Driver to drive?

[z]

On Dec 1, 11:14 pm, Jim Yanik <jya...@abuse.gov> wrote:>

then what hospital was he born at?
I would think that the hospital would be PROUD to claim that a President
was born there.And it doesn't reveal anything that would threaten his
privacy or identity.

i believe we've discussed this before. HIPAA act specifies a fine of
up to $50,000 and imprisonment of up to 1 year for each act of
disclosing health or medical information which can be identified to
one person. and that includes hospital stays and that includes birth.
try it and see.

however you are welcome to peruse his birth announcement printed in
not one, but two hawaiian newspapers in 1961

http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/obama-1961-birth-announcement-from-honolulu-advertiser0000.gif

http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/ObamaBirthStarBulletin.jpg

 

[James Arthur]

Don Klipstein wrote:

Have any hospitals where any previous US Presidents have been born
bragged about having Presidents born there?

- Don Klipstein (don@misty.com)

I doubt it ever came up before:

http://www.nps.gov/pub_aff/pres/trivia.htm

Jimmy Carter, 39th President: 1977-1981
• Jimmy Carter was the first president born in a hospital.


Cheers,
James Arthur

 

On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 00:08:25 -0600, "Tim Williams"
<tmoranwms@charter.net> Gave us:

Plenty.

Fix your clock, you little top-posting, top-listed retard.

 

[Jim Yanik]

don@manx.misty.com (Don Klipstein) wrote in
news:slrngj9f4k.h2l.don@manx.misty.com:

In article <Xns9B67EC6B175Ajyanikkuanet@74.209.136.87>, Jim Yanik
wrote:
RFI-EMI-GUY <Rhyolite@NETTALLY.COM> wrote in
news:4934a215$0$17061$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com:

krw wrote:
(snip)

I had to show my (unaltered, sealed) birth certificate last week to
get a drivers license.

So? Mine looks like a piece of crumbled trash from 54 years ago.
Still good, yet anyone could have forged it.

Why won't NObama show his to demonstrate he
has one of the qualifications to be President?

He has, you saw it.

then what hospital was he born at?
I would think that the hospital would be PROUD to claim that a
President was born there.And it doesn't reveal anything that would
threaten his privacy or identity.

(as if any crook would be dumb enough to try to use Obama's ID....)

I would think that if the hospital violated or even only arguably
violated any state, local or Federal law including any part of HIPPA
in verifying Obama's birth there, then I would expect the swiftboaters
to sue and prosecute (even if by private criminal complaint) to such
an extent as to *at least* cause a very expensive defense burden.

No law would be violated by a hospital saying Obama had been born there.

Have any hospitals where any previous US Presidents have been born
bragged about having Presidents born there?

- Don Klipstein (don@misty.com)

what OTHER President's citizenship has been so questioned?
(and so publicly)

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net

 

[krw]

In article <4934a215$0$17061$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com>,
Rhyolite@NETTALLY.COM says...>

krw wrote:
(snip)

I had to show my (unaltered, sealed) birth certificate last week to
get a drivers license.

So? Mine looks like a piece of crumbled trash from 54 years ago. Still
good, yet anyone could have forged it.

If the seal isn't legible it isn't valid.

Why won't NObama show his to demonstrate he
has one of the qualifications to be President?

He has, you saw it.

No, I didn't. I saw something that is *NOT* a valid birth
certificate.

Why is the one he
has shown photoshopped?

Do you have proof of this, or did someone tell you it was?

Enough proof that he should squash the issue with the real deal.
He hasn't.

Why do you support someone who may not be
so qualified and evades such simple questions?


He is the most qualified. You are not more qualified.

I have a birth certificate (and am >35), thus qualified. He
apparently doesn't. You're a liar.

