800 (PST), Rich Grise on Google groups <richardgrise@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Feb 11, 12:42 pm, o...@uakron.edu wrote:
No joke: South Carolina now requires ’subversives’ to register

Terrorists who want to overthrow the United States government must now
register with South Carolina's Secretary of State and declare their
intentions -- or face a $25,000 fine and up to 10 years in prison.

So what? Any terrorist would as easliy sign a loyalty pledge sas blow
himself up.

Why do government addicts think that making a law will magically
change
people's behavior?

Thanks,
Rich

Because it changes their behavior.
Clarification: it changes the behavior of the government addicts.

 

[Martin Brown]

JosephKK wrote:

On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:11:17 -0800 (PST), Rich Grise on Google groups <richardgrise@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Feb 11, 12:42 pm, o...@uakron.edu wrote:
No joke: South Carolina now requires ’subversives’ to register

Terrorists who want to overthrow the United States government must now
register with South Carolina's Secretary of State and declare their
intentions -- or face a $25,000 fine and up to 10 years in prison.

So what? Any terrorist would as easliy sign a loyalty pledge sas blow
himself up.

Why do government addicts think that making a law will magically
change
people's behavior?

Thanks,
Rich

Because it changes their behavior.

This sort of naive imbecility is singularly American. Other nations may
proscribe membership of terrorist organisations and/or ban entry to
specific named undesirables by putting them on no-fly lists.

The most recent unsuccessful US visiting bomber was on the UK's no-fly
list. I wonder if the US will also charge him with failing to tick the
"I am a terrorist box" on the landing card in addition to attempting to
blow up an airliner? Perhaps Americans are right to believe their
government is staffed by incompetent morons after all.

Regards,
Martin Brown

 

[JosephKK]

On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 02:15:25 -0800, Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> wrote:

JosephKK wrote:
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:11:17 -0800 (PST), Rich Grise on Google groups <richardgrise@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Feb 11, 12:42 pm, o...@uakron.edu wrote:
No joke: South Carolina now requires ’subversives’ to register

Terrorists who want to overthrow the United States government must now
register with South Carolina's Secretary of State and declare their
intentions -- or face a $25,000 fine and up to 10 years in prison.

So what? Any terrorist would as easliy sign a loyalty pledge sas blow
himself up.

Why do government addicts think that making a law will magically
change
people's behavior?

Thanks,
Rich

Because it changes their behavior.
Clarification: it changes the behavior of the government addicts.

Permitted.

 

[JosephKK]

On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 11:41:18 +0000, Martin Brown <|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk> wrote:

JosephKK wrote:
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:11:17 -0800 (PST), Rich Grise on Google groups <richardgrise@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Feb 11, 12:42 pm, o...@uakron.edu wrote:
No joke: South Carolina now requires ’subversives’ to register

Terrorists who want to overthrow the United States government must now
register with South Carolina's Secretary of State and declare their
intentions -- or face a $25,000 fine and up to 10 years in prison.

So what? Any terrorist would as easliy sign a loyalty pledge sas blow
himself up.

Why do government addicts think that making a law will magically
change
people's behavior?

Thanks,
Rich

Because it changes their behavior.

This sort of naive imbecility is singularly American. Other nations may
proscribe membership of terrorist organisations and/or ban entry to
specific named undesirables by putting them on no-fly lists.

The most recent unsuccessful US visiting bomber was on the UK's no-fly
list. I wonder if the US will also charge him with failing to tick the
"I am a terrorist box" on the landing card in addition to attempting to
blow up an airliner? Perhaps Americans are right to believe their
government is staffed by incompetent morons after all.

Regards,
Martin Brown

Non sequitur to my comment. See R. Baer's post.

The government addicts cannot grasp that anyone else might not change
behavior due to their (fanciful) changes in regulations or statutes.
This behavior is exhibited most strongly in extremist factions on the
left and the right. Perhaps it is a side effect of choosing to follow
demagogues.

 

[Martin Brown]

JosephKK wrote:

On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 11:41:18 +0000, Martin Brown <|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk> wrote:

JosephKK wrote:
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:11:17 -0800 (PST), Rich Grise on Google groups <richardgrise@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Feb 11, 12:42 pm, o...@uakron.edu wrote:
No joke: South Carolina now requires ’subversives’ to register

Terrorists who want to overthrow the United States government must now
register with South Carolina's Secretary of State and declare their
intentions -- or face a $25,000 fine and up to 10 years in prison.

So what? Any terrorist would as easliy sign a loyalty pledge sas blow
himself up.

Why do government addicts think that making a law will magically
change
people's behavior?

Thanks,
Rich
Because it changes their behavior.
This sort of naive imbecility is singularly American. Other nations may
proscribe membership of terrorist organisations and/or ban entry to
specific named undesirables by putting them on no-fly lists.

