Check Out This Month's "Microwaves & RF" Magazine

[Paul Burridge]

On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 09:13:59 +0100, John Woodgate
<jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> wrote:

I read in sci.electronics.design that Kevin Aylward
salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk> wrote (in <4loMc.79702$y04.61616@fe2.news.b
lueyonder.co.uk&gt about 'The bi-polar transistor at RF', on Sat, 24 Jul
2004:
Oh dear...Clueless as usual again my son.

Just ignore him. He seems to delight in provoking and insulting people.

Yeah, but he's *so* up his own arse one cannot help taking a pot-shot
at him from time to time. It's good entertainment value.

--

"What is now proved was once only imagin'd." - William Blake, 1793.

 

[Winfield Hill]

Roy Lewallen wrote...

One of my most treasured texts is _Modeling The Bipolar Transistor_,
by Ian Getreu, published by Tektronix in 1976 (Tek P/N 062-2841-00).
It's long out of print, but it might show up on eBay or elsewhere
from time to time and I highly recommend it to anyone seriously
interested in transistor modeling.

Amazon has one listed, for $190. :&gt

Thanks,
- Win

(email: use hill_at_rowland-dot-org for now)

 

[Kevin Aylward]

Paul Burridge wrote:

On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 07:37:36 GMT,

As yet unrecognized quantum electrodynamicist, astrophysicist,
mathematician, logician, neo-Darwinist, talented musican, programmer,
electronic designer, polymath and hierophant,

Oh...please dont...stop...

Kevin Aylward wrote:

History....

[the usual self-aggrandizement snipped]

If you're as smart

I'm not smart at all. If I were so, I wouldn't be wasting my time
discusing such mundane mattes with you.

as you make yourself out to be,

I have knowledge and experience gained over many years. I am good at
what I do, not by being smart, but by making 1000's of times of mistakes
more than others who don't actually do anything but just waffle on, like
for example, Mr. Burridge. I spend a lot of time doing what I do,
clearly all you do is doodle on the back of envelopes whilst ridding the
bus home from the day care centre.

you might address
the real questions here, rather than make continual attempts to gain
acceptance and recognition by blowing your own trumpet in an
embarrassingly obvious fashion.

Indeed I do. If one doesn't vote for oneself, how does one expect to get
other people to vote for one?

Kevin Aylward
salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk
http://www.anasoft.co.uk
SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.

 

[Paul Burridge]

On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 16:47:55 GMT, "Kevin Aylward"
<salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk> wrote:

I'm not smart at all. If I were so, I wouldn't be wasting my time
discusing such mundane mattes with you.

Yes, it must be truly awful having to put up with grubby oiks like me
who keep asking stoopid questions about basic electricity that a child
of 6 would know the answer to.

I have knowledge and experience gained over many years. I am good at
what I do, not by being smart, but by making 1000's of times of mistakes
more than others who don't actually do anything but just waffle on, like
for example, Mr. Burridge. I spend a lot of time doing what I do,
clearly all you do is doodle on the back of envelopes whilst ridding the
bus home from the day care centre.

Well day centers aren't really my thing. I don't need the company of a
bunch of old fogies like Jim Thompson to stimulate me. I read
extensively - something you yourself might benefit from. When was the
last time you actually picked up a book?

Indeed I do. If one doesn't vote for oneself, how does one expect to get
other people to vote for one?

You want a vote? Okay; I'll arrange one...

--

"What is now proved was once only imagin'd." - William Blake, 1793.

 

[Keith]

On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 00:07:55 +0000, Cuneg the Whale-scolder wrote:

Workaholic wrote:
David Sutherland <david@bitbucket.com> wrote in message
news:<ccrfd0583p5gpdnb1vuemmh3t60uh6e46b@4ax.com>...
newsgroups untrimmed from advocacy

David Sutherland wrote:
I don't think

That, unfortunately, is the harsh reality that is my existence.


Regards,
David Sutherland
(note **ANTI-SPAM** in reply field)

All os's suck eggs!!!

A) You've never used VMS then?

You must be lysdexic: MVS rules. VMS sucks smelly socks. ;-)

B) Write your own.

