Why don't People Start Talking some Fucking Sense on This Gr

  • Thread starter I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
  • Start date
I

I Was A Teenage Queerwolf

Guest
Can't you at least discuss why electrons don't have their counterparts
in the parallel transmision of superluminal circuitry?
 
On Aug 23, 11:44 am, I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
<brightice2...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
Can't you at least discuss why electrons don't have their counterparts
in the parallel transmision of superluminal circuitry?
Your pardon, but this was addressed to sci.electronics.basics.
 
"I Was A Teenage Queerwolf" <brightice2001@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1187865887.563731.309590@j4g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
Can't you at least discuss why electrons don't have their counterparts
in the parallel transmision of superluminal circuitry?
Can you elaborate this for us please? I'm a little confused by the phrase
"parallel transmision of superluminal circuitry?"

Do you know of a real world example of superluminal circuitry? I've only
heard theory suggesting that it may be possible to transmit information
superluminally. They use the concept of entagled states. But I don't see
that this pertains to relativity and I also don't see why only photons muyst
be used. Seems to me that electrons would also do the job.

Pete
 
I Was A Teenage Queerwolf wrote:


No matter what is discussed, it will be WAY over your head.


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
 
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 03:44:47 -0700, I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
<brightice2001@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

Can't you at least discuss why electrons don't have their counterparts
in the parallel transmision of superluminal circuitry?
We did, but the thread appeared on the servers 80,000 years ago, so
expired.

John
 
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 10:05:14 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
<mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:

I Was A Teenage Queerwolf wrote:


No matter what is discussed, it will be WAY over your head.
Especially now that he's a fat, balding, middle-aged Queerwolf.

John
 
John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 10:05:14 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:

I Was A Teenage Queerwolf wrote:


No matter what is discussed, it will be WAY over your head.

Especially now that he's a fat, balding, middle-aged Queerwolf.

He obviously has no reason to live, does he? ;-)


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
 
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 19:43:15 -0400, Michael A. Terrell wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 10:05:14 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
I Was A Teenage Queerwolf wrote:

No matter what is discussed, it will be WAY over your head.

Especially now that he's a fat, balding, middle-aged Queerwolf.

He obviously has no reason to live, does he? ;-)
Do you, other than bitching and pissing and moaning and complaining
and carping and criticizing everything ad nauseam?

Thanks,
Rich
 
In sci.physics.relativity, I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
<brightice2001@yahoo.co.uk>
wrote
on Thu, 23 Aug 2007 03:44:47 -0700
<1187865887.563731.309590@j4g2000prf.googlegroups.com>:
Can't you at least discuss why electrons don't have their counterparts
in the parallel transmision of superluminal circuitry?
But they do: tachyons. Not sure if ever the twain shall meet, though,
and how the heck one would detect them.

--
#191, ewill3@earthlink.net
Is it cheaper to learn Linux, or to hire someone
to fix your Windows problems?

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
 
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:05:08 -0700, "Dan Coby" <adcoby@earthlink.net>
wrote:

Please do not feed the trolls.
But that response was entertaining.

--
Al in St. Lou
 
On Aug 23, 12:00 pm, "Pmb" <some...@somewhere.net> wrote:
"I Was A Teenage Queerwolf" <brightice2...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in messagenews:1187865887.563731.309590@j4g2000prf.googlegroups.com...

Can't you at least discuss why electrons don't have their counterparts
in the parallel transmision of superluminal circuitry?

Can you elaborate this for us please? I'm a little confused by the phrase
"parallel transmision of superluminal circuitry?"

Do you know of a real world example of superluminal circuitry? I've only
heard theory suggesting that it may be possible to transmit information
superluminally. They use the concept of entagled states. But I don't see
that this pertains to relativity and I also don't see why only photons muyst
be used. Seems to me that electrons would also do the job.

Pete
Thirty-Six Nanoseconds Faster Than Light, P.T. Pappas, Alexis Guy
Obolensky, Article, Electronics & Wireless World, December, 1988.

In this they claimed that, in some cases, the EMF traveled 100 times
the speed of light, and in another case was unmeasureably fast.

But the number of times this article is cited on the Web makes it seem
doubtful that anyone was able to reproduce their experiment.
 
On Aug 24, 12:43 am, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net>
wrote:
John Larkin wrote:

On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 10:05:14 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terr...@earthlink.net> wrote:

I Was A Teenage Queerwolf wrote:

No matter what is discussed, it will be WAY over your head.

Especially now that he's a fat, balding, middle-aged Queerwolf.
It'll do for a toupee, then. :)

He obviously has no reason to live, does he? ;-)
That's why I *don't*!!!!
 
On Aug 24, 6:57 am, The Ghost In The Machine
<ew...@sirius.tg00suus7038.net> wrote:
In sci.physics.relativity, I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
brightice2...@yahoo.co.uk
wrote
on Thu, 23 Aug 2007 03:44:47 -0700
1187865887.563731.309...@j4g2000prf.googlegroups.com>:

Can't you at least discuss why electrons don't have their counterparts
in the parallel transmision of superluminal circuitry?

But they do: tachyons. Not sure if ever the twain shall meet, though,
and how the heck one would detect them.

Unless they're *positrons*. In which case they're already used, in
positronic brains. (I could do with one. :) )
 
On Aug 23, 11:57 pm, The Ghost In The Machine
<ew...@sirius.tg00suus7038.net> wrote:
In sci.physics.relativity, I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
brightice2...@yahoo.co.uk
wrote
on Thu, 23 Aug 2007 03:44:47 -0700
1187865887.563731.309...@j4g2000prf.googlegroups.com>:

Can't you at least discuss why electrons don't have their counterparts
in the parallel transmision of superluminal circuitry?

But they do: tachyons. Not sure if ever the twain shall meet, though,
and how the heck one would detect them.

--
#191, ewi...@earthlink.net
Is it cheaper to learn Linux, or to hire someone
to fix your Windows problems?

--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com
Tacky-yawns only exist beyond the causal horizon. It takes a "Journey
beyond the Stars " to get there.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top