Don Lancaster: RIP...

On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 3:19:07 AM UTC-4, boB wrote:
I remember when Don used to post on S.E.D. years ago.
I talked wth him once or twice in the 90s. I bought a couple of his
books like The TTL Cookbook and TV Typewriter.

Don was 83

https://gilaherald.com/obituary-for-don-lancaster/

boB

Oh my, thanks. RIP Don, your cook books where great. And you had quirky other lives which I loved hearing about.
George H.
 
boB <boB@K7IQ.com> wrote:
On Wed, 5 Jul 2023 13:55:50 -0700 (PDT), mkr5000 <mikerbgr@gmail.com
wrote:

On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 3:42:25?PM UTC-4, mkr5000 wrote:
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 11:26:22?AM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Thursday, July 6, 2023 at 12:35:21?AM UTC+10, Wanderer wrote:
Don Lancaster wrote books in the 70\'s that kids bought at Radio Shack
and that changed the world.
Actually it didn\'t. People like Tim Berners-Lee and Donald W Davies
had a much larger effect. Bob Widlar and Barry Gilbert gave the kids
components worth playing with, and that was a whole lot more effective
thanDon Lancaster\'s hobby level text-books.

He was a useful guy, but lets not go over the top.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Jesus. This group hasn\'t changed at all.
Pissing on a man\'s funeral ?
I also just realized that this was the guy who did the CMOS cookbook,
which was the most beloved book in collection. I used it more than any I
had. Didn\'t he also write a lot of articles for Popular Electronics? RIP, Mr. Lancaster.


Yes, that one too. Don did get people interested in trying different
electonics components and learing about them. Even if people like Bob
Widlar and others designed the components they used in their circuits.
It takes both kinds to design products. They are designed around
other people\'s components.

Don also wrote in magazines like Popular Electronics which a lot of us
read back then to help us get started.

And, AoE as well but for me, I hadn\'t seen that book until around 1990
or so. Way later than Don Lancaster started writing.

boB
I learned a lot from him too, back around 1980. My first engineering job
(1981-83) was doing 2/3 of the time- and frequency-keeping electronics for
the first civilian DBS system ( Spacetel from AEL Microtel).

The friendly acquaintance with logic ICs that I got from Don’s books made a
great difference—he encouraged all sorts of lateral thinking about
applications.

Didn’t prevent me from arguing with him about the usefulness of TECs, which
he was fond of trashing in his later years. ;)

Memory eternal!

Cheers

Phil Hobbs



--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC /
Hobbs ElectroOptics Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
 
On Thursday, July 6, 2023 at 7:42:12 AM UTC+10, boB wrote:
On Wed, 5 Jul 2023 13:55:50 -0700 (PDT), mkr5000 <mike...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 3:42:25?PM UTC-4, mkr5000 wrote:
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 11:26:22?AM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Thursday, July 6, 2023 at 12:35:21?AM UTC+10, Wanderer wrote:
Don Lancaster wrote books in the 70\'s that kids bought at Radio Shack and that changed the world.
Actually it didn\'t. People like Tim Berners-Lee and Donald W Davies had a much larger effect. Bob Widlar and Barry Gilbert gave the kids components worth playing with, and that was a whole lot more effective thanDon Lancaster\'s hobby level text-books.

He was a useful guy, but lets not go over the top.

<snipped silly claim>

I also just realized that this was the guy who did the CMOS cookbook, which was the most beloved book in collection. I used it more than any I had. Didn\'t he also write a lot of articles for Popular Electronics? RIP, Mr. Lancaster.

Yes, that one too. Don did get people interested in trying different electonics components and learning about them. Even if people like Bob Widlar and others designed the components they used in their circuits.

It takes both kinds to design products. They are designed around other people\'s components.

Don Lancaster wasn\'t a product designer. He was a populariser. People who did serious electronics read higher level books that the \"CMOS Cookbook\".

> Don also wrote in magazines like Popular Electronics which a lot of us read back then to help us get started.

Serious people read the peer-reviewed literature.

> And, AoE as well but for me, I hadn\'t seen that book until around 1990 or so. Way later than Don Lancaster started writing.

There were plenty of less comprehensive texts around before AoE.

