Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have a feeling that Brad is either a Matthew Goodyear wanna-be, or a"Brad" <goog...@vk2qq.com> wrote ...
On Nov 14, 3:38 pm, Coach <suv...@yahoo.fr> wrote:
On Nov 14, 2:31 pm, Brad <goog...@vk2qq.com> wrote:
On Nov 14, 3:15 pm, Coach <suv...@yahoo.fr> wrote:
And from that point on you assumed wrong several times and just talked
a lot of crap and noise.
We've already established that you have an old caravan in your
backyard full of cb radios where you try to chat to local young ladies.
No *we* haven't. You have alleged it, but no facts exist to support
your allegation.
I obtained photographic evidence and explained what I saw on that
photo to you - and you had no choice but to agree. We both know that
I'm right, don't we?
What you *saw* on the photo was correct, and I agreed with that. What
you imagined after that was not agreed and you yourself stated you
could not see inside the 'van, so everything else is supposition on
your part. Indeed much of it was just downright fabrication or
misrepresentation of the few facts you held. I even fed you false
details and you dutifully rehashed them and re-presented them as
facts, like a Murdoch journalist.
I'm surprised you want to go on with this story. Watching it unfold
last time was fascinating and like watching a train wreck in slow
motion. I found it difficult to believe you had no humility and felt
no embarrassment with regard to your behavior. It was only because you
wrote the 'help me Obi Wan Sylvia, you're my only friend' message a
couple of days later that I cut you some slack. Up to that point I was
compiling a file for the Police.
I had already been in contact with my local council and confirmed that
there had been no FOI requests regarding my property (your claims were
therefore bullshit) , and I had visited the local police and enquired
about applying for a warrant charging you with stalking. Once I read
you email to Sylvia I understood your frame of mind at that time I
ceased all action. You came very close indeed.
-----------------------------------------------
You don't have a sufficient case to get a stalking charge made,
you need to show each of the 4 conditions to qualify that stalking occured.
1/ The alleged stalker caused you feelings of apprehension - Oh Dear! *tick*
2/ The alleged stalker communicated with you - GASP! *tick*
3/ The alleged stalking occured on more than one occasion! Persistent Bastard! *tick*
4/ You've got a good rack! *cross*
Each of these stringent criteria must be met! Otherwise the police receptionist won't
give you a tour of all the bonus options like a free week lock up at the watch house, just sign here!
Herc
If you can't handle the heat mate, just simply either get out of theOn Nov 14, 3:38 pm, Coach <suv...@yahoo.fr> wrote:
On Nov 14, 2:31 pm, Brad <goog...@vk2qq.com> wrote:
On Nov 14, 3:15 pm, Coach <suv...@yahoo.fr> wrote:
And from that point on you assumed wrong several times and just talked
a lot of crap and noise.
We've already established that you have an old caravan in your
backyard full of cb radios where you try to chat to local young ladies.
No *we* haven't. You have alleged it, but no facts exist to support
your allegation.
I obtained photographic evidence and explained what I saw on that
photo to you - and you had no choice but to agree. We both know that
I'm right, don't we?
What you *saw* on the photo was correct, and I agreed with that. What
you imagined after that was not agreed and you yourself stated you
could not see inside the 'van, so everything else is supposition on
your part. Indeed much of it was just downright fabrication or
misrepresentation of the few facts you held. I even fed you false
details and you dutifully rehashed them and re-presented them as
facts, like a Murdoch journalist.
I'm surprised you want to go on with this story. Watching it unfold
last time was fascinating and like watching a train wreck in slow
motion. I found it difficult to believe you had no humility and felt
no embarrassment with regard to your behavior. It was only because you
wrote the 'help me Obi Wan Sylvia, you're my only friend' message a
couple of days later that I cut you some slack. Up to that point I was
compiling a file for the Police.
I had already been in contact with my local council and confirmed that
there had been no FOI requests regarding my property (your claims were
therefore bullshit) , and I had visited the local police and enquired
about applying for a warrant charging you with stalking. Once I read
you email to Sylvia I understood your frame of mind at that time I
ceased all action. You came very close indeed.
After your insistence Brad, I have re-read your post in full. So youI'm surprised you want to go on with this story. Watching it unfold
last time was fascinating and like watching a train wreck in slow
motion. I found it difficult to believe you had no humility and felt
no embarrassment with regard to your behavior. It was only because you
wrote the 'help me Obi Wan Sylvia, you're my only friend' message a
couple of days later that I cut you some slack. Up to that point I was
compiling a file for the Police.
braided copper around a compressible elestic inner. (ala bungee-cord)"Sylvia Else" <sylvia@not.here.invalid> wrote in...
On 13/11/2010 2:37 PM, |-|ercules wrote:
and the wires aren't even copper or insulated, they're frayed wire in the same rubber covering,
I think they're made that way so as to obviate the standard solution of replacing the plug when the wearer makes the the all too
common mistake of trying to walk away from the device the headphones are plugged into, causing the conductors to part company (if
only internally) with the plug.
They're probably made with specially designed inadequate strain relief as well.
Sylvia.
Actually the stretchy sheath and frayed wire on the $90 earphones is a lot easier to bend than the blackberry cable.
Any candidates for a stretchy conducting material to solve the sudden jolt problem?