Easy. ...as long as the requirements don't require it to compile. ;-)

--
Keith

 

[Cuneg the Whale-scolder]

Workaholic wrote:

David Sutherland <david@bitbucket.com> wrote in message
news:<ccrfd0583p5gpdnb1vuemmh3t60uh6e46b@4ax.com>...
newsgroups untrimmed from advocacy

David Sutherland wrote:
I don't think

That, unfortunately, is the harsh reality that is my existence.


Regards,
David Sutherland
(note **ANTI-SPAM** in reply field)

All os's suck eggs!!!

A) You've never used VMS then?

B) Write your own.

 

[Bonik the Goober-bumper]

Keith wrote:

On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 00:07:55 +0000, Cuneg the Whale-scolder wrote:

Workaholic wrote:
David Sutherland <david@bitbucket.com> wrote in message
news:<ccrfd0583p5gpdnb1vuemmh3t60uh6e46b@4ax.com>...
newsgroups untrimmed from advocacy

David Sutherland wrote:
I don't think

That, unfortunately, is the harsh reality that is my existence.


Regards,
David Sutherland
(note **ANTI-SPAM** in reply field)

All os's suck eggs!!!

A) You've never used VMS then?

You must be lysdexic: MVS rules. VMS sucks smelly socks. ;-)

B) Write your own.

Easy. ...as long as the requirements don't require it to compile. ;-)

Is that a deliberate tautology or don't you know just what the fuck you're
blabbing on about?

 

[Kadaitcha Man]

Keith wrote:

On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 02:27:22 +0000, Kadaitcha Man wrote:

Keith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 01:51:41 +0000, Wagdesh the Foot-poker wrote:

Keith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 00:24:20 +0000, Bonik the Goober-bumper wrote:

Keith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 00:07:55 +0000, Cuneg the Whale-scolder
wrote:

Workaholic wrote:
David Sutherland <david@bitbucket.com> wrote in message
news:<ccrfd0583p5gpdnb1vuemmh3t60uh6e46b@4ax.com>...
newsgroups untrimmed from advocacy

David Sutherland wrote:
I don't think

That, unfortunately, is the harsh reality that is my
existence.


Regards,
David Sutherland
(note **ANTI-SPAM** in reply field)

All os's suck eggs!!!

A) You've never used VMS then?

You must be lysdexic: MVS rules. VMS sucks smelly socks. ;-)

B) Write your own.

Easy. ...as long as the requirements don't require it to
compile. ;-)

Is that a deliberate tautology or don't you know just what the
fuck you're blabbing on about?

I guess I'll have to leave that question to the humor impaired.
What a maroon.

Oh, were you trying to be funny? I'm so glad you told me.

I tried to on the first post with the smiley, but I guess you're too
dense to understand simple emoticons.

So you believe that you can enthral your readers with inane,
tautological tripe and have them rolling on the ground, gasping for
breath from roaring in side-splitting laughter merely because you
can type a ;-) ?

No, but I thought

BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!! See how hilarious you can be without ever once having to
use a fuckwitted smiley face?

 

[Winfield Hill]

Keith wrote...

Winfield Hill wrote:
Keith wrote...
Dart the lethal Clam-starer wrote:
Keith wrote:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Keith wrote:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Keith wrote:
Wagdesh the Foot-poker wrote:
Keith wrote:
Bonik the Goober-bumper wrote:
Keith wrote:
Cuneg the Whale-scolder wrote:
Workaholic wrote:
David Sutherland wrote
That is the harsh reality that is my existence.
All os's suck eggs!!!
A) You've never used VMS then?
You must be lysdexic: MVS rules. VMS sucks smelly socks.
Is that a deliberate tautology ...?
I'll have to leave that question to the humor impaired.
Oh, were you trying to be funny? I'm so glad you told me.
I tried to on the first post with the smiley...
So you believe that you can enthral readers with inane tripe
No, but I thought
BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!! See a fuckwit?
Yes indeed.
Post edits. How terribly original. #3 in the lamer's kitbag.
Yes it is. I'm so glad you noticed that you are such a lamer.
An interesting >>>> pattern is developing.
Sure, and deliberate. ...but now you've gone and spoiled it. ;-)

How is that?

