T
The Last Mimsy
Guest
On Thu, 14 May 2009 23:30:17 -0700, D from BC <myrealaddress@comic.com>
wrote:
post is far more damaging to the group, Usenet on the whole, and mankind
in general.
Also funny is that even with the most basic statistics, your utterly
retarded remarks are proven wrong.
wrote:
Funny that these dopes call me a troll, and filter me, but the CRAP youOn Thu, 14 May 2009 14:24:00 -0600, qrus19@mindspring.com wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2009 00:30:52 -0700, D from BC
myrealaddress@comic.com> wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2009 22:26:10 -0600, qrus19@mindspring.com wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2009 18:23:38 -0700, D from BC
myrealaddress@comic.com> wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2009 21:10:24 GMT, Rich the Philosophizer
philosobphizer@example.net> wrote:
On Tue, 12 May 2009 15:26:19 -0700, D from BC wrote:
Show me proof for Noah's arc and I'll show you proof that all animals
didn't come from the same spot.
I don't have to. I don't make any claims about Noah's ark.
Best not too.. Noah's evidence is so thin that the existence for Darth
Vader is better.
You're the one who is wildly, stridently proclaiming that there couldn't
possibly be any Power Greater Than Yourself, and demanding "scientific
proof" of "fairy tales" from those who believe otherwise.
Yes, I do claim there's no quasihyperhomosapienGod based on the
scientific evidence.
Yes, I do demand people to prove their fairy tales.
Well, put your money where your mouth is! Start coming up with some
scientific proofs of your own!
Otherwise, shut your pie hole, dipstick.
Thanks,
Rich
And Noah has once again made someone resort to pie hole dipstick name
calling..
Religion is division.
Noah sucks..and there's no evidence.
D from BC
myrealaddress(at)comic(dot)com
BC, Canada
Posted to usenet sci.electronics.design
As evidence of a higher being one farther above humans than we are
above the ameba I offer the miricle that is human thought. As
evideince that said being doesn't exist I offer the miracle that is
human thought. oops same proof now what do I do I know the supreme
being likes to play jokes on humans as evidience of this I offer Bill
S , Eyore and the arguements for and against those who have faith in
said supreme being.
I'll try to translate the above...
'We think therefore there is a God' ..<<Is that it?
That's the evidence?
Human thought began as a mutation for survival.
The more thinking the better the survival.
The unique feature of thinking is not evidence for a we.so.specialGod.
Many other creatures have unique features.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamprey
Studies reported in Nature suggest that lampreys have a unique type of
immune system with parts that are unrelated to the antibodies found in
mammals.
D from BC
myrealaddress(at)comic(dot)com
BC, Canada
Posted to usenet sci.electronics.design
Ok good translation of line one.
How about lines two and three?
They need to be written better.
And by the by so far as we can tell intelligence actually does make us
better at survival, unless of course we kill ourselves off with
something our intelligence develops. D from BC I really don't care if
you are an atheist but I do dislike the fact that those who are
atheist demand that those that believe in God or Shiva or Gia or *Add
diety* here not believe or are stupid.
Christianity teaches how to think defectively. Defective thinking
people are only good at sayyy... flipping burgers at McDonalds.
D from BC
myrealaddress(at)comic(dot)com
BC, Canada
Posted to usenet sci.electronics.design
post is far more damaging to the group, Usenet on the whole, and mankind
in general.
Also funny is that even with the most basic statistics, your utterly
retarded remarks are proven wrong.