Driver to drive?

John Larkin wrote:
John Larkin wrote:

Hey, that could be an interesting business, carbon-neutral cremation.

John


Oh darn, it's been done:

http://www.funerals.coop/

http://www.australianwomenonline.com/carbon-neutral-cremations/

John
Well, I guess you better just keep tickin' then.

Cheers,
James
 
In article <gut1v5$grh$1@news.netins.net>, Andrew wrote:
"Don Klipstein"

Maybe we should start a strategic CO2 reserve, just in case...

Total human industrial CO2 production,
about 8 Gt C per year (7,56,57).
...
the atmosphere contains 780 Gt C; the surface ocean contains 1,000 Gt C;
vegetation, soils, and detritus contain 2,000 Gt C; and the intermediate
and deep oceans contain 38,000 Gt C, as CO2 or CO2 hydration
products.

Each year, the surface ocean and atmosphere exchange an
estimated 90 Gt C; vegetation and the atmosphere, 100 Gt C; marine
biota and the surface ocean, 50 Gt C; and the surface ocean and the
intermediate and deep oceans, 40 Gt C (56,57).

Though there are annual exchanges, most of your figures sound like
they are for annual exchanges that occur somewhat equally in both
directions within each year.

Of course.
Point is that man-made CO2 generation is negligible. We ought to generate
more CO2. I should buy SUV as a next car. You do too.
You did snip the link showing that atmospheric CO2 is significantly
increasing, ocean CO2 is increasing and recently carbon in the land
biomass is going up also, and that fossil fuel burning does a good job of
accounting for this.

http://lgmacweb.env.uea.ac.uk/lequere/co2/carbon_budget.htm

- Don Klipstein (don@misty.com)
 
On Sun, 17 May 2009 03:17:51 -0700, Fred Abse
<excretatauris@invalid.invalid> wrote:

On Sat, 16 May 2009 18:35:20 -0700, JosephKK wrote:

Punched tapes could reliably achieve this tightness of character
separation. Manual typists had much more jitter in start to start. The
system is truly asynchronous between characters. Intra character timing
was created by steady speed electromechanical means.

Most machines needed either CR-CR-LF or LF-CR-CR as end-of-line, adding a
delay, to allow the carriage or basket to fully return, otherwise you got
the first character of the next line printing whilst the carriage was
still flying.

That's the reason for the still-widespread CNC tape code using LF-CR-CR.
It was designed for ASR33s et al.

When all the "modern" magnetic and semiconductor media have lost data,
punched paper tape will still be readable, by humans if necessary.
And just what, per se, does that have to do with what i said?
 
On Sat, 16 May 2009 19:36:57 -0700, D from BC
<myrealaddress@comic.com> wrote:

On Sat, 16 May 2009 18:48:57 -0700,
"JosephKK"<quiettechblue@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Thu, 14 May 2009 23:30:17 -0700, D from BC
myrealaddress@comic.com> wrote:

On Thu, 14 May 2009 14:24:00 -0600, qrus19@mindspring.com wrote:

On Thu, 14 May 2009 00:30:52 -0700, D from BC
myrealaddress@comic.com> wrote:

On Wed, 13 May 2009 22:26:10 -0600, qrus19@mindspring.com wrote:

On Wed, 13 May 2009 18:23:38 -0700, D from BC
myrealaddress@comic.com> wrote:

On Wed, 13 May 2009 21:10:24 GMT, Rich the Philosophizer
philosobphizer@example.net> wrote:

On Tue, 12 May 2009 15:26:19 -0700, D from BC wrote:

Show me proof for Noah's arc and I'll show you proof that all animals
didn't come from the same spot.

I don't have to. I don't make any claims about Noah's ark.

Best not too.. Noah's evidence is so thin that the existence for Darth
Vader is better.


You're the one who is wildly, stridently proclaiming that there couldn't
possibly be any Power Greater Than Yourself, and demanding "scientific
proof" of "fairy tales" from those who believe otherwise.

