Chip with simple program for Toy

[MassiveProng]

On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 20:51:48 -0400, "Radiosrfun"
<Radiosrfun@radiosrfun.com> Gave us:

"RichD" <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1174175760.008956.226600@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 6, John Larkin <jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com
wrote:
snip
Lennon was right - 'Imagine'.

Hilarious, a billionaire singing "Imagine no possessions..."

To be fair, he wasn't a terminal tree hugger.
In his last interview, in Playboy, Lennon
showed some hard headed sense...
Q: "Why don't the Beatles stage a reunion,
raise $100 million for charity, give it to the
poor peasants in S. America?"
A: "So what, you buy them all dinner, then
they're hungry again tomorrow..."

I was astonished, I thought: wow, an airhead
hippie peacenik can grow up and get a clue,
there's hope for humanity! Then a few weeks
later, he was fertilizer...

But really, does it matter? Actions talk louder
than words. Lennon & McCartney were one of
the great creative partnerships, now immortal;
solo, they produced bubble gum pop, but the
team was genius.

--
Rich


I won't get into the character of Lennon - I didn't exactly study the guy.
But, him, the Beatles and a host of many others - regardless of their
private lives/beliefs - brought us some of the best damned music ever. Any 1
of their songs can beat hands down any dozen or so of some of the trash
music today.

Just my 2 cents for what it is/was worth.

I agree. RapTards, and the fucking retards that listen to that

horseshit are some of the most lame excuses for humans to have ever
walked on the planet's surface. How they have spines or get pussy,
I'll never know.

Oh, that's right... they buy it, and then dope 'em up and rape 'em.
What a bunch of low life fucktards.

 

There was no threat, you retarded fuck. Note the contingency that
the world be under "Old West Rules", dipshit. You are lucky we
aren't. That isn't a threat, that is a fact. Perhaps one day you will
know the difference, but I seriously doubt it.

oh dear!

you just don't learn do you?

having got publicly slaughtered in the little trot about PINs and card
security in general (oh yes you fucking were), you are up to your
tricks again... spouting about things you have no knowledge of, making
threats then denying them, ripping into people when they don't agree
with you.

hey... I am still waiting for you to do your hocus-pocus thingy on my
heart - oh wait! you can't - COZ IT'S ALL CRAP!

here... I had an idea... take a look at this link....

http://www.luddite.me.uk/bc/1.jpg

this is a scan of my birth certificate - I have blurred out all the
interesting stuff... you will also notice that I am certified male -
your certificate (if you had one - what with you being a little
bastard and all) would say "androgynon" - greek for "man-girl" i.e.
you are a weener with no balls... fits.

You reckon it would be a bad thing for a psycho - err, psychic to
stop my heart so you won't do it out of loyalty to some higher
power... well this is fairly benign and you won't get into trouble
with any sky-fairies...

here is my challenge to you - once again,
MY FAITH AGAINST YOURS-
I have faith you will fail.

remote view my birth certificate and give me two of the missing
details... just two... there's a reason I ask for two - lets see how
smart you are eh? If RV is all it is supposed to be, then you should
be able to give all the details... but like all other RVs you won't -
BECAUSE IT DOESN'T WORK! Oh, and your reference to some film I should
see that deal with RV... IT'S ONLY PEOPLE PRETENDING! IT'S NOT REAL -
are you one of these idiots that cheers ina movie when superman fixes
the bad guy... bet you are... whooping and punching the air - remember
the 80%? That's you that is.

you won't be able to resolve the data from the image - gaussian blur
leaves no residual that can be rebuilt.

I await your failure with baited breath.

A non-correct reply or abscence of a reply within one week is an
admission by you of complete failure - you must be used to this by
now.

PS... you suck gay cock.

 

On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 20:20:42 GMT, Idontthinkso@nospam.com (mojo)
wrote:

some people dont want to have to scroll every msg down to the second page
to read the response .. !!

good point well made.

I think TP is a better format but not wishing to annoy, I bend to
others preference.

 

[Lord Garth]

"Esther & Fester Bestertester" <not@me.really> wrote in message
news:0001HW.C21FA149002FD866F01826C8@news.sf.sbcglobal.net...

You'll need a pulse width modulator to control the motor speed yet
maintain
good torque. There are ways to create such a modulator with an LM555
timer IC. You use it output to control a power FET.

FDB603AL is such a FET and I found this one on an otherwise dead
motherboard. It is rated to handle 33A at 30V with a Vgs of 4.5 volts
and having a Rds(on) of .036 ohms
http://www.ortodoxism.ro/datasheets/fairchild/FDB603AL.pdf

Pretty nice specs for a $1 part, especially the Rds(on). What did it power
on
the moboard?

I'll drop copy of a modulator that ran in Electronics Design onto
alt.binaries.schematics.electronic

Thanks. Without doing all the math, what R & C values would you recommend?

I found a near-identical circuit here:

http://www.discovercircuits.com/PDF-FILES/SIMPLEPWM2.pdf

Any idea what function the diodes connecting to the pwm adjustment pot
perform?

