Driver to drive?

May 16, 2009

On May 15, 8:10 pm, Corbomite Carrie <Corbom...@maneuver.org> wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2009 07:33:23 -0700 (PDT), peterchowar...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 14, 7:25 pm, Corbomite Carrie <Corbom...@maneuver.org> wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2009 20:22:20 +0100, Baron <ba...@linuxmaniac.net> wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:

On Thu, 14 May 2009 08:25:40 -0400, Rich Webb
bbew...@mapson.nozirev.ten> wrote:

On Thu, 14 May 2009 12:05:41 +0100, Baron
baron.nos...@linuxmaniac.nospam.net> wrote:

Corbomite Carrie Inscribed thus:
...
You are as retarded as it gets in Usenet, boy!

PLONK

There's no point in announcing you're plonking him; that's the
reaction he wants, apparently.

Nope. If everyone would plonk NymNuts instead of troll-feeding him,
he'd be dead meat.

Please! Everyone join in.

Even less point of plonking just one out of the
several dozen (really) sockpuppets he uses.

Michael Terrell has recently been posting lists of recent aliases. See
Message-ID: <uf2dnT7rjZ4_vZjXnZ2dnUVZ_o2dn...@earthlink.com> for one.

So if your nntp client can't filter on the fields necessary to discard
all of them, you can at least "prime" your killfile with known
aliases.

Agent users contact me directly for "Jim's secret sauce"... it's
easier to filter NymNuts than you think ;-)

...Jim Thompson

I'd like to sample the sauce ! ;-)

This absolute retard Baron isn't even using Agent, yet he responds to
the ThompsonTard to get help.

This Baron retard knows about as much about Usenet as Casey Anthony
does about wading through her shit puddle she put herself into. Fucking
NIL. He's not a Linux Maniac, he's a goddamned newbie Linux maniac wanna
be. Bwuahahahhaahhahahahha!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

And you follow the Casey Anthony issue closely because it involves a
young child.

Your baseless conjecture is even more retarded than the last stupid post
you made, pussy boy.

You dream of all manner of kiddie porn, right creepo?

You need to refrain from looking in the mirror while you compose your
shithead petty pussy boy mouthings.

The thought of all that young flesh in nursery schools drive to to
swear off women, right?

You're an idiot.

Your end will come when an angered daddy sees
you watching his daughter and decides to slit off your puny dick and
stuff it down your throat.

You do know that gmail kills account like yours in a mere heartbeat for
stupid shit like this, right?

Just like we did back in the day to
charlie. How I wish you were there with me.

Charlie had more honor and more character than a retarded fuck like you
will ever have. A retarded fuck like you is very likely a proper
candidate for a war crimes tribunal. From your retarded remarks, that is
where an E-1 grade punk fuck retard like you belongs.

Sorry, chump, but you exposed yourself as a piece of shit right there..
You will never live that mistake down in this group. Expect it to be
brought up every time you decide to re-invade the group with more of your
retarded 4-F stupidity. Fuck off and die, you disgrace to the service.

I hope a boat person finds you and gives you back the behavior you
claim to have given his countrymen. You deserve a very slow, torturous
death for that stupidity. Nothing less. You have ZERO honor, and you
are a characterless bastard. This post you made here where you declare
what you did is evidence. You have admitted to committing crimes in
service. You will be reported, and I hope they investigate your retarded
ass. You define the word PUSSY, boy. You are what honorable servicemen
call a stain on the services.

Perhaps God will decide that what a chump, retarded PUSSY fuck like you
deserves senility and Alzheimers. That sure is what I am hoping for.

You have lost all credibility in this group, criminal.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

It's you Lever who is losing credibility. Now you're saying that
you're practically a war hero and are in a position to evaluate the
actions of others who have actually been in hot zones. I know quite a
few US forces personnel from more than one branch of the armed
services. Based on how you have presented and conducted yourself in
Usenet groups in which I have had the displeasure of seeing you rant
and rave, I feel confident that if you were actually ever in a
conflict zone with any of these fine soldiers, you would have been
fragged within a week. Hence, I can only conclude that your hints at
honorable service are false and purposely misleading. Shame on you.

