Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"Baphomet" <fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote in message
news:<vpaek4llfavg32@corp.supernews.com>...
"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:mbcapv8qcfiaq7tva1p23na70bljke8hkk@4ax.com...
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 06:43:19 -0700, "Baphomet"
fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote:
No John...I guess some people would rather do it than just endlessly
talk
about it ;-)
---
And then there's you...
and then this is for you
http://www.globecorp.org/sci.electronics.basics/
You swine, I was happily enjoying these posts until I clicked on the
above link, tried to get back here but it shut down my browser!
How dare you moderate my browser.
Also I am *not* Johnny Fields.
"I'll have a frisk with ye!"
Robin (the lurker) Pain
---Effectively an admission of guilt.
So you think it's ok to steal and lie, as long as you do it from yourOn Thu, 23 Oct 2003 02:37:23 GMT, "A Grass"
jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:
Funny you never mentioned that before, when I asked you what you did. We
never did get an answer to that question, come to think of it, just some
wafle about "I take care of business."
All e-mail has to go through you; how very busy you must be. I'm
surprised
that you find time to tinker with 555s.
Not a bad bluff, Jonny, but it won't work.
So you're going to carry out your threat to *grass* this fellow up to
his employers, then? Try to get his livelihood trashed because he
doesn't share your views? What make you believe his boss would share
your twisted prejudices?
I can't believe anyone who claimed to have served in the army would
stoop so low. Which army? Which regiment? And you're a CEO now? Which
company? Are you posting from Britain? I see you have a GMT timestamp.
We don't have CEOs in Britain. Who's the real bluffer?
Grasses! Lowest PoS on the planet.
---Steve, you may be an expert in electronics, but you obviously have no clue
about product development. Have you never heard of patents. At this point
in time, the product needs all the publicity it can get, even in such a
medium as this.
---Keep checking the technical press, the publicity will be going out very
shortly.
---And please don't call me stupid, Steve. You don't know me, have no idea of
my IQ and probably wouldn't understand the work I'm doing anyway.
---Actually, I was expecting a reply such as yours from Jonny boy, but I guess
once you've hung around him long enough, the attitude is contagious.
Gosh, I guess you outsmarted me, Jonny.On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 02:37:23 GMT, "John Fortier"
jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:
Funny you never mentioned that before, when I asked you what you did. We
never did get an answer to that question, come to think of it, just some
wafle about "I take care of business."
---
Waffle, dumbass.
---
All e-mail has to go through you; how very busy you must be.
that you find time to tinker with 555s.
---
Actually, it doesn't go through me, per se; I've built a filter which
detects stupidity and sorts incoming into three bins depending on the
level of stupidity detected. Bin1 is low, Bin2 is medium, and Bin 3 is
high. So far all of your stuff has fallen into bin 3, so even the
search through the bins for your trash is trivial. The interesting
thing is that the filter is implemented in hardware. All 555's.
Not a bad bluff, Jonny, but it won't work.
---
Bluff? Seems like you've been backed up to one more than a couple of
times and had to jump to save your sorry ass.
--
John Fields
---John Fortier wrote:
Now I shall have no reluctance at all in letting your employers know about
your behaviour.
What? With all the dodging and weaving he does, it may mean a promotion
into a higher position where those skills can be put to good use. But it
is typical of a thoroughly insignificant, unimportant, impotent,
unresourceful little fruit like you to appeal to a perceived higher
authority to take care of problems you can't deal with. Rochester eh?
---So you think it's ok to steal and lie, as long as you do it from your
employer? And turning in a bullying, lying dishonest rat isn't condoned in
your little book. As long as people like you have the idea that it's worse
to act against criminals than to act criminally, then people like fields
will get away with their behaviour.
In the army we would have taken fields outside and taught him manners.
---Since you seem to have such a firm opinion of "grasses", ("Whispering
Grass", for those of you who aren't up on East End criminal vernacular) one
can only assume that you have a criminal background.
---Grow up, sonny, the real world has consequences for anti-social behaviour.
Put yourself in his bosses shoes, how would you like someone to be using
company property and company time to do what fields has been doing for
years. Not only that, but every time he posts an abusive message, it
reflects on the company, whose name appears at the top of every post.
---Gosh, I guess you outsmarted me, Jonny.
I bet you received the scrub brush treatment a few times. Nobody likes aIn the army we would have taken fields outside and taught him manners.
