Chip with simple program for Toy

"Neil" <ksleep@sympatico.ca> wrote:
Actually, occams razor states that the easiest answer to this is that I'm a
idiot.
You use Outlook Express and top-post. It doesn't take an Occam...


Tim
--
The .sig is dead.
 
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 13:48:10 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
<mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:

Zardoz wrote:

On Sun, 18 Jan 2004 19:12:34 GMT, "www.free-celebs.com"
hxqbabhi@hvobaahh.com> wrote:
Christina Aguilera naked

Why go through all of the trouble to post a "mime" format? Why the
hell not just posta jpg??? Could it be there is something wrong with
your post?

Its a virus. Where have you been for the last year or two?
I was kind of suggesting that, in a dumb-post way.

Oh, and I have only been online since June 03, so for the last "year
or two" I've been out of it, but still smart enough to know not to
open any file that says it's a picture & not be .jpg or .gif.
 
Big Mac wrote:
I was kind of suggesting that, in a dumb-post way.

Oh, and I have only been online since June 03, so for the last "year
or two" I've been out of it, but still smart enough to know not to
open any file that says it's a picture & not be .jpg or .gif.
You would be amazed at the number of otherwise intelligent people who
will open anthing, just to see what it is.
--
We now return you to our normally scheduled programming.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
 
Muzicke posted:
<< Thousands of Electronic Definitions - Must see
Literally thousands terms and definitions - must see:
http://www.electronicdefinitions.com

I looked up six or so "definitions" and just found useless junk. It's not a
site I would bother visiting again.

Don
 
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 23:59:41 GMT, "Muzicke Grane"
<muzickegrane@rogers.com> Gave us:

Thousands of Electronic Definitions - Must see
Literally thousands terms and definitions - must see:
http://www.electronicdefinitions.com
No entry for "Crest Factor"?

Seems that "thousands" are still missing!
 
<s23@spam.mis.stu.edu.tw> wrote in message
news:27010416.0123@spam.mis.stu.edu.tw...
Sorry sir!
I'm a student now.I have a studying about Spam Mail issuse
case.Therefore I need more and more spam mail for this study.


Do you think maybe this retard might consider that having "spam" in his
message and each email address might slant the study results? Email bots are
getting pretty smart and might throw away addresses that include the word
"spam" as in spamtrap@somewhere

In any case it's highly annoying. And spam.
 
"Product developer" <jdurban@vorel.com> wrote in message
news:118afaeb.0402022213.167f551f@posting.google.com...
I hate those pre-formatted, one size fits all, just add water, forum
formats. They are too boxy and those smilie faces and user logos make
me want to puke. This forum is the real deal. I can't believe how many
real experts hang here, always jumping in to help anyone who asks. The
3 to 9 hour posting lag bites but there is no equal. I do however miss
the pre-takeover Deja days!
Don't crosspost a useless post. And if you bother to research what these
newsgroups actually are, you'll find out a way to achieve near zero-lag
posting.
 
"Mr Anon" <anon@anon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:i6b_b.10029$Y%6.1008090@wards.force9.net...
As a beginner whose highest level of electronics is at GCSE, I'd
appreciate
some help on this circuit please.

It would help if I told you what I want the circuit to do:
Between the +12v rail and base of Q1 is a set of clips connected to paper.
I
want to be able to trigger the relay by drawing a pencil line between the
clips. The graphite would conduct a tiny current, and I want to amplify
that
to trigger the relay. SW1 and VR1 simulate the presence or absence of the
pencil line.
The resistance of the pencil line is high - anything from 4M to 12M and
above - so the current coming through is tiny.

So, I tested this circuit using New Wave Concept's "Livewire" software,
and
closing SW1 would in turn trigger the relay.
However, I made the circuit up on stripboard, and as soon as I connect the
power to the circuit, the relay closes immediately. Q2 becomes very hot.
There are several things in your circuit that need revision.