May 16, 2009

On May 15, 8:33 pm, FatBytestard
<FatBytest...@somewheronyourharddrive.org> wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2009 12:21:46 -0700 (PDT), orville.forb...@personal.ro
wrote:

If he is half as intelligent as he constantly says he is here, then he
should not be surprised to confirm that he is actually a meek little
man, devoid of character, lacking self-esteem, who has no friends and
who sits at his computer looking for someone to talk to. His only
companion cannot speak and, even after being inflated, finds ways to
reject his advances. A long time ago, someone suggested ghe see Dr.
kavorkian. That makes the most sense to me.

Only because you are a total retard, boy.

The name is Kervorkian, dipshit. That says volumes about YOUR
intelligence. Mostly, it indicated the lack of intelligence that you
possess. Nice try though, you interloping, pussified retard.

But YOU are the one who sees a need to use multiple names here. Why
can't you stick with a single identity. Is it because as soon as you
make an arse of yourself with one nym, you shift to another to let the
obvious faux pas die down before attempting to use that ID again?
Don't bother. No matter what identity you select, you will always
take everything down to the lowest level. Lever is Lever no matter
what nym he tries to hide behind.

Michael A. Terrell · May 16, 2009

orville.forbush@personal.ro wrote:

It's you Lever who is losing credibility. Now you're saying that
you're practically a war hero and are in a position to evaluate the
actions of others who have actually been in hot zones. I know quite a
few US forces personnel from more than one branch of the armed
services. Based on how you have presented and conducted yourself in
Usenet groups in which I have had the displeasure of seeing you rant
and rave, I feel confident that if you were actually ever in a
conflict zone with any of these fine soldiers, you would have been
fragged within a week. Hence, I can only conclude that your hints at
honorable service are false and purposely misleading. Shame on you.

Maybe our little drag queen should become familiar with the 'Stolen
Valor Act'.

"The Stolen Valor Act of 2005 (the Act), signed into law by President
George W. Bush on December 20, 2006,[1] is a U.S. law that broadens the
provisions of previous U.S. law addressing the unauthorized wear,
manufacture, sale or claim (either written or verbal) of any military
decorations and medals. It is a federal misdemeanor offense, which
carries a punishment of imprisonment for not more than 1 year and/or a
fine; the scope previously covered only the Medal of Honor."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stolen_Valor_Act_of_2005

--
You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense!

TheKraken · May 16, 2009

On Fri, 15 May 2009 20:21:47 -0700 (PDT), orville.forbush@personal.ro
wrote:

It's you Lever who is losing credibility.

Really? An asswipe admits to having committed serious violation of his
oath and the UCMJ, and I call him on it, and you think you get to attack
me for that? You're an idiot.

Now you're saying that
you're practically a war hero

I never said any such thing. I stated that my service was honorable.

Your claims are not.

and are in a position to evaluate the
actions of others who have actually been in hot zones.

You have no clue where I have been.

I know quite a
few US forces personnel from more than one branch of the armed
services.

Good for you, Orville, The Retard Forbush.

Based on how you have presented and conducted yourself in
Usenet groups

Based on the fact that you do not know what the word "interloper"
means, I conclude that you should be ignored.

in which I have had the displeasure of seeing you rant
and rave,

You are the idiot that came into the group as an interloper and you
have not changed in that role since.You are pathetic. You are retarded.

I feel confident that if you were actually ever in a
conflict zone with any of these fine soldiers, you would have been
fragged within a week.

I feel confident that your conclusions are just as retarded as
everything else you have ever posted.

Hence, I can only conclude that your hints at
honorable service are false and purposely misleading.

My turds have more honor than an interloping bastard like you or a war
criminal like him ever will.

Shame on you.

You're retarded. Fuck you. Go interlope somewhere else.

FatBytestard · May 16, 2009

On Sat, 16 May 2009 03:27:38 GMT, dufus@bunghole.com (Richard Cranium)
wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2009 17:31:02 -0700, FatBytestard
FatBytestard@somewheronyourharddrive.org> wrote a load of
self-righteous bullshit:

Snip

You're acting like a keyboard Rambo again Archie. Tell me, do you
feel it was bad for US personnel to "torture" suspected terrorists?