I bought this book back when I was a graduate student, and found it very useful.

https://www.amazon.com/Analysis-Design-Transistor-Circuits-Lawrence/dp/0442017103/ref=sr_1_3?crid=346O9SU18W1X3&keywords=laurence+cowles&qid=1688621866&s=books&sprefix=laurance+cowles%2Cstripbooks-intl-ship%2C351&sr=1-3

Nothing Dona Lancaster wrote would have been anything like as useful.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
On Thursday, July 6, 2023 at 11:56:09 AM UTC+10, Phil Hobbs wrote:
boB <b...@K7IQ.com> wrote:
On Wed, 5 Jul 2023 13:55:50 -0700 (PDT), mkr5000 <mike...@gmail.com
wrote:

On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 3:42:25?PM UTC-4, mkr5000 wrote:
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 11:26:22?AM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Thursday, July 6, 2023 at 12:35:21?AM UTC+10, Wanderer wrote:
Don Lancaster wrote books in the 70\'s that kids bought at Radio Shack
and that changed the world.
Actually it didn\'t. People like Tim Berners-Lee and Donald W Davies
had a much larger effect. Bob Widlar and Barry Gilbert gave the kids
components worth playing with, and that was a whole lot more effective
thanDon Lancaster\'s hobby level text-books.

He was a useful guy, but lets not go over the top.

<snip>

And, AoE as well but for me, I hadn\'t seen that book until around 1990
or so. Way later than Don Lancaster started writing.

I learned a lot from him too, back around 1980. My first engineering job
(1981-83) was doing 2/3 of the time- and frequency-keeping electronics for
the first civilian DBS system ( Spacetel from AEL Microtel).

The friendly acquaintance with logic ICs that I got from Don’s books made a great difference—he encouraged all sorts of lateral thinking about applications.

Bizarre.

> Didn’t prevent me from arguing with him about the usefulness of TECs, which he was fond of trashing in his later years. ;)

For popular projects, TECs are much too cranky to be useful.

There are specific projects where their virtues outweigh their defects, but you do have to know exactly what you are doing, and even Jim William\'s wasn\'t as specific as he might have been about their defects. When I talked to him about it he invoked the Steven Hawking principle - each equation in a text halves the number of readers, which isn\'t actually true for application notes.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
Phil Hobbs wrote:
boB wrote:
mike wrote:

<snip>

I also just realized that this was the guy who did the CMOS cookbook,
which was the most beloved book in collection. I used it more than any I
had. Didn\'t he also write a lot of articles for Popular Electronics? RIP, Mr. Lancaster.

Yes, that one too. Don did get people interested in trying different
electonics components and learing about them. Even if people like Bob
Widlar and others designed the components they used in their circuits.
It takes both kinds to design products. They are designed around
other people\'s components.

Don also wrote in magazines like Popular Electronics which a lot of us
read back then to help us get started.

And, AoE as well but for me, I hadn\'t seen that book until around 1990
or so. Way later than Don Lancaster started writing.

I learned a lot from him too, back around 1980. My first engineering job
(1981-83) was doing 2/3 of the time- and frequency-keeping electronics for
the first civilian DBS system ( Spacetel from AEL Microtel).

The friendly acquaintance with logic ICs that I got from Don’s books made a
great difference—he encouraged all sorts of lateral thinking about
applications.

Didn’t prevent me from arguing with him about the usefulness of TECs, which
he was fond of trashing in his later years. ;)

Memory eternal!

TEC? Tactical Electromagnetic Coordinator? Total Estimated Cost?

Lancaster\'s TV typewriter popularized proto-PCs prior to Pong\'s home
edition. The TV typewriter provided powerless people with a taste of
control - an opening salvo to subtly subvert TV\'s totalitarian tyranny.
Although my _CMOS Cookbook_\'s covered with dust its bookmarks
denote the last few topics to pique my interest:

* A 4046 rundown circuit for electronic dice or roulette
* A bucket brigade built of 4013s for a Digital to Analog converter
* A 4518 and 4511 LED display driver
* A 4066 used to control a +1/-1 amplifier

God rest his soul.

Danke,

--
Don, KB7RPU, https://www.qsl.net/kb7rpu
There was a young lady named Bright Whose speed was far faster than light;
She set out one day In a relative way And returned on the previous night.
 
On Thursday, July 6, 2023 at 11:53:01 AM UTC-4, Don wrote:
Phil Hobbs wrote:
boB wrote:
mike wrote:

snip
I also just realized that this was the guy who did the CMOS cookbook,
which was the most beloved book in collection. I used it more than any I
had. Didn\'t he also write a lot of articles for Popular Electronics? RIP, Mr. Lancaster.

