J
John Larkin
Guest
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 11:41:41 -0500, keith <krw@att.bizzzz> wrote:
Damn, it no fun needling either of them (if indeed they're not the
same person). It's like clubbing baby seals.
John
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 05:15:02 -0800, bill.sloman wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
On 22 Jan 2005 16:15:45 -0800, bill.sloman@ieee.org wrote:
This analysis depends on a rather subjective classification, and
doesn't seem to control for observer bias - since no actual values
of A
or B for either Fred or me are quoted, it wouldn't be accepted in
any
referreed journal.
It also depends on the obviously fallacious proposition that if
groups
of postings score the same on some single arbitrary dimension, all
these postings have been generated by the same person.
Since our collection of irrational right-wingers share a common
inability to support their ridiculous propositions by citing any
kind
of independent authority, I could set up an Unsupported Assertion
index
and "prove" that Clarence was the same person as John S. Dyson.
-----------
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
So, if I add that last post to your total and recalculate your
D-factor
(grabs RPN calculator, hits keys furiously)... pause...
your score is *still* D = 1.0000
But maybe you aren't Fred after all. He did post something about
thermal runaway that didn't contain a single insult.
Perhaps you might care to check out contribution 32 to the "Odd Sensor
Design" thread
You may be able to detect an insult somewhere in that - I can't.
Ok, then that settles it, you are Fred.
Damn, it no fun needling either of them (if indeed they're not the
same person). It's like clubbing baby seals.
John