K
Ken Smith
Guest
In article <4236C693.4020904@nospam.com>,
Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
[.. saving band width ..]
Go back one level to see where I added the capacitor.
real life. The slightly mismatched capacitors we are likely to have in
real life will still match near exactly on the initial step but the
ext(-t/T) curves will not match.
It would be nice if we could make the circuit not rely on the match. If
we had a rail-to-rail op-amp, or something like the LM301, we could shift
both inputs of the op-amp up near the positivve rail. As it is, the LM741
will work with its inputs up within about 4V of the positive supply. If
we changed the resistor dividers to make them a 1/3,2/3 ratio, we would
get an improved transient performance.
minus supply to that section could be increased to lets say 100.
round off very short timed pulses. I don't think such things are common
in automotive power systems though.
The problem with looking for a higher Vbr(dss) is that Rds(on) runs about
as the square of Vbr(ds) for the same sized part.
--
--
kensmith@rahul.net forging knowledge
Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
[.. saving band width ..]
Go back one level to see where I added the capacitor.
I think the 50x factor assumes a tighter tolerance than we can expect inThat addition definitely makes for an improved transient response- by a
factor of 50x from what I can see.
real life. The slightly mismatched capacitors we are likely to have in
real life will still match near exactly on the initial step but the
ext(-t/T) curves will not match.
It would be nice if we could make the circuit not rely on the match. If
we had a rail-to-rail op-amp, or something like the LM301, we could shift
both inputs of the op-amp up near the positivve rail. As it is, the LM741
will work with its inputs up within about 4V of the positive supply. If
we changed the resistor dividers to make them a 1/3,2/3 ratio, we would
get an improved transient performance.
Since the LM741, IIRC, only draws about 3mA, the 22 ohm resistor in theThe big 1000u across the regulator
limits the current perturbations to under 5% when subjected to things
like that +30/-300V 20u/30u transient, and the 22 ohm resistor makes for
a nice low pass attenuating Volts-transient to mV-transient applied to
the circuit and on a time scale it can follow.
minus supply to that section could be increased to lets say 100.
We can put a small inductance in series. It won't help much except toSince we can't put a
component in series with the main current path, the MOSFET is on its
own, with the body diode saving it during negative transients, but no
protection from positive transients. The part numbers suggested thus far
are shy on Vbr,dss.
round off very short timed pulses. I don't think such things are common
in automotive power systems though.
The problem with looking for a higher Vbr(dss) is that Rds(on) runs about
as the square of Vbr(ds) for the same sized part.
--
--
kensmith@rahul.net forging knowledge