The most recent unsuccessful US visiting bomber was on the UK's no-fly
list. I wonder if the US will also charge him with failing to tick the
"I am a terrorist box" on the landing card in addition to attempting to
blow up an airliner? Perhaps Americans are right to believe their
government is staffed by incompetent morons after all.

Regards,
Martin Brown

Non sequitur to my comment. See R. Baer's post.

The government addicts cannot grasp that anyone else might not change
behavior due to their (fanciful) changes in regulations or statutes.

This makes no sense at all outside of America. Everyone laughs at your
Visa application form with its dumber than dumb questions on it.

The reaction is the same in every country that:
only an American would ever be dumb enough to answer them truthfully.

This behavior is exhibited most strongly in extremist factions on the
left and the right. Perhaps it is a side effect of choosing to follow
demagogues.

The closest the UK got to this was when Margaret Thatcher had terrorist
spokesmen banned from TV and Radio. So instead we were treated to a look
alike actor with a very similar voice reading the words of IRA spokesman
Gerry Adams. The whole thing was an exercise in futility. He was made
more famous as a direct result of this attempted censorship.

But it is as nothing to requiring terrorists and people intending to
overthrow the state to register their intention to do so. Only a nation
with an administration staffed by morons could ever expect that to work.

But if the population *are* morons then perhaps it does work on
Americans. How many people are locked up for ticking the wrong box?

Regards,
Martin Brown

 

[Robert Baer]

Martin Brown wrote:

JosephKK wrote:
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:11:17 -0800 (PST), Rich Grise on Google groups
richardgrise@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Feb 11, 12:42 pm, o...@uakron.edu wrote:
No joke: South Carolina now requires ’subversives’ to register

Terrorists who want to overthrow the United States government must now
register with South Carolina's Secretary of State and declare their
intentions -- or face a $25,000 fine and up to 10 years in prison.

So what? Any terrorist would as easliy sign a loyalty pledge sas blow
himself up.

Why do government addicts think that making a law will magically
change
people's behavior?

Thanks,
Rich

Because it changes their behavior.

This sort of naive imbecility is singularly American. Other nations may
proscribe membership of terrorist organisations and/or ban entry to
specific named undesirables by putting them on no-fly lists.

The most recent unsuccessful US visiting bomber was on the UK's no-fly
list. I wonder if the US will also charge him with failing to tick the
"I am a terrorist box" on the landing card in addition to attempting to
blow up an airliner? Perhaps Americans are right to believe their
government is staffed by incompetent morons after all.

Regards,
Martin Brown
Most are recognized as incompetent; one might think there is a race

to see who is the most incompetent..
Just see how TSA operates...worse than GM paying many union members
to NOT work.
The TSA does not have BS union crap..they are paid no matter what
they do not do..

 

[Michael A. Terrell]

life imitates life wrote:

On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:09:56 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:



life imitates life wrote:

On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:56:20 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:


In other words, your still a subhuman bastard.

When will your group abusing ass ever DIE! DIE! DIE!?


Some time after I piss on your gave, dimbulb.

Saying shit like that can get your ass in a time sling, boy.

You see, I can piss too. I wouldn't piss on your gRave though. I
would piss directly on your retching mass, while you writhe on the floor
in your death throes. So you had better hope that I am not present when
you are croaking, because that IS what I will do if I am.

Like any other poorly trained monkey?

I will laugh
and piss on anyone else that tries to stop me too.

You'll piss your mommies used panties as usual, coward.

THAT is your scorecard, retard boy.

Yawn. If you are such a 'bad ass' why are you afraid to use a real
name or give your address? You are just another nameless coward who
thinks you are a man.


--
Greed is the root of all eBay.

 

[life imitates life]

On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 21:16:39 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"
<mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:

life imitates life wrote:

On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:09:56 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:



life imitates life wrote:

On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:56:20 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:


In other words, your still a subhuman bastard.

When will your group abusing ass ever DIE! DIE! DIE!?


Some time after I piss on your gave, dimbulb.

Saying shit like that can get your ass in a time sling, boy.

You see, I can piss too. I wouldn't piss on your gRave though. I
would piss directly on your retching mass, while you writhe on the floor
in your death throes. So you had better hope that I am not present when
you are croaking, because that IS what I will do if I am.


Like any other poorly trained monkey?


I will laugh
and piss on anyone else that tries to stop me too.


You'll piss your mommies used panties as usual, coward.


THAT is your scorecard, retard boy.


Yawn. If you are such a 'bad ass' why are you afraid to use a real
name or give your address? You are just another nameless coward who
thinks you are a man.

I am a man. I ride 20 miles a day, and you hobble. Bwuahahahaha!

I hustle together and test $2M racks every day, and you wouldn't even
have a clue about what goes on in even one component of any one of them.

Oh, wait... I have to take that back, as one of them has a $90k
spectrum analyzer in it, and you have actually seen one of those in
operation (an old $50k model perhaps), and may have even had a slight
clue about what was going on with it.

