battery question

[Rod Speed]

"Petzl" <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:gd1d0apo8p1n03fdilm31cnmhg7ja7rr84@4ax.com...

On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 07:29:00 +1000, "Rod Speed"
rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

Jeßus <none@all.org> wrote
F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote
Damian wrote

Yeah, but he gets it via the medical marijuana scheme.
He got severe pain in the arse syndrome, 24/7. Only
cure is the medically prescribed whacky weed. )

It is difficult to believe much that you say when you are
demonstrably wrong on some things., for instance as far as
I know there is no medical marijuana scheme in Australia.

There's no official, legal one at least.

So it isnt even possible for it to be medically prescribed, stupid.

But there's a network of health professionals
who help people in this area.

Still not medically prescribed, stupid.

Theres something wrong with buying the "medically prescribed" chinese
copies at cheaper prices in Haymarket?

Those arent medically prescribed either.

 

[Jeßus]

On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 07:29:00 +1000, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

Jeßus <none@all.org> wrote
F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote
Damian wrote

Yeah, but he gets it via the medical marijuana scheme.
He got severe pain in the arse syndrome, 24/7. Only
cure is the medically prescribed whacky weed. )

It is difficult to believe much that you say when you are
demonstrably wrong on some things., for instance as far as
I know there is no medical marijuana scheme in Australia.

There's no official, legal one at least.

So it isnt even possible for it to be medically prescribed, stupid.

Going into autistic mode already, Rodney?
They prescribe it, and also provide it via a proxy. Deal with it.

But there's a network of health professionals
who help people in this area.

Still not medically prescribed, stupid.

It is medically prescribed. Too bad for you that you can't deal with
it.

 

[news13]

On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 14:55:20 +0000, Frank Slootweg wrote:


> Bottom line: Don't behave like a jerk and things will get/be better.

Yawn. Keep trying. Your facts are thin under your torrent of accussations.
It doesn't compensate, so cough up the facts or fess to being a fraud.

 

[news13]

On Wed, 03 Sep 2014 05:41:33 +0800, Clocky wrote:

In any case you are certainly obfuscating the facts to suit your end.

thus speaks opinion-man who is also fact lite and unable to deliver any
facts either. Where and what IT work did you do again?

 

[Clocky]

On 3/09/2014 11:08 AM, Petzl wrote:

On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 07:29:00 +1000, "Rod Speed"
rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

Jeßus <none@all.org> wrote
F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote
Damian wrote

Yeah, but he gets it via the medical marijuana scheme.
He got severe pain in the arse syndrome, 24/7. Only
cure is the medically prescribed whacky weed. )

It is difficult to believe much that you say when you are
demonstrably wrong on some things., for instance as far as
I know there is no medical marijuana scheme in Australia.

There's no official, legal one at least.

So it isnt even possible for it to be medically prescribed, stupid.

But there's a network of health professionals
who help people in this area.

Still not medically prescribed, stupid.

Theres something wrong with buying the "medically prescribed" chinese
copies at cheaper prices in Haymarket?

They're not medically prescribed because their quackery isn't recognised
either.

The side effects of marijuana often far outweigh the perceived benefits
and the only people I personally know that keep banging on about it are
those that would like to convince themselves and everyone else that they
are smoking weed because it's "medicine" in order to justify them
getting off their faces all the time.

I think they are missing the point though and not doing the argument for
medicinal use any favours. More research needs to be done so that
whatever benefits there are (ie: reducing nausea from chemotherapy),
those elements or compounds need to be isolated so that maximum benefit
is obtained with the least amount of side effects in prescribed dosages.

 

[SG1]

"Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> wrote in message
news:5407a892$0$11110$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...

On 3/09/2014 11:08 AM, Petzl wrote:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 07:29:00 +1000, "Rod Speed"
rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

Jeßus <none@all.org> wrote
F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote
Damian wrote

Yeah, but he gets it via the medical marijuana scheme.
He got severe pain in the arse syndrome, 24/7. Only
cure is the medically prescribed whacky weed. )

It is difficult to believe much that you say when you are
demonstrably wrong on some things., for instance as far as
I know there is no medical marijuana scheme in Australia.

There's no official, legal one at least.

So it isnt even possible for it to be medically prescribed, stupid.

But there's a network of health professionals
who help people in this area.

Still not medically prescribed, stupid.

Theres something wrong with buying the "medically prescribed" chinese
copies at cheaper prices in Haymarket?