John, it appears you missed a couple military lessons. There are rules, andI don't know which army you're referring to but, being civilized, here
in the US we have a military bound by what is called the Uniform Code of
Military Justice which specifically prohibits one taking matters into
one's own hands and engaging in the sort of vigilante behavior you
espouse. Our civil statutes also prohibit that kind of behavior.
---"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:9asfpv8ldonj20tc5c3ldg45f60qelklg6@4ax.com...
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 12:28:28 GMT, Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
snip...snip...snip...
---
Fortunately, our caller ID intercepted his call and diverted it to voice
mail, averting what could have been a sticky situation.
How does a caller ID intercept a call? Wouldn't you have had to program in a
suspect phone number or area code before the fact? If the latter, wouldn't
you be risking losing a lot of potential business?
Our firewall also picked up four interesting hits yesterday, tagged
"John", which are in the process of being investigated. We'll see...
When I used to get port scan attacks, my software firewall would warn me of
such and give an I.P. address (forged using high profile domains). Never did
I see an attack trace with a name tag. That doesn't necessarily mean it
doesn't (or can't) happen I suppose.
Just curious.
Ah, a startup CEO spending precious time prowling newsgroups makingSteve, you may be an expert in electronics, but you obviously have no clue
about product development. Have you never heard of patents. At this point
in time, the product needs all the publicity it can get, even in such a
medium as this.
---John, it appears you missed a couple military lessons. There are rules, and
then there are methods that are employed now and then that aren't in the
official book.
snip...snip...snip...On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 12:28:28 GMT, Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
How does a caller ID intercept a call? Wouldn't you have had to program in aFortunately, our caller ID intercepted his call and diverted it to voice
mail, averting what could have been a sticky situation.
When I used to get port scan attacks, my software firewall would warn me ofOur firewall also picked up four interesting hits yesterday, tagged
"John", which are in the process of being investigated. We'll see...
--
John Fields
I never said any such thing, Grass. Show me where you claim I did.So you think it's ok to steal and lie, as long as you do it from your
employer?
That's right. I wouldn't turn you in because I, unlike you, don'tAnd turning in a bullying, lying dishonest rat isn't condoned in
your little book.
It's *your* behaviour that stinks, Grass, not his.As long as people like you have the idea that it's worse
to act against criminals than to act criminally, then people like fields
will get away with their behaviour.
Again: which army, which regiment?In the army we would have taken fields outside and taught him manners.
Bullshit. Everyone knows that "the opinions of this poster are notSince you seem to have such a firm opinion of "grasses", ("Whispering
Grass", for those of you who aren't up on East End criminal vernacular) one
can only assume that you have a criminal background.
Grow up, sonny, the real world has consequences for anti-social behaviour.
Put yourself in his bosses shoes, how would you like someone to be using
company property and company time to do what fields has been doing for
years. Not only that, but every time he posts an abusive message, it
reflects on the company, whose name appears at the top of every post.
And please don't call me stupid, Steve. You don't know me, have no idea of
my IQ and probably wouldn't understand the work I'm doing anyway.
You ain't real bright, are ya, boy?How does a caller ID intercept a call?
Yep, yer an idiot.Wouldn't you have had to program in a
suspect phone number or area code before the fact? If the latter, wouldn't
you be risking losing a lot of potential business?
No. My wife did her Ph.D. in Austin, Texas, and was able to spend time withBill Sloman wrote:
Nowhere near as much as Dubbya's crew in the White House, who are
widely seen seen as a rabid pack of Texas oil-men. The consequent
defamation of Texas is unavoidable - they've dumped a problem governor
into a place where he can do even more damage - and while his antics
don't seem to be offensive to the mindless Texans of the John Fields
class, I imagine that a certain disquiet is circulating amongst those
few Texans with a few neurones to rub together - not that their
neighbours would tolerate any overt expression of this disquiet.
You don't think we have a monoculture down here do you?
Anything you say, John ...On 21 Oct 2003 03:19:06 -0700, bill.sloman@ieee.org (Bill Sloman) wrote:
Now that the Supreme Court has struck down the Texan anti-sodomy laws
(at least as far as they apply to behaviour in private) can we expect
you to devote less time to appearing aggressively hetro?
---
"hetro"? No, but "openly hetero" would be more accurate.
---
Not likely. My wife did her Ph.D. at Austin, Texas. The Ph.D. was veryAnd devote correspondingly less time to claiming that your critics are
"limp-wristed" and in other ways effeminate?
---
No, and I suspect that with the change in the law you'll soon be here
begging for citizenship.