I still have a few decades of making the world a better place for my
having been here, and I will continue to see and utilize equipment that
makes anything you ever worked with pale by comparison.

I am a man, fuckhead, and you...

...You're just another has been wanna be that barely even ever was.
If even that.

One of my farts killing a flea accomplishes more to make the world a
better place than you have.

Right now, you are worth even less than the flea was. Better hope I
never come over there and fart at you as it is fatal to most sub and non
humans. particularly pissy mouthed scumbags that think they are "the
shit". The reality is that you are... merely shit. So you'd likely
survive it... embrace it even. Like you do your desperation claims of
others being leftist. You are shit... 100% transparent shit.

Consider that assessment well stated... by a man. Then, eat shit
and die, you fucking worthless, unamerican bastard.

 

[Michael A. Terrell]

life imitates life wrote:

On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 21:16:39 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:


life imitates life wrote:

On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:09:56 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:



life imitates life wrote:

On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:56:20 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:


In other words, your still a subhuman bastard.

When will your group abusing ass ever DIE! DIE! DIE!?


Some time after I piss on your gave, dimbulb.

Saying shit like that can get your ass in a time sling, boy.

You see, I can piss too. I wouldn't piss on your gRave though. I
would piss directly on your retching mass, while you writhe on the floor
in your death throes. So you had better hope that I am not present when
you are croaking, because that IS what I will do if I am.


Like any other poorly trained monkey?


I will laugh
and piss on anyone else that tries to stop me too.


You'll piss your mommies used panties as usual, coward.


THAT is your scorecard, retard boy.


Yawn. If you are such a 'bad ass' why are you afraid to use a real
name or give your address? You are just another nameless coward who
thinks you are a man.

I am a man. I ride 20 miles a day, and you hobble. Bwuahahahaha!

What does that mean, other than you can't afford a car? I walk with
a cane because of a bad knee. You ride a bicycle since your mommy won't
let you use her car.

I hustle together and test $2M racks every day, and you wouldn't even
have a clue about what goes on in even one component of any one of them.

Your pimp tells you who to hustle, then beats you when you don't
bring back enough quarters.

Oh, wait... I have to take that back, as one of them has a $90k
spectrum analyzer in it, and you have actually seen one of those in
operation (an old $50k model perhaps), and may have even had a slight
clue about what was going on with it.

You stuff racks with other people's work. Big deal. You might as
well still be working for 'Time Warner' as a Cable TV gypsy'. I built
$80,000 telemetry equipment, and other models that was part of a multi
million dollar pair of ground stations for the European Space Agency.
Another turnkey system for NOAA, (The Microdyne MFR System, at Wallops
Island, Virginia). I also did a lot of work on the KU band Data Voice &
Video communications system aboard the ISS. It is based on the
Microdyne 700 series. the only modifications were:

1. Conformal coating the PC boards.
2. Replacing the lithium battery backed RAM with CapStore.
3. A 48 VDC power supply so it could be powered directly from the Space
Station's batteries.
4. Mounting it in one of the custom aluminum rack modules used aboard
the ISS.


Spectrum Analyzer? I guess you've never seen a Network Analyzer. I
also spent some time working in a metrology lab repairing test
equipment.

I still have a few decades of making the world a better place for my
having been here, and I will continue to see and utilize equipment that
makes anything you ever worked with pale by comparison.

You have a high opinion of yourself, but your actions don't prove one
word. You have decades of being ignorant, and little else.

I am a man, fuckhead, and you...

If you were really a man, you wouldn't act like an eight year old
that just discovered 'dirty words' and can't say anything without trying
to 'prove how grown up' he is. Most children outgrow it in a few years,
but you're still stuck at eight years old.

...You're just another has been wanna be that barely even ever was.
If even that.

One of my farts killing a flea accomplishes more to make the world a
better place than you have.

No, it pollutes the world, just like your ignorant and childish
rants.

Right now, you are worth even less than the flea was. Better hope I
never come over there and fart at you as it is fatal to most sub and non
humans. particularly pissy mouthed scumbags that think they are "the
shit". The reality is that you are... merely shit. So you'd likely
survive it... embrace it even. Like you do your desperation claims of
others being leftist. You are shit... 100% transparent shit.

You're too poor to make the trip. Anyone with more than three
neurons could find me. That lets you out, since you're short by one.

Consider that assessment well stated... by a man. Then, eat shit
and die, you fucking worthless, unamerican bastard.

Un-American? Post your DD-214 to show your honorable discharge,
loser.

You still won't post your name or address because you are a world
class idiot and coward. You make Forest Gump look like Einstein and
continue to prove how ignorant you are with every post.

My parents were married over a year before I was born. Your dad
picked your mom up in a bar for a couple cheap drinks.


Yawn. No one believes your ignorant lies and childish rants,
dimbulb. Keep it up, people are laughing their asses off at you every
time you post.


--
Greed is the root of all eBay.