They're not medically prescribed because their quackery isn't recognised
either.

The side effects of marijuana often far outweigh the perceived benefits
and the only people I personally know that keep banging on about it are
those that would like to convince themselves and everyone else that they
are smoking weed because it's "medicine" in order to justify them getting
off their faces all the time.

I think they are missing the point though and not doing the argument for
medicinal use any favours. More research needs to be done so that whatever
benefits there are (ie: reducing nausea from chemotherapy), those elements
or compounds need to be isolated so that maximum benefit is obtained with
the least amount of side effects in prescribed dosages.

It has a use for terminally ill cancer patients. Other than that I agree
with the law.
You don't have to inhale. Biscuits are an option.

 

[Jeßus]

On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 07:47:32 +0800, Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> wrote:

The side effects of marijuana often far outweigh the perceived benefits
and the only people I personally know that keep banging on about it are
those that would like to convince themselves and everyone else that they
are smoking weed because it's "medicine" in order to justify them
getting off their faces all the time.

You fuckwit. I'd smack you right in the head if you said that in front
of me. You can't differentiate between lazy no-hopers who want to
smoke cones all day, and the majority who has no such problems.

You might also take the time to look closer at medical marijuana, much
of which is low in THC (which is what gets you bent) and higher in CBD
and/or CBN. 'Marijuana' isn't some generic plant that are all the
same.

I think they are missing the point though and not doing the argument for
medicinal use any favours. More research needs to be done so that
whatever benefits there are (ie: reducing nausea from chemotherapy),

More research?? If you're going to express and opinion like this - do
some bloody homework first. Your attitude really fucks me right off,
it's people like you who are making life difficult

those elements or compounds need to be isolated so that maximum benefit
is obtained with the least amount of side effects in prescribed dosages.

In other words - you'll be happy when it's only the pharmaceutical
industry who provides synthetic analogues in pill form. That'll give
you a warm glow, I'm sure, you compliant and well-trained consumer.
You'll be waiting in vain - because they've spent decades trying to do
just that and have failed every single time (Marinol is a good
example) even though they claim cannabis has no medicinal value.
Gee, I wonder if it's because they can't patent and then legally
control it's production and distribution?

 

[Jeßus]

On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 09:53:35 +1000, "SG1" <Lost@theraces.com> wrote:

"Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> wrote in message
news:5407a892$0$11110$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...
On 3/09/2014 11:08 AM, Petzl wrote:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 07:29:00 +1000, "Rod Speed"
rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

Jeßus <none@all.org> wrote
F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote
Damian wrote

Yeah, but he gets it via the medical marijuana scheme.
He got severe pain in the arse syndrome, 24/7. Only
cure is the medically prescribed whacky weed. )

It is difficult to believe much that you say when you are
demonstrably wrong on some things., for instance as far as
I know there is no medical marijuana scheme in Australia.

There's no official, legal one at least.

So it isnt even possible for it to be medically prescribed, stupid.

But there's a network of health professionals
who help people in this area.

Still not medically prescribed, stupid.

Theres something wrong with buying the "medically prescribed" chinese
copies at cheaper prices in Haymarket?

They're not medically prescribed because their quackery isn't recognised
either.

The side effects of marijuana often far outweigh the perceived benefits
and the only people I personally know that keep banging on about it are
those that would like to convince themselves and everyone else that they
are smoking weed because it's "medicine" in order to justify them getting
off their faces all the time.

I think they are missing the point though and not doing the argument for
medicinal use any favours. More research needs to be done so that whatever
benefits there are (ie: reducing nausea from chemotherapy), those elements
or compounds need to be isolated so that maximum benefit is obtained with
the least amount of side effects in prescribed dosages.

It has a use for terminally ill cancer patients.

It has a lot more uses than that.

Other than that I agree with the law.
You don't have to inhale. Biscuits are an option.

Of course you don't need to smoke it.

 

[Clocky]

On 4/09/2014 8:11 AM, Jeßus wrote:

On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 07:47:32 +0800, Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> wrote:

The side effects of marijuana often far outweigh the perceived benefits
and the only people I personally know that keep banging on about it are
those that would like to convince themselves and everyone else that they
are smoking weed because it's "medicine" in order to justify them
getting off their faces all the time.

You fuckwit. I'd smack you right in the head if you said that in front
of me.

Then you had better make sure it's a good one.


You can't differentiate between lazy no-hopers who want to

smoke cones all day, and the majority who has no such problems.

