Driver to drive?

On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 13:17:50 -0700 (PDT), dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com
wrote:

On Monday, July 28, 2014 11:58:28 PM UTC-4, Robert Baer wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BtU8by1CIAENQZ3.jpg:large

I think it may be worse than that.

For a while, it was no secret that the (newer immigrant) Mexicans
were plotting to forcibly overtake the US.

Don't forget libertarians. It's rumored they want to take over the
government and leave everyone alone.

Including those who want to kill them.
 
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 14:43:12 -0700, John Larkin
<jlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote:

On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 20:58:28 -0700, Robert Baer
robertbaer@localnet.com> wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BtU8by1CIAENQZ3.jpg:large

...Jim Thompson
I think it may be worse than that.
For a while, it was no secret that the (newer immigrant) Mexicans
were plotting to forcibly overtake the US.

Mexicans are, in my experience, mostly decent, hard-working, family
people. Their kids speak standard English and assimilate just fine.

Our immigration policies should be selective, however, and keep out
the minority bad ones. Every country has the right to manage
immigration.

Absolutely. I have no problem with legal immigration... I do, after
all, have two Hispanic grandchildren.

The parents of my son-in-law were legal immigrants ~1950... so intent
on being American that the kids can't speak Spanish ;-)

My granddaughter had to take Spanish classes in high school and
college (UofA... graduated in May) to learn the language.

On the other side of the coin, my son Aaron is street fluent in both
Mexican-style Spanish and Brazilian Portuguese simply by assimilation
from working with them.

Immigrants are clobbering working-class jobs, by creating a pool of
cheap labor. Illegal immigrants are even cheaper, since many work off
the books, for cash, without benefits.

Immigration is, at least transiently, increasing income disparity in
the US. The guys who own the painting companies are getting rich using
Chinese and Mexican labor, and the native US guys who used to be
painters are unemployed.

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson | mens |
| Analog Innovations | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| San Tan Valley, AZ 85142 Skype: skypeanalog | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
 
"nuny@bid.nes" wrote:
Now, I may well be paranoid, but I'd like to know how many of those "children" know how to make IEDs.

Or are willing to wear a booby trap, like kids did in Vietnam?


--
Anyone wanting to run for any political office in the US should have to
have a DD214, and a honorable discharge.
 
John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 20:58:28 -0700, Robert Baer
robertbaer@localnet.com> wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BtU8by1CIAENQZ3.jpg:large

...Jim Thompson
I think it may be worse than that.
For a while, it was no secret that the (newer immigrant) Mexicans
were plotting to forcibly overtake the US.

Mexicans are, in my experience, mostly decent, hard-working, family
people. Their kids speak standard English and assimilate just fine.

Our immigration policies should be selective, however, and keep out
the minority bad ones. Every country has the right to manage
immigration.

Immigrants are clobbering working-class jobs, by creating a pool of
cheap labor. Illegal immigrants are even cheaper, since many work off
the books, for cash, without benefits.

Immigration is, at least transiently, increasing income disparity in
the US. The guys who own the painting companies are getting rich using
Chinese and Mexican labor, and the native US guys who used to be
painters are unemployed.



Add in farm labor...
 
jurb6006@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, July 28, 2014 11:59:01 PM UTC-5, Robert Baer wrote:
RobertMacy wrote:> On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 19:19:21 -0700, amdx<nojunkknology.net> wrote:> >>> ...snip....>> What is the resistance.>> >> Mikek> > Not much, else ACA would NEVER have gotten into place!? ? Affordable Care Act ? ? American Correctional Association ? ? American Canoe Association ? ? American Camp Association ? ? American Chiropractic Association ?

I dunno what anyone else thinks, but I deem that kinda not so helpful.

Simplify.



100K


-



FUCK all that. And fuck Kirschoff as well. He's right but that shit is for when you are designing some other shit. forget it for now.

Ummmmm

What voltage are you starting with ? yoiu got a voltafge at the top and you expect a portion of that voltage out of like a resistive divider, no ? if you have 100 bvolts at the top, and say one volt at the botom, if the top resistor is 500K, the bottom one, or whatever the combined load to ground at that point of the circuit would be 5K.

