A minimally moderated versionof this newsgroup

[John Fortier]

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:nribpvocr82kqv77odjoshli9cme9u00ro@4ax.com...

On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 23:39:46 GMT, "John Fortier"
jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:


"Paul Burridge" <pb@osiris.notthisbit.co.uk> wrote in message
news:2bbbpvcf3mi7h82l2pqc1c1d3umhu6d93h@4ax.com...
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 12:47:24 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

Because you wouldn't be able to speak since it would be stuck in your
throat.

Usenet is full of surprises. I'd never have guessed you were black,
John! ;-)
--


I'm not, I'm French Canadian and Huron. My wife is Cherokee.

Tell us about being fucked around!

---
He wasn't talking to you, Sasquatch.

Again Fields reveals his blatant racism.

This man is a slimy little creep. He uses his employer's PC to post this
garbage, without permision, he pretends to be in charge at his place of
work, when he's a minor employee, his expertise is restricted to a single
obsolescent chip and he's a bully.

Racist, bully, liar and dishonest.

A truuly unpleasant person.

 

[Bill Sloman]

John Fields <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message news:<4uebpvo5htidff5la8ulq1km3k9rsdvfsg@4ax.com>...

On 21 Oct 2003 15:25:17 -0700, bill.sloman@ieee.org (Bill Sloman) wrote:

John Fields <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message news:<baaapvon13e37i7968l7b6tbisvar04uh0@4ax.com>...
On 21 Oct 2003 02:59:27 -0700, bill.sloman@ieee.org (Bill Sloman) wrote:

John Fields <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message news:<8an8pvomhs7rqf7b26qkkligjq7lefe778@4ax.com>...
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 19:54:29 +0200, Roger Johansson <no-email@home.se
wrote:

snip

---
Good luck on finding a therepist who can keep from laughing...

Come now John. Therapists love that sort of woolly love-thy-neighbour
stuff.

Of course, your Texan sensibilities perceive this as
"sodomise-thy-neighbour" which you'd find intensely comic ....

---
One has nothing to do with the other, of course, and you're just using
this thread as a springboard to launch your irrelevant viewpoints, but
I must admit, the picture of you with a big Texan dick up your ass does
put a smile on my chops. Yours too, I expect.

Your fantasies are your own affair, but the picture is one that you
will have to continue to conjure out of your own imagination. I'm
afraid that my own sexual fanatasies are boringly hetrosexual.

---
I'm sure. I just couldn't resist the opportunity for a retaliatory
"swipe in kind"

Like I've said elsewhere, your fanatasies are your own business, and
you are now rather freer to publicise them since the Supreme Court
struck down the Texas anti-sodomy law. There's not a lot of point in
posting them here, but I imagine that if you did have specialised
tastes you would have to advertise as widely as possible.

-------
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen

 

[John Fields]

On 21 Oct 2003 20:00:33 -0700, peg@slingshot.co.nz (GPG) wrote:

Why dont you peurile bloody yanks find another forum to publicise your
childish games. This, I thought was abt electronics. Your behavior
does you and your country no credit.

---
One must learn to winnow, mate.

BTW, its "puerile".

--
John Fields

 

[John Fortier]

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:00kbpv41p9sea92i0nug89jbi8b8k3msdh@4ax.com...

On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 23:51:48 GMT, "John Fortier"
jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:


"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news7rapvsiksa306hgh330allo3a3rvk6frs@4ax.com...
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 16:45:00 GMT, "John Fortier"
jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:


"If a dog talks, one is amazed that it does it at all, not that it
does
it
well"

---
If a pig writes, his surname must be Fortier.

--
John Fields

0.5/10

I guess literary allusion goes over you head then, Jonny. I suppose I
should
have expected it, since your only expertise is the "good ole 555"

---
So you're a DSL and transmission specialist. What does that mean
exactly? Something like you install cable modems?

Not at all, John, I'm CEO of a small company which is developing a new type
of line driver which will extend the range and bandwidth of DSL and will
reduce the power requiremnts.

Cable is in direct competition with DSL, Digital Subscriber Line, which uses
standard telephone lines to transmit high speed data, for example, fast
internet access, rather than a specially installed cable. One of the
advantages of the new line driver is that it will extend DSL to areas which
it previiously could not reach, allowing it to compete more effectively with
cable. For users already connected to DSL it will increase the available
bandwidth, and therefore the speed of the connection.

