Chip with simple program for Toy

[Eeyore]

Rod Speed wrote:

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
John Fields wrote

Implosion is what happens when an evacuated volume
pulls in its walls when they're rendered unstable.

Thats just one way of imploding, stupid.

No.

Yep.

That IS implosion exactly.

Thats just one way of imploding, stupid.

http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/implode?view=uk

"verb collapse or cause to collapse violently inwards."

***INWARDS*** not DOWN.

You can't even understand the English Language.

Graham

 

[John Fields]

On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 05:31:52 +1000, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

John Fields <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
John Fields <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote

You're still stuck with the fat that it collects
when you fry them and thats bad for you.

Vegetable (esp olive) oil is bad for you ?

When its used for frying, yep.

Essentially because breaks down too quickly when heated.

Breaks down into what,

Look it up for yourself.

It doesn't work like that.

Wrong, as always.

and what kind of temperatures are you talking about?

What is used for frying.

reams of your juvenile shit any 2 year old could leave for dead flushed where it belongs

---
That doesn't make a lot of sense to me, but I guess that since she's
been pricked and wants to get nasty, she wants desperately to reveal
who violated her against her will.

So go ahead.

Who was it?

JF

 

[Eeyore]

Rod Speed wrote:

John Fields <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote

Yep, those damned rag heads aint exactly rocket scientist material.

Despite the CIA's best intel and the Iraq war !

Its always possible to do terrorist atrocitys.

In spades when the fools are happy to die in the process.

And to bring those atrocities to an end,

Not even possible, as I said.

you advocate that other "fools" who willingly give up their lives to end it are wrong?

Nope. Just do whats practical to stop them doing stuff like hijacking aircraft and
get used to the fact that there will always be some risk when using mass public
transport where its not practical to search everyone and dont sit next to swathy
individuals who are carrying anything much who are sweating a bit.

London's 'tube' or NYC's subway being perfect examples.

Now, if the West were on better terms with certain nations instead of aggravating them and
the extreme cults within them .........

Graham

 

[Eeyore]

Rod Speed wrote:

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote
Rob Dekker wrote
"Eeyore" wrote
Rob Dekker wrote

In vehicles, load varies wildly (unless you are crusing on the
freeway), so, well-tuned diesels performing in series hybrids
(essentially driving a generator) should be the most efficient
way to power a vehicle...

I totally agree. Opel of Germany are working on one.
May be out around 2012. Google Opel Flextreme.

Did you take a look at it btw ? It's like Europe's answer to the the Chevy Volt.

Didn't GM already build a hybrid diesel in the 90s that got 70mpg ?

Let me look that up... YES ! The Chrysler ESX-3.
And the Precept got 80mpg.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partnership_for_a_New_Generation_of_Vehicles

What a terrible shame that we have these vehicle designs
already for 10 year, and still don't produce them now.....

Extraordinary. I never knew about any of those. I wonder why
the automakers wanted the programme halted. Maybe they
preferred to make SUVs ? Or were they too expensive to build ?

Yep, bet the last is the real reason, given that no one else bothered world wide.

Now that was a sensible, civil response.

Mine always are.

I'm pleased to hear you aspire to that.

Why not try more of those ?

No need, thats all I ever do.

I can't entirely agree with that part. Try being nicer and less confrontational. I'd
also advise you read dictionary definitions more thoroughly.

Graham

 

[Eeyore]

Rod Speed wrote:

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote

How about addressing the source of the problem ?

Not even possible. Thats always been the problem with terrorism.

Ever heard of the 'Good Friday Agreement' ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_Friday_Agreement

Thats not addressing the source of the problem, thats just
ONE group of terrorists getting sick of being terrorists.

But they WERE terrorists and now they're not. And there were two sets not one, although the
Unionists didn't usually do much harm. NOW they are politicians sitting round the same table
governing their own country.

They aint even the ones stupid enough to buy the line that blowing
yourself to bits will see you instantly transported to nirvana etc.

Some of them nevertheless did manage to blow themselves to bits though. Including at least one
in my home town.

Once you have terrorists that stupid, there is no way to address the source of the problem.

You call it stupid. They call it a 'cause'. If you don't understand the phsychology of it,
it'll never go away.

Graham

 

[John Fields]

On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 05:35:22 +1000, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

John Fields <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote
Rob Dekker <rob@verific.com> wrote
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote
Rob Dekker wrote

Didn't GM already build a hybrid diesel in the 90s that got 70mpg ?

Let me look that up... YES ! The Chrysler ESX-3.
And the Precept got 80mpg.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partnership_for_a_New_Generation_of_Vehicles

What a terrible shame that we have these vehicle designs
already for 10 year, and still don't produce them now.....

