J
John Larkin
Guest
On Tue, 16 May 2023 16:04:09 -0700, John Larkin
<jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote:
The push-pull drive version is nice too.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/6d1csywqihhulx9/Tube_Pulser_JL_pp1.zip?dl=0
<jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote:
On Tue, 9 May 2023 05:27:59 -0700 (PDT), Lamont Cranston
amdx62@gmail.com> wrote:
More oil/water separation.
The AC vs DC separation test was performed and the AC was probably 10 times better. This was a stubborn emulsion, but the AC did work.
( Not throwing DC out yet, need to test other types of oils first.)
Literature says Pulsed DC is best. So to that end, I want to come up with a way to create 500V to 9000V, 1Hz to 1000Hz, HV DC pulses with variable width. Although, I would be satisfied by 1HZ to 100Hz, as literature says a lower frequency is optimum.
The little research I have done shows gated pulses (commercial units) versus a square wave into a step up transformer, and rectifying, I suspect because ringing would be a problem. Looked at old style ignition coil drive circuits, but their wave form is an AC decay signal. Not sure how I could make that a single DC pulse.
I\'m looking at the simple 555 to create the variable pulse, but after that I\'m not sure how to get a decent variable HV DC pulse.
Any ideas to help me are appreciated,
Thanks, Mikek
P.S. We are using a variac driving a neon sign transformer for variable AC voltage and then full wave bridge to get variable DC voltage.
Still waiting on a capacitance and parallel resistance of the test vessel with and without solution.
Here\'s a tube pulser:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/esci7na1lbpa82s/Tube_Pulser_JL_1.zip?dl=0
The push-pull drive version is nice too.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/6d1csywqihhulx9/Tube_Pulser_JL_pp1.zip?dl=0