But you got 0.6 volt.

Well, when everything is resistive, is was so nice. Unicorns danced all over my front lawn and shit, you know. Good old days.

So that would be 4K or whatever, but it probably ain't. It is probebly the latent drop of a semiconductor junction. And you hav to be aware that it can fool you when the equipment is off becus everything and its brother in law has all kinds of suppresion diodes built into the substrate, so when power goes out to one thing, everything it is connected to might read a "short" with an ohmmeter or DVM.

Pain in thre ass, it really is. Thsat's why I try to do things powered, and try to have a scope with tunnel diode triggering. That way I can see it happen. I do not care if it is 11.4 volts or 11.7 volts, I care if it is 3.4 volts or 52.9 volts. In most cases, my reading simply does not havbe to be all that exact.
....and those tunnel diodes go all the way to China.
 
On Thursday, 31 July 2014 16:22:01 UTC+10, Michael Terrell wrote:
"nuny@bid.nes" wrote:

Now, I may well be paranoid, but I'd like to know how many of those "children" know how to make IEDs.

Since few adults know how to make IEDs, as evidenced by the number of people blown up by their own bombs in the early stages of any insurrection (notably the provisional IRA in the UK, but US loonies haven't done too well either, until Darwinian selection has depleted the gene pool) the answer has to be "not very many at all".

> Or are willing to wear a booby trap, like kids did in Vietnam?

"Willing" implies that they knew what they were putting on. It's rather difficult to know this after the fact.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
On Thursday, July 31, 2014 3:57:19 AM UTC-4, Bill Sloman wrote:

<...>

Vast majority of these opinionated idiots are, not surprsingly, morons from hell. The U.S. has been fomenting mass murder in South America for decades and now it's coming back to bite them. Many of the henchmen of the drug cartels and the large gangs are U.S. trained murderers:

http://www.soaw.org/about-the-soawhinsec/what-is-the-soawhinsec

....and you better believe they know all about IEDs.
 
On Thursday, 31 July 2014 20:00:33 UTC+10, bloggs.fred...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, July 31, 2014 3:57:19 AM UTC-4, Bill Sloman wrote:

...

Vast majority of these opinionated idiots are, not surprisingly, morons from hell. The U.S. has been fomenting mass murder in South America for decades and now it's coming back to bite them. Many of the henchmen of the drug cartels and the large gangs are U.S. trained murderers:

http://www.soaw.org/about-the-soawhinsec/what-is-the-soawhinsec

...and you better believe they know all about IEDs.

Not a chance. They've got money and connections, and don't have to improvise their explosive devices - they just buy them for lots of money.

By the same token, they aren't going to be the kind of illegal immigrants being complained about here - if they do enter the country illegally, it will be to sort out drug distribution - mostly in a managerial role, though some might come in to supply a bit of specialised and expensive violence, with non-improvised tools.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 22:04:57 -0700, Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> wrote:

John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 20:58:28 -0700, Robert Baer
robertbaer@localnet.com> wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BtU8by1CIAENQZ3.jpg:large

...Jim Thompson
I think it may be worse than that.
For a while, it was no secret that the (newer immigrant) Mexicans
were plotting to forcibly overtake the US.

Mexicans are, in my experience, mostly decent, hard-working, family
people. Their kids speak standard English and assimilate just fine.

Our immigration policies should be selective, however, and keep out
the minority bad ones. Every country has the right to manage
immigration.

Immigrants are clobbering working-class jobs, by creating a pool of
cheap labor. Illegal immigrants are even cheaper, since many work off
the books, for cash, without benefits.

Immigration is, at least transiently, increasing income disparity in
the US. The guys who own the painting companies are getting rich using
Chinese and Mexican labor, and the native US guys who used to be
painters are unemployed.



Add in farm labor...

Yes. The "jobs that no American wants" are unwanted because the pay is so low,
and the pay is low because so many illegals are available to do them cheap.