PINGOn 2010-11-13, |-|ercules <radgray...@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Sylvia Else" <syl...@not.here.invalid> wrote in...
On 13/11/2010 2:37 PM, |-|ercules wrote:
and the wires aren't even copper or insulated, they're frayed wire in
the same rubber covering,
I think they're made that way so as to obviate the standard solution of
replacing the plug when the wearer makes the the all too
common mistake of trying to walk away from the device the headphones
are plugged into, causing the conductors to part company (if
only internally) with the plug.
They're probably made with specially designed inadequate strain relief
as well.
Sylvia.
Actually the stretchy sheath and frayed wire on the $90 earphones is a
lot easier to bend than the blackberry cable.
Any candidates for a stretchy conducting material to solve the sudden
jolt problem?
braided copper around a compressible elestic inner. (ala bungee-cord)
--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: n...@netfront.net ---
PINGOn 2010-11-13, |-|ercules <radgray...@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Sylvia Else" <syl...@not.here.invalid> wrote in...
On 13/11/2010 2:37 PM, |-|ercules wrote:
and the wires aren't even copper or insulated, they're frayed wire in the same rubber covering,
I think they're made that way so as to obviate the standard solution of replacing the plug when the wearer makes the the all too
common mistake of trying to walk away from the device the headphones are plugged into, causing the conductors to part company (if
only internally) with the plug.
They're probably made with specially designed inadequate strain relief as well.
Sylvia.
Actually the stretchy sheath and frayed wire on the $90 earphones is a lot easier to bend than the blackberry cable.
Any candidates for a stretchy conducting material to solve the sudden jolt problem?
braided copper around a compressible elestic inner. (ala bungee-cord)
--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: n...@netfront.net ---
mmm who on earth would pay $ 90 for a pair of ear fones ?????
betchya 90$ you couldnt pick the differance between a $15 pair and a $90
pair..
Like to see you get a quality in-ear noise cancelling earphone formmm who on earth would pay $ 90 for a pair of ear fones ?????
betchya 90$ you couldnt pick the differance between a $15 pair and a $90
pair..
After weeks to get my sound isolated earphones, which cut out surrounding
noise
perfectly with a bit of music, I ordered an iPod shuffle, a hotel matchbox
sized MP3 player.
But to keep my address private I sent it to my old address which redirects
to my PO BOX,
I always do that for mail order and on the occasion a courier goes to my
old address they
soon work it out and I get them to send it to the PO BOX themselves.
JB HIFI didn't do that, it says order complete and no IPOD... yada yada
yada, so I cut
the cables on the Blackberry earphones and the $90 Sound Insulating
earphones, well
worth the money!
There's 5 wires! Blackberry uses a smal USB plug so I was trying to plug
my SI earphones
into the Blackberry. So I snip further up the cable where it splits into
2 and there's 2 wires
but different colours to the 5 at the base of the cable. OK I'm going to
have to hotwire the
earphones and see what gives a signal. So I snip the $90 earphone cable
and despite having
stripped 1000 wires with my teeth with 100% record, this cable is made of
weird rubber,
and the wires aren't even copper or insulated, they're frayed wire in the
same rubber covering,
insulate by a powder coating it seems, I got one wire stripped but no
luck. 2 earphones wrecked,
now I have to buy a paper with good ole earplugs and hope I don't get
verbally assaulted too badly.
Herc
The Unrecognized Truman under 10 years strong sonic torture.
--
One small click for a mouse
One giant upgrade to www.MindReading.com
"Coach" <suv...@yahoo.fr> wrote in ...
On Nov 21, 6:58 pm, "mark krawczuk" <krawc...@adam.com.au> wrote:
mmm who on earth would pay $ 90 for a pair of ear fones ?????
betchya 90$ you couldnt pick the differance between a $15 pair and a $90
pair..
Wrong! With the volume at 10% they are louder than standard earphones at full volume.
Turn the volume up they don't get too loud, just more bassy.
Try this when you get some bassy earphones. http://hercshome.com/TRON.mp3
[Coach]
Like to see you get a quality in-ear noise cancelling earphone for
less than $100 - let alone $15
Not sure on quality, but Amazon has some cheap ones.http://www.amazon.com/JBuds-Premium-Noise-Isolating-Earbuds-Electric/...
Great sound with the barrel design, but I need higher isolation with the ribbed witchhat design
to block out the Truman Show.
"Coach" <suv...@yahoo.fr> wrote in ...
On Nov 21, 6:58 pm, "mark krawczuk" <krawc...@adam.com.au> wrote:
mmm who on earth would pay $ 90 for a pair of ear fones ?????
betchya 90$ you couldnt pick the differance between a $15 pair and a $90
pair..
Wrong! With the volume at 10% they are louder than standard earphones at full volume.
Turn the volume up they don't get too loud, just more bassy.
Try this when you get some bassy earphones. http://hercshome.com/TRON.mp3
[Coach]
Like to see you get a quality in-ear noise cancelling earphone for
less than $100 - let alone $15
Not sure on quality, but Amazon has some cheap ones.http://www.amazon.com/JBuds-Premium-Noise-Isolating-Earbuds-Electric/...
Great sound with the barrel design, but I need higher isolation with the ribbed witchhat design
to block out the Truman Show.