Yes, I do claim there's no quasihyperhomosapienGod based on the
scientific evidence.
Yes, I do demand people to prove their fairy tales.

Well, put your money where your mouth is! Start coming up with some
scientific proofs of your own!

Otherwise, shut your pie hole, dipstick.

Thanks,
Rich

And Noah has once again made someone resort to pie hole dipstick name
calling..

Religion is division.

Noah sucks..and there's no evidence.


D from BC
myrealaddress(at)comic(dot)com
BC, Canada
Posted to usenet sci.electronics.design


As evidence of a higher being one farther above humans than we are
above the ameba I offer the miricle that is human thought. As
evideince that said being doesn't exist I offer the miracle that is
human thought. oops same proof now what do I do I know the supreme
being likes to play jokes on humans as evidience of this I offer Bill
S , Eyore and the arguements for and against those who have faith in
said supreme being.

I'll try to translate the above...
'We think therefore there is a God' ..<<Is that it?
That's the evidence?

Human thought began as a mutation for survival.
The more thinking the better the survival.

The unique feature of thinking is not evidence for a we.so.specialGod.

Many other creatures have unique features.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamprey
Studies reported in Nature suggest that lampreys have a unique type of
immune system with parts that are unrelated to the antibodies found in
mammals.


D from BC
myrealaddress(at)comic(dot)com
BC, Canada
Posted to usenet sci.electronics.design


Ok good translation of line one.

How about lines two and three?

They need to be written better.


And by the by so far as we can tell intelligence actually does make us
better at survival, unless of course we kill ourselves off with
something our intelligence develops. D from BC I really don't care if
you are an atheist but I do dislike the fact that those who are
atheist demand that those that believe in God or Shiva or Gia or *Add
diety* here not believe or are stupid.

Christianity teaches how to think defectively. Defective thinking
people are only good at sayyy... flipping burgers at McDonalds.


D from BC
myrealaddress(at)comic(dot)com
BC, Canada
Posted to usenet sci.electronics.design

Along the way i have met serious Christians who can clean your clock
in engineering. I strongly suspect that even i can beat you soundly.
These persons cleaned my clock repeatedly. They are a bit rare
though.

I want you and all of them to post this..

I ________ believe Noah's arc is absolutely true, actually happened
for real and is a historic fact.

I__________ reject all scientific evidence that disproves the story of
Noah's arc.
And I can wear the above written on a T-shirt during a technology
convention.

Most Christians are ignorant of their religion.


D from BC
myrealaddress(at)comic(dot)com
BC, Canada
Posted to usenet sci.electronics.design
Why should my friends and i pander to your neuroses.

Neither they nor i am all that ignorant, but i offer myself as a least
common denominator of this set, and i am not even Christian. And i do
know how to use the net. And i still have KJV to hand (my own, read
it cover to cover).
 
On Mon, 18 May 2009 19:34:29 -0700, D from BC
<myrealaddress@comic.com> wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2009 22:02:36 GMT, Rich the Philosophizer
philosobphizer@example.net> wrote:

On Wed, 13 May 2009 18:23:38 -0700, D from BC wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2009 21:10:24 GMT, Rich the Philosophizer

Well, put your money where your mouth is! Start coming up with some
scientific proofs of your own!

Otherwise, shut your pie hole, dipstick.

And Noah has once again made someone resort to pie hole dipstick name
calling..

Religion is division.

Noah sucks..and there's no evidence.

And still not even a _hint_ of any scientific evidence to back up your
hysterical ranting.

Why does this not surprise me?

'Bye.
Rich


For every proof posted for the existence of Noah's arc, I will provide
one proof against the existence of Noah's arc.

I'll begin:

Noah's arc doesn't exist because polar bears can't walk to the Arctic
from Noah's landing spot...on the Mountains of Ararat in Turkey!

Your turn..


D from BC
myrealaddress(at)comic(dot)com
BC, Canada
Posted to usenet sci.electronics.design
God being all powerful and all knowing moved them without effort. AKA
the swam.
 