So the better-paid Americans get cheap nannies and housecleaners and gardeners
and painters, and often cheap employees, which makes us better off, while
blue-collar workers struggle.


--

John Larkin Highland Technology Inc
www.highlandtechnology.com jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com

Precision electronic instrumentation
 
On Thursday, July 31, 2014 10:02:53 AM UTC-4, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Thursday, 31 July 2014 20:00:33 UTC+10, bloggs.fred...@gmail.com wrote:

On Thursday, July 31, 2014 3:57:19 AM UTC-4, Bill Sloman wrote:



...



Vast majority of these opinionated idiots are, not surprisingly, morons from hell. The U.S. has been fomenting mass murder in South America for decades and now it's coming back to bite them. Many of the henchmen of the drug cartels and the large gangs are U.S. trained murderers:



http://www.soaw.org/about-the-soawhinsec/what-is-the-soawhinsec



...and you better believe they know all about IEDs.



Not a chance. They've got money and connections, and don't have to improvise their explosive devices - they just buy them for lots of money.



By the same token, they aren't going to be the kind of illegal immigrants being complained about here - if they do enter the country illegally, it will be to sort out drug distribution - mostly in a managerial role, though some might come in to supply a bit of specialised and expensive violence, with non-improvised tools.



--

Bill Sloman, Sydney

They are creating the conditions making people flee to the U.S.
 
On Thursday, July 31, 2014 12:57:19 AM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Thursday, 31 July 2014 16:22:01 UTC+10, Michael Terrell wrote:

"nuny@bid.nes" wrote:

Now, I may well be paranoid, but I'd like to know how many of those
"children" know how to make IEDs.

Since few adults know how to make IEDs, as evidenced by the number of people
blown up by their own bombs in the early stages of any insurrection (notably
the provisional IRA in the UK, but US loonies haven't done too well either,
until Darwinian selection has depleted the gene pool) the answer has to be
"not very many at all".

About half of the time I perceive you to be fairly level-headed, the other half I perceive you to be living in a fantasy world.

The "early stages" of the current example of IED making in the Middle East are long over. Relatively ignorant (illiterate, at least) people have been making shaped-charge IEDs for a decade or so there, and the skill is quite popular among militant Islamists. It's very difficult to tell a militant one from your average Muslim (until they yell Allahu akbar! and blow something up), and as I said Islam is growing rapidly in rural South America due to the influx of Muslims there from the Middle East.

It is therefore reasonable that at least some South American Muslims are militants who have that skill, and that they have taught it to their children, and to their local converts (who have lived in crushing dissatisfaction with the status quo basically since the Spanish Conquest), and it is reasonable to posit that at least some of those "children" crossing into the U. S. could have that skill *and* the mindset to use it, considering that the most zealous tend to be those under thirty.

Or are willing to wear a booby trap, like kids did in Vietnam?

"Willing" implies that they knew what they were putting on. It's rather
difficult to know this after the fact.

As I pointed out, most of the "children" under discussion are in their late teens. American teenagers are bad enough- they think they're immortal regardless of religion.

So, am I being paranoid, or just noticing a series of possibly unfortunate "coincidences"? We won't know until, or rather if, the "sleepers awake".


Mark L. Fergerson
 
John Larkin wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 22:04:57 -0700, Robert Baer<robertbaer@localnet.com> wrote:

John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 20:58:28 -0700, Robert Baer
robertbaer@localnet.com> wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BtU8by1CIAENQZ3.jpg:large

...Jim Thompson
I think it may be worse than that.
For a while, it was no secret that the (newer immigrant) Mexicans
were plotting to forcibly overtake the US.

Mexicans are, in my experience, mostly decent, hard-working, family
people. Their kids speak standard English and assimilate just fine.

Our immigration policies should be selective, however, and keep out
the minority bad ones. Every country has the right to manage
immigration.

Immigrants are clobbering working-class jobs, by creating a pool of
cheap labor. Illegal immigrants are even cheaper, since many work off
the books, for cash, without benefits.