This is achieved by reducing the capability of signals to produce NEXT and
FEXT in adjacent wire pairs in the telephone cables. It also provides an
exact hybrid match, eliminating echoes and an exact match of termination to
line impedance, eliminating reflections and providing a VSWR of almost
exactly 1.

Aditionally, it controlls common mode voltage, eliminating the need for
transformers or CM chokes at the terminations, making it extremely
economical as far as telcos are concerned.

So, really nothing like installing cable modems.

---

Your reply is rather pathetic; you haven't recognised the quotation, so
you
fall back to the grade school stuff. Please grow up a little if you wish
to
at least appear intelligent.

---
"A rose, by any other name..."

--
John Fields

Shakespeare; Romeo and Juliet, the balcony scene. "What's in a name? That
which we call a rose, by any other name, would smell as sweet."

Thanks!

 

[John Fields]

On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 10:47:09 GMT, "John Fortier"
<jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:

So, it's funny because it's racist.

---
No, it's funny because of the unexpected visual twist the image took.

If it was racist it would denigrate Black men when, in fact, it
compliments them. That is, unless you consider a large penis to be a
shortcoming. (There's a pun in there, John. can you find it?^)
---

Sorry, I don't share your racial
prejudices or steriotypes. The reference made no sense to me since I'm not
in on the kluxer repetoire of jokes.

---
The reference made no sense to you because you have no sense of humor.
---

The more you post, John, the nastier you reveal yourself to be.

---
On the contrary, John, the more I post the nastier you reveal _yourself_
to be.
---

Now I shall have no reluctance at all in letting your employers know about
your behaviour.

---
Well, since I'm the sysadmin here and all email has to go through me
I'll just block you, so go for it, cunt, and let's see how far you get.

--
John Fields

 

[John Fields]

On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 10:54:40 GMT, "John Fortier"
<jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:

Again Fields reveals his blatant racism.

This man is a slimy little creep. He uses his employer's PC to post this
garbage, without permision, he pretends to be in charge at his place of
work, when he's a minor employee, his expertise is restricted to a single
obsolescent chip and he's a bully.

Racist, bully, liar and dishonest.

A truuly unpleasant person.

---
At leaast I can spell.

--
John Fields

 

[John Fields]

On 22 Oct 2003 05:36:17 -0700, bill.sloman@ieee.org (Bill Sloman) wrote:

Like I've said elsewhere, your fanatasies are your own business, and
you are now rather freer to publicise them since the Supreme Court
struck down the Texas anti-sodomy law.

---
I don't see why since, contrary to your allusion, they have nothing to
do with sodomy.

However, striking down the law was a good thing since, in my opinion,
prison (AIUI) is hardly the place where punishment for sodomy could
result in anything other than life imprisonment for repeat offenses
while incarcerated.
---

There's not a lot of point in
posting them here, but I imagine that if you did have specialised
tastes you would have to advertise as widely as possible.

---
Fortunately, I have no need for an advertising budget.

--
John Fields

 

[R. Steve Walz]

John Fortier wrote:

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
So you're a DSL and transmission specialist. What does that mean
exactly? Something like you install cable modems?

Not at all, John, I'm CEO of a small company which is developing a new type
of line driver which will extend the range and bandwidth of DSL and will
reduce the power requiremnts.
---------------

Nonsense, you're far too stupid, and any actual CEO beholden to
stockholders would keep his stupid mouth shut.

-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public

 

[R. Steve Walz]

DarkMatter wrote:

On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 23:35:34 GMT, "John Fortier"
jfortier@rochester.rr.com> Gave us:


"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:3F95A8D2.2574@armory.com...
John Fortier wrote:

As for typing the word "fuck" (derivation, Latin, Fugio, to travel or to
do),
---------------
Ah, no, that's NOT "fuck"'s derivation.

And Fugio means "to flee", NOT "travel" or "do", as in "tempus fugit".

Fuck has its origin in germanic, not latinate lingua.
See "figgen" in Deutsch.


I stand corrected, Steve, although they all have the same original root.
Mind you, the German "ficken" seems to be grafitied all over Frankfurt. For
example "Ficken ist romantisch"!

An etimological thread, perhaps?


We were always taught that...
------------------

No, you weren't.

FUCK is an english acronym that stood for:

For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge.

Which is what some used to be thrown into the dungeons for.
--------------------

Myth.