On Sat, 16 May 2009 22:19:44 -0700, D from BC
<myrealaddress@comic.com> wrote:

On Sat, 16 May 2009 18:48:57 -0700,
"JosephKK"<quiettechblue@yahoo.com> wrote:

snip

Along the way i have met serious Christians who can clean your clock
in engineering. I strongly suspect that even i can beat you soundly.
These persons cleaned my clock repeatedly. They are a bit rare
though.

(Cut and pasted from 'Any Christian Electronics Designers Here')

Here's 5 ways to be a Christian electronics designer.

1) Ignorant of Christianity
'What? There's talking animals in the bible?'

2) Split personality.
Electronics mode (Dr Jekyll) and Christian mode (Mr Hyde).

3) Lying about being Christian
'I'm a fellow Christian. How about 20% off that oscilloscope?'

4) Fear of not being Christian
And miss out on those Christian women with big hooters? :(
And miss Christian BBQ's? :(

5) Crazy and Christian
'Please Jesus...make my transistor work.'


So yeah.. I believe there are Christians that are smarter than me.


D from BC
myrealaddress(at)comic(dot)com
BC, Canada
Posted to usenet sci.electronics.design
Just 'cause you never knowingly met one does not mean they do not
exist. Same thing with Jews and other religions. I hope that you
would find discourse with Ptolemy likely to be fascinating as i do.
 
On Mon, 18 May 2009 22:59:56 -0600, qrus19@mindspring.com wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2009 19:34:29 -0700, D from BC
myrealaddress@comic.com> wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2009 22:02:36 GMT, Rich the Philosophizer
philosobphizer@example.net> wrote:

On Wed, 13 May 2009 18:23:38 -0700, D from BC wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2009 21:10:24 GMT, Rich the Philosophizer

Well, put your money where your mouth is! Start coming up with some
scientific proofs of your own!

Otherwise, shut your pie hole, dipstick.

And Noah has once again made someone resort to pie hole dipstick name
calling..

Religion is division.

Noah sucks..and there's no evidence.

And still not even a _hint_ of any scientific evidence to back up your
hysterical ranting.

Why does this not surprise me?

'Bye.
Rich


For every proof posted for the existence of Noah's arc, I will provide
one proof against the existence of Noah's arc.

I'll begin:

Noah's arc doesn't exist because polar bears can't walk to the Arctic
from Noah's landing spot...on the Mountains of Ararat in Turkey!

Your turn..


D from BC
myrealaddress(at)comic(dot)com
BC, Canada
Posted to usenet sci.electronics.design

God being all powerful and all knowing moved them without effort. AKA
the swam.
So..you're saying God teleported the polar bears to the Arctic after
they got off Noah's arc
or.... the polar bears swam ~8000km from Turkey to the Artic?
You have evidence for this lunacy?

2)
Noah's arc doesn't exist because the world has no geologic evidence of
suddenly being covered by water.


D from BC
myrealaddress(at)comic(dot)com
BC, Canada
Posted to usenet sci.electronics.design
 
On May 18, 7:34 pm, D from BC <myrealaddr...@comic.com> wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2009 22:02:36 GMT, Rich the Philosophizer



philosobphi...@example.net> wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2009 18:23:38 -0700, D from BC wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2009 21:10:24 GMT, Rich the Philosophizer

Well, put your money where your mouth is! Start coming up with some
scientific proofs of your own!

Otherwise, shut your pie hole, dipstick.

And Noah has once again made someone resort to pie hole dipstick name
calling..

Religion is division.

Noah sucks..and there's no evidence.

And still not even a _hint_ of any scientific evidence to back up your
hysterical ranting.

Why does this not surprise me?

'Bye.
Rich

For every proof posted for the existence of Noah's arc, I will provide
one proof against the existence of Noah's arc.

