J
JeffM
Guest
George wrote:
to enter the low-cost ECAD market niche.
....but the page is sketchy WRT Cadsoft's limitations.
JeffM wrote:
::http://groups.google.com/group/comp.arch.embedded/browse_frm/thread/
f794e82d26b59e18/d7cf4149edb93ac7?q=*-*-website+reuse+paying.*+*-I-
will-switch+cracked-*+*.would.not.help.*+zzz+after-*-*-version-*+copied
+*.*.unlock.*.designs+*-*-*-*-exchange-*-*-*-*-third-party+reused+qq+*-
*-single-bit-*-*-*-*+useless+*-*-*-projects-could-no-longer-be-opened
::
with recent[1] versions of Cadsoft EAGLE is a minefield.
My intuition is that a lot of those data points are old posts
going back years and years and years
that reflect a distortion of the "installed base"
--and don't reflect the *current* reality.[1]
If, OTOH, you look at the trend of *new* users,
the trend is moving in the **open source** direction.
Most folks don't like the notion of *changing the rules down the road*
as Cadsoft has done surreptitiously.
e.g. KiCAD doesn't have the size/layers limitations of a demo
AND IT DOESN'T LOCK YOU OUT OF YOUR FILES.
Here's an extreme example of "No limitations" (gEDA)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.electronics.design/browse_frm/thread/dc3c1272fe977f38/90ef00cfb5444c09?q=50-something-layers+*-*-square+zz-zz+qq+boards-up-to
and another (gEDA again)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.electronics.cad/browse_frm/thread/e87733628a7eb0b8/48de1eeeb67614b2?q=I-tested-it-with-a-56-layer-board+it-worked
..
..
[1] Those who are aware of the more-recently-added DRM
are avoiding EAGLE
(and, as Markus' post shows, old users are abandoning EAGLE).
Maybe you've used Windoze so long
that you are used to being treated like a thief.
I find that most people don't like that sort of behavior.
Giving money/support to companies/people who treat you badly
seems foolish to me.
http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:IvwhatAg7dkJ:www.getopenoffice.org/ernieball.html+evening.news+Linux+Ernie.Ball+Business.Software.Alliance+Microsoft+$65000+Nail.Your.Boss+$35000+*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-treats-us-poorly+unlicensed.copies+*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-to-fight-them
It appears he wants to produce his own softwareI found this summary of what's out there:
http://www.fritzing.org/development/market-overview ...
A nice page by Andre Knoerig; it is more current than many others.
to enter the low-cost ECAD market niche.
....but the page is sketchy WRT Cadsoft's limitations.
JeffM wrote:
::**The Downside of EAGLE** by Markus ZinggIf you are planning to use other people's libraries,
EAGLE is the WORST choice you could make;
others have found their labors unusable (DRM):
::[link re-inserted]
::http://groups.google.com/group/comp.arch.embedded/browse_frm/thread/
f794e82d26b59e18/d7cf4149edb93ac7?q=*-*-website+reuse+paying.*+*-I-
will-switch+cracked-*+*.would.not.help.*+zzz+after-*-*-version-*+copied
+*.*.unlock.*.designs+*-*-*-*-exchange-*-*-*-*-third-party+reused+qq+*-
*-single-bit-*-*-*-*+useless+*-*-*-projects-could-no-longer-be-opened
::
As I pointed out, reusing others' library components...And it appears to confirm what I've noticed elsewhere
- that Eagle is probably the most widely used
among the occasional-use/hobbiest crowd where I would be.
with recent[1] versions of Cadsoft EAGLE is a minefield.
My intuition is that a lot of those data points are old posts
going back years and years and years
that reflect a distortion of the "installed base"
--and don't reflect the *current* reality.[1]
If, OTOH, you look at the trend of *new* users,
the trend is moving in the **open source** direction.
Most folks don't like the notion of *changing the rules down the road*
as Cadsoft has done surreptitiously.
e.g. KiCAD doesn't have the size/layers limitations of a demo
AND IT DOESN'T LOCK YOU OUT OF YOUR FILES.
Here's an extreme example of "No limitations" (gEDA)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.electronics.design/browse_frm/thread/dc3c1272fe977f38/90ef00cfb5444c09?q=50-something-layers+*-*-square+zz-zz+qq+boards-up-to
and another (gEDA again)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.electronics.cad/browse_frm/thread/e87733628a7eb0b8/48de1eeeb67614b2?q=I-tested-it-with-a-56-layer-board+it-worked
..
..
[1] Those who are aware of the more-recently-added DRM
are avoiding EAGLE
(and, as Markus' post shows, old users are abandoning EAGLE).
Maybe you've used Windoze so long
that you are used to being treated like a thief.
I find that most people don't like that sort of behavior.
Giving money/support to companies/people who treat you badly
seems foolish to me.
http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:IvwhatAg7dkJ:www.getopenoffice.org/ernieball.html+evening.news+Linux+Ernie.Ball+Business.Software.Alliance+Microsoft+$65000+Nail.Your.Boss+$35000+*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-treats-us-poorly+unlicensed.copies+*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-to-fight-them