WiFi sensitivity question for Jeff Liebermann & anyone well

In article <nnmo64$3cp$1@news.mixmin.net>, Aardvarks
<aardvarks@a.b.c.com> wrote:

I wonder what would happen if I removed the iCloud account from an iOS
device.

nothing. you don't even need one in the first place.
 
In article <nnmo64$3cp$1@news.mixmin.net>, Aardvarks
<aardvarks@a.b.c.com> wrote:

> Anytime Google wants to subsidize a phone for me, I'm perfectly happy.

and for that subsidy, google gets to track and data mine you, even
though you think you're avoiding it. you're not.
 
Am 31.07.2016 um 04:59 schrieb Aardvarks:
On Sat, 30 Jul 2016 17:49:59 -0700, Jeff Liebermann wrote:

As you walk away from the wireless router,
instead of a general slowdown, you'll see an abrupt drop in speed,
possibly followed by a disconnect.

Eureka! That's the test I need to run!

The typical 2.4GHz 802.11g system
will go about 10 meters before the speed drops abruptly. Measure and
record this distance along with the test conditions (devices,
frequency, protocol, fixed speed, etc).

That's a PERFECT test!
My hypothesis is that the iOS devices will drop in half the distance that
the Android devices will drop - but that remains to be seen in the test.

You will want to test different device orientations as well. Reception
might (from my experience: does) differ depending on device orientation
(e.g.: with the back facing in the AP direction, with the
top/bottom/left/right sides facing the AP).

Additionally, reception will differ as well depending on how/where you
put your hands (for an extreme example see the old iPhone4 Antennagate,
where bridging the different antenna segments of the frame could lead to
a dramatical decrease of signal strength), which hand you're using (a
ring on one hand might influence the readings), whether there's a
protective cover on the phone (and of which type, ...), ...

Obviously, you will need to test several devices for each device model
(in order to rule out issues with a specific device), and different
models altogether.

Lot's of influencing factors, that you want to take into consideration.

Best of luck,

Michael
 
On Mon, 01 Aug 2016 02:13:11 -0400, nospam wrote:

and for that subsidy, google gets to track and data mine you, even
though you think you're avoiding it. you're not.

You don't use any Google apps on that iOS device?
 
On Mon, 01 Aug 2016 02:13:11 -0400, nospam wrote:

and for that subsidy, google gets to track and data mine you, even
though you think you're avoiding it. you're not.

Without a Google ID, all it has is an advertising ID, which I switch
randomly, and which Google *says* they don't maintain the connection.

I don't log into *any* Google apps, as you know.

Since my system is well organized, I keep a duplicate folder of *just*
Google Apps, where every one is logged out of (and almost none are used
anyway, except maybe Google Maps). I have the history turned off if I'm
forced to log into an app, but I can't think of any app that you have to
log into other than Gmail, which is a different beast altogether, and,
which has the same issues on iOS anyway.

As you know, I also have my SSID tracking turned off, so that I'm not
spying on my self and my neighbors.

Likewise, I have all app connection to my location turned off, and no app
is allowed to use my location unless I expressly turn the app location
ability back on with App Ops Starter. And you have that same issue too on
iOS anyway, so, nothing is different there.

So, where, may I ask, is Google spying on me on Android that they're not
also spying on you in iOS?
 
On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 18:52:15 -0700, Jeff Liebermann wrote:

Also, you seem to have an
aversion to supplying numbers.
A few of these would also improve your credibility.

Jeff.
That is the understatement of the year!
 
On Mon, 01 Aug 2016 17:52:20 -0400, nospam wrote:

Without a Google ID, all it has is an advertising ID, which I switch
randomly, and which Google *says* they don't maintain the connection.

it has more than that.

Like what?
 
No Vista ?


find a cell tower with a straight desert highway stretching off from tower base.

drive away n check reception speeds n bytes captured.
 
In article <a9etpbtc0roj7ofbmsu8b9gki8f1u9phf0@4ax.com>, Jeff
Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> wrote:

I'll also assume that you're referring to the Dell XPS 27 Touch
All-In-One Desktop:
http://www.dell.com/en-us/shop/productdetails/xps-27-2720-aio?stp=1
The screen is 2560 X 1440 or 1/4th that of the Apple display.
Prices vary from $1,700 to $2,700.

you assume wrong.

i specifically said the dell 5k display, which has the same 5120 x 2880
resolution and is $2k msrp:

http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/productdetail.aspx?c=us&l=en&s=bsd&cs=04
&sku=up275k3

Sorry, but I thought you were comparing the price of equivalent
computers with build in displays, not comparing an Apple all in one
iMac, with a component system from Dell. Your point about pricing is
still correct, but it would be helpful if you would be more specific
about what you're comparing.

find a 5k all in one for comparison.

the imac 5k first came out 2 years ago and there *still* isn't anything
to match, so components is all that's possible.

there are some pc all in ones but they're not 5k displays which means
there's even more of a price advantage to the mac.