We did no such thing.

The United States Military Forces has the best record in history for the
treatment of military detainees. You had better check your facts.

RoyLFuchs · May 16, 2009

On Sat, 16 May 2009 04:03:40 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
<mike.terrell@tardsrus.net> wrote:

orville.forbush@personal.ro wrote:

It's you Lever who is losing credibility. Now you're saying that
you're practically a war hero and are in a position to evaluate the
actions of others who have actually been in hot zones. I know quite a
few US forces personnel from more than one branch of the armed
services. Based on how you have presented and conducted yourself in
Usenet groups in which I have had the displeasure of seeing you rant
and rave, I feel confident that if you were actually ever in a
conflict zone with any of these fine soldiers, you would have been
fragged within a week. Hence, I can only conclude that your hints at
honorable service are false and purposely misleading. Shame on you.

Maybe our little drag queen should become familiar with the 'Stolen
Valor Act'.

"The Stolen Valor Act of 2005 (the Act), signed into law by President
George W. Bush on December 20, 2006,[1] is a U.S. law that broadens the
provisions of previous U.S. law addressing the unauthorized wear,
manufacture, sale or claim (either written or verbal) of any military
decorations and medals. It is a federal misdemeanor offense, which
carries a punishment of imprisonment for not more than 1 year and/or a
fine; the scope previously covered only the Medal of Honor."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stolen_Valor_Act_of_2005

I know that you are too retarded to address me directly, TerrellTard, but
if you had the balls to actually read what I posted, you would note that
no such claim was ever made.

Nice try though, pussy.

Richard Cranium · May 16, 2009

On Sat, 16 May 2009 03:54:12 -0700, FatBytestard
<FatBytestard@somewheronyourharddrive.org> wrote:

On Sat, 16 May 2009 03:27:38 GMT, dufus@bunghole.com (Richard Cranium)
wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2009 17:31:02 -0700, FatBytestard
FatBytestard@somewheronyourharddrive.org> wrote a load of
self-righteous bullshit:

Snip

You're acting like a keyboard Rambo again Archie. Tell me, do you
feel it was bad for US personnel to "torture" suspected terrorists?

We did no such thing.

The United States Military Forces has the best record in history for the
treatment of military detainees. You had better check your facts.

Now that is truly a revealing statement. In fact, in terms of it
offering up evidence explaining why you are the way you are on Usenet,
it runs a close second only to your earlier statement of celibacy.

Not that I give a shit if we put Mohammeds balls in a vise and slowly
tightened it until they popped. Hell, I'd even include placing an
M-80 in his wife's snatch, but they don't care much about their women.
Maybe the threat of explosives up their camel's and/or goat's ass
would work better. Being "good guys" is something adversaries have
always counted on as a weakness to exploit. Your "proud military"
speech elsewhere is sickening. When will we see your GI Joe identity?

ItsASecretDummy · May 16, 2009

On Sat, 16 May 2009 12:33:40 GMT, dufus@bunghole.com (Richard Cranium)
wrote:

On Sat, 16 May 2009 03:54:12 -0700, FatBytestard
FatBytestard@somewheronyourharddrive.org> wrote:

On Sat, 16 May 2009 03:27:38 GMT, dufus@bunghole.com (Richard Cranium)
wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2009 17:31:02 -0700, FatBytestard
FatBytestard@somewheronyourharddrive.org> wrote a load of
self-righteous bullshit:

Snip

You're acting like a keyboard Rambo again Archie. Tell me, do you
feel it was bad for US personnel to "torture" suspected terrorists?

We did no such thing.

The United States Military Forces has the best record in history for the
treatment of military detainees. You had better check your facts.

Now that is truly a revealing statement.

As if a retard like you is even qualified to make any such assessment.

In fact,

You know nothing of facts.

in terms

You know nothing of terms.

of it

You know nothing of it.

offering up evidence

You know nothing of evidence.

explaining

You are an explainer wanna be.

why you are the way you are on Usenet,

I am the way I am because of total retards like you, Cranium.

it runs a close second only to your earlier statement of celibacy.

Where is this statement you refer to?

Not that I give a shit if we put Mohammeds balls in a vise and slowly
tightened it until they popped.

