Chip with simple program for Toy

On Mar 29, 1:59 am, Magnetic <magnetic.t...@yandex.ua> wrote:
Tomorrow, despite to our protests, CERN plans to perform the first
collisions of protons with the energy 3.5 TeV per proton (7 TeV per
collision).

It's midnight of March 31 in Geneva. How did your prediction work out?
Is Europe still there?

I give about 50% that the dangerous microscopic object will be
created. It will grow, ruining the ordinary matter, and can ruin our
planet or a part of it.
Here is my crude estimation of probable outcomes:
1. Explosion of the whole Earth – 49%.
2. Extermination of Geneva – 1%.
3. Extermination of Europe – 1%.
4. Other harmful unpredictable consequences – 5%.
5. Discovery of new subnuclear energy sources – 5%.
6. Outcomes with no harm and no use – the rest.

At the point 1 we all will die.
At the points 2, 3, 4 a part of humanity will be killed. Destruction
of a part of the Earth will be followed by huge Earthquake all over
the Earth. To raise the probability of survival it is necessary to be
at the free air with the stalk of water, food and warm clothes.

The most probable microscopic dangerous objects are:
1. Microscopic magnetic hole.
2. Growing nucleus, consisting from strange nucleons and/or neutrons
(uds, uss, udd).
3. Microscopic black hole.

According to ideas of Kaluza, Klein and Einstein about additional
short spatial dimension and unification of gravitational and
electromagnetic forces, we can conclude that black holes, at least at
microscopic levels, can be reduced to objects of the first or the
second types. That means that microscopic black hole is in fact a
condensate, consisting from bosons, as magnetic hole, or from
fermions, as strange matter. Condensates have a binding energy per
their constituent elements. This changes the argumentation about
survival and penetrating abilities of black holes, created in cosmic
and collider proton-proton collisions...
-----

My health is already ruined by depression. I know that we all can be
killed. I can not save myself, my family, my land. Criminal stupidity
of corrupted contemporary science had won.

http://darkenergy.narod.ru/
 
On 3/31/10 9:13 AM, Magnetic wrote:
Wait a little.
The time needed to grow is from 1000 seconds to 1000 days.
The Earth can already be pregnant now.
<laughing)

What bullshit!
 
On Mar 31, 3:17 pm, baron <baron.nos...@linuxmaniac.nospam.net> wrote:
Heiko Vogel Inscribed thus:

Yes! I am still alive or should I say: Damn!

;)

Me too.  I'll say it for you: Damm !  (*)

--
Best Regards:
                Baron.
Wait a little.
The time needed to grow is from 1000 seconds to 1000 days.
The Earth can already be pregnant now.

http://darkenergy.narod.ru/ru.html
 
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 09:18:59 -0500, Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
wrote:

On 3/31/10 9:13 AM, Magnetic wrote:
Wait a little.
The time needed to grow is from 1000 seconds to 1000 days.
The Earth can already be pregnant now.

laughing)

What bullshit!
At the risk of giving a paranoid bipolar more ammunition the device
wasn't used to it's full potential yet. It was a test run.
 
Hammy wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 09:18:59 -0500, Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com
wrote:

On 3/31/10 9:13 AM, Magnetic wrote:
Wait a little.
The time needed to grow is from 1000 seconds to 1000 days.
The Earth can already be pregnant now.
laughing)

What bullshit!

At the risk of giving a paranoid bipolar more ammunition the device
wasn't used to it's full potential yet. It was a test run.
Dont bother. Every time nothing happens, he changes the prediction
and probabilities.
 
Magnetic wrote:
[snip crap]

Wait a little.
The time needed to grow is from 1000 seconds to 1000 days.
The Earth can already be pregnant now.
Christ is coming back - look busy.

http://physics.aps.org/articles/v2/104
<http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100304/full/news.2010.108.html>
http://arxiv/abs/1003.2030
<http://www.jlab.org/news/releases/2006/hypernuclei.html>

idiot

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm
 
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 16:05:53 -0800, Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote:

Magnetic wrote:
[snip crap]

Wait a little.
The time needed to grow is from 1000 seconds to 1000 days.
The Earth can already be pregnant now.