Of course, this has nothing to do with any alleged wi-fi range
differences between Apple and Android products, which was the original
topic of this discussion.

there aren't any significant differences in normal everyday use.

Prove it. I supplied two very easy methods where you can test that
assertion using commonly available software (iperf and jperf) that
will run on most any device. I can run the test for you if you can't
seem to load one program on your Mac desktop or laptop, change one
setting in your router, and load one lousy app on your tablet.
However, I don't see why I should run it for you. I suspect that you
would not accept my results and conclusions as you did in my iPhone 4
death grip test. The problem is that you don't really know for sure
what will happen. Well, neither do I. I've run the test many times,
but never side by side comparing the range for various client devices.
It's always been to optimize something in the router, usually for
highest throughput, not for maximizing range.

that's not normal use.

normal use is connecting to wifi networks (public or private) and doing
normal everyday tasks, such as surfing the net, skype, checking email,
downloading new apps, etc. it's not running benchmarks and geeking out
over numbers.

i used to use my iphone 4 in a *wide* variety of places, from at home
(fairly strong signal) to airports & hotels (often weak and overcrowded
signals) and never had any problem with wifi or cellular.

he's trolling.

So am I. Sometimes trolling is useful. I'm tired of unsubstantiated
assertions from all sides. Time to test the various claims.

discussion is useful, not trolling.
 
In article <nnofsa$4hc$1@news.mixmin.net>, Aardvarks
<aardvarks@a.b.c.com> wrote:

and for that subsidy, google gets to track and data mine you, even
though you think you're avoiding it. you're not.

You don't use any Google apps on that iOS device?

don't change the topic.
 
In article <nnog5r$55e$1@news.mixmin.net>, Aardvarks
<aardvarks@a.b.c.com> wrote:

and for that subsidy, google gets to track and data mine you, even
though you think you're avoiding it. you're not.

Without a Google ID, all it has is an advertising ID, which I switch
randomly, and which Google *says* they don't maintain the connection.

it has more than that.
 
On Mon, 01 Aug 2016 17:04:05 -0400, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
wrote:

>that's not normal use.

Right. Instead of numbers that are useful for comparing performance,
we might have "it feels fast" or perhaps "it does what I need, which
is good enough". I used to do battle with such nonsense when dealing
with wireless product design. My standard answer was to suggest that
perhaps we need more realistic metrics, test conditions, procedures,
and environments, not vague impressions or "mean opinion scores".

normal use is connecting to wifi networks (public or private) and doing
normal everyday tasks, such as surfing the net, skype, checking email,
downloading new apps, etc. it's not running benchmarks and geeking out
over numbers.

The nice thing about performance tests and benchmarks is that under
real world conditions, you're NOT going to get any better performance
than what is achieved by the performance testing. In other words, it
puts a ceiling on what to expect with your real world tests. Testing
at maximum speeds also tends to expose anomalies that would not
necessarily appear using a real world test. Of course, in the real
world, products that advertise big numbers tend to sell better than
products advertising the lesser real world numbers, which makes
companies prefer benchmarking. It's also rather difficult to compare
products tested under different real world conditions. Many real
world tests are difficult or impossible to reproduce and often produce
different numbers.

i used to use my iphone 4 in a *wide* variety of places, from at home
(fairly strong signal) to airports & hotels (often weak and overcrowded
signals) and never had any problem with wifi or cellular.

Duly noted. Have you tried loading iperf or jperf and run a not so
real world test yet?

--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
 
In article <nnogs9$6m6$1@news.mixmin.net>, Aardvarks
<aardvarks@a.b.c.com> wrote:

Without a Google ID, all it has is an advertising ID, which I switch
randomly, and which Google *says* they don't maintain the connection.

it has more than that.

Like what?

you've been told several times before.
 
On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 13:03:59 +0200, Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> wrote:

You will want to test different device orientations as well. Reception
might (from my experience: does) differ depending on device orientation
(e.g.: with the back facing in the AP direction, with the
top/bottom/left/right sides facing the AP).

That's quite true. The RF pattern produced by a cell phone is
tailored primarily to meet SAR (specific absorption rate)
specifications. There's very little RF emitted in the direction of
the head, while much more out the back. Oddly, the peak for
smartphones is often straight down, where there are fewer obstructions
and the users hand is not likely to be holding the phone. Try
pointing the bottom of the phone at the nearest cell site and see if
the signal improves. It does on my Moto G phone.

Measuring the antenna patterns is not easy, but possible. All you
need is a $100 million anechoic RF chamber:
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x86tiU3fkSk> (1:41)
and a huge pile of RF test equipment. I do my best using junk, but it
doesn't compare to having the real goodies.

