Driver to drive?

Doug Miller wrote:
In article <4A687E43.D684F563@earthlink.net>, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:

Doug Miller wrote:

In article <4A67ADBB.B78F76D6@earthlink.net>, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:

Or the guts. A real man would turn them in for all the violations
before people die.

Michael, half the things that Jamie thinks are violations -- aren't. The
other
half are, but he doesn't know why.

That doesn't put him in a good position to be making complaints.


Then he is taking pay for a job he isn't qualified for.

At least in the discussions I've had with him, he hasn't claimed to be an
electrician. I figured he was the janitor.

He has made a lot of different claims on the Electronics newsgroups.


--
You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense!
 
pyotr filipivich wrote:
Okay, you can't afford a complete lid.

Not really anything to be ashamed of.

In the Amateur Radio community, he is a complete 'lid'.


--
You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense!
 
Lostgallifreyan <no-one@nowhere.net> wrote in
news:Xns9C512D9705DE7zoodlewurdle@216.196.109.145:

Definitely a communications breakdown spreading here but I'm not entirely
sure it's electro-optical in nature..
Does anyone here know how to adapt a diode model for a laser diode?
 
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:40:02 -0700 UltimatePatriot
<UltimatePatriot@thebestcountry.org> wrote in Message id:
<eb7i65l6ogf5heuird2cs960nslfiekdte@4ax.com>:

There was no "train of thought" directed toward your retarded query by
me.
Not surprising. You wouldn't even qualify to be a Pullman porter on *my*
train of thought.

I usually completely ignore stupid questions,
Why? Those are the only ones you might have a correct answer for.

but I occasionally do toy with them.
That's nice.
 
In article <io7i65tfk98ogmktl0gu8ssh5tfm0ms6hq@4ax.com>, UltimatePatriot@thebestcountry.org wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 02:01:10 GMT, spambait@milmac.com (Doug Miller)
wrote:

In article <hqvh65tqnv1o2ujpqsvqr6uttthbg2o96d@4ax.com>,
UltimatePatriot@thebestcountry.org wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:16:27 GMT, spambait@milmac.com (Doug Miller)
wrote:

I posted the Indiana statute that shows that it is a felony if the amount is

over 30g, or if it's a second offense regardless of the amount. Not my fault

if you didn't read it, or can't understand it.



No, it CAN be charged as a felony on subsequent offenses. It rarely
is, if it ever was even once.

The language of the law is very clear. Like I said, it's not my fault if you
can't understand it.

The circumstance of reality, however, is all that matters, and in
reality, it is never done.
The "circumstance of reality" is that you made certain specific claims about
what the law is regarding possession and sale of marijuana in all fifty
states, and I showed every one of those claims to be false.

You're just an ignorant buffoon.
 
On Jul 23, 10:41 pm, UltimatePatriot
<UltimatePatr...@thebestcountry.org> wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 02:01:10 GMT, spamb...@milmac.com (Doug Miller)
wrote:

In article <hqvh65tqnv1o2ujpqsvqr6uttthbg2o...@4ax.com>, UltimatePatr...@thebestcountry.org wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:16:27 GMT, spamb...@milmac.com (Doug Miller)
wrote:

I posted the Indiana statute that shows that it is a felony if the amount is
over 30g, or if it's a second offense regardless of the amount. Not my fault
if you didn't read it, or can't understand it.

 No, it CAN be charged as a felony on subsequent offenses.  It rarely
is, if it ever was even once.

The language of the law is very clear. Like I said, it's not my fault if you
can't understand it.

  The circumstance of reality, however, is all that matters, and in
reality, it is never done.

  That points to you being the one that has no grasp of the big picture,
little boy.
EAT SHIT FAGGOT YOU ARE NO PATRIOT YOU HAVE NO COUNTRY YOU FLEETING
COXUCKING MOTHERFUCKER

YOU SHOULD BE SHOT BY A FIRING SQUAD

OH AND STICK THAT BING DEEP INTO YOUR ANAL APERTURE NEXT TIME AND
REFRAIN FROM ADDRESSING THIS GROUP YOU TOTAL FUCKTARD

I AM PROTEUS
 
krw wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:19:57 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:


Jamie wrote:

Michael A. Terrell wrote:


Jamie wrote:


jk wrote:



Jamie <jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> wrote:





There was a transition period
allowed to give plenty of time for the switch over, mean while, they
simply did things like 480 volts in a 240 volt receptacle..