Christ is coming back - look busy.
Obama is so yesterday.
 
On Mar 31, 7:18 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/31/10 9:13 AM, Magnetic wrote:

Wait a little.
The time needed to grow is from 1000 seconds to 1000 days.
The Earth can already be pregnant now.

   <laughing)
i hope she is pregnant,
with a royal particle!

r.y
 
On Mar 31, 7:13 am, Magnetic <magnetic.t...@yandex.ua> wrote:
On Mar 31, 3:17 pm, baron <baron.nos...@linuxmaniac.nospam.net> wrote:

Heiko Vogel Inscribed thus:

Yes! I am still alive or should I say: Damn!

;)

Me too.  I'll say it for you: Damm !  (*)

--
Best Regards:
                Baron.

Wait a little.
The time needed to grow is from 1000 seconds to 1000 days.
Or maybe to 1000 months? If so - it is a safe bet, because all of us
will be dead by then and will never find out.

The Earth can already be pregnant now.
Mazel tov!

Materinstva ne vzyat' u Zemli,
Ne otnyat', kak ne vychepat' morya.
Kto poveril, chto Zemlyu sozhgli?
Net, ona potemnenla ot gorya.

/V. Vysotsky/
 
Uncle Al wrote:
Magnetic wrote:
[snip crap]

Wait a little.
The time needed to grow is from 1000 seconds to 1000 days.
The Earth can already be pregnant now.

Christ is coming back - look busy.
I think we are playing this the wrong way. CERN should announce today
that they have made a Black Hole and it is eating up the Earth.

Then with a bit of luck we can persuade the B-Ark material to cull
themselves to avoid the forthcoming cataclysm. They have short memories
so we can use the same method again for the 2012 fake EOTW.

It would clean up Usenet no end!

Regards,
Martin Brown
 
Heiko Vogel Inscribed thus:

Yes! I am still alive or should I say: Damn!

;)

Me too. I'll say it for you: Damm ! (*)

--
Best Regards:
Baron.

Wait a little.
The time needed to grow is from 1000 seconds to 1000 days.

Or maybe to 1000 months? If so - it is a safe bet, because all of us
will be dead by then and will never find out.
No, 9 month is much more probable than 1000 months.

The Earth can already be pregnant now.

Mazel tov!

Materinstva ne vzyat' u Zemli,
Ne otnyat', kak ne vychepat' morya.
Kto poveril, chto Zemlyu sozhgli?
Net, ona potemnenla ot gorya.

/V. Vysotsky/
"Kak nebo na moi dela plevalo,
Tak ja pluju na milosti nebes!"
From "Junona and Avos'".
 
On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 09:30:41 +0100, Martin Brown <|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk> wrote:
Uncle Al wrote:
Magnetic wrote:
[snip crap]

Wait a little.
The time needed to grow is from 1000 seconds to 1000 days.
The Earth can already be pregnant now.

Christ is coming back - look busy.

I think we are playing this the wrong way. CERN should announce
today that they have made a Black Hole and it is eating up the
Earth.

Then with a bit of luck we can persuade the B-Ark material to cull
themselves to avoid the forthcoming cataclysm. They have short
memories so we can use the same method again for the 2012 fake
EOTW.

It would clean up Usenet no end!

Regards,
Martin Brown
Martin,

You may be onto something. "Response to an overwhelming threat"...
this could be more serious than AGW.

I think it's time to involve our thoughtful (and, thanfully,
parsimonious) Congressional representatives and let them know that
the Earth faces imminent destruction from forces already unleashed
by experiments at the CERN LHC, and that this catastrophe can only
be averted through a massive and immediate infusion of research
money.

