Driver to drive?

Eeyore wrote:

john jardine wrote:
[...]
Servo arrangement summat like this?.
http://img518.imageshack.us/my.php?image=eloadte9.png
[An 'electronic load' project (scrapped). Occasionally blew opamps
consequent to particular dynamics on the Red wire. Traced to Drain/gate
feedback transients coupled with slightly dissimilar current source slew
rates.]

Surely would have been fixable with a reverse biased diode from op-amp o/p to V+
and another one from the - i/p to ground, but you'd have needed a small series
R.

Graham
Yes. Fitted. The diodes only helped. Fast 30~40V, (external) incoming
edges through the Cgd's caused lock-up of one section, quickly
noticed by the others, nett result a few uS of chaotic transient
oscillations (and Cgd pumping) as they all settled into step. A few nH
of series strays didn't help either. A LF 'dominant pole' fixed the
problem but the setup was numb out beyond a few kc hence useless as a
'load'. Did the job at the time but would rethink next time round.
 
Jamie wrote:

Well good, does that mean we'll see a lot less of your vile here?
One of the few truly vile people round here is you.

Did you even bother following the links ?

Graham
 
Jamie wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
"Michael A. Terrell" wrote

Personally, I think any 'reverb' sucks.

Your personal opinion in this matter is irrelevant.

Your personal opinion in this matter is irrelevant, like in most
things you post. Reveb sucks. Period. It was done to death, along
with Echo effects and other novelty garbage 40+ years ago. Its just
another annoying form of distortion.

The whole audio industry disagrees with you. I doubt you've even heard a
good modern reverb or ADT. It's not springs any more you know.

I'm glad you have graduated out of the spring technology..

What is it now? 8 Track Endless loops?
Don't be stupid.

How much DSP code have YOU written ? I can tell you, when I took it on I
though it would be a challenge. Not writing the code per se, that's easy
enough but making it sound so right that reviewers glow over it.

Graham
 
Eeyore wrote:

Jamie wrote:


Eeyore wrote:

Jamie wrote:


Being it's audio, there shouldn't be any legality issues since that
field has no secrets, you twit!

My DSP reverb code is definitely secret. Just to take one tiny example.


Cough, Cough.................................


And how much DSP reverb code have you written ?
http://www.studiomaster.com/products/162bpx.htm
http://www.studiomaster.com/products/C3&C3X.htm
http://www.studiomaster.com/products/VMS.htm
http://www.studiomaster.com/reviews/c3x-0205a.pdf
http://www.studiomaster.com/reviews/c3x-0205b.pdf
http://www.studiomaster.com/reviews/c3x-0505.pdf



Jesus Christ...

Who the hell would want your reverb code.


The MD of the company I used to consult for who's now desperate to have me
back. However I've also pretty much committed to another project last Monday.

Graham

Well good, does that mean we'll see a lot less of your vile here?


http://webpages.charter.net/jamie_5"
 
Eeyore wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:


Eeyore wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:


Personally, I think any 'reverb' sucks.

Your personal opinion in this matter is irrelevant.

Your personal opinion in this matter is irrelevant, like in most
things you post. Reveb sucks. Period. It was done to death, along
with Echo effects and other novelty garbage 40+ years ago. Its just
another annoying form of distortion.


The whole audio industry disagrees with you. I doubt you've even heard a
good modern reverb or ADT. It's not springs any more you know.

Graham

I'm glad you have graduated out of the spring technology..

What is it now? 8 Track Endless loops?


http://webpages.charter.net/jamie_5"
 
"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:48FE3BAF.7E70B8A3@hotmail.com...
[...]
Was this even with schottkies ?

Graham

Never progressed beyond Silicon diodes.
Opamps have CMOS output stages. Couldn't see a schottky threshold helping.
Problem looks simple enough to sort (trivial even!) but have picked up a
sixth sense over the years about the time and effort involved on 'working in
the margins', so am not averse to calling a halt.(Unless of course a
customer is paying for the investigation :)
 
Eeyore wrote:

Jamie wrote:


Eeyore wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:

Eeyore wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote


Personally, I think any 'reverb' sucks.