Immigration is, at least transiently, increasing income disparity in
the US. The guys who own the painting companies are getting rich using
Chinese and Mexican labor, and the native US guys who used to be
painters are unemployed.



Add in farm labor...

Yes. The "jobs that no American wants" are unwanted because the pay is so low,
and the pay is low because so many illegals are available to do them cheap.

So the better-paid Americans get cheap nannies and housecleaners and gardeners
and painters, and often cheap employees, which makes us better off, while
blue-collar workers struggle.


Yes, the Golden Rule: "He who has the Gold, Rules".
 
On Friday, 1 August 2014 05:32:29 UTC+10, nu...@bid.nes wrote:
On Thursday, July 31, 2014 12:57:19 AM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Thursday, 31 July 2014 16:22:01 UTC+10, Michael Terrell wrote:

"nuny@bid.nes" wrote:

Now, I may well be paranoid, but I'd like to know how many of those "children" know how to make IEDs.

Since few adults know how to make IEDs, as evidenced by the number of people blown up by their own bombs in the early stages of any insurrection (notably the provisional IRA in the UK, but US loonies haven't done too well either, until Darwinian selection has depleted the gene pool) the answer has to be "not very many at all".

About half of the time I perceive you to be fairly level-headed, the other half I perceive you to be living in a fantasy world.

The "early stages" of the current example of IED making in the Middle East are long over. Relatively ignorant (illiterate, at least) people have been making shaped-charge IEDs for a decade or so there, and the skill is quite popular among militant Islamists. It's very difficult to tell a militant one from your average Muslim (until they yell Allahu akbar! and blow something up), and as I said Islam is growing rapidly in rural South America due to the influx of Muslims there from the Middle East.

Islam may be growing rapidly in rural South America, but the number of Muslims there would still fit under "not very many at all". The proportion of those Muslims who are militant enough to make IEDs can be expected to be much the same as the proportion of fundamentalist Christians who are militant enough to go in for armed insurrection, again "not very many at all".

> It is therefore reasonable that at least some South American Muslims are militants who have that skill, and that they have taught it to their children, and to their local converts (who have lived in crushing dissatisfaction with the status quo basically since the Spanish Conquest), and it is reasonable to posit that at least some of those "children" crossing into the U.. S. could have that skill *and* the mindset to use it, considering that the most zealous tend to be those under thirty.

It might be reasonable to claim that there might be one or two South American Muslims who have bomb-making skills, if you could point to a single example. I can't.

And my definition of "children" stops as about age twelve. Anybody older than that is an adolescent, and that adolescence ends at age 18. After that there are immature adults, and they can be any age. Jim Thompson is 70-something.

Or are willing to wear a booby trap, like kids did in Vietnam?

"Willing" implies that they knew what they were putting on. It's rather difficult to know this after the fact.

As I pointed out, most of the "children" under discussion are in their late teens. American teenagers are bad enough- they think they're immortal regardless of religion.

Your definition of "children" - including people up to the age of thirty - is idiosyncratic. Describing someone as a "willing" bomb-vest wearer usually depends on a what they said in a video recorded before the bomb vest went off.

Mike Terrells hypothetical bomb-vest wearing Vietnamese children didn't make any such videos if they existed at all - the technology to make that sort of video wasn't widely accessible at that time.

> So, am I being paranoid, or just noticing a series of possibly unfortunate "coincidences"? We won't know until, or rather if, the "sleepers awake"..

My money's on you being paranoid. And H.G. Wells' novel "The Sleeper Awakes" reflects a different kind of a paranoia, describing a high-inequality dystopia that looks like an exaggeration of contemporary American society.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sleeper_Awakes

"Sleepers Wake!" by the Australian politician (and sometime quiz show winner) Barry Jones

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sleepers,_Wake!

is a much more recent and optimistic piece of work, and has been surprisingly popular and long-lived. I bought it when it was first published in 1982 - Barry was an acquaintance, back then - and was surprised twice, once by how good it was, and again a few years later, when I had no trouble buying a replacement copy.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
On 7/30/2014 6:32 PM, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 12:52:02 -0700, Jim Thompson
To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> wrote:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BtU8by1CIAENQZ3.jpg:large

...Jim Thompson

About an hour ago, I hired a new EE. Young girl, right out of a
Mexican college, BSEE, and she has really unusual (ie, really good)
electrical instincts.