I'll begin:

Noah's arc doesn't exist because polar bears can't walk to the Arctic
from Noah's landing spot...on the Mountains of Ararat in Turkey!
Polar bears can swim large distances if needed.

Kangaroos are a better example. They can't swim very far at all.

Your turn..

D from BC
myrealaddress(at)comic(dot)com
BC, Canada
Posted to usenet sci.electronics.design
 
"Andrew" <andyvbel@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:gut41e$hdc$1@news.netins.net:

Ever since the end of WW II the best our government can come up
with is 1) build military stuff and 2) build space stuff.

the space race was a great spur for electronics and medical.

For example?

where do you think miniaturized electronics came from?

Let me guess. TI and Fairchild?
there probalby would never have been either of those companies if the space
race hadn't occurred.All those jobs never created.
Medical was all sorts of monitoring/diagnostic gear.

Which could be omplemented at 1/10th the cost in private companies.
which had no incentive to develop them w/o the demands of the space race.
consumer products benefitted greatly from space.

Really. What exaclty?
all the electronic products developed,that would not have come without the
space race. No miniturization,no tiny,practical,useful small electronics.
and it creates good paying,productive jobs.

BS. To create this jobs money was taken from creating other good
paying, productive jobs.

For example?

We do not know. Knobody knows because it did not happen. Taxes would
be smaller, people can spend (or save) more of their money on whatever
goods they they prefer.
IOW,just an ASSumption of yours.an Unfounded ASSumption.

and those goods would NOT have been available,because there was no pressure
to develop them.

Goverment does not make wealth. It can only redistribute it loosing
portion of it in the process of redistribution.
Agreed,but gov't DOES encourage investment/development where it may not
have happened,or happened many years later.
Look at roadways;how many people or companies built their own roads before
gov'ts began making them? Few if any.they just made paths and
trrails,rutted and impassable in bad weather,few people chose to travel
because of that.But when gov't puts in a road,development springs up around
it quickly.
(IMO,it would have gone to social programs;welfare,etc,with a
corresponding decline in the society,and a huge increase in gov't
paper-pushing jobs.)

Exactly. If you want to say that space is better than social program,
I agree. Burning collected taxes would be even better...
Oh? Burning money would be better than all the millions of good paying jobs
the space race created?

More hyperbole and nonsense.

How much are YOU willing to spend on space programs? Send a check to
NASA.

I do when I pay my taxes.

You see. As soon as we are talking about YOUR money, you do not want
to spend them. Pity.
even people who don't directly use public roads benefit by them.
The same goes for everything the space and military races have brought
about.

Look at other societies,they become stagnant when they don't have the goad
of competition. Particularly the goad of defending your society.

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net
 
On Mon, 18 May 2009 22:48:13 -0700, D from BC
<myrealaddress@comic.com> wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2009 22:59:56 -0600, qrus19@mindspring.com wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2009 19:34:29 -0700, D from BC
myrealaddress@comic.com> wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2009 22:02:36 GMT, Rich the Philosophizer
philosobphizer@example.net> wrote:

On Wed, 13 May 2009 18:23:38 -0700, D from BC wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2009 21:10:24 GMT, Rich the Philosophizer

Well, put your money where your mouth is! Start coming up with some
scientific proofs of your own!

Otherwise, shut your pie hole, dipstick.

And Noah has once again made someone resort to pie hole dipstick name
calling..

Religion is division.

Noah sucks..and there's no evidence.

And still not even a _hint_ of any scientific evidence to back up your
hysterical ranting.

Why does this not surprise me?

'Bye.
Rich


For every proof posted for the existence of Noah's arc, I will provide
one proof against the existence of Noah's arc.

I'll begin:

Noah's arc doesn't exist because polar bears can't walk to the Arctic
from Noah's landing spot...on the Mountains of Ararat in Turkey!

Your turn..


D from BC
myrealaddress(at)comic(dot)com
BC, Canada
Posted to usenet sci.electronics.design

God being all powerful and all knowing moved them without effort. AKA
the swam.