You know nothing of giving a shit.

Hell, I'd even include placing an
M-80 in his wife's snatch,

You know nothing of snatches.

but they don't care much about their women.

You know nothing of women, particularly "their women", since most of
them were singular, non-indigenous invaders that came to the country with
a specific agenda to harm.

Maybe the threat of explosives up their camel's and/or goat's ass
would work better.

We were not at war with the Iraqi people, or their camels, or their
goats or their asses.

Being "good guys" is something adversaries have
always counted on as a weakness to exploit.

I think you are a goddamned retard.

Your "proud military"
speech elsewhere is sickening.

You horseshit here is right now, worldwide.

When will we see your GI Joe identity?

You ain't real bright, are ya boy?

Fred Abse · May 16, 2009

On Tue, 12 May 2009 15:24:51 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:

Now at device level (no behavioral)....

http://analog-innovations.com/SED/HammerDriver(J.Nagle)2.pdf

There's a problem with this, Jim. Your circuit works fine with a
continuous pulse train, but teletype isn't like that, it can have long
periods of no activity (constant Mark signal), then a few characters, then
more inactivity. The selector magnet must respond to the first drop to
Space (beginning of start bit) of the first character.

The idle state is constant Mark (positive or 0V, depending on whether it's
polar or neutral signaling).

John's approach does take account of this.

--
"Electricity is of two kinds, positive and negative. The difference
is, I presume, that one comes a little more expensive, but is more
durable; the other is a cheaper thing, but the moths get into it."
(Stephen Leacock)

Fred Abse · May 16, 2009

On Thu, 07 May 2009 10:16:12 -0700, John Nagle wrote:

The circuit seems to better snubbing at the selector magnet, to dump
the
energy when the magnet is turned off. But I'm holding off on that until
the model is realistic. For a real magnet, the R/C snubber shown is
sufficient.

Running a simulation here, I get a massive (400V plus) negative spike at
the coil on turnoff. I'd suggest replacing the RC snubber with a diode and
a 2k resistor, which will give the same falling time constant as the
original 120V "brute force" circuit, and reduce the -ve spike to around
-80V.

BTW, is there any reason for running your simulation at 75.75 baud, rather
than the 45.45 you said you would be running the machine at?

--
"Electricity is of two kinds, positive and negative. The difference
is, I presume, that one comes a little more expensive, but is more
durable; the other is a cheaper thing, but the moths get into it."
(Stephen Leacock)

Jim Thompson · May 16, 2009

On Sat, 16 May 2009 08:43:14 -0700, Fred Abse
<excretatauris@invalid.invalid> wrote:

On Tue, 12 May 2009 15:24:51 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:

Now at device level (no behavioral)....

http://analog-innovations.com/SED/HammerDriver(J.Nagle)2.pdf

There's a problem with this, Jim. Your circuit works fine with a
continuous pulse train, but teletype isn't like that, it can have long
periods of no activity (constant Mark signal), then a few characters, then
more inactivity. The selector magnet must respond to the first drop to
Space (beginning of start bit) of the first character.

The idle state is constant Mark (positive or 0V, depending on whether it's
polar or neutral signaling).

John's approach does take account of this.

Fred Abse · May 16, 2009

On Sat, 16 May 2009 09:10:20 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:

If "Mark" is current in the solenoid, it's fine.

On a neutral (current or no current) system, mark is no current.
Makes idling more economical.

--
"Electricity is of two kinds, positive and negative. The difference
is, I presume, that one comes a little more expensive, but is more
durable; the other is a cheaper thing, but the moths get into it."
(Stephen Leacock)

Jim Thompson · May 16, 2009

On Sat, 16 May 2009 09:25:47 -0700, Fred Abse
<excretatauris@invalid.invalid> wrote:

On Sat, 16 May 2009 09:10:20 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:

If "Mark" is current in the solenoid, it's fine.

On a neutral (current or no current) system, mark is no current.
Makes idling more economical.

Charlie E. · May 16, 2009

On Mon, 11 May 2009 11:32:19 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:

Archimedes' Lever wrote:

bill.sloman@ieee.org wrote:

We were, but cutting down on the chlorofluorocarbons seems to be doing
the trick.

