Chip with simple program for Toy

On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 05:46:58 -0800 (PST), pheeh.zero@gmail.com wrote:

On Monday, January 7, 2013 6:30:15 PM UTC-6, tm wrote:
"Jim Thompson" <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> wrote in

message news1kme8t28ehvsrhi1b2csqj08ktv4sm2t5@4ax.com...

On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 15:38:47 -0600, amdx <amdx@knology.net> wrote:



On 1/7/2013 10:52 AM, Jim Thompson wrote:

Hammers should be banned...



Here is what the NRA will never say...not only do they want their automatic weapons for protection from the government, but also for use in an apocalyptic race war against Muslims, Blacks, and Mexicans!

Why should they say what you believe. Amazing, really.

I have a brother and a cousin that will elude to this insanity.

The apple doesn't fall far...

This is more about white supremacy, prejudice, and paranoia than anything. (and of course, the aging male that needs to compensate for his sexual failings)

Projections, projections. So many projections.

 

On Friday, January 11, 2013 3:06:49 PM UTC-6, k...@attt.bizz wrote:

Here is what the NRA will never say...not only do they want their automatic weapons for protection from the government, but also for use in an apocalyptic race war against Muslims, Blacks, and Mexicans!

Why should they say what you believe. Amazing, really.

What part of NEVER don't you get?

I have a brother and a cousin that will elude to this insanity.

The apple doesn't fall far...

So I'm insane for not believing the same? Duh, moment for you.

This is more about white supremacy, prejudice, and paranoia than anything. (and of course, the aging male that needs to compensate for his sexual failings)

Projections, projections. So many projections.

May you be skewered by one.

 

On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:02:27 -0800 (PST), pheeh.zero@gmail.com wrote:

On Friday, January 11, 2013 3:06:49 PM UTC-6, k...@attt.bizz wrote:
Here is what the NRA will never say...not only do they want their automatic weapons for protection from the government, but also for use in an apocalyptic race war against Muslims, Blacks, and Mexicans!

Why should they say what you believe. Amazing, really.

What part of NEVER don't you get?

You must be illiterate.

I have a brother and a cousin that will elude to this insanity.

The apple doesn't fall far...

So I'm insane for not believing the same? Duh, moment for you.

No, I didn't say that. Not at all, in fact.

This is more about white supremacy, prejudice, and paranoia than anything. (and of course, the aging male that needs to compensate for his sexual failings)

Projections, projections. So many projections.

May you be skewered by one.

No, you're "skewered". Royally.

 

On Friday, January 11, 2013 11:30:15 PM UTC-6, k...@attt.bizz wrote:

On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:02:27 -0800 (PST), pheeh.zero@gmail.com wrote:



On Friday, January 11, 2013 3:06:49 PM UTC-6, k...@attt.bizz wrote:

Here is what the NRA will never say...not only do they want their automatic weapons for protection from the government, but also for use in an apocalyptic race war against Muslims, Blacks, and Mexicans!



Why should they say what you believe. Amazing, really.



What part of NEVER don't you get?



You must be illiterate.



I have a brother and a cousin that will elude to this insanity.



The apple doesn't fall far...



So I'm insane for not believing the same? Duh, moment for you.



No, I didn't say that. Not at all, in fact.



This is more about white supremacy, prejudice, and paranoia than anything. (and of course, the aging male that needs to compensate for his sexual failings)



Projections, projections. So many projections.



May you be skewered by one.



No, you're "skewered". Royally.

Whoa, don't strain yourself!

 

On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 07:15:37 -0800 (PST), pheeh.zero@gmail.com wrote:

On Friday, January 11, 2013 11:30:15 PM UTC-6, k...@attt.bizz wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:02:27 -0800 (PST), pheeh.zero@gmail.com wrote:



On Friday, January 11, 2013 3:06:49 PM UTC-6, k...@attt.bizz wrote:

Here is what the NRA will never say...not only do they want their automatic weapons for protection from the government, but also for use in an apocalyptic race war against Muslims, Blacks, and Mexicans!



Why should they say what you believe. Amazing, really.



What part of NEVER don't you get?



You must be illiterate.



I have a brother and a cousin that will elude to this insanity.



The apple doesn't fall far...



So I'm insane for not believing the same? Duh, moment for you.



No, I didn't say that. Not at all, in fact.