Yes, that one too. Don did get people interested in trying different
electonics components and learing about them. Even if people like Bob
Widlar and others designed the components they used in their circuits.
It takes both kinds to design products. They are designed around
other people\'s components.

Don also wrote in magazines like Popular Electronics which a lot of us
read back then to help us get started.

And, AoE as well but for me, I hadn\'t seen that book until around 1990
or so. Way later than Don Lancaster started writing.

I learned a lot from him too, back around 1980. My first engineering job
(1981-83) was doing 2/3 of the time- and frequency-keeping electronics for
the first civilian DBS system ( Spacetel from AEL Microtel).

The friendly acquaintance with logic ICs that I got from Don’s books made a
great difference—he encouraged all sorts of lateral thinking about
applications.

Didn’t prevent me from arguing with him about the usefulness of TECs, which
he was fond of trashing in his later years. ;)

Memory eternal!
TEC? Tactical Electromagnetic Coordinator? Total Estimated Cost?

Lancaster\'s TV typewriter popularized proto-PCs prior to Pong\'s home
edition. The TV typewriter provided powerless people with a taste of
control - an opening salvo to subtly subvert TV\'s totalitarian tyranny.
Although my _CMOS Cookbook_\'s covered with dust its bookmarks
denote the last few topics to pique my interest:

* A 4046 rundown circuit for electronic dice or roulette
* A bucket brigade built of 4013s for a Digital to Analog converter
* A 4518 and 4511 LED display driver
* A 4066 used to control a +1/-1 amplifier

God rest his soul.

Danke,

--
Don, KB7RPU, https://www.qsl.net/kb7rpu
There was a young lady named Bright Whose speed was far faster than light;
She set out one day In a relative way And returned on the previous night.

(1) I can\'t stand Australia.
(2) What a complete asshole.
 
On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 1:53:01 AM UTC+10, Don wrote:
Phil Hobbs wrote:
boB wrote:
mike wrote:

<snip>

Didn’t prevent me from arguing with him about the usefulness of TECs, which
he was fond of trashing in his later years. ;)

Memory eternal!
TEC? Tactical Electromagnetic Coordinator? Total Estimated Cost?

Thermoelectric coolers. Phil should have called them Peltier junctions.

> Lancaster\'s TV typewriter popularized proto-PCs prior to Pong\'s home edition.

<snip>

Hobbyist rather than revolutionary. Once they got to be mass market devices at mass market prices they made a real difference.

Don might have got a few hobbyist into that stuff early, but he was more an early adopter than a force for change.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
Don <g@crcomp.net> wrote:
Phil Hobbs wrote:
boB wrote:
mike wrote:

snip

I also just realized that this was the guy who did the CMOS cookbook,
which was the most beloved book in collection. I used it more than any I
had. Didn\'t he also write a lot of articles for Popular Electronics? RIP, Mr. Lancaster.

Yes, that one too. Don did get people interested in trying different
electonics components and learing about them. Even if people like Bob
Widlar and others designed the components they used in their circuits.
It takes both kinds to design products. They are designed around
other people\'s components.

Don also wrote in magazines like Popular Electronics which a lot of us
read back then to help us get started.

And, AoE as well but for me, I hadn\'t seen that book until around 1990
or so. Way later than Don Lancaster started writing.

I learned a lot from him too, back around 1980. My first engineering job
(1981-83) was doing 2/3 of the time- and frequency-keeping electronics for
the first civilian DBS system ( Spacetel from AEL Microtel).

The friendly acquaintance with logic ICs that I got from Don’s books made a
great difference—he encouraged all sorts of lateral thinking about
applications.

Didn’t prevent me from arguing with him about the usefulness of TECs, which
he was fond of trashing in his later years. ;)

Memory eternal!

TEC? Tactical Electromagnetic Coordinator? Total Estimated Cost?

Thermoelectric cooler.


--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC /
Hobbs ElectroOptics Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
 
On 7/5/2023 6:19, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 12:36:09 PM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
On Tue, 04 Jul 2023 19:08:40 -0700, boB <b...@K7IQ.com> wrote:
On Tue, 4 Jul 2023 18:10:08 -0700 (PDT), Flyguy <soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 8:21:44?AM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 11:55:27?PM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 01 Jul 2023 00:18:50 -0700, boB <b...@K7IQ.com> wrote:

snip

Great guy. His Active Filter Cookbook is still worth having around.
But Williams and Taylor\'s \"Electronic Filter Design Handbook\" is a whole lot better, if you design your filters.