You've obviously never seen the hole.

Quite a few suggest the hole was always there in the first place. It was
finding it that caused the panic.

Graham

Exactly! and those that jumped on the bandwagon suggesting that CFCs
were the cause, with the really complicated testing that they needed
to do to prove it!

Charlie

Fred Abse · May 16, 2009

On Sat, 16 May 2009 09:34:46 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:

Could the first "space" be made long?

The first space is the start bit from which the sample timing originates.
It's the usual start/stop protocol: One start bit, five NRZ data bits, 1.5
stop bits. The start bit trips the clutch that starts the reading
mechanism, which samples the position of the selector magnet at fixed
intervals. The mechanism resets after 5 bit intervals and the clutch
disengages. You can regard the idle condition as one long continuous stop
signal, it's actually only 1.5 bit intervals between successive characters
in a string.

Most machines have an adjustment to set the sampling window relative to
the start so as to get the sample on the flat part of the pulses.

I once had a teletype as printer for a TRS-80 (remember those?), using the
cassette motor relay for signaling. I think I've still got the Z80
assembly code somewhere.

--
"Electricity is of two kinds, positive and negative. The difference
is, I presume, that one comes a little more expensive, but is more
durable; the other is a cheaper thing, but the moths get into it."
(Stephen Leacock)

May 17, 2009

On May 16, 6:54 pm, Charlie E. <edmond...@ieee.org> wrote:

On Mon, 11 May 2009 11:32:19 +0100, Eeyore

rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Archimedes' Lever wrote:

bill.slo...@ieee.org wrote:

We were, but cutting down on the chlorofluorocarbons seems to be doing
the trick.

You've obviously never seen the hole.

Quite a few suggest the hole was always there in the first place. It was
finding it that caused the panic.

Graham

Exactly! and those that jumped on the bandwagon suggesting that CFCs
were the cause, with the really complicated testing that they needed
to do to prove it!

The chemistry involved is interesting - to put it mildly - but the
chemists who exploited the elaborate equipment that that already had
to elucidate what was going on don't seem to have become any more
famous than they were before they tackled that particular problem.

Care to name one? The one I have in mind refereed my Ph.D. thesis (and
liked it, which made pretty happy). A thoroughly admirable American.

--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen

JosephKK · May 17, 2009

On Sat, 16 May 2009 10:22:45 -0700, Fred Abse
<excretatauris@invalid.invalid> wrote:

On Sat, 16 May 2009 09:34:46 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:

Could the first "space" be made long?

The first space is the start bit from which the sample timing originates.
It's the usual start/stop protocol: One start bit, five NRZ data bits, 1.5
stop bits. The start bit trips the clutch that starts the reading
mechanism, which samples the position of the selector magnet at fixed
intervals. The mechanism resets after 5 bit intervals and the clutch
disengages. You can regard the idle condition as one long continuous stop
signal, it's actually only 1.5 bit intervals between successive characters
in a string.

Punched tapes could reliably achieve this tightness of character
separation. Manual typists had much more jitter in start to start.
The system is truly asynchronous between characters. Intra character
timing was created by steady speed electromechanical means.

Most machines have an adjustment to set the sampling window relative to
the start so as to get the sample on the flat part of the pulses.

I once had a teletype as printer for a TRS-80 (remember those?), using the
cassette motor relay for signaling. I think I've still got the Z80
assembly code somewhere.

JosephKK · May 17, 2009

On Thu, 14 May 2009 23:30:17 -0700, D from BC
<myrealaddress@comic.com> wrote:

On Thu, 14 May 2009 14:24:00 -0600, qrus19@mindspring.com wrote:

On Thu, 14 May 2009 00:30:52 -0700, D from BC
myrealaddress@comic.com> wrote:

On Wed, 13 May 2009 22:26:10 -0600, qrus19@mindspring.com wrote:

On Wed, 13 May 2009 18:23:38 -0700, D from BC
myrealaddress@comic.com> wrote:

On Wed, 13 May 2009 21:10:24 GMT, Rich the Philosophizer
philosobphizer@example.net> wrote:

On Tue, 12 May 2009 15:26:19 -0700, D from BC wrote:

Show me proof for Noah's arc and I'll show you proof that all animals
didn't come from the same spot.