The FET is part of the power regulator circuit. You'll find these or a
compatible
part on any P4 motherboard near the CPU and near several coils. Some
procesors draw quite a large amount of power during startup. Go to a
computer
shop and pick through their junk for a "free" source of parts.

I would design the oscillator to run at say 2KHz or so. I use a simulator
program
to pick the values. Do you need a copy?

The diodes allow for a different value of R during the charging versus the
discharge
time.

Good luck....

 

[Richard The Dreaded Liber]

On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 16:14:32 -0700, RichD wrote:

On Mar 15, Richard The Dreaded Libertarian <n...@example.net> wrote:
The truth is Free Will is Good, and anything in
opposition to Free Will is Evil.

Except that, like Never Never Land, it is a
mirage, per a simple reductionist argument...

Holding your own Will in denial doesn't make it not be.

Thanks,
Rich

 

[RichD]

On Mar 19, Richard The Dreaded Libertarian <n...@example.net> wrote:

The truth is Free Will is Good, and anything in
opposition to Free Will is Evil.

Except that, like Never Never Land, it is a
mirage, per a simple reductionist argument...

Holding your own Will in denial doesn't make it not be.

Say what?

--
Rich

 

[Homer J Simpson]

"RichD" <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1174344948.361671.248240@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...

On Mar 19, Richard The Dreaded Libertarian <n...@example.net> wrote:

Holding your own Will in denial doesn't make it not be.

Say what?

Perhaps he named his dick Will.

 

[Richard The Dreaded Liber]

On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:55:48 -0700, RichD wrote:

On Mar 19, Richard The Dreaded Libertarian <n...@example.net> wrote:
The truth is Free Will is Good, and anything in
opposition to Free Will is Evil.

Except that, like Never Never Land, it is a
mirage, per a simple reductionist argument...

Holding your own Will in denial doesn't make it not be.

Say what?

OK, I'll try to translate it into little words for you.

You have Free Will. You can't get rid of your Free Will, but
you can deny it.

But even that doesn't get rid of it, because you've made the
choice to deny your Will.

If you had no will, then you would nothing but a machine, that
follows a program, or follows orders.

But no matter whom you install as the authority over you, or what
program you choose to run, it is you who makes that choice, of
your own free will.

Of course, anyone who would freely choose to be a slave has a
very seriously damaged Will.

Cheers!
Rich

 

[MassiveProng]

On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 00:35:15 GMT, "Homer J Simpson"
<nobody@nowhere.com> Gave us:

"RichD" <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1174344948.361671.248240@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...

On Mar 19, Richard The Dreaded Libertarian <n...@example.net> wrote:

Holding your own Will in denial doesn't make it not be.

Say what?

Perhaps he named his dick Will.


Willy Will Whacker? :-]

 

[RichD]

On Mar 19, Richard The Dreaded Libertarian <n...@example.net> wrote:

The truth is Free Will is Good, and anything in
opposition to Free Will is Evil.

Except that, like Never Never Land, it is a
mirage, per a simple reductionist argument...

Holding your own Will in denial doesn't make it not be.

Say what?

OK, I'll try to translate it into little words for you.

Give it your best shot.

You have Free Will. You can't get rid of your Free Will, but
you can deny it.

Bzzzzzzz! I'm sorry, our panel of judges does not
accept this answer.

Correct is: You do not have free will, but you can deny
this reality, and ride with the illusion..

If you had no will, then you would nothing but a machine, that
follows a program, or follows orders.

I am. So are you. As are we all.

But no matter whom you install as the authority over you, or what
program you choose to run, it is you who makes that choice, of
your own free will.

Dude, it's science.

You are composed of cells, billions and billions. Each
cell follows the laws of chemistry, immutably - including
your brain cells. They just run along, minimizing the
Gibbs free energy, that's what molecules do. Your
consciousness/soul/'free will' is nothing but a sequence
of brain states.

Think otherwise? (of course you do) Then please specify
the catalytic reaction inside any neuron or synapse,
which your 'free will' alters contrary to the laws of
thermodynamics and electro-chemistry.

I fully expect you to continue bleating about free will -
"I am not a robot!" - while offering no counter-argument.

Of course, anyone who would freely choose to be a slave has a
very seriously damaged Will.

What about a damaged brain?

--
Rich

 

[Bob]

On 19 Mar 2007 20:26:32 -0700, "RichD" <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com>
wrote:

You are composed of cells, billions and billions. Each
cell follows the laws of chemistry, immutably - including
your brain cells. They just run along, minimizing the
Gibbs free energy, that's what molecules do.

You are reaching quite incorrect conclusions. More precisely, you are
misrepresenting what the laws of chemistry say. If we accept the
general intent of what you said or meant to say, it is statistical.
The importance of "random" fluctuations to biology is increasingly
appreciated.