--
Bozo Bill Slowman, Sydney

Leave it to Bozo to FUCK UP a memorial thread!

I\'m afraid that I can not disagree with that.

He is a gigantic minus sign. That can\'t be fun.

John Larkin expects to be flattered non-stop, and thinks that Don Lancaster had the same character defect. Flyguy is just a malicious half-wit.

And you chose to shit all over what is basically a talk at a funeral.
Did not realize your issues were *that* serious.
 
On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 8:13:53 AM UTC+10, Dimiter_Popoff wrote:
On 7/5/2023 6:19, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 12:36:09 PM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
On Tue, 04 Jul 2023 19:08:40 -0700, boB <b...@K7IQ.com> wrote:
On Tue, 4 Jul 2023 18:10:08 -0700 (PDT), Flyguy <soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 8:21:44?AM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 11:55:27?PM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 01 Jul 2023 00:18:50 -0700, boB <b...@K7IQ.com> wrote:

snip

Great guy. His Active Filter Cookbook is still worth having around..
But Williams and Taylor\'s \"Electronic Filter Design Handbook\" is a whole lot better, if you design your filters.

--
Bozo Bill Slowman, Sydney

Leave it to Bozo to FUCK UP a memorial thread!

I\'m afraid that I can not disagree with that.

He is a gigantic minus sign. That can\'t be fun.

John Larkin expects to be flattered non-stop, and thinks that Don Lancaster had the same character defect. Flyguy is just a malicious half-wit.

And you chose to shit all over what is basically a talk at a funeral.

Sci. electronics.designs isn\'t a forum for funeral eulogies, and Don Lancaster spent a lot of effort advertising himself as an electronics guru to people who didn\'t know much about electronics, diverting their attention (and money) from people who knew quite a bit more.

> Did not realize your issues were *that* serious.

I have a serious issue with frauds, and Don Lancaster skated close to being an outright fraud. What he advertised was more or less adequate, but very limited.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 7:43:23 AM UTC+10, mkr5000 wrote:
On Thursday, July 6, 2023 at 12:21:58 PM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 1:59:05 AM UTC+10, mkr5000 wrote:
On Thursday, July 6, 2023 at 11:53:01 AM UTC-4, Don wrote:
Phil Hobbs wrote:
boB wrote:
mike wrote:

You know what?
-- fuck you -- and I\'ll say that to have Don Lancaster\'s back.

Poor choice of hero.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
On 7/7/2023 9:28, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 8:13:53 AM UTC+10, Dimiter_Popoff wrote:
On 7/5/2023 6:19, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 12:36:09 PM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
On Tue, 04 Jul 2023 19:08:40 -0700, boB <b...@K7IQ.com> wrote:
On Tue, 4 Jul 2023 18:10:08 -0700 (PDT), Flyguy <soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 8:21:44?AM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 11:55:27?PM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 01 Jul 2023 00:18:50 -0700, boB <b...@K7IQ.com> wrote:

snip

Great guy. His Active Filter Cookbook is still worth having around.
But Williams and Taylor\'s \"Electronic Filter Design Handbook\" is a whole lot better, if you design your filters.

--
Bozo Bill Slowman, Sydney

Leave it to Bozo to FUCK UP a memorial thread!

I\'m afraid that I can not disagree with that.

He is a gigantic minus sign. That can\'t be fun.

John Larkin expects to be flattered non-stop, and thinks that Don Lancaster had the same character defect. Flyguy is just a malicious half-wit.

And you chose to shit all over what is basically a talk at a funeral.

Sci. electronics.designs isn\'t a forum for funeral eulogies, and Don Lancaster spent a lot of effort advertising himself as an electronics guru to people who didn\'t know much about electronics, diverting their attention (and money) from people who knew quite a bit more.

Whatever the group is this is obviously talk at a funeral.

Did not realize your issues were *that* serious.

I have a serious issue with frauds, and Don Lancaster skated close to being an outright fraud. What he advertised was more or less adequate, but very limited.

I don\'t know him at all, this thread is the first time I encounter
his name. However I do know what is appropriate at a funeral and what is
very inappropriate; you should know better, no matter whether your
judgment of who/what he was is correct or wrong.
 
