Driver to drive?

On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:36:15 -0600, krw <krw@att.zzzzzzzzz> wrote:

In article <k2iqm4ljrbp0kt450u9fbu7ujtvb5bf8nf@4ax.com>,
spam@spam.com says...
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:41:49 -0800, Archimedes' Lever
OneBigLever@InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote:


Look, you dopey, retarded fuckhead... There are IC chips in the
military that you have no clue about, and there are assemblies as well.

An IC chip is not a mainboard. Did I write that nothing man
has ever built had 100 or more layers? No. It seems both
of us should have been more clear on what we meant.

You *DID* say that 2-layers was all there was before 1980, which
shows your absolute ignorance on the subject. 2-layer boards may
have been the norm for consumer electronics (hell, some VCRs are
only one now) but there is obviously a big world out there you have
no clue about. ...and apparently want to keep it that way.
As a technician i was working on 4 and 6 layer boards by 1973. Flat
packs everywhere. A few had as many as 80 leads. Daisy and Mentor
were booming new businesses.
 
Thanks.
my application is simple. I have few passive components and and
amplifier on a PCB board. I would like to see how the currents flowing
there sets up the field and influence each other. Passive components
are inductor, capacitor and an op amp. Frequency range of interest is
50kHz to 100MHz..its not that high frequency.

Kristo
 
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:01:30 -0500, kony <spam@spam.com> wrote:

On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:26:18 -0800, Archimedes' Lever
OneBigLever@InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote:

On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:09:24 -0500, kony <spam@spam.com> wrote:


You don't seem to know much then.


I have decades more experience and knowledge than you do.

At trolling, farting, or looking like an idiot?

How many decades? You must think the average usenet
participant is 20 years old. Maybe in '75. Try again, it's
pretty unlikely the average age around here is even 10 years
your junior, all the kids use the web instead of usenet.
It wasn't that low in '75 and it wasn't that low in '83. Nor have i
found it to be that low since '83. Average age on Internet is
currently about 20, average age on usenet seems to be about mid 40s.
 
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:09:54 -0500, kony <spam@spam.com> wrote:

On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:48:21 -0800, Archimedes' Lever
OneBigLever@InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote:

On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:19:49 -0500, kony <spam@spam.com> wrote:

Besides that,
if the chipset supported the addt'l ports, and once the OP
had the needed capacitors, it was a 4 to 10 minute job.


Doesn't matter if the chipset has it if the BIOS doesn't dumbass.

How little you know about modular bios.

Find a different board with the same set of chips and you
don't even have to use the same bios! There are also tools
to reenable hidden features. They do not write a custom
bios for every board that has only minor changes, they just
add or subtract modules and hide features.

What you are failing to grasp is why the OP suspected the
mod was possible, because he, and I, and others, have
already seen and done such things in the past.
To say the least. Both Award and Phoenix bioses were modular by the
late 1970s. I used Phoenix in a knock off product back then.
 
So far, i am forced to use the SVGA driver which Win98SE does not
like either, and restore 800x600 16 colors which is the best i have been
able to do so far.
Now, the motherboard has its own video chip, disabled in the BIOS so
that the video card can work.
But it seems that Nvidia drivers do not see the GeForce 8400GS
daughter board, and so stops looking when it sees the motherboard chip
(unknown type so far).
The NV8269 driver does support the GeForce board in Win88SE, but does
not see it and if forced, does not give anything better than 640x480 16
colors (ugh!).
By using an old DOS version of AMIDIAG i found that VESA mode 103
(600x800 256 colors) *is* supported.
But the universal driver from Anapa Corp, giving VBE Miniport SVGA
etc types of support *also* does not give anything better than 640x480
16 colors (ugh!).
So, i am back to the WinDoze SVGA driver.
Now, there is UNIVBE.DRV which i could try, but how does one tell the
driver to "default" to mode 103?
Or do i continue to bumble along, load it "plain" and HexSpearmint?
*
Any suggestions?
Thanks.
 
"Richard The Dreaded Libertarian" <null@example.net> wrote in message
news:pan.2009.01.15.20.21.18.430560@example.net...
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:19:42 +0000, James Arthur wrote:

Problem is, we've got too many Pauls, not enough Peters, and that's why
we're having trouble paying the Bills.

Too many socialists with the "authority" to rob Peter.

