Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
---I start a thread for braggarts and who appears?
A loser in his own mind.
Cite?
Huge!
Show your work.
Run away?
You are always running away from any tech discussion because you know
you'll just make a complete fool of yourself.
Face reality: You have no interest in science or technology.
All you can do here is type:
LOL!
Cite?
You have so little direction or purpose you can be classified
nonfunctional.
I saw the exact same thing on misc.legal where someone legal beagle
claimed it was possible to get arrested for trespassing on a public
road.
You cannot _find_ people that dumb in real life.
---On Jul 31, 6:08 am, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote:
I think you've made your point Bret.
Which is?
It should be easy for any of
these guys to critique your proposal,
Why aren't they doing it?
Because they don't do crackpottery?
You are always running away from any tech discussion because you knowCite?
Huge!
Show your work.
Run away?
What exactly is your problem? I'm offering a critique of Bret'stg wrote:
On Jul 31, 12:58 am, BretCah...@peoplepc.com wrote:
Show us some stuff you've designed.
www.BretCahill.com
Bret Cahill
I think you've made your point Bret. It should be easy for any of
these guys to critique your proposal, particularly John Larkin who is
in the coffee processing business.
You are a stupid as you buddy. John's website is well known on the
electronics newsgroups, but you two can't find it.
Do either of you ever get ANYTHING right? John owns a electronics
design & manufacturing business in San Francisco. All you idiots do is
spin useless ideas, while John is designing & building things to complex
for your small, lying minds. He is right downtown, and has shown
pictures of his nw business location and new products on another
newsgroup. All you two do is a pathetic troll dance.
--http://improve-usenet.org/index.html
If you have broadband, your ISP may have a NNTP news server included in
your account:http://www.usenettools.net/ISP.htm
Sporadic E is the Earth's aluminum foil beanie for the 'global warming'
sheep.
You slept through thermodynamics class. You are no big deal.I'm taking all comers.
You've been bottom-feeding too long Bret, arguing with FundatariansI think you've made your point Bret.
Which is?
It should be easy for any of
these guys to critique your proposal,
Why aren't they doing it?
Uh, oh, now they are going to start saying,
"Cite?"
"Huge!"
"Show your work."
particularly John Larkin who is
in the coffee processing business.
Then we can forget about him saving any quads, not that their was ever
any hope for him.
But as usual, I'm the one who has
to pick up the burden...
Referring to picture 2:
Before we get into the actual physics of it, where would you apply
this? Why are we heating up liquids and then transferring the heat to
a gas?
Because it's easier than trying to transfer directly from a gas to a
gas.
Well that's one place where I don't agree. It is obviously always more
efficient to avoid the intermediate step, unless you are talking about
transport, where the liquid covers some distance.
Are you talking about something like auto radiators when you
say radiator?
Yes. With fluidization all you need is a single pipe.
Yeah I think you are wrong on that.
No reasoning?
Your particles are going to be
separated by the moving air, so it isn't clear how you expect to get
improved heat transfer.
The reason it isn't clear is because you never studied fluidization
or, for that matter, anything science or tech related.
You need to get the Pell grant. Write your congressman to expand the
program.
Here's an easy experiment to get a "feeling" for a heat transfer
coefficient in the same range as condensation.
Cap the bottom of a 4" PVC sewer pipe. Drill a 1/8" hole near the
bottom and run a line to shop compressor. Fill the T with ice water
including some crushed ice or small ice cubes.
Place you hand into the ice water and crank up the compressed air for
40 seconds.
That will cool a drink faster than liquid N2 or CO2 from a fire
extinguisher.
Bret Cahill
Because they don't do crackpottery?I think you've made your point Bret.
Which is?
It should be easy for any of
these guys to critique your proposal,
Why aren't they doing it?
At least someone is on topic.
Commercially available stacked flat plat heat exchangers are far more
efficient.. (no need for a working fluid, greater surface area,
Fins work in fluidization as well
higher
heat transfer coefficient.) .
The heat transfer coefficient is an order of magnitude greater with
particle bed fluidization.
I thought I made that clear.
Bret Cahill
You really are an idiot. KKKahill has alwaysOn Jul 31, 11:23 am, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote:
I think you've made your point Bret.
Which is?
It should be easy for any of
these guys to critique your proposal,
Why aren't they doing it?
Uh, oh, now they are going to start saying,
"Cite?"
"Huge!"
"Show your work."
particularly John Larkin who is
in the coffee processing business.
Then we can forget about him saving any quads, not that their was ever
any hope for him.
But as usual, I'm the one who has
to pick up the burden...
Referring to picture 2:
Before we get into the actual physics of it, where would you apply
this? Why are we heating up liquids and then transferring the heat to
a gas?
Because it's easier than trying to transfer directly from a gas to a
gas.
Well that's one place where I don't agree. It is obviously always more
efficient to avoid the intermediate step, unless you are talking about
transport, where the liquid covers some distance.