I don't have to. I don't make any claims about Noah's ark.

Best not too.. Noah's evidence is so thin that the existence for Darth
Vader is better.

You're the one who is wildly, stridently proclaiming that there couldn't
possibly be any Power Greater Than Yourself, and demanding "scientific
proof" of "fairy tales" from those who believe otherwise.

Yes, I do claim there's no quasihyperhomosapienGod based on the
scientific evidence.
Yes, I do demand people to prove their fairy tales.

Well, put your money where your mouth is! Start coming up with some
scientific proofs of your own!

Otherwise, shut your pie hole, dipstick.

Thanks,
Rich

And Noah has once again made someone resort to pie hole dipstick name
calling..

Religion is division.

Noah sucks..and there's no evidence.

D from BC
myrealaddress(at)comic(dot)com
BC, Canada
Posted to usenet sci.electronics.design

As evidence of a higher being one farther above humans than we are
above the ameba I offer the miricle that is human thought. As
evideince that said being doesn't exist I offer the miracle that is
human thought. oops same proof now what do I do I know the supreme
being likes to play jokes on humans as evidience of this I offer Bill
S , Eyore and the arguements for and against those who have faith in
said supreme being.

I'll try to translate the above...
'We think therefore there is a God' ..<<Is that it?
That's the evidence?

Human thought began as a mutation for survival.
The more thinking the better the survival.

The unique feature of thinking is not evidence for a we.so.specialGod.

Many other creatures have unique features.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamprey
Studies reported in Nature suggest that lampreys have a unique type of
immune system with parts that are unrelated to the antibodies found in
mammals.

D from BC
myrealaddress(at)comic(dot)com
BC, Canada
Posted to usenet sci.electronics.design

Ok good translation of line one.

How about lines two and three?

They need to be written better.

And by the by so far as we can tell intelligence actually does make us
better at survival, unless of course we kill ourselves off with
something our intelligence develops. D from BC I really don't care if
you are an atheist but I do dislike the fact that those who are
atheist demand that those that believe in God or Shiva or Gia or *Add
diety* here not believe or are stupid.

Christianity teaches how to think defectively. Defective thinking
people are only good at sayyy... flipping burgers at McDonalds.

D from BC
myrealaddress(at)comic(dot)com
BC, Canada
Posted to usenet sci.electronics.design

Along the way i have met serious Christians who can clean your clock
in engineering. I strongly suspect that even i can beat you soundly.
These persons cleaned my clock repeatedly. They are a bit rare
though.

JosephKK · May 17, 2009

On Thu, 14 May 2009 12:20:24 -0800, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
<paul@hovnanian.com> wrote:

Nobody wrote:

On Thu, 14 May 2009 09:41:10 -0700, Paul Hovnanian P.E. wrote:

Actually, how are you supposed to pull away on the flat? I know that, in
practice, most people just use the footbrake. But if you do that on the UK
driving test, you'll fail; you're not supposed to release the handbrake
until the clutch bites (i.e. no freewheeling at any point).

[Note to Rich: heel-and-toe will also cause you to fail. Pedals aren't
supposed to be operated with the heel.]

You take the test with an automatic transmission.

If you do that in the UK, you get a driving licence only allows you to
drive vehicles with automatic transmission. This would be a significant
drawback when 90% of cars (and nearly all vans) have manual transmission,
so very few people do so.

Interesting. I didn't know they made such distinctions on licenses over
there.

Here in the USA, although we do have a 'commercial drivers license'
class for people who drive large trucks commercially, one can drive the
same sized vehicle for personal use (even licensed as a 'passenger car')
with no special license endorsements. Stick shifts, vehicle size,
trailers, nothing dealing with vehicle characteristics requires a
special license. Except motorcycles.

Not quite. It requires a higher level drivers' license to drive a
roadway vehicle with air brakes, or more than one trailer.