Thanks,
Rich
So are you calling republicans socialists now too? Because the people that
did all the spending of Peter's money are republicans. That means you not
only call Democrats socialists but you have to include the republicans too
because they spent all the money during Bush's presidency when all the wild
spending happened. But I don't think many people will agree with you calling
the majority of Americans socialists.
So your point is stupid.

Hawke

>
 
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 05:16:54 -0800, Robert Baer
<robertbaer@localnet.com> wrote:

Sylvia Else wrote:

Robert Baer wrote:

JeffM wrote:

Robert Baer wrote:

Remember i am on dial-up so a long file (>2megs) takes a long time
and the longer the time, the more likely it can be trashed or lost.

http://www.mdgx.com/files/NV8269.EXE which is about 14Megs
[...]always terminates somewhere in the middle[...]
I tried GetIt Right, and it instantly dies with a 403.


Assuming you mean GetRight (the download manager),
a 403 means that the referring page isn't what those guys require.
(aka: We're anal and you have to do it OUR way--no leaching or
linking.)
A download manager doesn't give a referring page, so you're stuck.

Find a neighbor/friend with a fast connection and a CD burner.

Someone was *VERY* kind and sent me the file broken into 500K UUE
files.
After stripping off the (variable length) e-mail headers and the 4
blank lines at the end, and *then* combining to a large (21,364150
bytes) file, i was able to decode to a decent EXE (untried so far).


That seems rather large.

Don't run it unless you trust the person who sent it to you. It could
easily be a trojan horse.

Sylvia.
It may seem to be large, but this is ASCII characters which makes it
larger; the decoded EXE is 14,903 Kbytes in size.
You and i have worked reasonably well together before. My respect for
you and how you act in this ng gives you a substantial friend score.
So my offer is like this: You want a file, email me and physically
send media; RW or extendable strongly preferred, and i send it back
with the requested files on it. I have rewriters all the way to dual
layer DVD (9GB). Part of the idea is to reuse the media, may be
foolish versus postage though.
 
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:08:43 -0700, Jim Thompson
<To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@My-Web-Site.com> wrote:

On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 14:14:45 -0800, Joerg
notthisjoergsch@removethispacbell.net> wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
You enjoy quick cars don't you ? Go on, I dare you. You ought to be able
to get one as a personal import hopefully.

Just imagine leaving those 'muscle cars' at the lights. This is the 'Q
car' par excellence !
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sleeper_(car)

" Smart cars have been modified by Brabus of Germany, resulting in
Brabus production models. Other companies modify the Smart to use
motorcycle engines, such as the Suzuki Hayabusa 1340 cc inline
four-cylinder. These cars are known as Smartuki. The most powerful
models can accelerate from 0 to 60 mph (0 to 100 km/h) in less than 3.5
seconds."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart_(automobile)#Modification

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5S1NAMnYKM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=84e4Cl5naZI


In Aachen, Germany, someone had a (registered!) Citroen 2CV which was
"slightly" modified. It had a souped-up Citroen XM engine in there. The
only difference was that it had a steel roof but nobody could notice
because the old canvas top was glued over that. I've never seen it in
action but was told that it gave a lot of BMW drivers a good dose of
frustration.

Here in AZ I've seen VW Beetles that were fitted with Porsche engines.
Aren't German police cars normally so fitted?

I also know of one that was fitted with an Air Research (now
Honeywell) APU turbine.

...Jim Thompson
Back in the mid '60 my older brother's friend had a VW fitted with a
Porsche engine.
 
On Jan 14, 7:27 pm, "Joel Koltner" <zapwireDASHgro...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
m...@sushi.com> wrote in message

news:8a46e3d5-2e55-46ff-aab7-d9b114e32182@q30g2000prq.googlegroups.com...
"The nice thing about controller chips is a thousand customers have
flogged the design by the time you get to use it."

Yeah, but don't you think that about 900 of them probably just used the exact
example circuit shown on the first page of the data sheet? :)

What kind of ICs do you design, Miso?

---Joel
MIxed mode analog.
 
["Followup-To:" header set to sci.electronics.design.]
Skybuck Flying wrote:
The 20 euro bill I put in microwave was from 2001 and seemed to contain a
rf-chip, I am not sure though but I am bit worried about that ! ;)
Must have been a counterfeit one. The real Euro bills don't have RFID
chips.

robert
 
In article <7930n4pvr9vc1o3i8q9t09vapt0jv9vhea@4ax.com>,
quiettechblue@yahoo.com says...>
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:36:15 -0600, krw <krw@att.zzzzzzzzz> wrote:

In article <k2iqm4ljrbp0kt450u9fbu7ujtvb5bf8nf@4ax.com>,
spam@spam.com says...
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:41:49 -0800, Archimedes' Lever
OneBigLever@InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote:


Look, you dopey, retarded fuckhead... There are IC chips in the
military that you have no clue about, and there are assemblies as well.