Are you talking about something like auto radiators when you
say radiator?
Yes. With fluidization all you need is a single pipe.
Yeah I think you are wrong on that.
No reasoning?
Your particles are going to be
separated by the moving air, so it isn't clear how you expect to get
improved heat transfer.
The reason it isn't clear is because you never studied fluidization
or, for that matter, anything science or tech related.
You need to get the Pell grant. Write your congressman to expand the
program.
Here's an easy experiment to get a "feeling" for a heat transfer
coefficient in the same range as condensation.
Cap the bottom of a 4" PVC sewer pipe. Drill a 1/8" hole near the
bottom and run a line to shop compressor. Fill the T with ice water
including some crushed ice or small ice cubes.
Place you hand into the ice water and crank up the compressed air for
40 seconds.
That will cool a drink faster than liquid N2 or CO2 from a fire
extinguisher.
Bret Cahill
You've been bottom-feeding too long Bret, arguing with Fundatarians
and people who 'design' electronics. You forget what it's like to be
taken to school by a scholar. And now you have become a Snipatarian---
very sad.
They are obviously better at spotting an idiot thanOn Jul 31, 10:02 am, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net
wrote:
tg wrote:
On Jul 31, 12:58 am, BretCah...@peoplepc.com wrote:
Show us some stuff you've designed.
www.BretCahill.com
Bret Cahill
I think you've made your point Bret. It should be easy for any of
these guys to critique your proposal, particularly John Larkin who is
in the coffee processing business.
You are a stupid as you buddy. John's website is well known on the
electronics newsgroups, but you two can't find it.
Do either of you ever get ANYTHING right? John owns a electronics
design & manufacturing business in San Francisco. All you idiots do is
spin useless ideas, while John is designing & building things to complex
for your small, lying minds. He is right downtown, and has shown
pictures of his nw business location and new products on another
newsgroup. All you two do is a pathetic troll dance.
What exactly is your problem?
But Justice Black said this:I saw the exact same thing on misc.legal where someone legal beagle
claimed it was possible to get arrested for trespassing on a public
road.
The knowledge you seek is within, Seeker.You cannot _find_ people that dumb in real life.
Poor Bret can't see that tg is just trying to helpI think you've made your point Bret.
Which is?
It should be easy for any of
these guys to critique your proposal,
Why aren't they doing it?
Uh, oh, now they are going to start saying,
"Cite?"
"Huge!"
"Show your work."
particularly John Larkin who is
in the coffee processing business.
Then we can forget about him saving any quads, not that their was ever
any hope for him.
But as usual, I'm the one who has
to pick up the burden...
Referring to picture 2:
Before we get into the actual physics of it, where would you apply
this? Why are we heating up liquids and then transferring the heat to
a gas?
Because it's easier than trying to transfer directly from a gas to a
gas.
Well that's one place where I don't agree. It is obviously always more
efficient to avoid the intermediate step, unless you are talking about
transport, where the liquid covers some distance.
Are you talking about something like auto radiators when you
say radiator?
Yes. With fluidization all you need is a single pipe.
Yeah I think you are wrong on that.
No reasoning?
Your particles are going to be
separated by the moving air, so it isn't clear how you expect to get
improved heat transfer.
The reason it isn't clear is because you never studied fluidization
or, for that matter, anything science or tech related.
You need to get the Pell grant. Write your congressman to expand the
program.
You are right, though. People seem to be attractedDeTocqueville pointed out that the vices of the politicians don't
really damage a democracy. The reason is there's no coherence in
their vices.
Being around people as worthless as Al Gore in a dust devil might not
be lofty but it's better than having a lot of nazis focused on killing
you.
The same is true here.
Don't forget the CIA's corpwhore mind control neutrino ray gun.Now that BATF has beam weapons
He doesn't do that kind of thing. He just blustersAt first I thought you wanted to discuss tech.
In Ireland, they drink their Guinness at room temperature.Are you going to build the emergency beer chiller or not?
I use a T with clear plastic Si rubbered to the front porthole for a
window.
Says it all, really.BretCah...@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:3a69da9c-1149-4f3a-a64d-53fd867a524c@r15g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
Show us some stuff you've designed.
www.BretCahill.com
Very descriptive title:
title>Blank</title
Paul
Since you can't figure out how to decode my web site address, here itAll ya gotta do is put out the shoe and the idiots step right in to
demonstrate it fits:
Show us some stuff you've designed.
www.BretCahill.com
Bret Cahill
Cartoons. How about some hardware?
You want it delivered?
For what purpose?
Anyway you are already down one straw. ?You have never generated a
single novel idea in your entire life.
Since you have no IP or web page, perhaps you'ld like to try something
else?
? ?Yes John has his corporate web page,
Is he ashamed of it or what?
This is remins me of the looneytarian posting under the handle
"Caliban."
He said he was running for office but he wouldn't post his name.
Bret Cahill