1.) You are overdriving Q2.
--> The base current of Q2 must be limited by a resistor
(just place one between E(Q1) and B(Q2). The value
does not really matter, it's just a limiter as not
to fry Q2 (and Q1 by the way too), use sth. like 2K2

2.) You probably force the circuit into oscillation.
--> The wire leading to B(Q1) picks up alls sorts of RF,
unless shunted by a small cap (between B(Q1) and 0V)
that attenuates all AC input to the amp. Otherwise
the amp picks up its own output (the relay is induc-
tive and facilitates oscillation). A cap between B
and E of Q2 should also be placed as well as a 200K
resistor. Also consider connecting a ~10M resistor
between B(Q1) and 0V against static electricity.

3.) There is no current limiter in the B(Q1) circuit.
--> If you use the 2K2 Resistor as stated above, this
problem will already be dealt with, but just to
be safe, it doesn't hurt to place a resistor in
series with B(Q1).

Note that the capacitors will slow down the time by which
the circuit reacts to changes of the VR2 resistance. This
delay may take considerable time depending on the values.

Dimitrij
 
"Mr Anon" <anon@anon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:IXv_b.9718$h44.1089599@stones.force9.net...
Dimitrij,

Thanks so much for your very kind help - the lesson I've learnt is that
electronics from a text book is far too ideal! I've revised the circuit
with
your suggestions (see the attachment).

THe circuit appears to work well at VR1 of up to 12M, but my multimeter
shows that the resistance of a thick line of graphite from a pencil drawn
on
paper is actually up to 15-18M. Am I asking too much to have a simple
circuit that can cope with such a variance in resistance?
Are the values for C1 and C2 enough to attenuate any AC?
I just measured a thick 2cm graphite line to be about 100k ohms. Maybe it
depends on how thick the line is?

With the circuit you have (the original one, not the 'improved' one) the
current through the relay is max about 10,000 times the current into the
base. If you have 18M across 12-1.4V=10.6V, then the current will be just
shy of a microamp. Thus, the current through the relay will be 10,000 times
that, or 10mA, which might not be enough to close the relay.

Instead of using a darlington connected pair, you could use the following
circuit:

(view with courier font)

12V
-+-------------------+
| | |
| .-. |
| | | |
| | |1MEG |
| '-' |
o | |
+-------G||-+S
o | ||-> P-MOSFET
| | ||-+D
| |c |
'----b| NPN |
|e Relay Coil Here
| |
| |
GND------+-----------+

When there is no connection between the 'o's, the transistor is off, and so
the P-MOSFET base is at 12V, turning it off.

When there is a connection through a resistance of 100MEG or less, the NPN
will turn on fully, causing the gate of the P-MOSFET to go near ground. This
turns it on, thus closing the relay.

Any P-MOSFET where Vgs(th) is < 8V should work. You don't need to parallel a
diode, because the mosfet has a substrate diode which should prevent any
damage when the coil is turned off. If the relay isn't a 12V relay (say, its
a 5V relay), you should add in a resistor between the P-MOSFET and the coil.

Oh, and you may need a 0.2uF cap _before_ your 7812, between in and gnd.

Regards,
Bob Monsen
 
"Robert C Monsen" <rcsurname@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:jiB_b.377519$I06.4134130@attbi_s01...
I just measured a thick 2cm graphite line to be about 100k ohms. Maybe it
depends on how thick the line is?

With the circuit you have (the original one, not the 'improved' one) the
current through the relay is max about 10,000 times the current into the
base. If you have 18M across 12-1.4V=10.6V, then the current will be just
shy of a microamp. Thus, the current through the relay will be 10,000
times
that, or 10mA, which might not be enough to close the relay.

Instead of using a darlington connected pair, you could use the following
circuit:

(view with courier font)

12V
-+-------------------+
| | |
| .-. |
| | | |
| | |1MEG |
| '-' |
o | |
+-------G||-+S
o | ||-> P-MOSFET
| | ||-+D
| |c |
'----b| NPN |
|e Relay Coil Here
| |
| |
GND------+-----------+

When there is no connection between the 'o's, the transistor is off, and
so
the P-MOSFET base is at 12V, turning it off.

When there is a connection through a resistance of 100MEG or less, the NPN
will turn on fully, causing the gate of the P-MOSFET to go near ground.
This
turns it on, thus closing the relay.