D from BC · May 17, 2009

On Sat, 16 May 2009 18:48:57 -0700,
"JosephKK"<quiettechblue@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Thu, 14 May 2009 23:30:17 -0700, D from BC
myrealaddress@comic.com> wrote:

On Thu, 14 May 2009 14:24:00 -0600, qrus19@mindspring.com wrote:

On Thu, 14 May 2009 00:30:52 -0700, D from BC
myrealaddress@comic.com> wrote:

On Wed, 13 May 2009 22:26:10 -0600, qrus19@mindspring.com wrote:

On Wed, 13 May 2009 18:23:38 -0700, D from BC
myrealaddress@comic.com> wrote:

On Wed, 13 May 2009 21:10:24 GMT, Rich the Philosophizer
philosobphizer@example.net> wrote:

On Tue, 12 May 2009 15:26:19 -0700, D from BC wrote:

Show me proof for Noah's arc and I'll show you proof that all animals
didn't come from the same spot.

I don't have to. I don't make any claims about Noah's ark.

Best not too.. Noah's evidence is so thin that the existence for Darth
Vader is better.

You're the one who is wildly, stridently proclaiming that there couldn't
possibly be any Power Greater Than Yourself, and demanding "scientific
proof" of "fairy tales" from those who believe otherwise.

Yes, I do claim there's no quasihyperhomosapienGod based on the
scientific evidence.
Yes, I do demand people to prove their fairy tales.

Well, put your money where your mouth is! Start coming up with some
scientific proofs of your own!

Otherwise, shut your pie hole, dipstick.

Thanks,
Rich

And Noah has once again made someone resort to pie hole dipstick name
calling..

Religion is division.

Noah sucks..and there's no evidence.

D from BC
myrealaddress(at)comic(dot)com
BC, Canada
Posted to usenet sci.electronics.design

As evidence of a higher being one farther above humans than we are
above the ameba I offer the miricle that is human thought. As
evideince that said being doesn't exist I offer the miracle that is
human thought. oops same proof now what do I do I know the supreme
being likes to play jokes on humans as evidience of this I offer Bill
S , Eyore and the arguements for and against those who have faith in
said supreme being.

I'll try to translate the above...
'We think therefore there is a God' ..<<Is that it?
That's the evidence?

Human thought began as a mutation for survival.
The more thinking the better the survival.

The unique feature of thinking is not evidence for a we.so.specialGod.

Many other creatures have unique features.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamprey
Studies reported in Nature suggest that lampreys have a unique type of
immune system with parts that are unrelated to the antibodies found in
mammals.

D from BC
myrealaddress(at)comic(dot)com
BC, Canada
Posted to usenet sci.electronics.design

Ok good translation of line one.

How about lines two and three?

They need to be written better.

And by the by so far as we can tell intelligence actually does make us
better at survival, unless of course we kill ourselves off with
something our intelligence develops. D from BC I really don't care if
you are an atheist but I do dislike the fact that those who are
atheist demand that those that believe in God or Shiva or Gia or *Add
diety* here not believe or are stupid.

Christianity teaches how to think defectively. Defective thinking
people are only good at sayyy... flipping burgers at McDonalds.

D from BC
myrealaddress(at)comic(dot)com
BC, Canada
Posted to usenet sci.electronics.design

Along the way i have met serious Christians who can clean your clock
in engineering. I strongly suspect that even i can beat you soundly.
These persons cleaned my clock repeatedly. They are a bit rare
though.

I want you and all of them to post this..

I ________ believe Noah's arc is absolutely true, actually happened
for real and is a historic fact.

I__________ reject all scientific evidence that disproves the story of
Noah's arc.
And I can wear the above written on a T-shirt during a technology
convention.

Most Christians are ignorant of their religion.

D from BC
myrealaddress(at)comic(dot)com
BC, Canada
Posted to usenet sci.electronics.design

Driver to drive?

Guest

Guest

Michael A. Terrell

Guest

TheKraken

Guest

FatBytestard

Guest

RoyLFuchs

Guest

Richard Cranium

Guest

ItsASecretDummy

Guest

Fred Abse

Guest

Fred Abse

Guest

Jim Thompson

Guest

Fred Abse

Guest

Jim Thompson

Guest

Charlie E.

Guest

Fred Abse

Guest

Guest

JosephKK

Guest

JosephKK

Guest

JosephKK

Guest

D from BC

Guest

Log in

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor