Driver to drive?

John Larkin wrote:
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 14:54:19 +0100, Paul Burridge
pb@notthisbit.osiris1.co.uk> wrote:


On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 18:43:25 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highlandSNIPtechTHISnologyPLEASE.com> wrote:


On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 02:17:44 +0100, Paul Burridge
pb@notthisbit.osiris1.co.uk> wrote:


On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 21:49:57 GMT, Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com
wrote:


The backfire is one awesome machine- the B-52 is a hot air balloon by
comparison.

Indeed?? I find it hard to believe that the Ruskies have trumped the
Yanks on their own turf. :-|

The B-52 is now mostly a cruise missile truck.

Maybe. But it's a darned good lookin' one. I can't think of anything
else I'd sooner be bombed by. BTW, what was the model desgination of
Enola Gay?


That was a B-29.

My favorite plane was the Spitfire. I have a book full of specs and
mechanical drawings that I found in a ratty little bookstore in
Oxford.

John
What makes it your favorite? The color scheme?
 
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 19:28:36 +0000, Robert Monsen wrote:

I suspect many republicans are now regretting this faustian bargain, which
gave them control of Congress for the first time in a generation, at the
cost of some of their most honored principles. There also appears to be a
movement within the republican party to purge those old-style moderate
republicans from their ranks.
Something in your post reminded me - hey, aren't we voting on some
senators and congressdrones to?

So I went to find out who's on the ballot, and just out of curiosity
clicked "president" and got this:
http://www.smartvoter.org/2004/11/02/ca/la/president.html

And, lo and behold! Look who got top billing!

It's a message from God, I tell ya! A message from God!
;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-)

Cheers!
Rich
 
Tom Seim wrote:

Phew, what a relief!

From factcheck.org:

To call Kerry the "most liberal man in the Senate" based on a single
year's rating is simply incorrect, however. Over his entire career,
the Journal rates Kerry the 11th most liberal Senator. It's doubtful
that Kerry would have qualified for the "most liberal" label even
during his first Senate term, when was rated #1 for three of the six
years: 1986, 1988, and 1990. In each of those years Kerry actually
tied for the "most liberal" rating, sharing it with as many as five
other senators.
So will you vote for him after all :)?

Perhaps Nader -- you seem to be conservative, and Ralphie was quoted
several months ago making a case for why conservatives should vote for him.

--

Tim Wescott
Wescott Design Services
http://www.wescottdesign.com
 
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 11:12:57 -0700, Tom Seim wrote:
That is precisely the point I am making. The vitriol coming from the lib
camp on this issue was truely amazing.

It's really tragic that you and your pals consider "noticing that your
master is insane" to be "vitriol."

Thanks,
Rich
 
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 18:22:45 +0000, Fred Bloggs wrote:

Tom Seim wrote:

I agree conservatives aren't as hypocritical or dishonorable as liberals
by orders of magnitude.

Tom

Conservatives don't seem to have any problem with stealing elections,
Aren't these just the fanatical neocons? Isn't the Conservative ideal
more along the lines of limited government, self-responsibility, that sort
of thing?

Did you notice that 75% of actual, living, breathing, poll-taking
republicans are pro-choice?
http://www.rpcc.org/cgi-bin/opedmanager/readarticle.cgi?article=21

'scuse me, I exaggerated. It's only seventy-THREE percent. ;-)

Cheers!
Rich
 
"Reg Edwards" <g4fgq.regp@ZZZbtinternet.com> wrote in message
news:clefrm$7et$1@hercules.btinternet.com...


Contributed nothing of value to the news group.
 
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 09:27:13 -0700, kell wrote:

I would hate to think that martial law might be declared in this country.
Sure there are a lot of left-wing kooks out there, but if it happens it
ain't gonna be the kooks that set the wheels a-turning. It's going to be
^
left-wing
the hard-headed people doing what they think is right. Ouch!
They're still kooks, but kooks with their finger on the button.

Shudder!
Rich
 
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 18:01:44 +0000, Fred Bloggs wrote:

kell wrote:
I would hate to think that martial law might be declared in this
country. Sure there are a lot of left-wing kooks out there, but if it
happens it ain't gonna be the kooks that set the wheels a-turning. It's
going to be the hard-headed people doing what they think is right.
Ouch!

It is logistically impossible to put this nation under martial law- it is
impossible to do with this with 100% coverage in most major cities.
This is the same reason that it would be logistically impossible for any
other country to conquer the USA, so we could stop making war all over the
planet and still be safe from invasion. And, of course, stopping pissing
everybody off will go a long way toward reducing tensions.

Cheers!
Rich
 
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 20:44:38 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards"
<g4fgq.regp@ZZZbtinternet.com> wrote:

It began with Enola Gay.
---
It began with the first lifeforms on this planet eating each other.


Chimpanzees, hoping to improve on Shakespear with old-fashioned typewriters,
would manage much better.
---
Perhaps, but they wouldn't be able to communicate their
accomplishments to each other that way.

--
John Fields
 
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 21:09:34 GMT, "Clarence" <no@No.com> wrote:

"Reg Edwards" <g4fgq.regp@ZZZbtinternet.com> wrote in message
news:clefrm$7et$1@hercules.btinternet.com...


Contributed nothing of value to the news group.
---
PKB

--
John Fields
 
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 10:01:28 -0700, Tom Seim wrote:

Rich Grise <rich@example.net> wrote in message

Like, for example, in 1965, I was in jumior high or high school - I'm
horseshit at keeping track of dates. But I graduated HS in '67, went to
Minnesota Institutite of Technology in '67-'68, joined the US Air Force
in '68, and did drugs until they threw me out of the Air Force in 1976.

Where were you?