There is no such clear distinction between the two groups in my
experience. Most pot smokers claim to have no problems and are quick to
bring out the self-defeating "it's natural" argument as they light up
another hydroponically grown joint.

You might also take the time to look closer at medical marijuana, much
of which is low in THC (which is what gets you bent) and higher in CBD
and/or CBN. 'Marijuana' isn't some generic plant that are all the
same.

I'm well aware of that.

I think they are missing the point though and not doing the argument for
medicinal use any favours. More research needs to be done so that
whatever benefits there are (ie: reducing nausea from chemotherapy),

More research?? If you're going to express and opinion like this - do
some bloody homework first. Your attitude really fucks me right off,
it's people like you who are making life difficult

Howso? You are acting as is the benefits are proven and clear cut. They
are not.

those elements or compounds need to be isolated so that maximum benefit
is obtained with the least amount of side effects in prescribed dosages.

In other words - you'll be happy when it's only the pharmaceutical
industry who provides synthetic analogues in pill form. That'll give
you a warm glow, I'm sure, you compliant and well-trained consumer.

No, I'll be happy when it gives maximum benefit in the smallest, safest
and most convenient and efficient methods of dispensing with minimum
side effects so it's helpful and accessible to more people. I don't give
a fuck if it's comes as a cookie, a pill or comes in a fucking foil for
that matter.

You'll be waiting in vain - because they've spent decades trying to do
just that and have failed every single time (Marinol is a good
example) even though they claim cannabis has no medicinal value.
Gee, I wonder if it's because they can't patent and then legally
control it's production and distribution?

I doubt that is an issue at all, because you can legally control
production and distribution.
The real issue, I suspect, is that it might not be called "marijuana"
and that it no longer provides the leverage to the pro-legalisation of
marijuana proponents with their own agenda that have latched onto the
medicinal usage debate.

 

[Rod Speed]

Jeßus <none@all.org> wrote

Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Jeßus <none@all.org> wrote
F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote
Damian wrote

Yeah, but he gets it via the medical marijuana scheme.
He got severe pain in the arse syndrome, 24/7. Only
cure is the medically prescribed whacky weed. )

It is difficult to believe much that you say when you are
demonstrably wrong on some things., for instance as far as
I know there is no medical marijuana scheme in Australia.

There's no official, legal one at least.

So it isnt even possible for it to be medically prescribed, stupid.

Going into autistic mode already, Rodney?

You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag.

> They prescribe it,

Like hell they do. It isnt even possible to prescribe what is illegal,
cretin.

> and also provide it via a proxy.

Pigs arse they do.

> Deal with it.

Nothing to deal with except your pig ignorant shit, fuckwit.

But there's a network of health professionals
who help people in this area.

Still not medically prescribed, stupid.

It is medically prescribed.

Like hell it is. It isnt even possible to prescribe what is illegal, cretin.

> Too bad for you that you can't deal with it.

Nothing to deal with except your pig ignorant shit, fuckwit.

 

[Clocky]

On 4/09/2014 11:33 AM, news13 wrote:

On Wed, 03 Sep 2014 05:41:33 +0800, Clocky wrote:



In any case you are certainly obfuscating the facts to suit your end.

thus speaks opinion-man who is also fact lite and unable to deliver any
facts either.

You aren't just arguing with me, you are arguing with the Linux elite
and everyone else with a clue who know a damn sight more about Unix and
Linux then you could ever hope to since they helped create one from the
other.

I've provided the links, all you have provided is obfuscating nonsense,
context snipping and goalpost shifting irrelevance.

Where and what IT work did you do again?
>

You had better start posting some basic facts yourself before you start
questioning others on their experience. Based on the level of bullshit
you post in here I wouldn't hire you in a fit and you aren't doing
yourself any favours.

 

[Frank Slootweg]

news13 <newsthirteenspam-spam@woa.com.au> wrote:

[Post-edit deleted.]

QED.

EOTD.

 

[Frank Slootweg]

Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> wrote:

On 4/09/2014 11:33 AM, news13 wrote:
On Wed, 03 Sep 2014 05:41:33 +0800, Clocky wrote:

In any case you are certainly obfuscating the facts to suit your end.

thus speaks opinion-man who is also fact lite and unable to deliver any
facts either.

You aren't just arguing with me, you are arguing with the Linux elite
and everyone else with a clue who know a damn sight more about Unix and
Linux then you could ever hope to since they helped create one from the
other.