This is more about white supremacy, prejudice, and paranoia than anything. (and of course, the aging male that needs to compensate for his sexual failings)



Projections, projections. So many projections.



May you be skewered by one.



No, you're "skewered". Royally.

Whoa, don't strain yourself!

With a lightweight lefty like you? <LOL>

 

On Saturday, January 12, 2013 7:44:50 PM UTC-6, k...@attt.bizz wrote:

No, you're "skewered". Royally.



Whoa, don't strain yourself!



With a lightweight lefty like you? <LOL

So you like "labels" and that makes you feel superior...how based and prejudiced...if you can't hold your dick you want it on cold, blued-steel.
You and your kind are a pathetic lot of mentally defective replacements for the KKK's absence!
Here's hoping you shit your head out and see the light of day!

 

On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 06:42:48 -0800 (PST), pheeh.zero@gmail.com wrote:

On Saturday, January 12, 2013 7:44:50 PM UTC-6, k...@attt.bizz wrote:




No, you're "skewered". Royally.



Whoa, don't strain yourself!



With a lightweight lefty like you? <LOL

So you like "labels" and that makes you feel superior...how based and prejudiced

No, just stating the facts. Apparently you don't grasp the concept,
though.

...if you can't hold your dick you want it on cold, blued-steel.

Wow! What's with the homo references? You sound like Fields and his
best bud Always wrong. Is scat next?

You and your kind are a pathetic lot of mentally defective replacements for the KKK's absence!
Here's hoping you shit your head out and see the light of day!

What a flyweight. Buzz off, dummy.

 

On Sunday, January 13, 2013 4:44:08 PM UTC-6, k...@attt.bizz wrote:

So you like "labels" and that makes you feel superior...how based and prejudiced


No, just stating the facts. Apparently you don't grasp the concept,

though.


...if you can't hold your dick you want it on cold, blued-steel.



Wow! What's with the homo references? You sound like Fields and his

best bud Always wrong. Is scat next?



You and your kind are a pathetic lot of mentally defective replacements for the KKK's absence!

Here's hoping you shit your head out and see the light of day!



What a flyweight. Buzz off, dummy.

There are no homo references (may be wishful thinking on your part). Try re-reading moron. A hint: blued-steel is a gun!

 

On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 03:22:05 -0800 (PST), pheeh.zero@gmail.com wrote:

On Sunday, January 13, 2013 4:44:08 PM UTC-6, k...@attt.bizz wrote:


So you like "labels" and that makes you feel superior...how based and prejudiced


No, just stating the facts. Apparently you don't grasp the concept,

though.


...if you can't hold your dick you want it on cold, blued-steel.



Wow! What's with the homo references? You sound like Fields and his

best bud Always wrong. Is scat next?



You and your kind are a pathetic lot of mentally defective replacements for the KKK's absence!

Here's hoping you shit your head out and see the light of day!



What a flyweight. Buzz off, dummy.

There are no homo references (may be wishful thinking on your part).

There you go again. You really need to see a shrink.

Try re-reading moron. A hint: blued-steel is a gun!

Can't be. You'd piss your pants if you even saw one. Lefties are
that way.

 

[Michael A. Terrell]

krw@attt.bizz wrote:

On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 03:22:05 -0800 (PST), pheeh.zero@gmail.com wrote:

On Sunday, January 13, 2013 4:44:08 PM UTC-6, k...@attt.bizz wrote:


So you like "labels" and that makes you feel superior...how based and prejudiced


No, just stating the facts. Apparently you don't grasp the concept,

though.


...if you can't hold your dick you want it on cold, blued-steel.



Wow! What's with the homo references? You sound like Fields and his

best bud Always wrong. Is scat next?



You and your kind are a pathetic lot of mentally defective replacements for the KKK's absence!

Here's hoping you shit your head out and see the light of day!



What a flyweight. Buzz off, dummy.

There are no homo references (may be wishful thinking on your part).

There you go again. You really need to see a shrink.

Try re-reading moron. A hint: blued-steel is a gun!

Can't be. You'd piss your pants if you even saw one. Lefties are
that way.

Only some weapons are blued. There are may colors availible to treat
metal. I hear that they are working on a pink dye for liberals.

