Driver to drive?

[John Fields]

On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:51:31 -0400, Spehro Pefhany
<speffSNIP@interlogDOTyou.knowwhat> wrote:

I think Frank is right. A data sheet created in Microsoft Word- WTF do
you expect!!

Maybe some mixup with symbol fonts.

---
Or semi-literate proofreaders?

IMO, there's really no excuse for production documentation to be
released in that condition.

--
John Fields

 

[Rich Grise]

On Thursday 30 September 2004 12:32 am, John Woodgate did deign to grace us
with the following:

I read in sci.electronics.design that Rich Grise <null@example.net
wrote (in <mBI6d.13575$Ym1.12633@trnddc03&gt about 'Labour Party
Conference Report', on Thu, 30 Sep 2004:

Well, even envy isn't necessarily a "bad" thing, if it motivates you to
strive to better your lot in life, no?

And you claim to be a metaphysicist? Don't you know that emotions like
envy, hate and jealousy diminish the electric field of your 3 3/4th
okra, and results in suppression of your Linguini?
--

Yeah. That's it.

 

[jan Axelson]

There is a voltage drop be detected by USB host controller,
we can recongnize this signal to know a new device, but, anybody know
hos is the function or API or ..... in windows programming? ( VC/VB )

Applications can detect device attachment and removal using
RegisterDeviceNotification and device-change messages. I have example
code here:

www.Lvr.com/hidpage.htm

Jan Axelson
www.Lvr.com

 

[John Woodgate]

I read in sci.electronics.design that Kevin Aylward
<salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk> wrote (in <UeX6d.125240$U04.32295@fe1.news.
blueyonder.co.uk&gt about 'OT: Memes Vs. Free Will', on Thu, 30 Sep 2004:

If one has a claim that an assumption is required for a certain
result, yet that *same* result can *still* be explained *without* that
assumption, then that assumption is wrong.

No, it's not wrong, it's unnecessary. The action of assuming it might be
described as 'wrong', but 'misguided' might be more accurate.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk

 

[colin]

"donburo" <nicola.burani@libero.it> wrote in message
news:760870b.0409300752.169c9634@posting.google.com...

Hello everybody..

I'm trying to built a simple transimpedence amplifier for a Plastic
Optical Fibre (POF) photodiode (E05 EM PIN ST 001). I'm using an
OPA2277 operational amplifier (+15 -15 as power supply) and a 1Mohm
resistance as feedback. This should give me a transimpendence of app.
1V/uA.
The diode is biased at 7.5V and is connected between ground and the
non-inverting op. amp node.
The source power I'm trying to detect is very small (nWatt app.) and
the diode sensitivity should be around 0.5A/W.
I should see something like some mV at the output (too small signal).
Any Idea to make things run better????

Thanks a lot....

Nicola

Depends if the light source is modulated and what bandwidth you need.

Colin =^.^=

 

[Clarence]

"John Woodgate" <jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> wrote in message
news:MO421BCuq8WBFwO+@jmwa.demon.co.uk...

I read in sci.electronics.design that Clarence <no@No.com> wrote (in
T3P6d.21771$QJ3.1453@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com&gt about 'What lies do
you tell in your CV?', on Thu, 30 Sep 2004:

Makes you want a "One Size Fits all" (criteria) but you can't find one.

That's an oxymoron to end all oxymorons. 'Criteria' is plural. The
singular is 'criterion'. But the plural of 'oxymoron' is not 'oxymora'
(outside a pedant's ivory tower, anyway).
--

But it still makes a pretty good joke.

 

[John Woodgate]

I read in sci.electronics.design that Rolavine <rolavine@aol.com> wrote
(in <20040930120618.22480.00000021@mb-m06.aol.com&gt about '[OT]: The
not-so-democratic Democrats', on Thu, 30 Sep 2004:

"The head of Iraq's nuclear programme under Saddam Hussein has said Iraq
destroyed its nuclear weapons programme in 1991 and never restarted it.

Jafar Dhia Jafar told the BBC sanctions and inspections worked in
stopping the reconstitution of the programme.

He also said Iraq's chemical and biological weapons programmes were
destroyed after the first Gulf War and never reactivated."

Why did SH make the job of the UN inspectors impossible, then? Just
cussedness?
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk

 

[John Woodgate]

I read in sci.electronics.design that Rolavine <rolavine@aol.com> wrote
(in <20040930121640.22480.00000023@mb-m06.aol.com&gt about '[OT]: The
intent of the Founding Fathers', on Thu, 30 Sep 2004:

I haven't looked at these for years and went to see what they had to say
about the commander and cheif power granted the President.

However I got amused by Hamilton's language while I searched and wanted
to share this bit of it.

"It has indeed been brought forward in the most vague and general form,
supported only by bold assertions, without the appearance of argument;
without even the sanction of theoretical opinions;

He was writing about newsgroup articles?
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk

 

[John Woodgate]

I read in sci.electronics.design that uvcceet@juno.com wrote (in
<415c5732$1$woehfu$mr2ice@giganews.aros.net&gt about '48 Nobel Laureates
Endorse Kerry', on Thu, 30 Sep 2004:

Man is either descended
from the slime that crawled out of the primordial ooze, or he is the
creation of a superior being.

