What is the symbol for a mic?

On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:08:02 -0700, Rich Grise <richgrise@example.net>
wrote:

On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 22:47:33 -0500, Lostgallifreyan wrote:
Rich Grise <richgrise@example.net> wrote in

Just use two mics, one labeled "Right" and the other labeled "Left."

Sure, there are "stereo mics", but they're really just two mics in the
same package.

This is true, but when the point is to think in terms of a pairing as
default state that would be like having to always explicitly specify
multiples of the scissor, or the trouser.

When's the last time you needed a schematic of a scissor or a trouser? ;-)

Why do they wear a pair of panties but only one bra? ;-)

Cheers!
Rich
Then, there is the hot dogs / buns thing.
 
Rich Grise <richgrise@example.net> wrote in
news:pan.2009.10.19.21.08.00.390513@example.net:

On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 22:47:33 -0500, Lostgallifreyan wrote:
Rich Grise <richgrise@example.net> wrote in

Just use two mics, one labeled "Right" and the other labeled "Left."

Sure, there are "stereo mics", but they're really just two mics in the
same package.

This is true, but when the point is to think in terms of a pairing as
default state that would be like having to always explicitly specify
multiples of the scissor, or the trouser.

When's the last time you needed a schematic of a scissor or a trouser? ;-)
Was going to say all the time. :) But that is lame.. But there might be
people who do. I'm thinking of the labels they put on shoes and stuff. Last
time I looked at some wshing instructions on something I had to do a bit of
decyphering but I think it was put there assuming someone out there knew the
language. But I think they still kept their trousers in one piece.

Why do they wear a pair of panties but only one bra? ;-)
They do? >:)

Cheers!
Rich
 
CellShocked <cellshocked@thecellvalueattheendofthespreadsheet.org> wrote in
news:m1tpd55u72tn7f4aeajr9ca3djr08gnocm@4ax.com:

This is true, but when the point is to think in terms of a pairing as
default state that would be like having to always explicitly specify
multiples of the scissor, or the trouser.

When's the last time you needed a schematic of a scissor or a trouser? ;-)

Why do they wear a pair of panties but only one bra? ;-)

Cheers!
Rich

Then, there is the hot dogs / buns thing.
Double entendre? Or is that just the single entendre?
 
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:46:43 -0500, Lostgallifreyan <no-one@nowhere.net>
wrote:

CellShocked <cellshocked@thecellvalueattheendofthespreadsheet.org> wrote in
news:m1tpd55u72tn7f4aeajr9ca3djr08gnocm@4ax.com:

This is true, but when the point is to think in terms of a pairing as
default state that would be like having to always explicitly specify
multiples of the scissor, or the trouser.

When's the last time you needed a schematic of a scissor or a trouser? ;-)

Why do they wear a pair of panties but only one bra? ;-)

Cheers!
Rich

Then, there is the hot dogs / buns thing.



Double entendre? Or is that just the single entendre?

Hot dogs are sold in packs of ten, while hot dog buns are sold in packs
of eight.
 
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:47:18 -0700, CellShocked wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:46:43 -0500, Lostgallifreyan <no-one@nowhere.net
CellShocked <cellshocked@thecellvalueattheendofthespreadsheet.org> wrote in

This is true, but when the point is to think in terms of a pairing as
default state that would be like having to always explicitly specify
multiples of the scissor, or the trouser.

When's the last time you needed a schematic of a scissor or a trouser? ;-)

Why do they wear a pair of panties but only one bra? ;-)

Then, there is the hot dogs / buns thing.

Double entendre? Or is that just the single entendre?

Hot dogs are sold in packs of ten, while hot dog buns are sold in packs
of eight.
That's so you can take the two leftover weiners, cut them up, and put
them in your mac&cheese. ;-)

Cheers!
Rich
 
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:58:11 -0700, Rich Grise <richgrise@example.net>
wrote:

On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:47:18 -0700, CellShocked wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:46:43 -0500, Lostgallifreyan <no-one@nowhere.net
CellShocked <cellshocked@thecellvalueattheendofthespreadsheet.org> wrote in

This is true, but when the point is to think in terms of a pairing as
default state that would be like having to always explicitly specify
multiples of the scissor, or the trouser.