So..you're saying God teleported the polar bears to the Arctic after
they got off Noah's arc
or.... the polar bears swam ~8000km from Turkey to the Artic?
You have evidence for this lunacy?

2)
Noah's arc doesn't exist because the world has no geologic evidence of
suddenly being covered by water.


D from BC
myrealaddress(at)comic(dot)com
BC, Canada
Posted to usenet sci.electronics.design
Not me then again I'm not a hard core believer in the Judeo Christian
story line., but can you prove that the all powerful god of these
folks couldn't do this.

There is evidence of huge amounts of flooding in certain parts of the
world, the badlands of the Dakota, and in some minds the grand canyon
are such. presnt science also shows that there was avalley at the
northern end of the persian gulf that flooded about the time the bible
places Noah and his flood. plus somewhere around then they believe the
black sea and Agean broke through and created a flood. Personal take
on this is preists looking for more power But that does not mean it
didn't happen just that I don't actually believe it.
 
On Mon, 18 May 2009 17:44:49 -0700, Jim Thompson
<To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@My-Web-Site.com> wrote:

On Sat, 16 May 2009 09:10:20 -0700, Jim Thompson
To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@My-Web-Site.com> wrote:

On Sat, 16 May 2009 08:43:14 -0700, Fred Abse
excretatauris@invalid.invalid> wrote:

On Tue, 12 May 2009 15:24:51 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:

Now at device level (no behavioral)....

http://analog-innovations.com/SED/HammerDriver(J.Nagle)2.pdf

There's a problem with this, Jim. Your circuit works fine with a
continuous pulse train, but teletype isn't like that, it can have long
periods of no activity (constant Mark signal), then a few characters, then
more inactivity. The selector magnet must respond to the first drop to
Space (beginning of start bit) of the first character.

[snip]

So add a weenie supply to keep the capacitor "alive", as shown in...

www.analog-innovations.com/SED/HammerDriver_RevD.pdf

Since the current requirements are essentially leakage, I'd be tempted
to use a capacitor type feed directly from the AC line. I do that
often in appliance control chips.
Where did the OP of this thread (John Nagle) go to?

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

Stormy on the East Coast today... due to Bush's failed policies.
 
On Tue, 19 May 2009 02:11:42 +0000, Don Klipstein wrote:
You did snip the link showing that atmospheric CO2 is significantly
increasing, ocean CO2 is increasing and recently carbon in the land
biomass is going up also, and that fossil fuel burning does a good job of
accounting for this.

http://lgmacweb.env.uea.ac.uk/lequere/co2/carbon_budget.htm
The question everyone seems to be steadfastly avoiding is:

Even if it _were_ true, So What?

Thanks,
Rich
 
On Mon, 18 May 2009 19:34:29 -0700, D from BC wrote:
For every proof posted for the existence of Noah's arc, I will provide
one proof against the existence of Noah's arc.
Go fuck yourself. You're the one who made the blanket statement that
there couldn't possibly be any power greater than yourself.

The burden of proof is on you, bucko.

So show me scientific proof that there couldn't possibly be any power
greater than yourself, or shut your pie hole,

Show me that _Your_ dogma is right, and everybody else's dogma is
wrong.

Show me, coward.

Or are you claiming that your detractors have to show proof, while you
just demand that people follow your proclamations, on faith?

Man, if that ain't a religious cult, then I don't know what is.

Good Luck!
Rich
 
On Tue, 19 May 2009 18:30:56 GMT, Rich the Philosophizer
<philosobphizer@example.net> wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2009 19:34:29 -0700, D from BC wrote:

For every proof posted for the existence of Noah's arc, I will provide
one proof against the existence of Noah's arc.

Go fuck yourself. You're the one who made the blanket statement that
there couldn't possibly be any power greater than yourself.

The burden of proof is on you, bucko.

So show me scientific proof that there couldn't possibly be any power
greater than yourself, or shut your pie hole,

Show me that _Your_ dogma is right, and everybody else's dogma is
wrong.