Both could be true. The SB could have created the slime and given it the
power, and the environment, to evolve.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk

 

[Jonathan Kirwan]

On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:14:01 GMT, "Clarence" <no@No.com> wrote:

But not everyone cares a whit what a Noble laureate" thinks about politics.

Actually, they care about science and, because of that, they cannot escape
worrying about how a particularly virulent administration impacts them.

It's a fair concern and they have a right to voice it. You can choose to ignore
it or not, but a reasoned and comprehensive viewpoint would probably give it
some weight.

Jon

 

[B]

I found a soloution:

Initialise as normal.

Initialise again about 10 seconds if it did not Initialise the first time.

Thanks for your help

Darren

 

[Jonathan Kirwan]

On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:46:17 GMT, "Clarence" <no@No.com> wrote:

snip
I
did not see a comprehensive or cohesive position stated, only a partisan
statement.

Is there any kind of statement you could read that took a position that you
would not consider partisan?

Jon

 

[Paul Burridge]

On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:31:34 GMT, Joerg
<notthisjoergsch@removethispacbell.net> wrote:

That reminds me of old radio restorations. I found a dried up
electrolytic made by a famous Italian motorcycle manufacturer, with logo
and all. Ducati or something like that. It would have broken my heart to
simply rip it out and replace it with a modern version. So, I scraped
out the innards and placed a newer and thus smaller cap inside.

I know an old guy who does dumb-ass things like that. The joys of
excess free time in retirement, I guess.
--

"What is now proved was once only imagin'd." - William Blake, 1793.

 

[Paul Burridge]

On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 23:51:02 -0700, "john jardine"
<john@jjdesigns.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:

In Hell, the English run the police, the English run the railroads, the
English do the repairs, the English are the lovers, and (maybe) the English
do the cooking.

Plus of course the Brits still think they run the world minus America.
--

"What is now proved was once only imagin'd." - William Blake, 1793.

 

[Rich Grise]

On Thursday 30 September 2004 02:15 am, martin griffith did deign to grace
us with the following:

On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 05:31:03 GMT, in sci.electronics.design you wrote:

snip

In Heaven, the English run the police, the Swiss run the railroads,
the Germans do the repairs, the Italians are the lovers, and the French
do the cooking.

In Hell, the Germans run the police, the Italians run the railroads, the
French do the repairs, the Swiss are the lovers, and the English do the
cooking.
;-)

Cheers!
Rich
and the Irish?

1. Make Beer
2. Drink Beer

Nobody's quite sure which they do where. ;-)

Cheers!
Rich

 

[Dirk Bruere at Neopax]

John Larkin wrote:

On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:02:59 +0100, Dirk Bruere at Neopax
dirk@neopax.com> wrote:



The entire pretext for the war was a lie.



Good grief! Of course it was. There are many obvious things that
everybody knows, but that are impolitic to say out loud.

Another thing it is impolitic to say is that the world will be a safer place if
Iraq costs so much in blood and treasure that it scrubs further such adventures
for another generation.

--
Dirk

The Consensus:-
The political party for the new millenium
http://www.theconsensus.org

 

[Rich Grise]

On Thursday 30 September 2004 01:58 am, John Woodgate did deign to grace us
with the following:

I read in sci.electronics.design that Clarence <no@No.com> wrote (in
T3P6d.21771$QJ3.1453@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com&gt about 'What lies do
you tell in your CV?', on Thu, 30 Sep 2004:

Makes you want a "One Size Fits all" (criteria) but you can't find one.

That's an oxymoron to end all oxymorons. 'Criteria' is plural. The
singular is 'criterion'. But the plural of 'oxymoron' is not 'oxymora'
(outside a pedant's ivory tower, anyway).
--

I thought Oxymoron was that pimple cream for the slow-witted.

Thanks!
Rich

 

[Rich Grise]

On Thursday 30 September 2004 08:26 am, John Larkin did deign to grace us
with the following:

On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:12:42 +0100, John Woodgate
jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> wrote:

I read in sci.electronics.design that Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org
wrote (in <7c584d27.0409300534.6f689463@posting.google.com&gt about
'[OT]: The not-so-democratic Democrats', on Thu, 30 Sep 2004:
so I'm expecting
royalties .....

Would you settle for the Earl and Countess of Wessex?

A nobel offer indeed!

It should win a prize, yes. ;-)

Cheers!
Rich

 

[Fred Bloggs]

Clarence wrote:

Well, of course there is the matter of the conflict of interest.

Then problem with the "Nobel Prize" being made to people who advance the
liberal agenda.

Absolutely nothing is sacred to the venal, materialistic, and
unaccomplished Republican wannabees. You are a deceitful liar and Bush
campaign operative. We have caught you in numerous lies.

 

[Rich Grise]

On Thursday 30 September 2004 07:41 am, Fred Bloggs did deign to grace us
with the following:
....
[letter from soldier]

It is all the more ironic that this un-Constitutional mission is being
performed by citizen soldiers such as myself who swore an oath to uphold
and defend the Constitution of the United States, the same oath that the
commander in chief himself has sworn.

September 20, 2004

Maybe if enough of them start thinking like this, they'll mutiny and take
care of the problem.

Well, I can dream, can't I?

Cheers!
Rich