J
Jon Slaughter
Guest
<silusilusilu@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:b83fc31e-1383-4a66-931e-58fe1917ab7f@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
If i consider the open loop gain of an opamp with negative feedback
composed of 2 poles (with negative real part) and one zero (with
positive real part) and if i want a phase margin of 45°, from its
definition
360°-tan^-1[-A(jwo)F(jwo)]=45°
i have
+180°-tan^-1[A(jwo)F(jwo)]=+180°-[-tan^-1(w/p1)-tan^-1(w/p2) -tan^-1(w/
z)]=45°
where +180 is obtained from 360°-tan^-1[negative constant]=360°-
tan^-1[-1]=360°-180°
Instead i've found as solution
+-180°-tan^-1(w/p1)-tan^-1(w/p2) -tan^-1(w/z) =45°
what's wrong?
thanks
=================
wtf is all that?
maybe rewrite them using better notation tan^-1 is also known as arctan,
A(jwo) looks like a function such as f(x) and jwo looks like a single
object.
Also define all your symbols so it will be easier to decipher.
in anycase maybe http://www.intersil.com/data/an/an9415.pdf will help
news:b83fc31e-1383-4a66-931e-58fe1917ab7f@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
If i consider the open loop gain of an opamp with negative feedback
composed of 2 poles (with negative real part) and one zero (with
positive real part) and if i want a phase margin of 45°, from its
definition
360°-tan^-1[-A(jwo)F(jwo)]=45°
i have
+180°-tan^-1[A(jwo)F(jwo)]=+180°-[-tan^-1(w/p1)-tan^-1(w/p2) -tan^-1(w/
z)]=45°
where +180 is obtained from 360°-tan^-1[negative constant]=360°-
tan^-1[-1]=360°-180°
Instead i've found as solution
+-180°-tan^-1(w/p1)-tan^-1(w/p2) -tan^-1(w/z) =45°
what's wrong?
thanks
=================
wtf is all that?
maybe rewrite them using better notation tan^-1 is also known as arctan,
A(jwo) looks like a function such as f(x) and jwo looks like a single
object.
Also define all your symbols so it will be easier to decipher.
in anycase maybe http://www.intersil.com/data/an/an9415.pdf will help