A particular inspectior in a particular jurisdiction might have
allowed this, but it would not be to code, and ther eIS NO GRANDFATHER
CLAUSE any where in the NEC.



jk

You're correct, there isn't, that has long been past.

when the change was done, there was a time period allotted to us, to
update the electrical to match the change.

Not all of it has been done in many of the old mills/factories..

The issue is that, a lot of portable equipment is used from one
process to another, locations change and so on. One has the correct
plug, where the other does not. So, most of the time, the shortest way
is taken during portable equipment relocation.

When you have plant managers constantly at you, you tend to find the
fastest way to make them happy. Of course, when something goes wrong,
the big guy simply goes down the food chain. Facts of life.

The guy above you is never wrong, that is why you get shit on, and
all you see when you look up, is an ass.

So many live in closets!..




That is some chick shit oputfit you work for.



I don't question who I work for, we all have to eat.


The old Nazi excuse? I vaz only followink orders!


The idiot can't question who he works for. He clearly hasn't the
brains.
And you do ?
 
Michael A. Terrell wrote:

krw wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:19:57 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:


Jamie wrote:

Michael A. Terrell wrote:


Jamie wrote:


jk wrote:



Jamie <jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> wrote:





There was a transition period
allowed to give plenty of time for the switch over, mean while, they
simply did things like 480 volts in a 240 volt receptacle..

A particular inspectior in a particular jurisdiction might have
allowed this, but it would not be to code, and ther eIS NO GRANDFATHER
CLAUSE any where in the NEC.



jk

You're correct, there isn't, that has long been past.

when the change was done, there was a time period allotted to us, to
update the electrical to match the change.

Not all of it has been done in many of the old mills/factories..

The issue is that, a lot of portable equipment is used from one
process to another, locations change and so on. One has the correct
plug, where the other does not. So, most of the time, the shortest way
is taken during portable equipment relocation.

When you have plant managers constantly at you, you tend to find the
fastest way to make them happy. Of course, when something goes wrong,
the big guy simply goes down the food chain. Facts of life.

The guy above you is never wrong, that is why you get shit on, and
all you see when you look up, is an ass.

So many live in closets!..




That is some chick shit oputfit you work for.



I don't question who I work for, we all have to eat.


The old Nazi excuse? I vaz only followink orders!

The idiot can't question who he works for. He clearly hasn't the
brains.



Or the guts. A real man would turn them in for all the violations
before people die.


I suppose I could do that, that is, if I wanted to be unemployed.

Such a bigot.
 
Doug Miller wrote:

In article <4A687E43.D684F563@earthlink.net>, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:

Doug Miller wrote:

In article <4A67ADBB.B78F76D6@earthlink.net>, "Michael A. Terrell"

mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:

Or the guts. A real man would turn them in for all the violations
before people die.

Michael, half the things that Jamie thinks are violations -- aren't. The

other

half are, but he doesn't know why.

That doesn't put him in a good position to be making complaints.


Then he is taking pay for a job he isn't qualified for.


At least in the discussions I've had with him, he hasn't claimed to be an
electrician. I figured he was the janitor.

No, I sit and watch people like you make an ass of them self's.

Must be a daily routine for you and your crony senile friends.
 
In article <tzmam.27750$BP6.16205@newsfe24.iad>, Jamie <jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> wrote:
Doug Miller wrote:

No, I sit and watch people like you make an ass of them self's.
And you didn't, with that sentence? How old were you when you dropped out?

Guess you were lying when you said you killfiled me.
 
Doug Miller wrote:

In article <tzmam.27750$BP6.16205@newsfe24.iad>, Jamie <jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> wrote:

Doug Miller wrote:


No, I sit and watch people like you make an ass of them self's.


And you didn't, with that sentence? How old were you when you dropped out?

Guess you were lying when you said you killfiled me.

Oh I had you blocked for a few days, and no, I don't lie. You on the
other hand, do have a problem with accepting reality..

You're in the class of "Mushroom Bigot" management.
 
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 14:06:44 -0400, Jamie wrote:
No, I sit and watch people like you make an ass of them self's.
So, you sit on your high horse, handing down self-righteous judgements,
while not even ever having learned to spell "themselves"?

Yeah, that makes you really credible.

NOT!

Cheers,
Rich
 
In article <SYmam.42025$FP2.39977@newsfe05.iad>, Jamie <jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> wrote:
Doug Miller wrote:

In article <tzmam.27750$BP6.16205@newsfe24.iad>, Jamie
jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> wrote:

Doug Miller wrote:


No, I sit and watch people like you make an ass of them self's.


And you didn't, with that sentence? How old were you when you dropped out?

Guess you were lying when you said you killfiled me.

Oh I had you blocked for a few days, and no, I don't lie. You on the
other hand, do have a problem with accepting reality..
No, actually, I think that would be the guy that doesn't have the first clue
about grounding -- in other words, yourself.
You're in the class of "Mushroom Bigot" management.
That's pretty funny, actually, since I am not, and never have been, in
management.
 
Jamie wrote:
Michael A. Terrell wrote:

krw wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:19:57 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:


Jamie wrote:

Michael A. Terrell wrote:


Jamie wrote:


jk wrote:



Jamie <jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> wrote:





There was a transition period
allowed to give plenty of time for the switch over, mean while, they
simply did things like 480 volts in a 240 volt receptacle..

A particular inspectior in a particular jurisdiction might have
allowed this, but it would not be to code, and ther eIS NO GRANDFATHER
CLAUSE any where in the NEC.



jk

You're correct, there isn't, that has long been past.

when the change was done, there was a time period allotted to us, to
update the electrical to match the change.

Not all of it has been done in many of the old mills/factories..

The issue is that, a lot of portable equipment is used from one
process to another, locations change and so on. One has the correct
plug, where the other does not. So, most of the time, the shortest way
is taken during portable equipment relocation.

When you have plant managers constantly at you, you tend to find the
fastest way to make them happy. Of course, when something goes wrong,
the big guy simply goes down the food chain. Facts of life.

The guy above you is never wrong, that is why you get shit on, and
all you see when you look up, is an ass.

So many live in closets!..




That is some chick shit oputfit you work for.



I don't question who I work for, we all have to eat.


The old Nazi excuse? I vaz only followink orders!

The idiot can't question who he works for. He clearly hasn't the
brains.



Or the guts. A real man would turn them in for all the violations
before people die.


I suppose I could do that, that is, if I wanted to be unemployed.

No one would miss you.


Such a bigot.

Bigot? No. Concerned about a safe workplace? Yes. You have no
idea what the word 'Bigot' means, but you sure like to plaster it on the
walls.

You sound like the type that chained the fire doors shut a few years
ago to keep the workers inside all day, and they all died when the plant
caught fire.


--
You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense!
 
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 14:06:44 -0400, Jamie
<jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> wrote:

Doug Miller wrote:

In article <4A687E43.D684F563@earthlink.net>, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:

Doug Miller wrote:

In article <4A67ADBB.B78F76D6@earthlink.net>, "Michael A. Terrell"

mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:

Or the guts. A real man would turn them in for all the violations
before people die.

Michael, half the things that Jamie thinks are violations -- aren't. The

other

half are, but he doesn't know why.

That doesn't put him in a good position to be making complaints.


Then he is taking pay for a job he isn't qualified for.


At least in the discussions I've had with him, he hasn't claimed to be an
electrician. I figured he was the janitor.


No, I sit and watch people like you make an ass of them self's.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Indeed!

Must be a daily routine for you and your crony senile friends.
Laughing at you and DimBulb? Yep, that's certainly become routine.
 
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 13:48:00 -0400, Jamie
<jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> wrote:

Michael A. Terrell wrote:

krw wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:19:57 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:


Jamie wrote:

Michael A. Terrell wrote:


Jamie wrote:


jk wrote:



Jamie <jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> wrote:





There was a transition period
allowed to give plenty of time for the switch over, mean while, they
simply did things like 480 volts in a 240 volt receptacle..

A particular inspectior in a particular jurisdiction might have
allowed this, but it would not be to code, and ther eIS NO GRANDFATHER
CLAUSE any where in the NEC.



jk

You're correct, there isn't, that has long been past.

when the change was done, there was a time period allotted to us, to
update the electrical to match the change.

Not all of it has been done in many of the old mills/factories..

The issue is that, a lot of portable equipment is used from one
process to another, locations change and so on. One has the correct
plug, where the other does not. So, most of the time, the shortest way
is taken during portable equipment relocation.