On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 8:40:06 PM UTC+10, Dimiter_Popoff wrote:
On 7/7/2023 9:28, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 8:13:53 AM UTC+10, Dimiter_Popoff wrote:
On 7/5/2023 6:19, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 12:36:09 PM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
On Tue, 04 Jul 2023 19:08:40 -0700, boB <b...@K7IQ.com> wrote:
On Tue, 4 Jul 2023 18:10:08 -0700 (PDT), Flyguy <soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 8:21:44?AM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 11:55:27?PM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 01 Jul 2023 00:18:50 -0700, boB <b...@K7IQ.com> wrote:

snip

Great guy. His Active Filter Cookbook is still worth having around.
But Williams and Taylor\'s \"Electronic Filter Design Handbook\" is a whole lot better, if you design your filters.

Leave it to Bill to FUCK UP a memorial thread!

I\'m afraid that I can not disagree with that.

He is a gigantic minus sign. That can\'t be fun.

John Larkin expects to be flattered non-stop, and thinks that Don Lancaster had the same character defect. Flyguy is just a malicious half-wit.

And you chose to shit all over what is basically a talk at a funeral.

Sci. electronics.designs isn\'t a forum for funeral eulogies, and Don Lancaster spent a lot of effort advertising himself as an electronics guru to people who didn\'t know much about electronics, diverting their attention (and money) from people who knew quite a bit more.

Whatever the group is this is obviously talk at a funeral.

Did not realize your issues were *that* serious.

I have a serious issue with frauds, and Don Lancaster skated close to being an outright fraud. What he advertised was more or less adequate, but very limited.

I don\'t know him at all, this thread is the first time I encounter
his name. However I do know what is appropriate at a funeral and what is
very inappropriate; you should know better, no matter whether your
judgment of who/what he was is correct or wrong.

A funeral is a ceremony held in a church, or perhaps a funeral parlour. What got posted here were comments about a guy who happens to be dead.

There is no such thing as a funeral thread. It\'s not as if Don posted here regularly, if at all. His pretensions to be a n electronics guru wouldn\'t have lasted long if he had.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
boB <boB@K7IQ.com> wrote:
On Wed, 5 Jul 2023 13:55:50 -0700 (PDT), mkr5000 <mikerbgr@gmail.com
wrote:

On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 3:42:25?PM UTC-4, mkr5000 wrote:
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 11:26:22?AM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Thursday, July 6, 2023 at 12:35:21?AM UTC+10, Wanderer wrote:
Don Lancaster wrote books in the 70\'s that kids bought at Radio Shack
and that changed the world.
Actually it didn\'t. People like Tim Berners-Lee and Donald W Davies
had a much larger effect. Bob Widlar and Barry Gilbert gave the kids
components worth playing with, and that was a whole lot more effective
thanDon Lancaster\'s hobby level text-books.

He was a useful guy, but lets not go over the top.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Jesus. This group hasn\'t changed at all.
Pissing on a man\'s funeral ?
I also just realized that this was the guy who did the CMOS cookbook,
which was the most beloved book in collection. I used it more than any I
had. Didn\'t he also write a lot of articles for Popular Electronics? RIP, Mr. Lancaster.


Yes, that one too. Don did get people interested in trying different
electonics components and learing about them. Even if people like Bob
Widlar and others designed the components they used in their circuits.
It takes both kinds to design products. They are designed around
other people\'s components.

Don also wrote in magazines like Popular Electronics which a lot of us
read back then to help us get started.

And, AoE as well but for me, I hadn\'t seen that book until around 1990
or so. Way later than Don Lancaster started writing.

boB

I learned a lot from him too, back around 1980. My first engineering job
(1981-83) was doing 2/3 of the time- and frequency-keeping electronics for
the first civilian DBS system ( Spacetel from AEL Microtel).

The friendly acquaintance with logic ICs that I got from Don’s books made a
great difference—he encouraged all sorts of lateral thinking about
applications.

Didn’t prevent me from arguing with him about the usefulness of TECs, which
he was fond of trashing in his later years. ;)

Memory eternal!

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

Charles Petzold had a similar experience to mine and many others’, it
sounds like.

https://www.charlespetzold.com/blog/2023/07/In-Praise-of-Don-Lancaster.html

I liked Petzold’s stuff on OS/2 BITD.