--

 

[RFI-EMI-GUY]

Jim Yanik wrote:

don@manx.misty.com (Don Klipstein) wrote in
news:slrngj9f4k.h2l.don@manx.misty.com:

In article <Xns9B67EC6B175Ajyanikkuanet@74.209.136.87>, Jim Yanik
wrote:
RFI-EMI-GUY <Rhyolite@NETTALLY.COM> wrote in
news:4934a215$0$17061$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com:

krw wrote:
(snip)
I had to show my (unaltered, sealed) birth certificate last week to
get a drivers license.
So? Mine looks like a piece of crumbled trash from 54 years ago.
Still good, yet anyone could have forged it.

Why won't NObama show his to demonstrate he
has one of the qualifications to be President?
He has, you saw it.
then what hospital was he born at?
I would think that the hospital would be PROUD to claim that a
President was born there.And it doesn't reveal anything that would
threaten his privacy or identity.

(as if any crook would be dumb enough to try to use Obama's ID....)
I would think that if the hospital violated or even only arguably
violated any state, local or Federal law including any part of HIPPA
in verifying Obama's birth there, then I would expect the swiftboaters
to sue and prosecute (even if by private criminal complaint) to such
an extent as to *at least* cause a very expensive defense burden.

No law would be violated by a hospital saying Obama had been born there.

Have any hospitals where any previous US Presidents have been born
bragged about having Presidents born there?

- Don Klipstein (don@misty.com)


what OTHER President's citizenship has been so questioned?
(and so publicly)

Only by idiots..

--
Joe Leikhim K4SAT
"The RFI-EMI-GUY"Š

"Treason doth never prosper: what's the reason?
For if it prosper, none dare call it treason."

"Follow The Money" ;-P

 

[RFI-EMI-GUY]

krw wrote:

In article <4934a215$0$17061$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com>,
Rhyolite@NETTALLY.COM says...
krw wrote:
(snip)
I had to show my (unaltered, sealed) birth certificate last week to
get a drivers license.
So? Mine looks like a piece of crumbled trash from 54 years ago. Still
good, yet anyone could have forged it.

If the seal isn't legible it isn't valid.

Why won't NObama show his to demonstrate he
has one of the qualifications to be President?
He has, you saw it.

No, I didn't. I saw something that is *NOT* a valid birth
certificate.

Why is the one he
has shown photoshopped?
Do you have proof of this, or did someone tell you it was?

Enough proof that he should squash the issue with the real deal.
He hasn't.

Why do you support someone who may not be
so qualified and evades such simple questions?

He is the most qualified. You are not more qualified.

I have a birth certificate (and am >35), thus qualified. He
apparently doesn't. You're a liar.

I am sorry, by what number of popular votes were you elected?

--
Joe Leikhim K4SAT
"The RFI-EMI-GUY"Š

"Treason doth never prosper: what's the reason?
For if it prosper, none dare call it treason."

"Follow The Money" ;-P

 

[Jim Yanik]

RFI-EMI-GUY <Rhyolite@NETTALLY.COM> wrote in
news:49356a4b$0$4900$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com:

Jim Yanik wrote:
don@manx.misty.com (Don Klipstein) wrote in
news:slrngj9f4k.h2l.don@manx.misty.com:

In article <Xns9B67EC6B175Ajyanikkuanet@74.209.136.87>, Jim Yanik
wrote:
RFI-EMI-GUY <Rhyolite@NETTALLY.COM> wrote in
news:4934a215$0$17061$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com:

krw wrote:
(snip)
I had to show my (unaltered, sealed) birth certificate last week to
get a drivers license.
So? Mine looks like a piece of crumbled trash from 54 years ago.
Still good, yet anyone could have forged it.

Why won't NObama show his to demonstrate he
has one of the qualifications to be President?
He has, you saw it.
then what hospital was he born at?
I would think that the hospital would be PROUD to claim that a
President was born there.And it doesn't reveal anything that would
threaten his privacy or identity.

(as if any crook would be dumb enough to try to use Obama's ID....)
I would think that if the hospital violated or even only arguably
violated any state, local or Federal law including any part of HIPPA
in verifying Obama's birth there, then I would expect the swiftboaters
to sue and prosecute (even if by private criminal complaint) to such
an extent as to *at least* cause a very expensive defense burden.

No law would be violated by a hospital saying Obama had been born there.

Have any hospitals where any previous US Presidents have been born
bragged about having Presidents born there?

- Don Klipstein (don@misty.com)


what OTHER President's citizenship has been so questioned?
(and so publicly)

Only by idiots..

Ah,if you disagree,you are an idiot;Typical liberal stance.

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net

 

[Jim Thompson]

On 2 Dec 2008 17:12:56 GMT, Jim Yanik <jyanik@abuse.gov> wrote:

RFI-EMI-GUY <Rhyolite@NETTALLY.COM> wrote in
news:49356a4b$0$4900$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com:

Jim Yanik wrote:
don@manx.misty.com (Don Klipstein) wrote in
news:slrngj9f4k.h2l.don@manx.misty.com:

In article <Xns9B67EC6B175Ajyanikkuanet@74.209.136.87>, Jim Yanik
wrote:
RFI-EMI-GUY <Rhyolite@NETTALLY.COM> wrote in
news:4934a215$0$17061$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com:

krw wrote:
(snip)
I had to show my (unaltered, sealed) birth certificate last week to
get a drivers license.
So? Mine looks like a piece of crumbled trash from 54 years ago.
Still good, yet anyone could have forged it.

Why won't NObama show his to demonstrate he
has one of the qualifications to be President?
He has, you saw it.
then what hospital was he born at?
I would think that the hospital would be PROUD to claim that a
President was born there.And it doesn't reveal anything that would
threaten his privacy or identity.

(as if any crook would be dumb enough to try to use Obama's ID....)
I would think that if the hospital violated or even only arguably
violated any state, local or Federal law including any part of HIPPA
in verifying Obama's birth there, then I would expect the swiftboaters
to sue and prosecute (even if by private criminal complaint) to such
an extent as to *at least* cause a very expensive defense burden.

No law would be violated by a hospital saying Obama had been born there.

Have any hospitals where any previous US Presidents have been born
bragged about having Presidents born there?

- Don Klipstein (don@misty.com)


what OTHER President's citizenship has been so questioned?
(and so publicly)

Only by idiots..


Ah,if you disagree,you are an idiot;Typical liberal stance.

Yep. I'm surprised he didn't label us all as morons.

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

"Liberals" (aka leftist weenies) are very confused people.
Anyone they disagree with, they label as "moron".
Yet the truth is that the most moronic & gullible people in the
world are "liberals".

Clearly "liberal" is an oxymoron.

 

[krw]

In article <49356b46$0$4864$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com>,
Rhyolite@NETTALLY.COM says...>

krw wrote:
In article <4934a215$0$17061$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com>,
Rhyolite@NETTALLY.COM says...
krw wrote:
(snip)
I had to show my (unaltered, sealed) birth certificate last week to
get a drivers license.
So? Mine looks like a piece of crumbled trash from 54 years ago. Still
good, yet anyone could have forged it.

If the seal isn't legible it isn't valid.

Why won't NObama show his to demonstrate he
has one of the qualifications to be President?
He has, you saw it.

No, I didn't. I saw something that is *NOT* a valid birth
certificate.

Why is the one he
has shown photoshopped?
Do you have proof of this, or did someone tell you it was?

Enough proof that he should squash the issue with the real deal.
He hasn't.

Why do you support someone who may not be
so qualified and evades such simple questions?

He is the most qualified. You are not more qualified.

I have a birth certificate (and am >35), thus qualified. He
apparently doesn't. You're a liar.


I am sorry, by what number of popular votes were you elected?

What part of "qualification" did you not understand? Typical
weenie.

 

[Don Klipstein]

In article <Xns9B685129A984Cjyanikkuanet@74.209.136.87>, Jim Yanik wrote:

don@manx.misty.com (Don Klipstein) wrote in
news:slrngj9f4k.h2l.don@manx.misty.com:

In article <Xns9B67EC6B175Ajyanikkuanet@74.209.136.87>, Jim Yanik
wrote:
RFI-EMI-GUY <Rhyolite@NETTALLY.COM> wrote in
news:4934a215$0$17061$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com:

krw wrote:
(snip)

I had to show my (unaltered, sealed) birth certificate last week to
get a drivers license.

So? Mine looks like a piece of crumbled trash from 54 years ago.
Still good, yet anyone could have forged it.

Why won't NObama show his to demonstrate he
has one of the qualifications to be President?

He has, you saw it.

then what hospital was he born at?
I would think that the hospital would be PROUD to claim that a
President was born there.And it doesn't reveal anything that would
threaten his privacy or identity.

(as if any crook would be dumb enough to try to use Obama's ID....)

I would think that if the hospital violated or even only arguably
violated any state, local or Federal law including any part of HIPPA
in verifying Obama's birth there, then I would expect the swiftboaters
to sue and prosecute (even if by private criminal complaint) to such
an extent as to *at least* cause a very expensive defense burden.

No law would be violated by a hospital saying Obama had been born there.

Until they provided proof so much as good as what FactCheck got.

Have any hospitals where any previous US Presidents have been born
bragged about having Presidents born there?

- Don Klipstein (don@misty.com)

what OTHER President's citizenship has been so questioned?
(and so publicly)

That is rather unrelated to bragging rights of hospitals - and I have
yet to hear of any exercising bragging rights even when they were more
free to do so.

- Don Klipstein (don@misty.com)

 

[Jim Yanik]

don@manx.misty.com (Don Klipstein) wrote in
news:slrngjc579.kbr.don@manx.misty.com:

In article <Xns9B685129A984Cjyanikkuanet@74.209.136.87>, Jim Yanik wrote:
don@manx.misty.com (Don Klipstein) wrote in
news:slrngj9f4k.h2l.don@manx.misty.com:

In article <Xns9B67EC6B175Ajyanikkuanet@74.209.136.87>, Jim Yanik
wrote:
RFI-EMI-GUY <Rhyolite@NETTALLY.COM> wrote in
news:4934a215$0$17061$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com:

krw wrote:
(snip)

I had to show my (unaltered, sealed) birth certificate last week to
get a drivers license.

So? Mine looks like a piece of crumbled trash from 54 years ago.
Still good, yet anyone could have forged it.

Why won't NObama show his to demonstrate he
has one of the qualifications to be President?

He has, you saw it.

then what hospital was he born at?
I would think that the hospital would be PROUD to claim that a
President was born there.And it doesn't reveal anything that would
threaten his privacy or identity.

(as if any crook would be dumb enough to try to use Obama's ID....)

I would think that if the hospital violated or even only arguably
violated any state, local or Federal law including any part of HIPPA
in verifying Obama's birth there, then I would expect the swiftboaters
to sue and prosecute (even if by private criminal complaint) to such
an extent as to *at least* cause a very expensive defense burden.

No law would be violated by a hospital saying Obama had been born there.

Until they provided proof so much as good as what FactCheck got.

I would not trust FactCheck after their work on the recent NRA Obama ads.

Have any hospitals where any previous US Presidents have been born
bragged about having Presidents born there?

- Don Klipstein (don@misty.com)

what OTHER President's citizenship has been so questioned?
(and so publicly)

That is rather unrelated to bragging rights of hospitals - and I have
yet to hear of any exercising bragging rights even when they were more
free to do so.

- Don Klipstein (don@misty.com)

what OTHER President's citizenship has been so questioned?
(and so publicly)


The question is there,there IS reasonable doubt,and a simple declaration
from the hospital would solve it,WITHOUT revealing any personal
information.


--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net

 

[J.A. Legris]

On Dec 2, 12:12 pm, Jim Yanik <jya...@abuse.gov> wrote:

RFI-EMI-GUY <Rhyol...@NETTALLY.COM> wrote innews:49356a4b$0$4900$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com:



Jim Yanik wrote:
d...@manx.misty.com (Don Klipstein) wrote in
news:slrngj9f4k.h2l.don@manx.misty.com:

In article <Xns9B67EC6B175Ajyanikkua...@74.209.136.87>, Jim Yanik
wrote:
RFI-EMI-GUY <Rhyol...@NETTALLY.COM> wrote in
news:4934a215$0$17061$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com:

krw wrote:
(snip)
I had to show my (unaltered, sealed) birth certificate last week to
get a drivers license.  
So? Mine looks like a piece of crumbled trash from 54 years ago.
Still good, yet anyone could have forged it.

Why won't NObama show his to demonstrate he
has one of the qualifications to be President?  
He has, you saw it.
then what hospital was he born at?
I would think that the hospital would be PROUD to claim that a
President was born there.And it doesn't reveal anything that would
threaten his privacy or identity.

(as if any crook would be dumb enough to try to use Obama's ID....)
  I would think that if the hospital violated or even only arguably
violated any state, local or Federal law including any part of HIPPA
in verifying Obama's birth there, then I would expect the swiftboaters
to sue and prosecute (even if by private criminal complaint) to such
an extent as to *at least* cause a very expensive defense burden.

No law would be violated by a hospital saying Obama had been born there.

  Have any hospitals where any previous US Presidents have been born
bragged about having Presidents born there?

 - Don Klipstein (d...@misty.com)

what OTHER President's citizenship has been so questioned?
(and so publicly)

Only by idiots..

Ah,if you disagree,you are an idiot;Typical liberal stance.

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net

Evidently a typical paranoid right-wing whack-job response too. Then
he shoots you.

--
Joe

 

[Richard The Dreaded Liber]

On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 17:12:56 +0000, Jim Yanik wrote:

RFI-EMI-GUY <Rhyolite@NETTALLY.COM> wrote in
Jim Yanik wrote:
what OTHER President's citizenship has been so questioned? (and so
publicly)

Only by idiots..

Ah,if you disagree,you are an idiot;Typical liberal stance.

That's odd - it's indistinguishable from the tyical neocon stance!

Cheers!
Rich

 

[James Arthur]

J.A. Legris wrote:

On Dec 2, 12:12 pm, Jim Yanik <jya...@abuse.gov> wrote:
RFI-EMI-GUY <Rhyol...@NETTALLY.COM> wrote:

Only by idiots..
Ah,if you disagree,you are an idiot;Typical liberal stance.


Evidently a typical paranoid right-wing whack-job response too. Then
he shoots you.

--
Joe

Actually, I'd bet most shooters / violent criminals are liberals.

Seriously.

Cheers,
James Arthur

 

[Jim Thompson]

On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:55:31 GMT, James Arthur
<bogusabdsqy@verizon.net> wrote:

J.A. Legris wrote:
On Dec 2, 12:12 pm, Jim Yanik <jya...@abuse.gov> wrote:
RFI-EMI-GUY <Rhyol...@NETTALLY.COM> wrote:

Only by idiots..
Ah,if you disagree,you are an idiot;Typical liberal stance.


Evidently a typical paranoid right-wing whack-job response too. Then
he shoots you.

--
Joe

Actually, I'd bet most shooters / violent criminals are liberals.

Seriously.

Cheers,
James Arthur

I think that's a given. Reason: Inadequacy breeds paranoia which, in
turn, breeds criminal behavior.

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

"Liberals" (aka leftist weenies) are very confused people.
Anyone they disagree with, they label as "moron".
Yet the truth is that the most moronic & gullible people in the
world are "liberals".

Clearly "liberal" is an oxymoron.

 

[James Arthur]

Jim Thompson wrote:

On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:55:31 GMT, James Arthur wrote:

J.A. Legris wrote:
On Dec 2, 12:12 pm, Jim Yanik <jya...@abuse.gov> wrote:
RFI-EMI-GUY <Rhyol...@NETTALLY.COM> wrote:
Only by idiots..
Ah,if you disagree,you are an idiot;Typical liberal stance.

Evidently a typical paranoid right-wing whack-job response too. Then
he shoots you.

Actually, I'd bet most shooters / violent criminals are liberals.

Seriously.

I think that's a given. Reason: Inadequacy breeds paranoia which, in
turn, breeds criminal behavior.

...Jim Thompson

Naw, what I said was from my impression of the
beliefs expressed by prison inmates, as well as
the ex-felon controversy from the 2000 election.