Your personal opinion in this matter is irrelevant.

Your personal opinion in this matter is irrelevant, like in most
things you post. Reveb sucks. Period. It was done to death, along
with Echo effects and other novelty garbage 40+ years ago. Its just
another annoying form of distortion.

The whole audio industry disagrees with you. I doubt you've even heard a
good modern reverb or ADT. It's not springs any more you know.

I'm glad you have graduated out of the spring technology..

What is it now? 8 Track Endless loops?


Don't be stupid.

How much DSP code have YOU written ? I can tell you, when I took it on I
though it would be a challenge. Not writing the code per se, that's easy
enough but making it sound so right that reviewers glow over it.

Graham

LOL, I can tell you that you have a hard time reading between the lines.

I did a project years!!!!!!!!!! ago using a ISA bus card in a 486
computer that sampled up to 500K, this was used for harmonic spectrum
analyses reports using DFT/IDFT which later on was translated into
a FFT with coefficient tables. the PC was 100% dedicated to this
application under a DOS os with the time consuming code written in
ASM to help things along and the rest of it in C using custom graphic
code, also written by me..

The code had to isolate signals, remove unwanted signals etc..

Oh btw, I also wrote some 8 Bit FFT code in a uc controller for other
lesser important usage's for things like transferring video images over
low band radio via audio spectrum.. Then adopted that to a windows sound
card which really has it's fall backs with hardware quality and OS issues.

Your reverb code does interrest me just like my said above project
does not interest you and most likely every one else that is reading this.

http://webpages.charter.net/jamie_5"
 
Jamie wrote:

LOL, I can tell you that you have a hard time reading between the lines.
You can tell me you can PISS OFF.

Anything else will from now on be regarded as legal harrassment.

Graham
 
Jamie wrote:

I did a project years!!!!!!!!!! ago using a ISA bus card in a 486
computer that sampled up to 500K, this was used for harmonic spectrum
analyses reports using DFT/IDFT which later on was translated into
a FFT with coefficient tables.
And the connection with audio reverb is ?

Graham
 
Eeyore wrote:
"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:

Personally, I think any 'reverb' sucks.

Your personal opinion in this matter is irrelevant.

Your personal opinion in this matter is irrelevant, like in most
things you post. Reveb sucks. Period. It was done to death, along
with Echo effects and other novelty garbage 40+ years ago. Its just
another annoying form of distortion.

The whole audio industry disagrees with you.

The audio industry is run by empty suits these days. Rarely is
anything produced that is fit to listen to.


I doubt you've even heard a
good modern reverb or ADT.

I have, and I didn't like it.


It's not springs any more you know.


Up yours.


--
http://improve-usenet.org/index.html

aioe.org, Goggle Groups, and Web TV users must request to be white
listed, or I will not see your messages.

If you have broadband, your ISP may have a NNTP news server included in
your account: http://www.usenettools.net/ISP.htm


There are two kinds of people on this earth:
The crazy, and the insane.
The first sign of insanity is denying that you're crazy.
 
"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:

Personally, I think any 'reverb' sucks.

Your personal opinion in this matter is irrelevant.

Your personal opinion in this matter is irrelevant, like in most
things you post. Reveb sucks. Period. It was done to death, along
with Echo effects and other novelty garbage 40+ years ago. Its just
another annoying form of distortion.

The whole audio industry disagrees with you.

The audio industry is run by empty suits these days.
I understand where you're coming from better than you might imagine, but
thankfully no 'suit' knows how to mix.

I loathe the 'suits' too.

Rarely is anything produced that is fit to listen to.
There's a lot of that going on for sure. I prefer LIVE music myself
(including reverb and compression) and I might be mixing it myself..


I doubt you've even heard a good modern reverb or ADT.

I have, and I didn't like it.
I'm surprised. I doubt you've heard mine.