Show me, coward.

Or are you claiming that your detractors have to show proof, while you
just demand that people follow your proclamations, on faith?

Man, if that ain't a religious cult, then I don't know what is.

Good Luck!
Rich
You're not helping Noah's case.

3) Noah's arc doesn't exist cause all the animal species couldn't fit
in the arc.

The story of Noah is going down like a sinking ship.

If Noah's arc doesn't exist then that's supporting evidence that
asphyxiaphilicGod doesn't exist.


D from BC
myrealaddress(at)comic(dot)com
BC, Canada
Posted to usenet sci.electronics.design
 
"Richard the Dreaded Libertarian" <freedom_guy@example.net> wrote in message
news:pan.2009.05.19.18.40.26.805825@example.net...
On Tue, 19 May 2009 02:11:42 +0000, Don Klipstein wrote:

You did snip the link showing that atmospheric CO2 is significantly
increasing, ocean CO2 is increasing and recently carbon in the land
biomass is going up also, and that fossil fuel burning does a good job of
accounting for this.

http://lgmacweb.env.uea.ac.uk/lequere/co2/carbon_budget.htm

The question everyone seems to be steadfastly avoiding is:

Even if it _were_ true, So What?
So We Need To Burn More Fuel to increase biomass and feed poor countries.

http://nrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/gtr/gtr_nc241.pdf
....
Growing-stock volume on U.S. timberland increased from 616 to 856 billion
cubic feet (39 percent) between 1953 and 2002
....


--
Andrew
 
In article <guvr19$otm$1@news.netins.net>, Andrew wrote:
"Richard the Dreaded Libertarian" <freedom_guy@example.net> wrote in message
news:pan.2009.05.19.18.40.26.805825@example.net...
On Tue, 19 May 2009 02:11:42 +0000, Don Klipstein wrote:

You did snip the link showing that atmospheric CO2 is significantly
increasing, ocean CO2 is increasing and recently carbon in the land
biomass is going up also, and that fossil fuel burning does a good job of
accounting for this.

http://lgmacweb.env.uea.ac.uk/lequere/co2/carbon_budget.htm

The question everyone seems to be steadfastly avoiding is:

Even if it _were_ true, So What?

So We Need To Burn More Fuel to increase biomass and feed poor countries.

http://nrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/gtr/gtr_nc241.pdf
...
Growing-stock volume on U.S. timberland increased from 616 to 856 billion
cubic feet (39 percent) between 1953 and 2002
In large part for reasons other than increase of CO2, such as planting
of more favorable trees and harvesting them at times of their growth so as
to maximize yield. We also have increased plant agriculture yields in
general from gains in irrigation, fertilizers, pest control, and breeding
and genetic modification for more productive plants.

- Don Klipstein (don@misty.com)
 
On Tue, 19 May 2009 02:11:42 +0000 (UTC), don@manx.misty.com (Don
Klipstein) wrote:

In article <gut1v5$grh$1@news.netins.net>, Andrew wrote:

Point is that man-made CO2 generation is negligible. We ought to generate
more CO2. I should buy SUV as a next car. You do too.

You did snip the link showing that atmospheric CO2 is significantly
increasing, ocean CO2 is increasing and recently carbon in the land
biomass is going up also, and that fossil fuel burning does a good job of
accounting for this.

http://lgmacweb.env.uea.ac.uk/lequere/co2/carbon_budget.htm

- Don Klipstein (don@misty.com)
Don, you keep responding to these endless CO2 or AGW posts with
informative links and patient, studied answers.

Even when baited, you never seem to lapse into hyperbole or
emotionality.

Kudos.
 
On Mon, 18 May 2009 22:48:13 -0700, D from BC
<myrealaddress@comic.com> wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2009 22:59:56 -0600, qrus19@mindspring.com wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2009 19:34:29 -0700, D from BC
myrealaddress@comic.com> wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2009 22:02:36 GMT, Rich the Philosophizer
philosobphizer@example.net> wrote:

On Wed, 13 May 2009 18:23:38 -0700, D from BC wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2009 21:10:24 GMT, Rich the Philosophizer

Well, put your money where your mouth is! Start coming up with some
scientific proofs of your own!