I've provided the links, all you have provided is obfuscating nonsense,
context snipping and goalpost shifting irrelevance.

Where and what IT work did you do again?

You had better start posting some basic facts yourself before you start
questioning others on their experience. Based on the level of bullshit
you post in here I wouldn't hire you in a fit and you aren't doing
yourself any favours.

Indeed, and *start* by *answering* (No, you did *not* answer.) this,
which was the *first* (so no bull about us (TINU) not answering your
questions) question in this subthread:

"Cites!? Which 'organisation' and which 'company' might that be!?"

 

[Jeßus]

On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 13:18:52 +1000, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

Jeßus <none@all.org> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Jeßus <none@all.org> wrote
F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote
Damian wrote

Yeah, but he gets it via the medical marijuana scheme.
He got severe pain in the arse syndrome, 24/7. Only
cure is the medically prescribed whacky weed. )

It is difficult to believe much that you say when you are
demonstrably wrong on some things., for instance as far as
I know there is no medical marijuana scheme in Australia.

There's no official, legal one at least.

So it isnt even possible for it to be medically prescribed, stupid.

Going into autistic mode already, Rodney?

You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag.

They prescribe it,

Like hell they do. It isnt even possible to prescribe what is illegal,
cretin.

and also provide it via a proxy.

Pigs arse they do.

Deal with it.

Nothing to deal with except your pig ignorant shit, fuckwit.

But there's a network of health professionals
who help people in this area.

Still not medically prescribed, stupid.

It is medically prescribed.

Like hell it is. It isnt even possible to prescribe what is illegal, cretin.

And yet, it is done regularly, daily. I know that for a fact.
So what if it's against the law? That somehow means it can't happen?

Too bad for you that you can't deal with it.
Nothing to deal with except your pig ignorant shit, fuckwit.

You know, you better hope I never find out your address.

 

[SG1]

"Jeßus" <none@all.org> wrote in message
news:3tsi0apnqqsmpknhsbia9s398mcgsjjl6m@4ax.com...

On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 13:18:52 +1000, "Rod Speed"
rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

Jeßus <none@all.org> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Jeßus <none@all.org> wrote
F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote
Damian wrote

Yeah, but he gets it via the medical marijuana scheme.
He got severe pain in the arse syndrome, 24/7. Only
cure is the medically prescribed whacky weed. )

It is difficult to believe much that you say when you are
demonstrably wrong on some things., for instance as far as
I know there is no medical marijuana scheme in Australia.

There's no official, legal one at least.

So it isnt even possible for it to be medically prescribed, stupid.

Going into autistic mode already, Rodney?

You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag.

They prescribe it,

Like hell they do. It isnt even possible to prescribe what is illegal,
cretin.

and also provide it via a proxy.

Pigs arse they do.

Deal with it.

Nothing to deal with except your pig ignorant shit, fuckwit.

But there's a network of health professionals
who help people in this area.

Still not medically prescribed, stupid.

It is medically prescribed.

Like hell it is. It isnt even possible to prescribe what is illegal,
cretin.

And yet, it is done regularly, daily. I know that for a fact.
So what if it's against the law? That somehow means it can't happen?

Too bad for you that you can't deal with it.
Nothing to deal with except your pig ignorant shit, fuckwit.

You know, you better hope I never find out your address.

Head to the Mary Jane capital of NSW.

>

 

[Jeßus]

On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 10:55:21 +0800, Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> wrote:

On 4/09/2014 8:11 AM, Jeßus wrote:
On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 07:47:32 +0800, Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> wrote:

The side effects of marijuana often far outweigh the perceived benefits
and the only people I personally know that keep banging on about it are
those that would like to convince themselves and everyone else that they
are smoking weed because it's "medicine" in order to justify them
getting off their faces all the time.

You fuckwit. I'd smack you right in the head if you said that in front
of me.

Then you had better make sure it's a good one.

More than willing to show you.

You can't differentiate between lazy no-hopers who want to
smoke cones all day, and the majority who has no such problems.


There is no such clear distinction between the two groups in my
experience.

Fuck your experience.

Most pot smokers claim to have no problems and are quick to
bring out the self-defeating "it's natural" argument as they light up
another hydroponically grown joint.

And? What does that have to do with anything?
Who gives a fuck about no-hopers or other idiots who smoke hydro?

You might also take the time to look closer at medical marijuana, much
of which is low in THC (which is what gets you bent) and higher in CBD
and/or CBN. 'Marijuana' isn't some generic plant that are all the
same.