I won't address the specifics of "free will". But it is improper to
dismiss it by invoking thermodynamics or such.

bob

 

[Lord Garth]

"BILKS" <mmbs234@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:1174363707.540544.123850@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...

HEY MANG WAT U DO GIV ME HELP FO MY PROJET WAT IS A CAPCITOR

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacitor

 

[Eeyore]

Richard The Dreaded Libertarian wrote:

Of course, anyone who would freely choose to be a slave has a
very seriously damaged Will.

Some ppl claim to get a kick out of it !

Graham

 

[chuck]

Josh916 wrote:

I would like to use RSSI to locate an object in a 3D space. The space
will be a square box with transmitters located on the 4 corners. An
object will be place at certain positions within the box and I want to
be able to determine its location inside the box. Much like an
internal GPS.

I would like to know what components (IC's?) I need to perform such a
task.

Or if anyone else has any other more effective methods to acheive such
a task your comments are welcomed.

Thanks,

Josh

GPS doesn't use RSSI, of course.

Is the task you want to perform the use of RSSI, or the determination of
position location with a box? What kind of accuracy do you hope to achieve?

Have you considered ultrasonic distance measurement?

Chuck

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

 

[Michael A. Terrell]

RichD wrote:

What about a damaged brain?

What proof do you have that it wasn't shipped that way? You can't
blame UPS for everything that is damaged.


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

 

[Rich the Philosophizer]

On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:26:32 -0700, RichD wrote:

On Mar 19, Richard The Dreaded Libertarian <n...@example.net> wrote:
The truth is Free Will is Good, and anything in opposition to Free
Will is Evil.

Except that, like Never Never Land, it is a mirage, per a simple
reductionist argument...

Holding your own Will in denial doesn't make it not be.

Say what?

OK, I'll try to translate it into little words for you.

Give it your best shot.

You have Free Will. You can't get rid of your Free Will, but you can
deny it.

Bzzzzzzz! I'm sorry, our panel of judges does not accept this answer.

OK, well, check back with me when you've learned to undeny.

Good Luck!
Rich
--
For more information, please feel free to visit http://www.godchannel.com

 

[LaMeRbOy]

On 19 Mar 2007 08:44:28 -0700, "good_online_jobs" <good_online_bjs@yahoo.com>
wrote:

Simply Find Your Engineering Job Vacancy and resources here --

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHO8l-Bd1O4

 

[Meat Plow]

水曜日に、2007 年05:27:21 3 月21 日-0700 のfdfdf は書いた:

出ていきなさい
--
の記念のホック、ライン及びシンカー、2004

 

[Kevin Aylward]

Richard The Dreaded Libertarian wrote:

On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:55:48 -0700, RichD wrote:
On Mar 19, Richard The Dreaded Libertarian <n...@example.net> wrote:
The truth is Free Will is Good, and anything in
opposition to Free Will is Evil.

Except that, like Never Never Land, it is a
mirage, per a simple reductionist argument...

Holding your own Will in denial doesn't make it not be.

Say what?

OK, I'll try to translate it into little words for you.

You have Free Will. You can't get rid of your Free Will, but
you can deny it.

But even that doesn't get rid of it, because you've made the
choice to deny your Will.

If you had no will, then you would nothing but a machine, that
follows a program, or follows orders.

But no matter whom you install as the authority over you, or what
program you choose to run, it is you who makes that choice, of
your own free will.

Not at all. This choice was due to *prior* gene and meme programming, with a
quantum random component.

Of course, anyone who would freely choose to be a slave has a
very seriously damaged Will.

No we dont have free will. Trivial logic shows that this is the case.

http://www.kevinaylward.co.uk/replicators/freewill.html

--
Kevin Aylward
ka@anasoftEXTRACT.co.uk
www.anasoft.co.uk
SuperSpice

 

[Bob Myers]

"Kevin Aylward" <kevin_aylward@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:4yfMh.12668$7l1.7957@newsfe4-gui.ntli.net...

No we dont have free will. Trivial logic shows that this is the case.

http://www.kevinaylward.co.uk/replicators/freewill.html

Hmmmm...very interesting argument, Kevin. Not to further
hijack the thread into a philosophical discussion, but...oh, what
the hell, a philosophical discussion will be a whole lot more fun
than what we typically discuss around here....

I like, and to a very large extent agree with, your comments and
logical argument re the notion of "free will." However, from a
practical perspective, does it really make much difference? If it
APPEARS TO US that we have free will, and certainly if along
with that it appears to everyone else that we have free will, then I
would suggest that there is no difference between the conclusion
of your argument ("we do not in reality have free will") and the
belief that we do, in practical terms. (I.e., there is no impact on
our behavior in either case.) It would seem to me that the only
practical definition of "free will" would be something along the lines
of saying that the response of a given individual to a given set of
stimuli cannot be predicted with certainty - whether we attribute
this to "true free will" (whatever that might be) or some level of
randomness in the workings of our brains makes no practical
difference, either as we ourselves perceive our behavior or as it
is seen by those around us.

Bob M.