E
Eeyore
Guest
Lostgallifreyan wrote:
Graham
No, it's fine. I hadn't previously noticed anything above about 150 lumens.Eeyore wrote
185 lumens using your figure of 2.2x times the reference brightness @
1A.
That should satisfy you then. You challenged me to cite proof of 176 mW as
if I was claiming too much. Are you now saying I'm wrong because it's not
EXACTLY 176 mW? If so I'm done discussing the matter.
Graham