Otherwise, shut your pie hole, dipstick.

And Noah has once again made someone resort to pie hole dipstick name
calling..

Religion is division.

Noah sucks..and there's no evidence.

And still not even a _hint_ of any scientific evidence to back up your
hysterical ranting.

Why does this not surprise me?

'Bye.
Rich


For every proof posted for the existence of Noah's arc, I will provide
one proof against the existence of Noah's arc.

I'll begin:

Noah's arc doesn't exist because polar bears can't walk to the Arctic
from Noah's landing spot...on the Mountains of Ararat in Turkey!

Your turn..


D from BC
myrealaddress(at)comic(dot)com
BC, Canada
Posted to usenet sci.electronics.design

God being all powerful and all knowing moved them without effort. AKA
the swam.

So..you're saying God teleported the polar bears to the Arctic after
they got off Noah's arc
or.... the polar bears swam ~8000km from Turkey to the Artic?
You have evidence for this lunacy?
Naw, nothing so dramatic. They just floated around on the arctic ice
pack (which is floating anyway). No need to move them at all in the
first place.
2)
Noah's arc doesn't exist because the world has no geologic evidence of
suddenly being covered by water.


D from BC
myrealaddress(at)comic(dot)com
BC, Canada
Posted to usenet sci.electronics.design
 
On Wed, 20 May 2009 20:57:28 -0700,
"JosephKK"<quiettechblue@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2009 22:48:13 -0700, D from BC
myrealaddress@comic.com> wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2009 22:59:56 -0600, qrus19@mindspring.com wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2009 19:34:29 -0700, D from BC
myrealaddress@comic.com> wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2009 22:02:36 GMT, Rich the Philosophizer
philosobphizer@example.net> wrote:

On Wed, 13 May 2009 18:23:38 -0700, D from BC wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2009 21:10:24 GMT, Rich the Philosophizer

Well, put your money where your mouth is! Start coming up with some
scientific proofs of your own!

Otherwise, shut your pie hole, dipstick.

And Noah has once again made someone resort to pie hole dipstick name
calling..

Religion is division.

Noah sucks..and there's no evidence.

And still not even a _hint_ of any scientific evidence to back up your
hysterical ranting.

Why does this not surprise me?

'Bye.
Rich


For every proof posted for the existence of Noah's arc, I will provide
one proof against the existence of Noah's arc.

I'll begin:

Noah's arc doesn't exist because polar bears can't walk to the Arctic
from Noah's landing spot...on the Mountains of Ararat in Turkey!

Your turn..


D from BC
myrealaddress(at)comic(dot)com
BC, Canada
Posted to usenet sci.electronics.design

God being all powerful and all knowing moved them without effort. AKA
the swam.

So..you're saying God teleported the polar bears to the Arctic after
they got off Noah's arc
or.... the polar bears swam ~8000km from Turkey to the Artic?
You have evidence for this lunacy?

Naw, nothing so dramatic. They just floated around on the arctic ice
pack (which is floating anyway). No need to move them at all in the
first place.
lol...

If the world was flooded by rain, what was the weather in the Arctic?
Rain? Massive snow? Sunny sky?
If there were massive snow, the polar bears might get overwhelmed and
buried and killed by finalsolutionGod.
If that happened, scientists would discover many dead frozen polar
bears packed in snow all at the same depth and with the same
radiometric age.

2)
Noah's arc doesn't exist because the world has no geologic evidence of
suddenly being covered by water.


D from BC
myrealaddress(at)comic(dot)com
BC, Canada
Posted to usenet sci.electronics.design
4) Noah's arc doesn't exist because notsoperfectGod goofed up.
iows..It's like notsoperfectGod took a sh*t and flushed the
toilet(earth).