Much worse than a shame. I'd call it borderline criminal.

Unlikely given that no one else does either.

---
Two wrongs make a right?
---

Much more likely that it turns out to have some real practical
downsides.

---
Like, f'rinstance?
---

How much of an effect do you think big oil had in shutting down the program?

None, zero, nada, ziltch. They couldnt have done that world wide.

---
Yeah, right.

From a zillion barrels a day to a quarter of that and the source
wouldn't bitch?

You're a lot stupider than you pretend to be.


JF

 

[Eeyore]

John Fields wrote:

"Rod Speed" wrote:
Eeyore wrote
Rod Speed wrote

Yep, those damned rag heads aint exactly rocket scientist material.

Despite the CIA's best intel and the Iraq war !

Its always possible to do terrorist atrocitys.

In spades when the fools are happy to die in the process.

---
And to bring those atrocities to an end, you advocate that other
"fools" who willingly give up their lives to end it are wrong?

To jaw-jaw is always better than to war-war.
Winston Churchill
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/w/q141781.html

That IMHO is the only likely resolution. It worked in Northern Ireland
ultimately.

Graham

 

[John Fields]

On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 05:38:33 +1000, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

John Fields <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:51:39 +1000, "Rod Speed"
rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

John Fields <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

Not with busses it aint.

Have you never heard of "The Grid"?

Tad unlikely I havent seeing as I have used that term a number of times.

Whoooooosh...

Your desperate wanking doesnt sound anything like that, child.

The grid _is_ a "buss", Mr. Clever.

Pathetic, Master Wanker.

---
Not at all.

At the very least, it seems you're purporting that if you think I'm
the Master Wanker, then my orgasm, when masturbating, is superior to
yours.

You're probably right, since nothing you've posted so far allays the
guilt you associate with getting yourself off.

That last line:

"Pathetic, Master Wanker."

Sealed your fate.


JF

 

[Eeyore]

Rod Speed wrote:

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote

secondary reply

Ever heard of the 'Good Friday Agreement' ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_Friday_Agreement

Thats not addressing the source of the problem, thats just
ONE group of terrorists getting sick of being terrorists.

Why do you think they were sick of it ? I can tell you there were plenty who weren't.

They aint even the ones stupid enough to buy the line that blowing
yourself to bits will see you instantly transported to nirvana etc.

Once you have terrorists that stupid, there is no way to address the source of the problem.

So you'd give up ?

Graham

 

[Eeyore]

Rod Speed wrote:

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote

http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/implode?view=uk

"verb collapse or cause to collapse violently inwards."

***INWARDS*** not DOWN.

The top imploded inwards, stupid.

No it didn't. It held steady. It just went directly down as a result of
the collapsing structure below it.

Graham

 

[Eeyore]

Rod Speed wrote:

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote

How about addressing the source of the problem ?

Not even possible. Thats always been the problem with terrorism.

Ever heard of the 'Good Friday Agreement' ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_Friday_Agreement

Thats not addressing the source of the problem, thats just
ONE group of terrorists getting sick of being terrorists.

But they WERE terrorists and now they're not.

Yes but that wasnt due to any addressing of the source of the problem,

<snip>

You need to do some reading sunshine. Your ideas are way out of kilter with reality. It was
EXACTLY to do with addressing the source of the problem.

Graham

 

[Eeyore]

Rod Speed wrote:

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote

If you don't understand the phsychology of it, it'll never go away.

And it wont even if you do either. Its easy enough to understand the
psychology of the fools that are stupid enough to believe that blowing
themselves to bits is a guaranteed ticket to nirvana. Understanding
that doesnt do a damned thing about making it go away.

You're SO (mostly) wrong.

Graham

 

[Eeyore]

Rod Speed wrote:

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
John Fields <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote

Yep, those damned rag heads aint exactly rocket scientist material.

Despite the CIA's best intel and the Iraq war !

Its always possible to do terrorist atrocitys.

In spades when the fools are happy to die in the process.

And to bring those atrocities to an end,

Not even possible, as I said.

you advocate that other "fools" who willingly give up their lives to end it are wrong?

Nope. Just do whats practical to stop them doing stuff like
hijacking aircraft and get used to the fact that there will always
be some risk when using mass public transport where its not
practical to search everyone and dont sit next to swathy individuals
who are carrying anything much who are sweating a bit.

London's 'tube' or NYC's subway being perfect examples.

Yep.

Now, if the West were on better terms with certain nations
instead of aggravating them and the extreme cults within them .........