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC /
Hobbs ElectroOptics Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
 
On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 13:39:56 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com>
wrote:

On 7/7/2023 9:28, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 8:13:53?AM UTC+10, Dimiter_Popoff wrote:
On 7/5/2023 6:19, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 12:36:09?PM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
On Tue, 04 Jul 2023 19:08:40 -0700, boB <b...@K7IQ.com> wrote:
On Tue, 4 Jul 2023 18:10:08 -0700 (PDT), Flyguy <soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 8:21:44?AM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 11:55:27?PM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 01 Jul 2023 00:18:50 -0700, boB <b...@K7IQ.com> wrote:

snip

Great guy. His Active Filter Cookbook is still worth having around.
But Williams and Taylor\'s \"Electronic Filter Design Handbook\" is a whole lot better, if you design your filters.

--
Bozo Bill Slowman, Sydney

Leave it to Bozo to FUCK UP a memorial thread!

I\'m afraid that I can not disagree with that.

He is a gigantic minus sign. That can\'t be fun.

John Larkin expects to be flattered non-stop, and thinks that Don Lancaster had the same character defect. Flyguy is just a malicious half-wit.

And you chose to shit all over what is basically a talk at a funeral.

Sci. electronics.designs isn\'t a forum for funeral eulogies, and Don Lancaster spent a lot of effort advertising himself as an electronics guru to people who didn\'t know much about electronics, diverting their attention (and money) from people who knew quite a bit more.

Whatever the group is this is obviously talk at a funeral.


Did not realize your issues were *that* serious.

I have a serious issue with frauds, and Don Lancaster skated close to being an outright fraud. What he advertised was more or less adequate, but very limited.


I don\'t know him at all, this thread is the first time I encounter
his name. However I do know what is appropriate at a funeral and what is
very inappropriate; you should know better, no matter whether your
judgment of who/what he was is correct or wrong.

Get an old copy of his Active Filter Cookbook and you\'ll see a glimpse
of Lancaster\'s personality.
 
On Thursday, July 6, 2023 at 11:28:47 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
> Sci. electronics.designs isn\'t a forum for funeral eulogies, and Don Lancaster spent a lot of effort advertising himself as an electronics guru to people who didn\'t know much about electronics, diverting their attention (and money) from people who knew quite a bit more. ... I have a serious issue with frauds, and Don Lancaster skated close to being an outright fraud. What he advertised was more or less adequate, but very limited.

Bill, you\'re out of line here. Let it drop, please.

-- john, KE5FX
 
Phil Hobbs wrote:
Phil Hobbs wrote:
boB wrote:
mike wrote:

<snip>

I also just realized that this was the guy who did the CMOS cookbook,
which was the most beloved book in collection. I used it more than any I
had. Didn\'t he also write a lot of articles for Popular Electronics? RIP, Mr. Lancaster.


Yes, that one too. Don did get people interested in trying different
electonics components and learing about them. Even if people like Bob
Widlar and others designed the components they used in their circuits.
It takes both kinds to design products. They are designed around
other people\'s components.

Don also wrote in magazines like Popular Electronics which a lot of us
read back then to help us get started.

And, AoE as well but for me, I hadn\'t seen that book until around 1990
or so. Way later than Don Lancaster started writing.

I learned a lot from him too, back around 1980. My first engineering job
(1981-83) was doing 2/3 of the time- and frequency-keeping electronics for
the first civilian DBS system ( Spacetel from AEL Microtel).

The friendly acquaintance with logic ICs that I got from Don’s books made a
great difference—he encouraged all sorts of lateral thinking about
applications.

Didn’t prevent me from arguing with him about the usefulness of TECs, which
he was fond of trashing in his later years. ;)

Memory eternal!

Charles Petzold had a similar experience to mine and many others’, it
sounds like.

https://www.charlespetzold.com/blog/2023/07/In-Praise-of-Don-Lancaster.html

I liked Petzold’s stuff on OS/2 BITD.

As an side, Petzold\'s _Programming Windows_ is another dust collector on
my bookshelf.

Stan Veit wrote the gospel of Personal Computer history. Lancaster\'s
mentioned throughout Veit\'s book:

<https://dl.acm.org/doi/book/10.5555/572947>

Lancaster\'s \"Serial Interface\" article appears in very first issue of
_Byte_:

<https://archive.org/details/sim_byte_1975-09_1_1/page/n3/mode/2up>

Many Lancaster books are available at archive:

<https://archive.org/search?query=creator:%22Don+Lancaster%22>

Lancaster\'s proximity to Jim Thompson makes me wonder how often their
paths crossed.