An IC chip is not a mainboard. Did I write that nothing man
has ever built had 100 or more layers? No. It seems both
of us should have been more clear on what we meant.

You *DID* say that 2-layers was all there was before 1980, which
shows your absolute ignorance on the subject. 2-layer boards may
have been the norm for consumer electronics (hell, some VCRs are
only one now) but there is obviously a big world out there you have
no clue about. ...and apparently want to keep it that way.


As a technician i was working on 4 and 6 layer boards by 1973. Flat
packs everywhere. A few had as many as 80 leads. Daisy and Mentor
were booming new businesses.
No surprise. It seems Kony is the only one who thinks multilayer
boards are the latest fad. We had our own design system. I didn't
use any third party design software until '99. In college (before
'74) the "design system" was tape on paper.
 
Eeyore wrote:
Clifford Heath wrote:

Paul wrote:
Anyhow, what kind of circuit are they using in this AM-240? It
appears as if it *resists* change!
It's almost certainly a bootstrapped input amplifier, with the
bootstrap gain slightly over unity.

Damn you reminded me.

Hah ! Bootstrapping ! You have to be careful in critical apps but I did
one 24 yrs ago with 100M input Z. Very few app notes mention it. In fact
I reckon I worked this one out for myself.

Graham
It was invented in World War II to get rid of the cable capacitance in
hydrophones--the original name was 'ghost repeater'. It's a great help
with frequency response but generally doesn't do much for the SNR. Of
course in a scope that usually isn't such a worry.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs
 
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 20:12:24 -0800 (PST), "krishmaniac@hotmail.com"
<krishmaniac@hotmail.com> wrote:

Thanks.
my application is simple. I have few passive components and and
amplifier on a PCB board. I would like to see how the currents flowing
there sets up the field and influence each other. Passive components
are inductor, capacitor and an op amp. Frequency range of interest is
50kHz to 100MHz..its not that high frequency.

Kristo
Magnetic interactions are unlikely in a situation like this, with just
one inductor. I'd not bother.

John
 
Gunner Asch wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 14:53:04 -0500, cavelamb himself
cavelamb@Xearthlink.net> wrote:


I have 10 extra tickets for the Robbie Knievel event at
"The Swamp" in Gainesville next weekend if anybody wants them.

He's going to try to jump 500 Obama supporters with a bull dozer.



Here! Here!!!



Political Correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional,
illogical liberal minority, and rabidly promoted by an
unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the
proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.

Today's e-mail brought me these:


Daffynitions:

Arbitrator: A cook that leaves Arby's to work at McDonalds

Avoidable: What a bullfighter tries to do.

Bernadette: The act of torching a mortgage.

Burglarize: What a crook sees with.

Control: A short, ugly inmate.

Counterfeiters: Workers who install kitchen counters

Eclipse: What an English barber does for a living.

Eyedropper: A clumsy ophthalmologist.

Heroes: What a guy in a boat does.

Left Bank: What the robber did when his bag was full of loot.

Misty: How golfers create divots.

Paradox: Two physicians

Parasites: What you see from the top of the Eiffel Tower

Pharmacist: A helper on the farm.

Polarize: What penguins see with.

Primate: Removing your spouse from in front of the TV

Relief: What trees do in the Spring.

Rubberneck: What you do to relax your wife.

Seamstress: Describes 250 pounds in a size 6 dress.

Selfish: What the owner of a seafood store does.

Sudafed: Brought litigation against a government official.

Subdued: Like, a guy who, like, works on one of those, like, submarines,
man.

Jeff
--
Jeffry Wisnia
(W1BSV + Brass Rat '57 EE)
The speed of light is 1.8*10^12 furlongs per fortnight.
 
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:53:16 GMT, "David L. Jones" <altzone@gmail.com>
wrote:

pseidel78@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:e665943f-f69f-4ec1-bda4-7ec54888f5a6@o40g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
Is a degree from DeVry University just as good as a degree from
California State University. CA state calls it B.S. Electrical
Engineering versus DeVry calls it B.S. Electrical Engineering
Technology.