When's the last time you needed a schematic of a scissor or a trouser? ;-)

Why do they wear a pair of panties but only one bra? ;-)

Then, there is the hot dogs / buns thing.

Double entendre? Or is that just the single entendre?

Hot dogs are sold in packs of ten, while hot dog buns are sold in packs
of eight.

That's so you can take the two leftover weiners, cut them up, and put
them in your mac&cheese. ;-)

Cheers!
Rich

I do Mac-Chee-Tuna-Pea.

I don't do Mac-Chee-DogBits.
 
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 03:11:06 -0700 (PDT), Proteus IIV
<proteusiiv@gmail.com> wrote:

On Oct 20, 8:35 pm, CellShocked
cellshoc...@thecellvalueattheendofthespreadsheet.org> wrote:
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:58:11 -0700, Rich Grise <richgr...@example.net
wrote:





On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:47:18 -0700, CellShocked wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:46:43 -0500, Lostgallifreyan <no-...@nowhere.net
CellShocked <cellshoc...@thecellvalueattheendofthespreadsheet.org> wrote in

This is true, but when the point is to think in terms of a pairing as
default state that would be like having to always explicitly specify
multiples of the scissor, or the trouser.

When's the last time you needed a schematic of a scissor or a trouser? ;-)

Why do they wear a pair of panties but only one bra? ;-)

  Then, there is the hot dogs / buns thing.

Double entendre? Or is that just the single entendre?

  Hot dogs are sold in packs of ten, while hot dog buns are sold in packs
of eight.

That's so you can take the two leftover weiners, cut them up, and put
them in your mac&cheese. ;-)

Cheers!
Rich

 I do Mac-Chee-Tuna-Pea.

  I don't do Mac-Chee-DogBits.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text

YOU MUST HAVE INHALED TROLL GASES

GO SEE A DOCTOR

I AM PROTEUS

Go away, stupid troll.
 
On Oct 18, 12:59 pm, Archimedes' Lever
<OneBigLe...@InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote:
On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 11:55:58 -0500, Bill Shymanski <wtshy...@mts.net
wrote:





Lostgallifreyan wrote:
Eddie <du...@invalid.com> wrote in
news:Xns9CA5B35E7A5FA91F3A2@feeder.eternal-september.org:

I want to write (by hand) if some voice recordings of mine are in
mono or stereo.

Are there some standard symbols used for a mono mic and a stereo
mic?  

Are there mono/stereo mic symbols used in schematic circuit diagrams
which could be used?

--------------------------------

I've seen two overlapping circles used for stereo. But for some
reason a mono mic is one circle PLUS a short bar

http://tinyurl.com/ykdar8p

Here's an idea...
For mono, do the usual, the circle and bar. If you were using it in a block
diagram you'd get by with one pin coming off the circle at the point opposite
the bar's contact with the circle, otherwise two, each slightly offset from
that position, and parallel.

For stereo, use the two overlapping circles, and a bar joining tangents on
each and extending to a point at each end coexistent with a tangent on the
points most distant from each other on the double-circle pattern. (Bar is
this same length now). Add one pin to each circle as before, for block
diagrams, and for schematics, a third extending from the circle intersection
point out to a point halfway between the outer ends of the other pins.

Stereo mics do exist, so this symbol makes sense, it fits existing
conventions, and isn't going to get confused with a current source symbol
because that has no bar, and its pins are in line, not offset.

I could have just drawn this, but I have no file hosting arranged, and
figuring that out is a lot harder than saying this stuff..

Is your purpose communication or demonstrating how clever you are?