Danke,

--
Don, KB7RPU, https://www.qsl.net/kb7rpu
There was a young lady named Bright Whose speed was far faster than light;
She set out one day In a relative way And returned on the previous night.
 
On Saturday, July 8, 2023 at 12:30:25 AM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 13:39:56 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <d...@tgi-sci.com
wrote:
On 7/7/2023 9:28, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 8:13:53?AM UTC+10, Dimiter_Popoff wrote:
On 7/5/2023 6:19, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 12:36:09?PM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
On Tue, 04 Jul 2023 19:08:40 -0700, boB <b...@K7IQ.com> wrote:
On Tue, 4 Jul 2023 18:10:08 -0700 (PDT), Flyguy <soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 8:21:44?AM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 11:55:27?PM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 01 Jul 2023 00:18:50 -0700, boB <b...@K7IQ.com> wrote:

snip

Great guy. His Active Filter Cookbook is still worth having around.
But Williams and Taylor\'s \"Electronic Filter Design Handbook\" is a whole lot better, if you design your filters.

--
Bozo Bill Slowman, Sydney

Leave it to Bozo to FUCK UP a memorial thread!

I\'m afraid that I can not disagree with that.

He is a gigantic minus sign. That can\'t be fun.

John Larkin expects to be flattered non-stop, and thinks that Don Lancaster had the same character defect. Flyguy is just a malicious half-wit.

And you chose to shit all over what is basically a talk at a funeral.

Sci. electronics.designs isn\'t a forum for funeral eulogies, and Don Lancaster spent a lot of effort advertising himself as an electronics guru to people who didn\'t know much about electronics, diverting their attention (and money) from people who knew quite a bit more.

Whatever the group is this is obviously talk at a funeral.


Did not realize your issues were *that* serious.

I have a serious issue with frauds, and Don Lancaster skated close to being an outright fraud. What he advertised was more or less adequate, but very limited.


I don\'t know him at all, this thread is the first time I encounter his name. However I do know what is appropriate at a funeral and what is very inappropriate; you should know better, no matter whether your judgment of who/what he was is correct or wrong.

Get an old copy of his Active Filter Cookbook and you\'ll see a glimpse of Lancaster\'s personality.

Compare it with Williams and Taylor\'s \"Electronic Filter Design Handbook\" and you\'ll have the measure of his technical acumen.

I don\'t want personality in a textbook - I want information.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
On 05/07/2023 22:41, boB wrote:
On Wed, 5 Jul 2023 13:55:50 -0700 (PDT), mkr5000 <mikerbgr@gmail.com
wrote:

On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 3:42:25?PM UTC-4, mkr5000 wrote:
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 11:26:22?AM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Thursday, July 6, 2023 at 12:35:21?AM UTC+10, Wanderer wrote:
Don Lancaster wrote books in the 70\'s that kids bought at Radio Shack and that changed the world.
Actually it didn\'t. People like Tim Berners-Lee and Donald W Davies had a much larger effect. Bob Widlar and Barry Gilbert gave the kids components worth playing with, and that was a whole lot more effective thanDon Lancaster\'s hobby level text-books.

He was a useful guy, but lets not go over the top.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Jesus. This group hasn\'t changed at all.
Pissing on a man\'s funeral ?
I also just realized that this was the guy who did the CMOS cookbook, which was the most beloved book in collection. I used it more than any I had. Didn\'t he also write a lot of articles for Popular Electronics? RIP, Mr. Lancaster.


Yes, that one too. Don did get people interested in trying different
electonics components and learing about them. Even if people like Bob
Widlar and others designed the components they used in their circuits.
It takes both kinds to design products. They are designed around
other people\'s components.

Don also wrote in magazines like Popular Electronics which a lot of us
read back then to help us get started.

And, AoE as well but for me, I hadn\'t seen that book until around 1990
or so. Way later than Don Lancaster started writing.

boB

Yes. Sad to hear this news, he had a quirky mind but was a good
communicator. I enjoyed some of his articles in Nuts & Volts and other
places. His writings on the patent system are fun too!

His website tinaja.com is still up.

piglet
 
On Friday, 7 July 2023 at 07:28:47 UTC+1, Anthony William Sloman wrote:

> Don Lancaster spent a lot of effort advertising himself as an electronics guru to people who didn\'t know much about electronics,

All experts were young once, and a lot used to read that kind of thing. It\'s all part of the learning process. If you have a problem with that it\'s no-one else\'s problem.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top