Any P-MOSFET where Vgs(th) is < 8V should work. You don't need to parallel
a
diode, because the mosfet has a substrate diode which should prevent any
damage when the coil is turned off. If the relay isn't a 12V relay (say,
its
a 5V relay), you should add in a resistor between the P-MOSFET and the
coil.

Oh, and you may need a 0.2uF cap _before_ your 7812, between in and gnd.
And you will need a resistor in the B(NPN) circuit
to make sure an input short won't send it to hell.

Dimitrij

P.S. The darlington version may still work if you choose
transistors with a higher gain (sth like 300) and
play around with the resistor values a little. Also
going up with the voltages to 24V or adding a third
transistor may be some sort of an idea. Just feel
free to experiment and let us know the results!
 
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 01:12:28 +0000, CBarn24050 wrote:

Oh not just resistors, NEXT generation resitors!
Are they used on the Starship Enterprise ?

--
Michael Turner
Email (ROT13)
zvxr.gheare1963@ivetva.arg
 
Hello all,

As I am a newbie in the world of theoretical and practical
electronics I have come across quite a few ares that I have questions
in. One subject that I am not clear on is the level needed for
accurate measurements via an analog voltmeter and/or a multimeter.

I understand that, as per the mathematics, the higher the impedence
value the more accurate the measurement from the meter. However I was
wondering what would be the necessary level of ohms/volt that an
analog voltmeter and/or a multimeter would need to operate at in order
for the measurement(s) being displayed to be considered accurate for
the testing of compuers/arcade PCB's, as well as general trouble
shooting of other common electrical devices (phone, PDA, etc.). Is
20,000 ohms/volt generally satisfactory, or does one really need a
50,000 ohms/volt meter?

As a note, I have a digital multimeter that is rated at 4 megaohms,
however, I am interested in the analog multimeter so that I can see
any spikes that may be produced by the electrical device.

Thank you all for your time and advice!

Respectfully,

Sam
 
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 22:21:57 GMT, jacobson98@earthlink.net wrote:

Hello all,

As I am a newbie in the world of theoretical and practical
electronics I have come across quite a few ares that I have questions
in. One subject that I am not clear on is the level needed for
accurate measurements via an analog voltmeter and/or a multimeter.

I understand that, as per the mathematics, the higher the impedence
value the more accurate the measurement from the meter. However I was
wondering what would be the necessary level of ohms/volt that an
analog voltmeter and/or a multimeter would need to operate at in order
for the measurement(s) being displayed to be considered accurate for
the testing of compuers/arcade PCB's, as well as general trouble
shooting of other common electrical devices (phone, PDA, etc.). Is
20,000 ohms/volt generally satisfactory, or does one really need a
50,000 ohms/volt meter?
I believe 20,000 ohms/volt is (or was) considered a "pretty good
meter", but whether it is adequate for any particular application will
depend on the source impedance of the circuit being measured, how that
circuit will respond to the meter loading, and the expected accuracy
of the measurement.

The "20,000 ohms/volt" refers to the full-scale range setting of the
meter - if it is set to 10 volts full scale, the meter will look like
a 200,000 ohm resistance to the circuit being measured. If you are
measuring TTL logic levels and power supply voltages, this will
represent an insignificant load, but it may have some serious effects
in high impedance circuits.

The important thing is to be aware that _any_ measurement device can
have some effect on the circuit being measured, and to be prepared to
account for those effects.



--
Peter Bennett, VE7CEI
peterbb (at) interchange.ubc.ca
new newsgroup users info : http://vancouver-webpages.com/nnq
GPS and NMEA info: http://vancouver-webpages.com/peter
Vancouver Power Squadron: http://vancouver.powersquadron.ca
 
<jacobson98@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:5dp440hb49lcuus8gr2sk2k7js4l1a2nak@4ax.com...
Hello all,

As I am a newbie in the world of theoretical and practical
electronics I have come across quite a few ares that I have questions
in. One subject that I am not clear on is the level needed for
accurate measurements via an analog voltmeter and/or a multimeter.

I understand that, as per the mathematics, the higher the impedence
value the more accurate the measurement from the meter. However I was
wondering what would be the necessary level of ohms/volt that an
analog voltmeter and/or a multimeter would need to operate at in order
for the measurement(s) being displayed to be considered accurate for
the testing of compuers/arcade PCB's, as well as general trouble
shooting of other common electrical devices (phone, PDA, etc.). Is
20,000 ohms/volt generally satisfactory, or does one really need a
50,000 ohms/volt meter?