Thanks,
- Win

(email: use hill_at_rowland-dot-org for now)

 

[Diogenes]

John Woodgate wrote:

I read in sci.electronics.design that Winfield Hill
Winfield_member@newsguy.com> wrote (in <ce0l7u0kmf@drn.newsguy.com&gt
about 'I've dumped Linux and moved to Windows XP.', on Sun, 25 Jul
2004:

An interesting >>>> pattern is developing.

I understand that Outhouse Distress doesn't do '>'. Several of my
e-mail correspondents have to jump through symbolic hoops to separate
their responses from my message text. So a lot of people won't see
that pattern.

You understand wrong. Must be linux lusers: linux makes you stupid.

 

[Gririg the sadistic]

Keith wrote:

On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 08:56:46 -0700, Winfield Hill wrote:

Keith wrote...
Dart the lethal Clam-starer wrote:
Keith wrote:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Keith wrote:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Keith wrote:
Wagdesh the Foot-poker wrote:
Keith wrote:
Bonik the Goober-bumper wrote:
Keith wrote:
Cuneg the Whale-scolder wrote:
Workaholic wrote:
David Sutherland wrote
That, unfortunately, is the harsh reality that is my
existence.
Regards, David Sutherland
All os's suck eggs!!!
A) You've never used VMS then?
You must be lysdexic: MVS rules. VMS sucks smelly socks.
Is that a deliberate tautology ...?
I guess I'll have to leave that question to the humor
impaired.
Oh, were you trying to be funny? I'm so glad you told me.
I tried to on the first post with the smiley...
So you believe that you can enthral your readers with inane
tripe
No, but I thought
BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!! See a fuckwit?
Yes indeed.
Post edits. How terribly original. #3 in the lamer's kitbag.
Yes it is. I'm so glad you noticed that you are such a lamer.

An interesting >>>> pattern is developing.

Sure, and deliberate. ...but now you've gone and spoiled it. ;-)

Are you trying to be deliberately funny again there, Keith? You it doesn't
work, don't you?

 

[Vrurg the rotten]

John Woodgate wrote:

I read in sci.electronics.design that Winfield Hill
Winfield_member@newsguy.com> wrote (in <ce0l7u0kmf@drn.newsguy.com&gt
about 'I've dumped Linux and moved to Windows XP.', on Sun, 25 Jul
2004:

An interesting >>>> pattern is developing.

I understand that Outhouse Distress doesn't do '>'.

Then you don't understand anything at all. It does them very nicely, out of
the box.

Several of my
e-mail correspondents have to jump through symbolic hoops to separate
their responses from my message text.

Tell your correspondents to download OEQuoteFix. They'll adore you for it.
Maybe even chuck you a bone.

 

[Wonig the horrific]

John Woodgate wrote:

I read in sci.electronics.design that Diogenes
diogenes@sinope.gr.com> wrote (in
GTRMc.19575$KU.15576@animal.nntpserver.com&gt about 'I've dumped
Linux and moved to Windows XP.', on Sun, 25 Jul 2004:

You understand wrong.

Well, no. THEY understand wrong.

"I understand that Outhouse Distress doesn't do '>'."

Just a little reminder for the totally fuckwitted cunts who can't remember
anything from one moment to the next.

 

[Ken Smith]

In article <Uc4QxhB3K+ABFwcz@jmwa.demon.co.uk>,
John Woodgate <noone@yuk.yuk> wrote:
[...]

I understand that Outhouse Distress doesn't do '>'. Several of my e-mail
correspondents have to jump through symbolic hoops to separate their
responses from my message text. So a lot of people won't see that
pattern.

I use Lookout Distress for my email at work. It does have a setting you
can enable that is to insert the ">" characters. It works a good 25% of
the time. If the E-mail is in HTML, RTF or the moon is full it simply
won't do it. It does let you export the e-mail as a text file (how nice
of them). I wrote a program that inserts the ">" characters so I can then
suck it back into Lookout. It only adds about 10 extra minutes to
answering a long e-mail so its not too back for a MS product.