Though it seems to have been rooted in the dutch
Etymology: akin to Dutch fokken to breed (cattle), Swedish dialect
fokka to copulate
Date: 1503
--------------------

Lots more from other ancient Germanic words, f_(c)kk-something,
meaning to poke or push.

-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public

 

[John Fortier]

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:0hadpvo2j182h2qgj94shmt3c2ggseg616@4ax.com...

On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 10:54:40 GMT, "John Fortier"
jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:


Again Fields reveals his blatant racism.

This man is a slimy little creep. He uses his employer's PC to post this
garbage, without permision, he pretends to be in charge at his place of
work, when he's a minor employee, his expertise is restricted to a single
obsolescent chip and he's a bully.

Racist, bully, liar and dishonest.

A truuly unpleasant person.

---
At leaast I can spell.

--
John Fields

Effectively an admission of guilt.

 

[John Fortier]

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:fj9dpvcm204l240qdc3j8h1a9val2edb9i@4ax.com...

On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 10:47:09 GMT, "John Fortier"
jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:


So, it's funny because it's racist.

---
No, it's funny because of the unexpected visual twist the image took.

If it was racist it would denigrate Black men when, in fact, it
compliments them. That is, unless you consider a large penis to be a
shortcoming. (There's a pun in there, John. can you find it?^)
---

Sorry, I don't share your racial
prejudices or steriotypes. The reference made no sense to me since I'm
not
in on the kluxer repetoire of jokes.

---
The reference made no sense to you because you have no sense of humor.
---

The more you post, John, the nastier you reveal yourself to be.

---
On the contrary, John, the more I post the nastier you reveal _yourself_
to be.
---

Now I shall have no reluctance at all in letting your employers know
about
your behaviour.

---
Well, since I'm the sysadmin here and all email has to go through me
I'll just block you, so go for it, cunt, and let's see how far you get.

--
John Fields

Funny you never mentioned that before, when I asked you what you did. We
never did get an answer to that question, come to think of it, just some
wafle about "I take care of business."

All e-mail has to go through you; how very busy you must be. I'm surprised
that you find time to tinker with 555s.

Not a bad bluff, Jonny, but it won't work.

 

[John Fortier]

Steve, you may be an expert in electronics, but you obviously have no clue
about product development. Have you never heard of patents. At this point
in time, the product needs all the publicity it can get, even in such a
medium as this.

Keep checking the technical press, the publicity will be going out very
shortly.

And please don't call me stupid, Steve. You don't know me, have no idea of
my IQ and probably wouldn't understand the work I'm doing anyway.

Actually, I was expecting a reply such as yours from Jonny boy, but I guess
once you've hung around him long enough, the attitude is contagious.

John Fortier

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:3F973186.30EE@armory.com...

John Fortier wrote:

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
So you're a DSL and transmission specialist. What does that mean
exactly? Something like you install cable modems?

Not at all, John, I'm CEO of a small company which is developing a new
type
of line driver which will extend the range and bandwidth of DSL and will
reduce the power requiremnts.
---------------
Nonsense, you're far too stupid, and any actual CEO beholden to
stockholders would keep his stupid mouth shut.

-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public

 

[robin.pain@tesco.net]

"Baphomet" <fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote in message news:<vpaek4llfavg32@corp.supernews.com>...

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:mbcapv8qcfiaq7tva1p23na70bljke8hkk@4ax.com...
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 06:43:19 -0700, "Baphomet"
fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote:


No John...I guess some people would rather do it than just endlessly talk
about it ;-)

---
And then there's you...

and then this is for you http://www.globecorp.org/sci.electronics.basics/

You swine, I was happily enjoying these posts until I clicked on the
above link, tried to get back here but it shut down my browser!

How dare you moderate my browser.

Also I am *not* Johnny Fields.

"I'll have a frisk with ye!"

Robin (the lurker) Pain

 

[Spehro Pefhany]

On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 02:00:30 GMT, the renowned "R. Steve Walz"
<rstevew@armory.com> wrote:

Lots more from other ancient Germanic words, f_(c)kk-something,
meaning to poke or push.
-Steve

Which is the derived and which is the original meaning? My theory is
that it's ultimately an onomatopoeic word. If you can't see that,
you're probably not doing it right. ;-)

Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
--
"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
speff@interlog.com Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com

 

[Frank Bemelman]

"Spehro Pefhany" <speffSNIP@interlogDOTyou.knowwhat> schreef in bericht
news:fc3fpvkq32cmunmk6qv3hn79sa4tgb8ntv@4ax.com...

