U
UCLAN
Guest
William Sommerwerck wrote:
His post, in part "Several indoor antennas work significantly better that
rabbit ears? I think not. If his rabbit ears won't work then a super duper
amplified "As Seen on TV" antenna would be a waste of money."
NOBODY had yet even mentioned Terk antennas.
But yes, the Terk I later mention is just ONE of several that work better
than rabbit ears, and that was with several DTV converter boxes.
Message-ID: <9kap945ekd4j20o4jmiqtjru57ssbdmi4c@4ax.com>Inasmuch as "rabbit ears" do a horrible job at best in receiving UHF
signals, such a comparison would be useless. *That* is one reason
that the post praising "the TV's rabbit ears" over any indoor antenna
was so laughable.
I don't remember the poster praising rabbit ears over _any_ indoor
antenna -- just the Terk. Are you certain he's wrong -- or lying?
His post, in part "Several indoor antennas work significantly better that
rabbit ears? I think not. If his rabbit ears won't work then a super duper
amplified "As Seen on TV" antenna would be a waste of money."
NOBODY had yet even mentioned Terk antennas.
But yes, the Terk I later mention is just ONE of several that work better
than rabbit ears, and that was with several DTV converter boxes.