--
--
kensmith@rahul.net forging knowledge

 

[Cork the ill-favored]

Keith wrote:

On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 22:57:29 +0000, Gririg the sadistic wrote:
Keith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 08:56:46 -0700, Winfield Hill wrote:
Keith wrote...
Dart the lethal Clam-starer wrote:
Keith wrote:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Keith wrote:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Keith wrote:
Wagdesh the Foot-poker wrote:
Keith wrote:
Bonik the Goober-bumper wrote:
Keith wrote:
Cuneg the Whale-scolder wrote:
Workaholic wrote:
David Sutherland wrote
That, unfortunately, is the harsh reality that is my
existence.
Regards, David Sutherland
All os's suck eggs!!!
A) You've never used VMS then?
You must be lysdexic: MVS rules. VMS sucks smelly
socks.
Is that a deliberate tautology ...?
I guess I'll have to leave that question to the humor
impaired.
Oh, were you trying to be funny? I'm so glad you told me.
I tried to on the first post with the smiley...
So you believe that you can enthral your readers with inane
tripe
No, but I thought
BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!! See a fuckwit?
Yes indeed.
Post edits. How terribly original. #3 in the lamer's kitbag.
Yes it is. I'm so glad you noticed that you are such a lamer.

An interesting >>>> pattern is developing.

Sure, and deliberate. ...but now you've gone and spoiled it. ;-)

Are you trying to be deliberately funny again there, Keith?

You figure it out.

So you don't know then? Doubt's a bitch, eh.

 

[Ban]

Workaholic wrote:

All os's suck eggs!!!
The problem is that programmers nowadays have lost the art.
And if you never have to do a format-and-reinstall with xp,then you
are not using your pc enough.
And when you do a reinstall,you might discover that you reclaim more
than 50% of your hd.

If you have a 3GB HD and have stored a couple of backup points, yes. But now
we have 100G and somehow they want to be filled...
--
ciao Ban
Bordighera, Italy

 

[Ban]

John Woodgate wrote:

I read in sci.electronics.design that Winfield Hill
Winfield_member@newsguy.com> wrote (in <ce0l7u0kmf@drn.newsguy.com&gt
about 'I've dumped Linux and moved to Windows XP.', on Sun, 25 Jul
2004:

An interesting >>>> pattern is developing.

I understand that Outhouse Distress doesn't do '>'. Several of my
e-mail correspondents have to jump through symbolic hoops to separate
their responses from my message text. So a lot of people won't see
that pattern.

With OE quotefix you can see everything even in colour. I recommend it
really since it puts the sig on the right place, which is down.
--
ciao Ban
Bordighera, Italy

 

[JEDIDIAH]

["Followup-To:" header set to comp.os.linux.advocacy.]
On 2004-07-25, Cuneg the Whale-scolder <IdKWJIbKsGAC@alt.binaries.erotica.pictures> wrote:

Workaholic wrote:
David Sutherland <david@bitbucket.com> wrote in message
news:<ccrfd0583p5gpdnb1vuemmh3t60uh6e46b@4ax.com>...
newsgroups untrimmed from advocacy

David Sutherland wrote:
I don't think

That, unfortunately, is the harsh reality that is my existence.


Regards,
David Sutherland
(note **ANTI-SPAM** in reply field)

All os's suck eggs!!!

A) You've never used VMS then?

VMS really sucks.

While highly robust, it's not an interface that I would wish on my
worst enemy. It's only something I would subject myself or others
to if I had some really serious production uptime requirements.

B) Write your own.

Yeah, I think I will hammer out my own automobile while waiting
between compiles...


--
It is not true that Microsoft doesn't innovate.

They brought us the email virus.

In my Atari days, such a notion would have |||
been considered a complete absurdity. / | \

 

[Lunal the Whale-blunderer]

The Ghost In The Machine wrote:

-- just not by default.

Crapola.

 

[Clifford Heath]

John Woodgate wrote:

Ahem. Nigeria's problems , AIUI, is that there are too many conflicting
'archies',

My Nigerian friends maintain that the military is the robber of
peace in Nigeria, propped up by money from an un-named oil company.