Thanks,
Rich

Since you asked me in such a polite way, I'll tell you. While you were
doing drugs I was involved in top secret national defense projects at the
Hanford Nuclear Reservation after graduating from Oregon State U. in 1969.
I am not a vet and never pretended to be one.
Thank you.

Cheers!
Rich
 
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 12:41:24 -0700, Tom Seim wrote:

Phew, what a relief!

From factcheck.org:

To call Kerry the "most liberal man in the Senate" based on a single
year's rating is simply incorrect, however. Over his entire career, the
Journal rates Kerry the 11th most liberal Senator. It's doubtful that
Kerry would have qualified for the "most liberal" label even during his
first Senate term, when was rated #1 for three of the six years: 1986,
1988, and 1990. In each of those years Kerry actually tied for the "most
liberal" rating, sharing it with as many as five other senators.
You dittoheads really have no clue how you're advancing Mr. Kerry's
campaign with this kind of weird attempt at mudslinging.

Mr. Seim, what you're slinging here isn't mud - You're shouting from the
rooftops that your opponent is the better man, you idiot!

Cheers!
Rich
 
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 00:37:22 +0000, Jim Yanik wrote:

Rich Grise <rich@example.net> wrote in
news:pan.2004.10.17.23.20.52.848578@example.net:

On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 23:21:15 +0200, Frank Bemelman wrote:

"Rich Grise" <rich@example.net> schreef in bericht
news:pan.2004.10.17.20.56.19.372099@example.net...

You're talking about being better off with the US military removed,
right?

It would not be a good idea to remove the military, not now, with
the mess created.

You sound like a caricature ER doctor, with a patient with an electric
drill still drilling into his guts, tearing out organs and stuff,
and the doctor says, "It's not a good idea to just pull the drill
right out, because of the mess it might cause."

Stop the Killing.

Thanks,
Rich



Sometimes,killing it a good thing.

Are you a pacifist,Rich? I'm curious.
Yes, War is bad. Killing is bad.

And anyone who believes either is good, is a bad person.

Sorry, but the truth is the truth, and no amount of self-deception
can change the fact that a murderer is a murderer.

Thanks,
Rich
 
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 20:44:38 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards"
<g4fgq.regp@ZZZbtinternet.com> wrote:

It began with Enola Gay.

[snip]

Bush and Blair are mere puppets it the hands of the Multinational
Corporations, Insurance Companies, Bankers and the Media IT Controllers.

[snip]

You missed the Trilateral Commission.

Bwahahahahahaha, What an idiot ;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
 
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 20:05:21 +0000, Robert Monsen wrote:

I did enjoy Dyson's reaction to your posting, though. It sounded like a
speech by "Holden Caulfield".
No Way!

_I'm_ doing the Caulfield character!
http://wa.essortment.com/holdencaufield_rkfs.htm
"... Perhaps the lesson to be learned from this classic literary
character in regards to wealth, corruption and the American dream, is
that no matter how many beautiful, expensive things one is surrounded
by, true happiness can only be found from within."

Cheers!
Rich
 
Mac foo@bar.net wrote:

[snip]

You always want to use the common terminal. That's why they call it
common, I guess. ;-)
Visit Newcastle NW UK some time. Look at the women. You'll find a completely
new use for the word.

Gibbo
 
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 12:20:23 -0700, Tom Seim wrote:

If they can't even get supporters out for Cher, how are they going to
get them to vote?
[snip]

I think you are creating a false contradiction. Most of the people I know
are planning on voting (not necessarily for Kerry).

Of those friends and relatives of mine who are registered Democrats and
Kerry supporters, I don't think any of them would go to a rally to see
Cher.

--Mac
 
In article <pan.2004.10.23.21.11.53.7508@example.net>,
Rich Grise <rich@example.net> wrote:
[....]
Conservatives don't seem to have any problem with stealing elections,

Aren't these just the fanatical neocons? Isn't the Conservative ideal
more along the lines of limited government, self-responsibility, that sort
of thing?
Yes, the neocons have given the word "conservative" a bad name. I have
always been conservative in my political views. In my case conservative
includes such ideas as: when something is working fairly well you dont
mess with it, policies should be based on real science and if something
that sounded good isn't working you try to figure out why before more
money goes missing.

I have gotten so sick of the neocons and the right wing nut cases abusing
the word conservative that I've decided to call them on it. This is the
reason I have posted in support of Kerry. Personally I don't like Kerry
but he would be better than the current bunch of loons by such a wide
margin that I really can't see why any conservative would put the current
crew back in for 4 more years.


Did you notice that 75% of actual, living, breathing, poll-taking
republicans are pro-choice?
The number goes even higher if you suggest a 13 year old girl raped by a
retard as the case to start with. Many peoples opinion on the subject is
not through. If you push them you can make the numbers higher or lower
depending on the result you want.


--
--
kensmith@rahul.net forging knowledge
 
In article <pan.2004.10.23.06.19.56.955696@example.net>,
Rich Grise <rich@example.net> wrote:
[...]
Yes, but is there a way that they can stop the killing TODAY?
If you kick a dog and then stop kicking it, it is still likely to bite
you. Even if the US started doing everything right, deaths would continue
for some time.


--
--
kensmith@rahul.net forging knowledge
 
In article <meukn0pn4dn6hfp5av09aesa2onpgirlq0@4ax.com>,
John Fields <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 03:23:42 +0000 (UTC), toor@iquest.net (John S.
Dyson) wrote:

Remember, ...

---
Remember, that's an interesting device.

Preface everything with 'remember' and it lends a certain credibility
to whatever follows.
In most cases, when John Dyson uses that device, it indicates the weakest
point in his argument. Its almost like a "tell" in poker.

--
--
kensmith@rahul.net forging knowledge
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top