DeVry Faster, More Expensive

State University Takes longer, Less Expensive

It doesn't matter at all.
Smart employers want someone who can do the job, and who fit in with their
corporate culture, nothing else matters. It makes no difference where you
did your degree, or even if you have a degree at all in many cases.
There are a few anal retentive exceptions of course, but they are best
avoided anyway.

Dave.
Simple. Manager looks at resume. Sees Devry, files resume in
circular file.

Unless there is something in experience, like 10 years of experience
in field, military training, or ham radio that might make him think
you actually have a clue.

Charlie
 
John Larkin wrote:

On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:18:44 -0800 (PST), bulegoge@columbus.rr.com
wrote:

On Jan 12, 7:05 pm, "Bill Sloman" <bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote:
a7yvm109gf...@netzero.com> schreef in

berichtnews:004b248a-7863-4ca8-afaa-7ee4c0d75a8e@j39g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...





Hi gang,
I'm trying to find out why people use CPWs on PCBs.
I'm looking into improving the rise-time performance of a PCB. It is
currently using microstrip on 6.6mils of Rogers 4450B, with a ground
plane right underneath.
We are launching a 50ps step and getting 150ps out at the other end.
The path is about 5 inches long, an 11 mils trace with a nominal
impedance of 50ohms.
The test report from the PCB shop shows we are within 5% of 50ohms.
This is measured, not calculated.
The 150ps figure comes from the lab. Our early simulations showed
there would be rise-time degradation, but not at this level.
So I'm trying to educate myself on CPWs, I'm reading Microwave
Engineering by Pozar.

But I'd like a pre-digested answer like: it makes no difference, it
helps in the high frequencies, your 11mil traces are too thin, etc...
TIA

For what it is worth, strip-line - a track routed over ground-plane -
is intrinsically dispersive. Microstrip - a track routed on an inner
layer between two ground planes - is not.

--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I think you have your terms backwards there. I use microstrip all the
time (a track routed over the groundplane , but exposed). You can
combine lumped elements to the circuits. All power transistors that I
have used are matched into microstrip circuits.

It is a legitimate , bonified, transmission line, like a coax or
strip line.

He's right that microstrip is dispersive, but that's not the major
risetime-loss contributor in the op's situation. On a given board
stackup, stripline is generally lossier... the trace will be skinnier,
the dielectric layers thinner, and any pcb dielectric is lossier than
air. Not to mention the vias.

John
Why is microstrip dispersive, and how much? (excluding poor dielectrics with
frequency-dependent dielectric constant of course)

Chris
 
"Chris Jones" <lugnut808@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:B79cl.4978$iX1.3732@newsfe24.ams2...
Why is microstrip dispersive, and how much?
http://www.microwaves101.com/encyclopedia/dispersion.cfm
 
"MooseFET
"Phil Allison"
He won't now go back and read your
earlier posts and realize that he is wrong,

** You LYING piece of autistic SHIT !!!!

YOU misread what had been posted and YOU will not go back and look at it
again.

Nope, I'm right and you are wrong.

** ROTFL !!

What moronic CRAPOLOGY !!!

You have no explanation at all - you

You LYING PILE of autistic SHIT !!!!




...... Phil
 
"MooseFET = total MORON "
Raveninghorde

And CFL lamps have typical power factor of 0.5. That is twice as much
power has to be generated as you would expect from the lamps power
rating.
The power factor does not mean that extra power must be created. They
draw lagging current so the power company needs to connect more power
factor correction capacitors.


** This STILL completely WRONG !!

And the BULL- SHITTING SCUMBAG will not correct it.

Mooooooooooooooossssssssssssssss




....... Phil
 
"Moronic Cunt FET"


The situation isn't so simple. The power factor sense of a CFL depends
on the type of ballast it has. An electromagnetic ballast introduces a
lagging power factor, which is a problem, but an electronic ballast
usually has a leading power factor.
That depends a lot on the sort of ballast. The two tube ones often
are near unity power factor.

** HUH ?????????

What the FUCK has that got to do with CFLs ??



You can still find some fixtures that
use them. Almost all now use electronic ballasts. Next time you go
into the local Ace hardware store, take a look at the name plates on
the replacement ballasts.

** HUH ?????????

What the FUCK has that got to do with CFLs ??

YOU FUCKING QUADRUPED MORON

Moooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooossss




....... Phil
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top