 

On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:30:26 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"
<mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:

krw@attt.bizz wrote:

On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 03:22:05 -0800 (PST), pheeh.zero@gmail.com wrote:

On Sunday, January 13, 2013 4:44:08 PM UTC-6, k...@attt.bizz wrote:


So you like "labels" and that makes you feel superior...how based and prejudiced


No, just stating the facts. Apparently you don't grasp the concept,

though.


...if you can't hold your dick you want it on cold, blued-steel.



Wow! What's with the homo references? You sound like Fields and his

best bud Always wrong. Is scat next?



You and your kind are a pathetic lot of mentally defective replacements for the KKK's absence!

Here's hoping you shit your head out and see the light of day!



What a flyweight. Buzz off, dummy.

There are no homo references (may be wishful thinking on your part).

There you go again. You really need to see a shrink.

Try re-reading moron. A hint: blued-steel is a gun!

Can't be. You'd piss your pants if you even saw one. Lefties are
that way.


Only some weapons are blued. There are may colors availible to treat
metal. I hear that they are working on a pink dye for liberals.

What a great idea! They should all be dyed pink.

 

[Michael A. Terrell]

krw@attt.bizz wrote:

On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:30:26 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:


krw@attt.bizz wrote:

On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 03:22:05 -0800 (PST), pheeh.zero@gmail.com wrote:

On Sunday, January 13, 2013 4:44:08 PM UTC-6, k...@attt.bizz wrote:


So you like "labels" and that makes you feel superior...how based and prejudiced


No, just stating the facts. Apparently you don't grasp the concept,

though.


...if you can't hold your dick you want it on cold, blued-steel.



Wow! What's with the homo references? You sound like Fields and his

best bud Always wrong. Is scat next?



You and your kind are a pathetic lot of mentally defective replacements for the KKK's absence!

Here's hoping you shit your head out and see the light of day!



What a flyweight. Buzz off, dummy.

There are no homo references (may be wishful thinking on your part).

There you go again. You really need to see a shrink.

Try re-reading moron. A hint: blued-steel is a gun!

Can't be. You'd piss your pants if you even saw one. Lefties are
that way.


Only some weapons are blued. There are may colors availible to treat
metal. I hear that they are working on a pink dye for liberals.

What a great idea! They should all be dyed pink.

Liberals, or their toy guns?

 

[Bob Villa]

On Jan 13, 4:44 pm, k...@attt.bizz wrote:

What a flyweight.  Buzz off, dummy.

They can put that on your tombstone...to remember how quick witted you
were!

 

On Monday, January 14, 2013 5:30:26 PM UTC-6, Michael Terrell wrote:

Only some weapons are blued. There are may colors available to treat

metal. I hear that they are working on a pink dye for liberals.

Classic weapons are/were blued and that is what I used for an example.
Does your inferior mind have a problem with that?

 

On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 20:57:12 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"
<mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:

krw@attt.bizz wrote:

On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:30:26 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:


krw@attt.bizz wrote:

On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 03:22:05 -0800 (PST), pheeh.zero@gmail.com wrote:

On Sunday, January 13, 2013 4:44:08 PM UTC-6, k...@attt.bizz wrote:


So you like "labels" and that makes you feel superior...how based and prejudiced


No, just stating the facts. Apparently you don't grasp the concept,

though.


...if you can't hold your dick you want it on cold, blued-steel.



Wow! What's with the homo references? You sound like Fields and his

best bud Always wrong. Is scat next?



You and your kind are a pathetic lot of mentally defective replacements for the KKK's absence!

Here's hoping you shit your head out and see the light of day!



What a flyweight. Buzz off, dummy.

There are no homo references (may be wishful thinking on your part).

There you go again. You really need to see a shrink.

Try re-reading moron. A hint: blued-steel is a gun!

Can't be. You'd piss your pants if you even saw one. Lefties are
that way.


Only some weapons are blued. There are may colors availible to treat
metal. I hear that they are working on a pink dye for liberals.

What a great idea! They should all be dyed pink.


Liberals, or their toy guns?

Lefties. BTW, they've changed their name, again, to "progressives".
Let them call themselves what they want and call them what they are.

 

On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:45:52 -0800 (PST), Bob Villa
<pheeh.zero@gmail.com> wrote:

On Jan 13, 4:44 pm, k...@attt.bizz wrote:

What a flyweight.  Buzz off, dummy.

They can put that on your tombstone...to remember how quick witted you
were!

My, my, another moron lefty joins the club.