Since the threat involves the destruction of atomic and subatomic
particles, it's clear that the research should be funded through a
"Particle Tax" assessed against any person or company which creates,
destroys, uses, or is composed of particles. In order to make the
tax fairer, if a company can show that it is destroying or creating
fewer particles, it will be able to sell its "Particle Credits" to
other personas or companies allowing them to increase their use of
particulate matter.

Act now! There is no time to lose!


Frank McKenney
--
Nothing helps a bad mood like spreading it around.˙ -- Calvin
--
Frank McKenney, McKenney Associates
Richmond, Virginia / (804) 320-4887
Munged E-mail: frank uscore mckenney ayut mined spring dawt cahm (y'all)
 
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 09:18:59 -0500, Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
wrote:

On 3/31/10 9:13 AM, Magnetic wrote:
Wait a little.
The time needed to grow is from 1000 seconds to 1000 days.
The Earth can already be pregnant now.

laughing)

What bullshit!
Or what brilliance. Most of the religiously afflicted have to set a
firm date - within their prophet's lifetime for the prophet to reap
the respect and power he craves. So we have lots of magic dates where
the world should have ended. When the planet outlives its expiration
date, the prophet loses stature.

Magnetic has given himself a 3 year respite. He could just as easily
predicted 1,000 years. Three years is just about right: Long enough
for people to forget the dire predictions, and short enough to pretend
he's right and everyone else is bonkers, and its still important to
us.
--
 
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 23:52:17 -0700 (PDT), Magnetic
<magnetic.trap@yandex.ua> wrote:

No, 9 month is much more probable than 1000 months.
but he's waffling and leaving himself some wiggle room
--
 
Sam Wormley Inscribed thus:

On 3/31/10 9:13 AM, Magnetic wrote:
Wait a little.
The time needed to grow is from 1000 seconds to 1000 days.
The Earth can already be pregnant now.

laughing)

What bullshit!
Pregnant !#@* Better not let the Missus find out... (*)

--
Best Regards:
Baron.
 
default wrote:


Most of the religiously afflicted have to set a
firm date - within their prophet's lifetime for the prophet to reap
the respect and power he craves. So we have lots of magic dates where
the world should have ended. When the planet outlives its expiration
date, the prophet loses stature.
Experience shows that in the cases like that profets don't loose their
face. What usually happens after the grandiose prediction failure is the
overturn of the tactics. Small groups start active recruiting; big open
groups shrink into secret societies only for chosen ones, etc.

Magnetic has given himself a 3 year respite. He could just as easily
predicted 1,000 years.
An active idiot will find some different application. Fortunately,
active people are not very many, and active idiots, too.

Vladimir Vassilevsky
DSP and Mixed Signal Design Consultant
http://www.abvolt.com
 
"Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr." wrote:
On Mar 31, 11:52 pm, Magnetic <magnetic.t...@yandex.ua> wrote:
[snip crap]

No, 9 month is much more probable than 1000 months.

The Earth can already be pregnant now.

Why 9 months? Is Earth's pregnancy the same as human pregnancy?
Cow, 285 days (vs. human 280 days) - LHC refugee East Indian post-docs
have it rigged to blow Lakshmi.

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm
 
On Mar 31, 11:52 pm, Magnetic <magnetic.t...@yandex.ua> wrote:
Heiko Vogel Inscribed thus:

Yes! I am still alive or should I say: Damn!

;)

Me too.  I'll say it for you: Damm !  (*)

--
Best Regards:
                Baron.

Wait a little.
The time needed to grow is from 1000 seconds to 1000 days.

Or maybe to 1000 months? If so - it is a safe bet, because all of us
will be dead by then and will never find out.

No, 9 month is much more probable than 1000 months.

The Earth can already be pregnant now.
Why 9 months? Is Earth's pregnancy the same as human pregnancy?
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top