On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 02:00:30 GMT, the renowned "R. Steve Walz"
rstevew@armory.com> wrote:

Lots more from other ancient Germanic words, f_(c)kk-something,
meaning to poke or push.
-Steve

Which is the derived and which is the original meaning? My theory is
that it's ultimately an onomatopoeic word. If you can't see that,
you're probably not doing it right. ;-)

It sounds a hell of lot better than 'screw'.



--
Thanks,
Frank Bemelman
(remove 'x' & .invalid when sending email)

 

[Paul Burridge]

On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 02:37:23 GMT, "A Grass"
<jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:

Funny you never mentioned that before, when I asked you what you did. We
never did get an answer to that question, come to think of it, just some
wafle about "I take care of business."

All e-mail has to go through you; how very busy you must be. I'm surprised
that you find time to tinker with 555s.

Not a bad bluff, Jonny, but it won't work.

So you're going to carry out your threat to *grass* this fellow up to
his employers, then? Try to get his livelihood trashed because he
doesn't share your views? What make you believe his boss would share
your twisted prejudices?
I can't believe anyone who claimed to have served in the army would
stoop so low. Which army? Which regiment? And you're a CEO now? Which
company? Are you posting from Britain? I see you have a GMT timestamp.
We don't have CEOs in Britain. Who's the real bluffer?
Grasses! Lowest PoS on the planet.

--

"Windows [n.], A thirty-two bit extension and GUI shell to a sixteen bit patch
to an eight bit operating system originally coded for a four bit
microprocessor and produced by a two bit company."

 

[Paul Burridge]

On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 02:47:05 GMT, "A Grass"
<jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:

And please don't call me stupid, Steve.

That's right, Steve. "slimy self-opinionated grass" is far more
appropriate.

You don't know me,

No one in their right mind would want to.

have no idea of
my IQ

I know I for one am beginning to get a good idea, though.

and probably wouldn't understand the work I'm doing anyway.

If you got on with your fucking "work" instead of trying to tell
others what to think and say, I for one would be a lot happier.
HTH, Grass.
--

"Windows [n.], A thirty-two bit extension and GUI shell to a sixteen bit patch
to an eight bit operating system originally coded for a four bit
microprocessor and produced by a two bit company."

 

[Fred Bloggs]

John Fortier wrote:

Now I shall have no reluctance at all in letting your employers know about
your behaviour.

What? With all the dodging and weaving he does, it may mean a promotion
into a higher position where those skills can be put to good use. But it
is typical of a thoroughly insignificant, unimportant, impotent,
unresourceful little fruit like you to appeal to a perceived higher
authority to take care of problems you can't deal with. Rochester eh?

 

[John Fields]

On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 02:37:23 GMT, "John Fortier"
<jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:

Funny you never mentioned that before, when I asked you what you did. We
never did get an answer to that question, come to think of it, just some
wafle about "I take care of business."
---

Waffle, dumbass.
---

All e-mail has to go through you; how very busy you must be.
that you find time to tinker with 555s.

---
Actually, it doesn't go through me, per se; I've built a filter which
detects stupidity and sorts incoming into three bins depending on the
level of stupidity detected. Bin1 is low, Bin2 is medium, and Bin 3 is
high. So far all of your stuff has fallen into bin 3, so even the
search through the bins for your trash is trivial. The interesting
thing is that the filter is implemented in hardware. All 555's.

Not a bad bluff, Jonny, but it won't work.

---
Bluff? Seems like you've been backed up to one more than a couple of
times and had to jump to save your sorry ass.

--
John Fields

 

[John Fields]

On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 02:47:05 GMT, "John Fortier"
<jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:

Steve, you may be an expert in electronics, but you obviously have no clue
about product development. Have you never heard of patents. At this point
in time, the product needs all the publicity it can get, even in such a
medium as this.

Keep checking the technical press, the publicity will be going out very
shortly.

And please don't call me stupid, Steve. You don't know me, have no idea of
my IQ and probably wouldn't understand the work I'm doing anyway.

Actually, I was expecting a reply such as yours from Jonny boy, but I guess
once you've hung around him long enough, the attitude is contagious.

---
Well, then, I expect we can welcome you and your pinned back ears and
your new attitude into the fold very soon!

--
John Fields