 

[Michael A. Terrell]

krw@attt.bizz wrote:

Michael A. Terrell wrote:

Liberals, or their toy guns?

Lefties. BTW, they've changed their name, again, to "progressives".
Let them call themselves what they want and call them what they are.

Progessivly lowering their average IQ.

<http://www.wftv.com/news/news/local/9-investigates-financial-firepower-gun-advocates-f/nTxfg/>

 

On Wednesday, January 30, 2013 2:42:15 PM UTC-8, Jim Thompson wrote:

I'd guess that NY State will ban 3D printers...



http://tinyurl.com/azk5no7



...Jim Thompson

It's only the receiver (and possibly the magazine). Although, if thick enough, I suppose the chamber could be made of plastic... possibly if firing .22LRs...

Michael

 

[Jamie]

John Doe wrote:

Correct me if I'm wrong on any of this, but... The motion sensor
(part) output constantly varies. Only when its output reaches a
certain level relative to its normal state, then it trips a switch
that drives the light for some period of time. Then the lightbulb
switches off and waits for another significant change in
detection.

What I would like to do is have a lightbulb or LED
brightness/intensity follow the motion sensor output part. In
other words... If a bird flies by, the lightbulb would momentarily
dimly light. If a person walks into close range, the lightbulb
would continuously shine brightly. If the person walked behind
some object, the lightbulb would go off, and then when they
reappeared, the lightbulb would come back on. Hopefully I'm not
over describing this, but I'll be happy to provide more
description if asked.

Does such a device (or close) already exist for purchase in a
store?

The sensor output part typically could not be connected to an LED
without putting an amplifier on it? Anybody do this before, any
schematic?

Thanks.

look at ultrasonic distance sensors. You can get outputs that
are analog for a distance reading of an object infront of it or
a switched output when an object is with in range.

http://store.mp3car.com/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=COM-078&cvsfa=3961&cvsfe=2&cvsfhu=434f4d2d303738&gclid=CJ2d-vabmbUCFUid4AodwxIAIg


Jamie

 

[Tim Williams]

AFAIK, pyroelectric sensors are a "single pixel" sort of thing, so they
don't know if the scene is moving, only if the average IR changes. Which it
does when someone comes into view or jumps out of the shadows, but it
doesn't do jack if someone walks around freely while holding up a
room-temperature blanket, or moves in the scene while presenting an equal
viewing cross section (probably tricky to do).

The output is positive or negative charge, corresponding to the change in
temperature viewed. Into a high resistive load (say, like something Phil
might be working on right now ), this has a time constant (the sensor's
just an insulating crystal), so it automatically centers after a while. In
other words, it's a temperature differentiator (for pedants, that's the RC
kind). Obviously, a motion detector needs only a window comparator; you
could use a suitably calibrated gain instead (followed by a full-wave active
rectifier), and maybe a lowpass, or falling slew rate limiter, to enhance
the effect.

Still might not be quite as intended; if the detector response is equal
across the viewing angle, then a person walking across the path will cause
it to light up (or down), then not do so much (depending on how the sensor
sees a walking body), then light up again on leaving the frame.

Tim

--
Deep Friar: a very philosophical monk.
Website: http://www.seventransistorlabs.com/

"John Doe" <jdoe@usenetlove.invalid> wrote in message
news:keklhq$s3c$1@dont-email.me...

Correct me if I'm wrong on any of this, but... The motion sensor
(part) output constantly varies. Only when its output reaches a
certain level relative to its normal state, then it trips a switch
that drives the light for some period of time. Then the lightbulb
switches off and waits for another significant change in
detection.

What I would like to do is have a lightbulb or LED
brightness/intensity follow the motion sensor output part. In
other words... If a bird flies by, the lightbulb would momentarily
dimly light. If a person walks into close range, the lightbulb
would continuously shine brightly. If the person walked behind
some object, the lightbulb would go off, and then when they
reappeared, the lightbulb would come back on. Hopefully I'm not
over describing this, but I'll be happy to provide more
description if asked.

Does such a device (or close) already exist for purchase in a
store?

The sensor output part typically could not be connected to an LED
without putting an amplifier on it? Anybody do this before, any
schematic?

Thanks.





--
Crossposted, feel free to delete the other group(s).
BTW. I'm not suggesting that anybody else could use or enjoy this.