Again, not even possible. You english tried it tried it right thruout your
colonys and it just plain isnt possible with the worst of the rabid loonys.

You've been reading the wrong history books again.
The former 'British Commonwealth' is the largest collective bloc of nations on the planet.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commonwealth_of_Nations

"The Commonwealth of Nations, usually known as the Commonwealth, is a voluntary association of
53 independent sovereign states, most of which are former British colonies, or dependencies of
these colonies (the exceptions being the United Kingdom itself and Mozambique)."

So well considered that requests for membership have been received from countries that were
never previously under formal British Control. Including even France (secretly)

You didnt even manage to apply the jackboot to the Irish for very long
and got fucked over trying to apply the jackboot to afghanistan very
comprehensively indeed. So comprehensively that with one attempt,
there was literally just ONE survivor out of thousands.

The Irish problem was unique. It dates back at least 400 years. It's now fixed. It is a former
problem from another age.

In spades with the current terrorist activity in India.

Care to elaborate ?

Graham

 

[John Fields]

On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:55:59 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:

John Fields wrote:

"Rod Speed" wrote:
John Fields wrote
Rod Speed wrote

Not with busses it aint.

Have you never heard of "The Grid"?

Tad unlikely I havent seeing as I have used that term a number of times.

---
Whoooooosh...

The grid _is_ a "buss", Mr. Clever.

Or even "bus" in UK English. Hence the UK grid is indeed a big bus.

---
Indeed.

And where the "Magic Bus" came from.


JF

 

[Eeyore]

Rod Speed wrote:

Eeyore wrote

Try being nicer and less confrontational.

Go and fuck yourself.

I'd also advise you read dictionary definitions more thoroughly.

I order you to go shove your head up a dead bear's arse.

Over here we call that "game set and match". And, no you didn't win.

You need to learn some civility.

Graham

 

[Eeyore]

Rod Speed wrote:

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote

http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/implode?view=uk

"verb collapse or cause to collapse violently inwards."

***INWARDS*** not DOWN.

The top imploded inwards, stupid.

No it didn't.

Yes it did.

It held steady.

Sitting in free air eh ? Yeah, right.

Supported by the floors below it that also held steady for ages. The
pics are readily available.

Graham

 

[Eeyore]

Rod Speed wrote:

Eeyore wrote

It was EXACTLY to do with addressing the source of the problem.

Nope, and it wouldnt work with the terrorists being discussed
anyway, because they havent got sick of being terrorists and
they are stupid enough to believe that blowing themselve to
bits is an instant ticket to nirvana.

Even the stupidest Irish fuckwit was never THAT stupid.

You clearly have NO IDEA what really happened. Talks between the IRA and even
the Thatcher government (of all to imagine) took place in secret.

Graham

 

[Eeyore]

Rod Speed wrote:

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote

If you don't understand the phsychology of it, it'll never go away.

And it wont even if you do either. Its easy enough to understand
the psychology of the fools that are stupid enough to believe that
blowing themselves to bits is a guaranteed ticket to nirvana.

Understanding that doesnt do a damned thing about making it go away.

You're SO (mostly) wrong.

Nope, you are. About Churchill in spades.

And your silly line didnt work with Ireland itself.

It was Churchill that had to give up and let them stew in their own juice
and they were actually stupid enough to have a full civil war when he did too.

You're talking about the 1920s ?

I'm talking about NOW.

Graham

 

[Eeyore]

Rod Speed wrote:

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
John Fields <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote

Yep, those damned rag heads aint exactly rocket scientist material.

Despite the CIA's best intel and the Iraq war !

Its always possible to do terrorist atrocitys.

In spades when the fools are happy to die in the process.

And to bring those atrocities to an end,

Not even possible, as I said.

you advocate that other "fools" who willingly give up their lives to end it are wrong?

Nope. Just do whats practical to stop them doing stuff like
hijacking aircraft and get used to the fact that there will always
be some risk when using mass public transport where its not
practical to search everyone and dont sit next to swathy
individuals who are carrying anything much who are sweating a bit.

London's 'tube' or NYC's subway being perfect examples.

Yep.

Now, if the West were on better terms with certain nations
instead of aggravating them and the extreme cults within them
.........

Again, not even possible. You english tried it tried it right thruout your
colonys and it just plain isnt possible with the worst of the rabid loonys.

You've been reading the wrong history books again.

Nope.

The former 'British Commonwealth' is the largest collective bloc of nations on the > planet.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commonwealth_of_Nations

Irrelevant to what the english attempted with terrorists.

Uh ?

Graham

 

[Eeyore]

Rod Speed wrote:

There is no 'problem' that can be addressed.

Is that so ?

Graham