Second best is to model the phone with an NEC4 modeling program.
<https://www.google.com/search?tbm=isch&q=antenna+pattern+cell+phone>
Those are the colorful 3D patterns. I do my best with 4NEC2 free
software.
<http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/antennas/>

What you'll probably find is that the local RF environment (reflectors
and absorbers) has a much bigger effect on RF performance than the
cell phone antenna pattern. Both will cause variations in signal
strength, often in odd ways. The best I can do is wave the phone
around and record the highest reading or the average reading. Neither
is perfect, but the effort necessary to obtain a good 3D picture of
the phone is just too much work.

Obviously, you will need to test several devices for each device model
(in order to rule out issues with a specific device), and different
models altogether.

Lot's of influencing factors, that you want to take into consideration.

In this case, the issue is whether there is a difference in range and
performance (speed) between Apple wi-fi devices, and Android wi-fi
devices. This can be tested with both types of devices side-by-side
and connecting to the same wireless router. I previously posted 2
good ways to perform the test, which so far nobody seems to have
performed. Also, nobody has asked me to perform any tests in order to
settle the issue, so I'm doing what I do best, which is nothing.

--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
 
On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 17:39:30 -0700 (PDT), avagadro7@gmail.com wrote:

find a cell tower with a straight desert highway stretching off from tower base.
drive away n check reception speeds n bytes captured.

Please re-read the original comments by Aardvarks.
<https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!original/alt.internet.wireless/mr9elO6AFnU/TNZOls9aAwAJ>
This is about wi-fi, not cellular.


--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
 
Am 02.08.2016 um 01:02 schrieb Jeff Liebermann:
On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 13:03:59 +0200, Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> wrote:

You will want to test different device orientations as well. Reception
might (from my experience: does) differ depending on device orientation
(e.g.: with the back facing in the AP direction, with the
top/bottom/left/right sides facing the AP).

That's quite true. The RF pattern produced by a cell phone is
tailored primarily to meet SAR (specific absorption rate)
specifications. There's very little RF emitted in the direction of
the head, while much more out the back. Oddly, the peak for
smartphones is often straight down, where there are fewer obstructions
and the users hand is not likely to be holding the phone. Try
pointing the bottom of the phone at the nearest cell site and see if
the signal improves. It does on my Moto G phone.

The primary directions for mobile network antennas and WiFi antennas may
be different, so one would have to test them independently...

Lot's of influencing factors, that you want to take into consideration.

In this case, the issue is whether there is a difference in range and
performance (speed) between Apple wi-fi devices, and Android wi-fi
devices. This can be tested with both types of devices side-by-side

Side-by-side (taking this literally) might be yet another influencing
factor, where one device (might) severely interfere with the other.
Additionally (forgot to mention that in my previous post) there
shouldn't be anybody running around inside the test area (which is
larger than just the direct line of sight between the device(s) and the
AP), no cars should be passing in the vicinity, there should be no
neighboring WiFi networks even at the horizon, ...

and connecting to the same wireless router. I previously posted 2
good ways to perform the test, which so far nobody seems to have
performed. Also, nobody has asked me to perform any tests in order to
settle the issue, so I'm doing what I do best, which is nothing.

I won't do the tests, for several reasons:

- I don't have any Android device available, least several different ones.
- Where I live I can easily and at any time find several other WiFi
networks.
- I wouldn't have enough open range (without reflections from other
houses, passings cars, heck there are even electrified railroad tracks
at about 500m distance).
- ...

Way too bad conditions for performing such a test.

Best regards,

Michael
 
On Tuesday, August 2, 2016 at 12:54:23 AM UTC-4, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 17:39:30 -0700 (PDT), avagadro7@gmail.com wrote:

find a cell tower with a straight desert highway stretching off from tower base.
drive away n check reception speeds n bytes captured.

Please re-read the original comments by Aardvarks.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!original/alt.internet.wireless/mr9elO6AFnU/TNZOls9aAwAJ
This is about wi-fi, not cellular.


--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

? cell to PC as laptop or handheld is CELLULAR ? not wifi.....the Inspiron here logs cell to PC as wifi...as nomenclature. If the wifi is slid OFF then the PC to tower connection is lost.

the S5 line is uh dedicated via liability as a talk op where the PC wifi line isnot that is S5 internet is available where PC wifi doesn't connect.

I was abt to look for the Black Rock tower......

I'll read later....
 
On Mon, 01 Aug 2016 18:47:23 -0400, nospam wrote:

Like what?

you've been told several times before.

Heh heh.

Without a google play account, there's nothing for Google to latch on to.
 
On Tue, 02 Aug 2016 11:05:44 -0400, nospam wrote:

Without a google play account, there's nothing for Google to latch on to.

wrong

So, without a google play account, and without a static advertising ID,
what are you saying Google latches on to then?
 
In article <nnqcq9$d04$1@news.mixmin.net>, Aardvarks
<aardvarks@a.b.c.com> wrote:

Like what?

you've been told several times before.

Heh heh.

Without a google play account, there's nothing for Google to latch on to.

wrong
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top