Designers often do it right the first time.
You don't see bridges getting blown up a week after completion.
But notsoperfectGod has to start over again from scratch with *help*
from Noah..


D from BC
myrealaddress(at)comic(dot)com
BC, Canada
Posted to usenet sci.electronics.design
 
NEW & SEALED APPLE IPOD TOUCH 8GB 2ND GEN MB528LL/A

FREE USPS PRIORITY MAIL! BONUS SOFTWARE! CASHBACK!

Click to go

http://rover.ebay.com/rover/1/711-53200-19255-0/1?type=4&campid=5336229480&toolid=10001&customid=&mpre=http%3A%2F%2Felectronics.shop.ebay.com%2Fitems%2FiPod-MP3-Players_%3FBrand%3DApple%252520iPod%26Product%252520Line%3DiPod%252520Touch%26Condition%3DNew%26_dmpt%3DOther_MP3_Players%26_fln%3D1%26_sacat%3D73839%26_ssov%3D1%26_trksid%3Dp3286.c0.m282%26_mPrRngCbx%3D1%26_udlo%3D179.91%26_udhi%3D267.99%26_qi%3DRTM547901



HELLO ALL AND WELCOME TO OUR BUY IT NOW FOR A BRAND NEW, 100% AUTHENTIC AND
SEALED APPLE IPOD TOUCH! ,
8GB MODEL!! This is the latest and greatest from Apple and the 2ND
Generation of this wonderful iPod!


As well, this is eligible for live.com's cashback. You can get this iPod for
about $186!
Please email us if you need assistance on getting the cashback rebate.


Click to go

http://rover.ebay.com/rover/1/711-53200-19255-0/1?type=4&campid=5336229480&toolid=10001&customid=&mpre=http%3A%2F%2Felectronics.shop.ebay.com%2Fitems%2FiPod-MP3-Players_%3FBrand%3DApple%252520iPod%26Product%252520Line%3DiPod%252520Touch%26Condition%3DNew%26_dmpt%3DOther_MP3_Players%26_fln%3D1%26_sacat%3D73839%26_ssov%3D1%26_trksid%3Dp3286.c0.m282%26_mPrRngCbx%3D1%26_udlo%3D179.91%26_udhi%3D267.99%26_qi%3DRTM547901



"Soundhaspriority" <nowhere@nowhere.com> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:C62ED760.C3F86%nowhere@nowhere.com...
"Soundhaspriority" <nowhere@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:wdmdnQpMe58GTZrXnZ2dnUVZ_hydnZ2d@giganews.com...

me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:eiff05pbi0257fqgv71hu4ie3c0cdtah15@4ax.com...
On Sun, 10 May 2009 10:51:20 -0700 (PDT), Greg Dixon
noxidgerg@gmail.com> wrote:

It could be argued that the quality of the PCM-D50 would be completely
masked by a tie-clip microphone. There are no really good tie-clip
mikes. If
you are determined to use such a mike, a low quality unit, may do just
as
well for you.

What about considering DPA's miniature microphone line? I've used the
4060 extensively and it's an excellent sounding mic that is also tie-
clippable. The 4060 is a high-sensitivity model and will pick up
quiet sounds, just as the OP wanted.

Who are DPA, can you quote a website? Can you give me the names / web
addresses of a few firms which you would recommend for easily
concealed tie clip microphones?

I would add that miniature microphones have characteristics which are not
displayed by the specs, such as handling noise, cord flexibility,
performance in different placements, damage resistance. Some microphones
are
regarded as having more "reach" than others. This site brings a lot of
that
out: http://www.kenstone.net/fcp_homepage/lavs_brockett.html .

I would then post a question to rec.arts.movies.production.sound, because
those people use this type of mike daily. I would post the question
myself,
but they don't respond to me anymore. They are annoyed that I have been
stalking several sound engineers over the years, and have conspired to
silence me.

It's not working.

Bob Morein
(310) 237-6511
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top