I
I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
Guest
Can't you at least discuss why electrons don't have their counterparts
in the parallel transmision of superluminal circuitry?
in the parallel transmision of superluminal circuitry?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your pardon, but this was addressed to sci.electronics.basics.Can't you at least discuss why electrons don't have their counterparts
in the parallel transmision of superluminal circuitry?
Can you elaborate this for us please? I'm a little confused by the phraseCan't you at least discuss why electrons don't have their counterparts
in the parallel transmision of superluminal circuitry?
We did, but the thread appeared on the servers 80,000 years ago, soCan't you at least discuss why electrons don't have their counterparts
in the parallel transmision of superluminal circuitry?
Especially now that he's a fat, balding, middle-aged Queerwolf.I Was A Teenage Queerwolf wrote:
No matter what is discussed, it will be WAY over your head.
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 10:05:14 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:
I Was A Teenage Queerwolf wrote:
No matter what is discussed, it will be WAY over your head.
Especially now that he's a fat, balding, middle-aged Queerwolf.
Do you, other than bitching and pissing and moaning and complainingJohn Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 10:05:14 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
I Was A Teenage Queerwolf wrote:
No matter what is discussed, it will be WAY over your head.
Especially now that he's a fat, balding, middle-aged Queerwolf.
He obviously has no reason to live, does he? ;-)
But they do: tachyons. Not sure if ever the twain shall meet, though,Can't you at least discuss why electrons don't have their counterparts
in the parallel transmision of superluminal circuitry?
But that response was entertaining.Please do not feed the trolls.
Thirty-Six Nanoseconds Faster Than Light, P.T. Pappas, Alexis Guy"I Was A Teenage Queerwolf" <brightice2...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in messagenews:1187865887.563731.309590@j4g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
Can't you at least discuss why electrons don't have their counterparts
in the parallel transmision of superluminal circuitry?
Can you elaborate this for us please? I'm a little confused by the phrase
"parallel transmision of superluminal circuitry?"
Do you know of a real world example of superluminal circuitry? I've only
heard theory suggesting that it may be possible to transmit information
superluminally. They use the concept of entagled states. But I don't see
that this pertains to relativity and I also don't see why only photons muyst
be used. Seems to me that electrons would also do the job.
Pete
John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 10:05:14 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terr...@earthlink.net> wrote:
I Was A Teenage Queerwolf wrote:
No matter what is discussed, it will be WAY over your head.
Especially now that he's a fat, balding, middle-aged Queerwolf.
It'll do for a toupee, then.![]()
That's why I *don't*!!!!He obviously has no reason to live, does he? ;-)
positronic brains. (I could do with one.In sci.physics.relativity, I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
brightice2...@yahoo.co.uk
wrote
on Thu, 23 Aug 2007 03:44:47 -0700
1187865887.563731.309...@j4g2000prf.googlegroups.com>:
Can't you at least discuss why electrons don't have their counterparts
in the parallel transmision of superluminal circuitry?
But they do: tachyons. Not sure if ever the twain shall meet, though,
and how the heck one would detect them.
Unless they're *positrons*. In which case they're already used, in
Tacky-yawns only exist beyond the causal horizon. It takes a "JourneyIn sci.physics.relativity, I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
brightice2...@yahoo.co.uk
wrote
on Thu, 23 Aug 2007 03:44:47 -0700
1187865887.563731.309...@j4g2000prf.googlegroups.com>:
Can't you at least discuss why electrons don't have their counterparts
in the parallel transmision of superluminal circuitry?
But they do: tachyons. Not sure if ever the twain shall meet, though,
and how the heck one would detect them.
--
#191, ewi...@earthlink.net
Is it cheaper to learn Linux, or to hire someone
to fix your Windows problems?
--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com