When you have plant managers constantly at you, you tend to find the
fastest way to make them happy. Of course, when something goes wrong,
the big guy simply goes down the food chain. Facts of life.

The guy above you is never wrong, that is why you get shit on, and
all you see when you look up, is an ass.

So many live in closets!..




That is some chick shit oputfit you work for.



I don't question who I work for, we all have to eat.


The old Nazi excuse? I vaz only followink orders!

The idiot can't question who he works for. He clearly hasn't the
brains.



Or the guts. A real man would turn them in for all the violations
before people die.


I suppose I could do that, that is, if I wanted to be unemployed.
If you don't you're an accessory.

Such a bigot.
Yeah, we should have more empathy for the terminally stupid. Oops.
Too bad. OTOH, perhaps you should stay away if showing up here makes
you cry.
 
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 13:42:18 -0400, Jamie
<jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> wrote:

krw wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:19:57 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:


Jamie wrote:

Michael A. Terrell wrote:


Jamie wrote:


jk wrote:



Jamie <jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> wrote:





There was a transition period
allowed to give plenty of time for the switch over, mean while, they
simply did things like 480 volts in a 240 volt receptacle..

A particular inspectior in a particular jurisdiction might have
allowed this, but it would not be to code, and ther eIS NO GRANDFATHER
CLAUSE any where in the NEC.



jk

You're correct, there isn't, that has long been past.

when the change was done, there was a time period allotted to us, to
update the electrical to match the change.

Not all of it has been done in many of the old mills/factories..

The issue is that, a lot of portable equipment is used from one
process to another, locations change and so on. One has the correct
plug, where the other does not. So, most of the time, the shortest way
is taken during portable equipment relocation.

When you have plant managers constantly at you, you tend to find the
fastest way to make them happy. Of course, when something goes wrong,
the big guy simply goes down the food chain. Facts of life.

The guy above you is never wrong, that is why you get shit on, and
all you see when you look up, is an ass.

So many live in closets!..




That is some chick shit oputfit you work for.



I don't question who I work for, we all have to eat.


The old Nazi excuse? I vaz only followink orders!


The idiot can't question who he works for. He clearly hasn't the
brains.
And you do ?
To question who I work for? Certainly. I'm paid to think, not kill
people.
 
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 22:21:44 -0700, pyotr filipivich
<phamp@mindspring.com> wrote:

Okay, you can't afford a complete lid.
Yet another retarded, brainless, unqualified assessment.
Not really anything to be ashamed of.
Yet another retarded, brainless, unqualified assessment.

I have always found it to be strange that so many Usenet retards think
they actually know what is going on in the heads of others in the world,
when they usually cannot even keep a grip on their own.
 
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 02:53:55 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
<mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:

Doug Miller wrote:

In article <4A687E43.D684F563@earthlink.net>, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:

Doug Miller wrote:

In article <4A67ADBB.B78F76D6@earthlink.net>, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:

Or the guts. A real man would turn them in for all the violations
before people die.

Michael, half the things that Jamie thinks are violations -- aren't. The
other
half are, but he doesn't know why.

That doesn't put him in a good position to be making complaints.


Then he is taking pay for a job he isn't qualified for.

At least in the discussions I've had with him, he hasn't claimed to be an
electrician. I figured he was the janitor.


He has made a lot of different claims on the Electronics newsgroups.
So have you, but there is not some lame dope (like you) running around
behind you calling you something you are not, dipshit.

Instead, *I* will run around... anywhere I please... and call anyone
I want... anything I want.

I usually keep it to those that deserve it most, however.
 
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 05:34:29 -0400, Bill Palmer <Biiil@none.not> wrote:

On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:40:02 -0700 UltimatePatriot
UltimatePatriot@thebestcountry.org> wrote in Message id:
eb7i65l6ogf5heuird2cs960nslfiekdte@4ax.com>:

There was no "train of thought" directed toward your retarded query by
me.

Not surprising. You wouldn't even qualify to be a Pullman porter on *my*
train of thought.
Being that it was a "retarded query", I wouldn't want anything to do
with your train, aside from causing it to derail and dive down a 2500
foot chasm to be obliterated at the bottom.
I usually completely ignore stupid questions,

Why?
Go away, you retarded fuckhead.

Those are the only ones you might have a correct answer for.
Your "train" is petty. Its "engineer" is retarded.

You are not worthy of anyone's time.

but I occasionally do toy with them.

That's nice.
You're an idiot.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top