J
John Fields
Guest
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 23:34:45 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill
<BretCahill@aol.com> wrote:
If I feel like writing "LOL" to accentuate the outlandishly ridiculous
nature of the feigned technical acumen in your posts, I will.
Plus, snip boy, I don't flame because I'm vexed, I flame because
sometimes a fire has to be built under a mule in order to get it to
move.
And, snip boy, you don't seem to have much regard for women at all.
What's up with that?
Or, maybe, it's: "What's not up with that?"
---
Sorry Charlie.
Did have, do have, and will have.
You'll say anything, no matter how stupid, just to stay in the
limelight, won't you?
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=&num=10&scoring=r&hl=en&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_ugroup=&as_usubject=&as_uauthors=John+Fields&lr=&as_drrb=q&as_qdr=&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=12&as_maxm=8&as_maxy=2008&safe=off
JF
<BretCahill@aol.com> wrote:
---Ya need to make up yer mind.
Are you a happy camper?
If so then type "LOL" a lot.
Are you vexed and want to flame?
If so then flame a lot.
But if you do both in a lot of posts then it looks like you cannot
make up your womanish mind.
If I feel like writing "LOL" to accentuate the outlandishly ridiculous
nature of the feigned technical acumen in your posts, I will.
Plus, snip boy, I don't flame because I'm vexed, I flame because
sometimes a fire has to be built under a mule in order to get it to
move.
And, snip boy, you don't seem to have much regard for women at all.
What's up with that?
Or, maybe, it's: "What's not up with that?"
---
---In any event, no one will believe you will ever have anything to
contribute to any tech discussion.
Sorry Charlie.
Did have, do have, and will have.
You'll say anything, no matter how stupid, just to stay in the
limelight, won't you?
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=&num=10&scoring=r&hl=en&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_ugroup=&as_usubject=&as_uauthors=John+Fields&lr=&as_drrb=q&as_qdr=&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=12&as_maxm=8&as_maxy=2008&safe=off
JF