G
Glen Walpert
Guest
On Sun, 28 May 2023 09:44:41 -0700, John Larkin wrote:
Yes, that\'s it. It does solve the ground problem, but like John says you
probably don\'t need the bottom half, which would double the available
current at the same voltage. Your neutral/ground problem will be solved
either way.
On Sun, 28 May 2023 05:16:56 -0700 (PDT), Lamont Cranston
amdx62@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday, May 28, 2023 at 6:10:50?AM UTC-5, Glen Walpert wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2023 11:25:00 -0700, John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2023 10:52:16 -0700 (PDT), Lamont Cranston
amd...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, May 27, 2023 at 11:24:07?AM UTC-5, Glen Walpert wrote:
Your bridge uses 4 diodes. A half-wave doubler would use two.
The bridge is not usable for producing a ground referenced HVDC from a
transformer with a grounded secondary, but full wave rectification is
possible with 2 diodes from a center tapped transformer with a single
diode in each transformer HV to the filter cap, return to grounded CT.
This gives you full wave rectification at half voltage. Substitute a
half wave doubler for both diodes to get back to full voltage, still
ground referenced.
Hi Glen, I\'m not sure how to draw what you describe, but I found
this, that uses the earth grounded
CT as the negative lead of the HV. I think this solves the
Neutral/ground problem.
Is this what you described?
https://www.dropbox.com/s/c4t13kzi62txwqo/Centertapped%20Doubler.jpg?
dl=0
Thanks, Mikek
You don\'t really need the bottom half; your load current will be low.
Yes, that\'s it. It does solve the ground problem, but like John says you
probably don\'t need the bottom half, which would double the available
current at the same voltage. Your neutral/ground problem will be solved
either way.