Cheers,
James Arthur

 

[Jim Thompson]

On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:30:23 GMT, James Arthur
<bogusabdsqy@verizon.net> wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:
On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:55:31 GMT, James Arthur wrote:

J.A. Legris wrote:
On Dec 2, 12:12 pm, Jim Yanik <jya...@abuse.gov> wrote:
RFI-EMI-GUY <Rhyol...@NETTALLY.COM> wrote:
Only by idiots..
Ah,if you disagree,you are an idiot;Typical liberal stance.

Evidently a typical paranoid right-wing whack-job response too. Then
he shoots you.

Actually, I'd bet most shooters / violent criminals are liberals.

Seriously.

I think that's a given. Reason: Inadequacy breeds paranoia which, in
turn, breeds criminal behavior.

...Jim Thompson

Naw, what I said was from my impression of the
beliefs expressed by prison inmates, as well as
the ex-felon controversy from the 2000 election.

Cheers,
James Arthur

You don't think Liberals feel inadequate ?

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

Liberals are so cute.  Dumb as a box of rocks, but cute.

 

[Paul Hovnanian P.E.]

Jim Yanik wrote:

don@manx.misty.com (Don Klipstein) wrote in
news:slrngj9f4k.h2l.don@manx.misty.com:

In article <Xns9B67EC6B175Ajyanikkuanet@74.209.136.87>, Jim Yanik
wrote:
RFI-EMI-GUY <Rhyolite@NETTALLY.COM> wrote in
news:4934a215$0$17061$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com:

krw wrote:
(snip)

I had to show my (unaltered, sealed) birth certificate last week to
get a drivers license.

So? Mine looks like a piece of crumbled trash from 54 years ago.
Still good, yet anyone could have forged it.

Why won't NObama show his to demonstrate he
has one of the qualifications to be President?

He has, you saw it.

then what hospital was he born at?
I would think that the hospital would be PROUD to claim that a
President was born there.And it doesn't reveal anything that would
threaten his privacy or identity.

(as if any crook would be dumb enough to try to use Obama's ID....)

I would think that if the hospital violated or even only arguably
violated any state, local or Federal law including any part of HIPPA
in verifying Obama's birth there, then I would expect the swiftboaters
to sue and prosecute (even if by private criminal complaint) to such
an extent as to *at least* cause a very expensive defense burden.

No law would be violated by a hospital saying Obama had been born there.


Have any hospitals where any previous US Presidents have been born
bragged about having Presidents born there?

- Don Klipstein (don@misty.com)


what OTHER President's citizenship has been so questioned?
(and so publicly)

McCain's

--
Paul Hovnanian mailtoaul@Hovnanian.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
Life is like an analogy.

 

[James Arthur]

Jim Thompson wrote:

On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:30:23 GMT, James Arthur
bogusabdsqy@verizon.net> wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:
On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:55:31 GMT, James Arthur wrote:

J.A. Legris wrote:
On Dec 2, 12:12 pm, Jim Yanik <jya...@abuse.gov> wrote:
RFI-EMI-GUY <Rhyol...@NETTALLY.COM> wrote:
Only by idiots..
Ah,if you disagree,you are an idiot;Typical liberal stance.

Evidently a typical paranoid right-wing whack-job response too. Then
he shoots you.
Actually, I'd bet most shooters / violent criminals are liberals.

Seriously.
I think that's a given. Reason: Inadequacy breeds paranoia which, in
turn, breeds criminal behavior.

...Jim Thompson
Naw, what I said was from my impression of the
beliefs expressed by prison inmates, as well as
the ex-felon controversy from the 2000 election.



You don't think Liberals feel inadequate ?

I dunno.

Joe Legris said he thought paranoid right-wing whack-jobs
would shoot you.

So I was reacting to Joe's stereotype, not making a
comment about liberals in general--liberals do not
generally shoot people.

The rank-and-file guy who shoots you, though, the
common thug...generally espouses 'liberal' views,
AFAICT.


Cheers,
James Arthur