As a note, I have a digital multimeter that is rated at 4 megaohms,
however, I am interested in the analog multimeter so that I can see
any spikes that may be produced by the electrical device.
----------
Chances are that the meter will not even indicate a spikes unless it lasts
for an appreciable part of a second and even then may not measure it
accurately- an analogue meter has inertia which averages out the torque
driving the pointer.
--
Don Kelly
dhky@peeshaw.ca
remove the urine to answer

Thank you all for your time and advice!

Respectfully,

Sam
 
I am interested in the analog multimeter
so that I can see any spikes that may be produced by the electrical device.
Sam (jacobson98)
Spikes are too fast to move the needle.


what would be the necessary level of ohms/volt
that an analog voltmeter...would need to operate at...
for the testing of compuers/arcade PCB's ?
A 20,000 ohms/volt meter, when set to a 5 volt range
will have a 100k input resistance.
Put this across a 100k circuit and there is a 50% error.
Putting it across a 1M circuit will not give usable results
--in fact it will change the operating point of the circuit.

If you want to look at transients in high impedence circuits,
you want an oscilloscope.
 
thank you Robert. I'll try out your suggestion.

Steve.



"Robert C Monsen" <rcsurname@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:jiB_b.377519$I06.4134130@attbi_s01...
"Mr Anon" <anon@anon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:IXv_b.9718$h44.1089599@stones.force9.net...
Dimitrij,

Thanks so much for your very kind help - the lesson I've learnt is that
electronics from a text book is far too ideal! I've revised the circuit
with
your suggestions (see the attachment).

THe circuit appears to work well at VR1 of up to 12M, but my multimeter
shows that the resistance of a thick line of graphite from a pencil
drawn
on
paper is actually up to 15-18M. Am I asking too much to have a simple
circuit that can cope with such a variance in resistance?
Are the values for C1 and C2 enough to attenuate any AC?

I just measured a thick 2cm graphite line to be about 100k ohms. Maybe it
depends on how thick the line is?

With the circuit you have (the original one, not the 'improved' one) the
current through the relay is max about 10,000 times the current into the
base. If you have 18M across 12-1.4V=10.6V, then the current will be just
shy of a microamp. Thus, the current through the relay will be 10,000
times
that, or 10mA, which might not be enough to close the relay.

Instead of using a darlington connected pair, you could use the following
circuit:

(view with courier font)

12V
-+-------------------+
| | |
| .-. |
| | | |
| | |1MEG |
| '-' |
o | |
+-------G||-+S
o | ||-> P-MOSFET
| | ||-+D
| |c |
'----b| NPN |
|e Relay Coil Here
| |
| |
GND------+-----------+

When there is no connection between the 'o's, the transistor is off, and
so
the P-MOSFET base is at 12V, turning it off.

When there is a connection through a resistance of 100MEG or less, the NPN
will turn on fully, causing the gate of the P-MOSFET to go near ground.
This
turns it on, thus closing the relay.

Any P-MOSFET where Vgs(th) is < 8V should work. You don't need to parallel
a
diode, because the mosfet has a substrate diode which should prevent any
damage when the coil is turned off. If the relay isn't a 12V relay (say,
its
a 5V relay), you should add in a resistor between the P-MOSFET and the
coil.

Oh, and you may need a 0.2uF cap _before_ your 7812, between in and gnd.

Regards,
Bob Monsen
 
"Lee Cross" <lcross@mail.utexas.edu> wrote in message
news:Ij82c.48293$OH4.32606@fe2.texas.rr.com...
I am looking for a circuit that will trigger a pulse after waiting for
like
60 minutes.

Use a 555 timer with appropriate RC. An LM 122 is superior.
 
Vierlingj wrote:
Stupid fuck? Well pindick my IQ is over 130 what is yours? I obviously know
[]
Death to psychotronic weaponry. Religion is fraud. James M. Vierling Jr.
----------------
You're not stupid, you're schizophrenic, get help.

-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top