I'm well aware of that.

I think they are missing the point though and not doing the argument for
medicinal use any favours. More research needs to be done so that
whatever benefits there are (ie: reducing nausea from chemotherapy),

More research?? If you're going to express and opinion like this - do
some bloody homework first. Your attitude really fucks me right off,
it's people like you who are making life difficult


Howso? You are acting as is the benefits are proven and clear cut. They
are not.

They are. People like you will never be satisfied, and help contribute
tho those who suffer purely because cannabis is so propagandised. For
some people who get no relief from any pharmaceuticals, it is their
only option.

those elements or compounds need to be isolated so that maximum benefit
is obtained with the least amount of side effects in prescribed dosages.

In other words - you'll be happy when it's only the pharmaceutical
industry who provides synthetic analogues in pill form. That'll give
you a warm glow, I'm sure, you compliant and well-trained consumer.

No, I'll be happy when it gives maximum benefit in the smallest, safest
and most convenient and efficient methods of dispensing with minimum
side effects so it's helpful and accessible to more people. I don't give
a fuck if it's comes as a cookie, a pill or comes in a fucking foil for
that matter.

That's already here. Where have you been? Not that there's anything
wrong with cannabis in it's natural state.

You'll be waiting in vain - because they've spent decades trying to do
just that and have failed every single time (Marinol is a good
example) even though they claim cannabis has no medicinal value.
Gee, I wonder if it's because they can't patent and then legally
control it's production and distribution?


I doubt that is an issue at all, because you can legally control
production and distribution.

Your missing the point. But not point elaborating, either.

The real issue, I suspect, is that it might not be called "marijuana"
and that it no longer provides the leverage to the pro-legalisation of
marijuana proponents with their own agenda that have latched onto the
medicinal usage debate.

See, there you go again. Fuck you Clocky, and if you ever want to call
my bluff about smacking you in the head, PLEASE let know. Cunts like
you fuck me right off, and I'd love the opportunity.

 

[Jeßus]

On Fri, 5 Sep 2014 18:34:03 +1000, "SG1" <Lost@theraces.com> wrote:

"Jeßus" <none@all.org> wrote in message
news:3tsi0apnqqsmpknhsbia9s398mcgsjjl6m@4ax.com...
On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 13:18:52 +1000, "Rod Speed"
rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

Jeßus <none@all.org> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Jeßus <none@all.org> wrote
F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote
Damian wrote

Yeah, but he gets it via the medical marijuana scheme.
He got severe pain in the arse syndrome, 24/7. Only
cure is the medically prescribed whacky weed. )

It is difficult to believe much that you say when you are
demonstrably wrong on some things., for instance as far as
I know there is no medical marijuana scheme in Australia.

There's no official, legal one at least.

So it isnt even possible for it to be medically prescribed, stupid.

Going into autistic mode already, Rodney?

You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag.

They prescribe it,

Like hell they do. It isnt even possible to prescribe what is illegal,
cretin.

and also provide it via a proxy.

Pigs arse they do.

Deal with it.

Nothing to deal with except your pig ignorant shit, fuckwit.

But there's a network of health professionals
who help people in this area.

Still not medically prescribed, stupid.

It is medically prescribed.

Like hell it is. It isnt even possible to prescribe what is illegal,
cretin.

And yet, it is done regularly, daily. I know that for a fact.
So what if it's against the law? That somehow means it can't happen?

Too bad for you that you can't deal with it.
Nothing to deal with except your pig ignorant shit, fuckwit.

You know, you better hope I never find out your address.

Head to the Mary Jane capital of NSW.

I doubt that somehow!

 

[news13]

On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 15:04:08 +0800, Clocky wrote:

You had better start posting some basic facts yourself before you start
questioning others on their experience.

Just as I thought. You have limited experience and hide behind "ummies
skirts".

 

[news13]

On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 18:03:42 +0000, Frank Slootweg wrote:

"Cites!? Which 'organisation' and which 'company' might that be!?"

After you list your experience or are you also hiding behind "mummy's
skirt"
I said it was educational. You can wok out the company that provided it.

 

[news13]

On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 18:03:42 +0000, Frank Slootweg wrote:

news13 <newsthirteenspam-spam@woa.com.au> wrote:

[Post-edit deleted.]

QED.

EOTD.

frank is continuing to run away when asked to deliver.
Probabl worked on IBM hardware.