I've met very few Mexican, or female, circuit designers. Should be
interesting.


I bet she has a human brain.
 
On 7/30/2014 6:32 PM, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 12:52:02 -0700, Jim Thompson
To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> wrote:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BtU8by1CIAENQZ3.jpg:large

...Jim Thompson

About an hour ago, I hired a new EE. Young girl, right out of a
Mexican college, BSEE, and she has really unusual (ie, really good)
electrical instincts.

I've met very few Mexican, or female, circuit designers. Should be
interesting.
Maureen and I just got back from being fingerprinted to get our green
cards renewed. The USCIS is a lot like the DMV, except scarier.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics

160 North State Road #203
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510

hobbs at electrooptical dot net
http://electrooptical.net
 
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 16:16:17 -0400, Tom Biasi <tombiasi@optonline.net>
wrote:

On 7/30/2014 6:32 PM, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 12:52:02 -0700, Jim Thompson
To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> wrote:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BtU8by1CIAENQZ3.jpg:large

...Jim Thompson

About an hour ago, I hired a new EE. Young girl, right out of a
Mexican college, BSEE, and she has really unusual (ie, really good)
electrical instincts.

I've met very few Mexican, or female, circuit designers. Should be
interesting.


I bet she has a human brain.

Humans do come in two sorts, male and female. My wife is a speech
pathologist, a profession that is literally 99% female. Electronic
circuit designers are, I'd guess, 99% male. Don't know why.


--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc

jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com
 
On 7/31/2014 6:11 PM, John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 16:16:17 -0400, Tom Biasi <tombiasi@optonline.net
wrote:

On 7/30/2014 6:32 PM, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 12:52:02 -0700, Jim Thompson
To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> wrote:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BtU8by1CIAENQZ3.jpg:large

...Jim Thompson

About an hour ago, I hired a new EE. Young girl, right out of a
Mexican college, BSEE, and she has really unusual (ie, really good)
electrical instincts.

I've met very few Mexican, or female, circuit designers. Should be
interesting.


I bet she has a human brain.

Humans do come in two sorts, male and female. My wife is a speech
pathologist, a profession that is literally 99% female. Electronic
circuit designers are, I'd guess, 99% male. Don't know why.


I'm aware of that John, just having a little fun.
 
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 03:16:28 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 22:04:57 -0700, Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> wrote:

John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 20:58:28 -0700, Robert Baer
robertbaer@localnet.com> wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BtU8by1CIAENQZ3.jpg:large

...Jim Thompson
I think it may be worse than that.
For a while, it was no secret that the (newer immigrant) Mexicans
were plotting to forcibly overtake the US.

Mexicans are, in my experience, mostly decent, hard-working, family
people. Their kids speak standard English and assimilate just fine.

Our immigration policies should be selective, however, and keep out
the minority bad ones. Every country has the right to manage
immigration.

Immigrants are clobbering working-class jobs, by creating a pool of
cheap labor. Illegal immigrants are even cheaper, since many work off
the books, for cash, without benefits.

Immigration is, at least transiently, increasing income disparity in
the US. The guys who own the painting companies are getting rich using
Chinese and Mexican labor, and the native US guys who used to be
painters are unemployed.



Add in farm labor...

Yes. The "jobs that no American wants" are unwanted because the pay is so low,
and the pay is low because so many illegals are available to do them cheap.

http://townhall.com/political-cartoons/2014/07/30/121243

So the better-paid Americans get cheap nannies and housecleaners and gardeners
and painters, and often cheap employees, which makes us better off, while
blue-collar workers struggle.
 