It's not springs any more you know.

Up yours.
Childish comment.

Graham
 
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 01:07:29 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:

Jamie wrote:

Oh btw, I also wrote some 8 Bit FFT code in a uc controller

Really ?

Mine was 32 bit code. Work out how to do that eh ?
---
So you prefer brute force to cleverness?

Why am I not surprised?


JF
 
Eeyore wrote:

Jamie wrote:


LOL, I can tell you that you have a hard time reading between the lines.


You can tell me you can PISS OFF.

Anything else will from now on be regarded as legal harrassment.

Graham

You wimp..

The Monarchy does not extend to me you tea gobbling twit.

If you have no back bone for it, why temp those that do?



http://webpages.charter.net/jamie_5"
 
Eeyore wrote:

Jamie wrote:


Oh btw, I also wrote some 8 Bit FFT code in a uc controller


Really ?

Mine was 32 bit code. Work out how to do that eh ?

Graham

Shit....
Any one that can't do higher precision in Uc's other than
what is supplied natively, does not belong coding in uc's

you're hitting bottom!..

and for you info, that was a 8 bit Uc but the FFT was 16 bit,.
more than enough.


http://webpages.charter.net/jamie_5"
 
Jamie wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
Jamie wrote:

Oh btw, I also wrote some 8 Bit FFT code in a uc controller

Really ?

Mine was 32 bit code. Work out how to do that eh ?

Graham

Shit....
Any one that can't do higher precision in Uc's other than
what is supplied natively, does not belong coding in uc's

you're hitting bottom!..

and for you info, that was a 8 bit Uc but the FFT was 16 bit,.
more than enough.
FFTs have nothing to do with it.

Graham
 
Jamie wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
Jamie wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Jamie wrote:

Oh btw, I also wrote some 8 Bit FFT code in a uc controller

Really ?

Mine was 32 bit code. Work out how to do that eh ?

Graham


Shit....
Any one that can't do higher precision in Uc's other than
what is supplied natively, does not belong coding in uc's

you're hitting bottom!..

and for you info, that was a 8 bit Uc but the FFT was 16 bit,.
more than enough.


FFTs have nothing to do with it.

Graham

What a pig shitting BS'er you are..

Go away!...

You're treaded on thin ice you old crony!
You're the fool. You are nothing more than a disgusting piece of pig
excrement.

You're just jealous because you can't do it. Bloody typical of idiots.
 
Eeyore wrote:

Jamie wrote:


Eeyore wrote:

Jamie wrote:


Oh btw, I also wrote some 8 Bit FFT code in a uc controller

Really ?

Mine was 32 bit code. Work out how to do that eh ?

Graham


Shit....
Any one that can't do higher precision in Uc's other than
what is supplied natively, does not belong coding in uc's

you're hitting bottom!..

and for you info, that was a 8 bit Uc but the FFT was 16 bit,.
more than enough.


FFTs have nothing to do with it.

Graham

What a pig shitting BS'er you are..

Go away!...

You're treaded on thin ice you old crony!


http://webpages.charter.net/jamie_5"
 
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 01:43:23 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:

Personally, I think any 'reverb' sucks.

Your personal opinion in this matter is irrelevant.

Your personal opinion in this matter is irrelevant, like in most
things you post. Reveb sucks. Period. It was done to death, along
with Echo effects and other novelty garbage 40+ years ago. Its just
another annoying form of distortion.

The whole audio industry disagrees with you.

The audio industry is run by empty suits these days.

I understand where you're coming from better than you might imagine, but
thankfully no 'suit' knows how to mix.

I loathe the 'suits' too.

Rarely is anything produced that is fit to listen to.

There's a lot of that going on for sure. I prefer LIVE music myself
(including reverb and compression) and I might be mixing it myself..
---
If you're mixing it, then the output isn't live and is subject to all of
the vagaries which make you think that because it sounds good to you it
should sound good to everyone else.

JF
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top