On Friday, 1 August 2014 11:10:53 UTC+10, Jim Thompson wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 19:51:50 -0400, krw@attt.bizz wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 16:30:52 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman
bill.sloman@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, 1 August 2014 05:32:29 UTC+10, nu...@bid.nes wrote:
On Thursday, July 31, 2014 12:57:19 AM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Thursday, 31 July 2014 16:22:01 UTC+10, Michael Terrell wrote:
"nuny@bid.nes" wrote:

Now, I may well be paranoid, but I'd like to know how many of those "children" know how to make IEDs.

Since few adults know how to make IEDs, as evidenced by the number of people blown up by their own bombs in the early stages of any insurrection (notably the provisional IRA in the UK, but US loonies haven't done too well either, until Darwinian selection has depleted the gene pool) the answer has to be "not very many at all".

About half of the time I perceive you to be fairly level-headed, the other half I perceive you to be living in a fantasy world.

The "early stages" of the current example of IED making in the Middle East are long over. Relatively ignorant (illiterate, at least) people have been making shaped-charge IEDs for a decade or so there, and the skill is quite popular among militant Islamists. It's very difficult to tell a militant one from your average Muslim (until they yell Allahu akbar! and blow something up), and as I said Islam is growing rapidly in rural South America due to the influx of Muslims there from the Middle East.

Islam may be growing rapidly in rural South America, but the number of Muslims there would still fit under "not very many at all". The proportion of those Muslims who are militant enough to make IEDs can be expected to be much the same as the proportion of fundamentalist Christians who are militant enough to go in for armed insurrection, again "not very many at all".

About the same number as there are Jews in the USA.

An unfed troll gathers no podium. Don't feed Slowman.

Don't feed the Thompson either? Sadly, I can't resist commenting on his comic misconceptions.

> An upside to this whole "conversation"... the IED people are testing their devices is Slowman's neighborhood >:-}

Jim-out-of-touch-with-reality-Thompson is in fine ignorant form. There are no reports of improvised explosive devices in Sydney, or Australia generally.

The right-wing nitwit federal government is frothing at the mouth about Australian Islamic militants who have gone off to fight for their factions in Syria, being frightened that those who survive may come back and exercise their terrorist skills in Australia. The fact that the rather more numerous Australian military who went of to keep the peace in Afghanistan and Irak came back with a much better grasp of improvised explosive technology seems to have escaped them, as does the example of Timothy McVeigh

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_McVeigh

which would suggest that native-born gun nuts pose a rather greater risk. Gun-nuts have shot a few people in Australia over the years - Australia does have gun control laws, but clearly not enough of them. Political terrorists haven't been as much of problem - unless you include the Australian politicians who love to frighten the population about improbable risks.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 16:30:52 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman@gmail.com> wrote:

On Friday, 1 August 2014 05:32:29 UTC+10, nu...@bid.nes wrote:
On Thursday, July 31, 2014 12:57:19 AM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Thursday, 31 July 2014 16:22:01 UTC+10, Michael Terrell wrote:

"nuny@bid.nes" wrote:

Now, I may well be paranoid, but I'd like to know how many of those "children" know how to make IEDs.

Since few adults know how to make IEDs, as evidenced by the number of people blown up by their own bombs in the early stages of any insurrection (notably the provisional IRA in the UK, but US loonies haven't done too well either, until Darwinian selection has depleted the gene pool) the answer has to be "not very many at all".

About half of the time I perceive you to be fairly level-headed, the other half I perceive you to be living in a fantasy world.

The "early stages" of the current example of IED making in the Middle East are long over. Relatively ignorant (illiterate, at least) people have been making shaped-charge IEDs for a decade or so there, and the skill is quite popular among militant Islamists. It's very difficult to tell a militant one from your average Muslim (until they yell Allahu akbar! and blow something up), and as I said Islam is growing rapidly in rural South America due to the influx of Muslims there from the Middle East.

Islam may be growing rapidly in rural South America, but the number of Muslims there would still fit under "not very many at all". The proportion of those Muslims who are militant enough to make IEDs can be expected to be much the same as the proportion of fundamentalist Christians who are militant enough to go in for armed insurrection, again "not very many at all".

About the same number as there are Jews in the USA.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top