Every time I have to figure out some knot-headed icon, I curse. Write
"Stereo" on the stereo recordings and "Mono" on the mono recordings -
then anyone who knows enough about the subject to care about the
difference will understand. I speak, read and write English, not
Iconese. let them go back to Iconland where they belong.

rantingly,

Bill

  THIS is the correct response!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
OH SHUT UP YOU FOOL
IF YOU KNEW ANYTHING ABOUT WHAT IS CORRECT YOU WOULD NOT BE POSTING AS
A TROLL
YOU ARTE GOING TO DIE JUST WAIT UNTIL THE GATEWAY TO FANTASY LAND
OPENS AGAIN

I AM PROTEUS
 
On Oct 20, 8:35 pm, CellShocked
<cellshoc...@thecellvalueattheendofthespreadsheet.org> wrote:
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:58:11 -0700, Rich Grise <richgr...@example.net
wrote:





On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:47:18 -0700, CellShocked wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:46:43 -0500, Lostgallifreyan <no-...@nowhere.net
CellShocked <cellshoc...@thecellvalueattheendofthespreadsheet.org> wrote in

This is true, but when the point is to think in terms of a pairing as
default state that would be like having to always explicitly specify
multiples of the scissor, or the trouser.

When's the last time you needed a schematic of a scissor or a trouser? ;-)

Why do they wear a pair of panties but only one bra? ;-)

  Then, there is the hot dogs / buns thing.

Double entendre? Or is that just the single entendre?

  Hot dogs are sold in packs of ten, while hot dog buns are sold in packs
of eight.

That's so you can take the two leftover weiners, cut them up, and put
them in your mac&cheese. ;-)

Cheers!
Rich

 I do Mac-Chee-Tuna-Pea.

  I don't do Mac-Chee-DogBits.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text
YOU MUST HAVE INHALED TROLL GASES

GO SEE A DOCTOR

I AM PROTEUS
 
On Oct 21, 7:26 am, CellShocked
<cellshoc...@thecellvalueattheendofthespreadsheet.org> wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 03:11:06 -0700 (PDT), Proteus IIV





proteus...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 20, 8:35 pm, CellShocked
cellshoc...@thecellvalueattheendofthespreadsheet.org> wrote:
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:58:11 -0700, Rich Grise <richgr...@example.net
wrote:

On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:47:18 -0700, CellShocked wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:46:43 -0500, Lostgallifreyan <no-...@nowhere..net
CellShocked <cellshoc...@thecellvalueattheendofthespreadsheet.org> wrote in

This is true, but when the point is to think in terms of a pairing as
default state that would be like having to always explicitly specify
multiples of the scissor, or the trouser.

When's the last time you needed a schematic of a scissor or a trouser? ;-)

Why do they wear a pair of panties but only one bra? ;-)

  Then, there is the hot dogs / buns thing.

Double entendre? Or is that just the single entendre?

  Hot dogs are sold in packs of ten, while hot dog buns are sold in packs
of eight.

That's so you can take the two leftover weiners, cut them up, and put
them in your mac&cheese. ;-)

Cheers!
Rich

 I do Mac-Chee-Tuna-Pea.

  I don't do Mac-Chee-DogBits.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text

YOU MUST HAVE INHALED TROLL GASES

GO SEE A DOCTOR

I AM PROTEUS

 Go away, stupid troll.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
YOU ARE CONFUSED

AND YES YOU DO BELONG IN A CELL

I AM PROTEUS
 
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 04:45:37 -0700 (PDT), Proteus IIV
<proteusiiv@gmail.com> wrote:

On Oct 21, 7:26 am, CellShocked
cellshoc...@thecellvalueattheendofthespreadsheet.org> wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 03:11:06 -0700 (PDT), Proteus IIV





proteus...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 20, 8:35 pm, CellShocked
cellshoc...@thecellvalueattheendofthespreadsheet.org> wrote:
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:58:11 -0700, Rich Grise <richgr...@example.net
wrote:

On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:47:18 -0700, CellShocked wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:46:43 -0500, Lostgallifreyan <no-...@nowhere.net
CellShocked <cellshoc...@thecellvalueattheendofthespreadsheet.org> wrote in

This is true, but when the point is to think in terms of a pairing as
default state that would be like having to always explicitly specify
multiples of the scissor, or the trouser.

When's the last time you needed a schematic of a scissor or a trouser? ;-)

Why do they wear a pair of panties but only one bra? ;-)

  Then, there is the hot dogs / buns thing.

Double entendre? Or is that just the single entendre?

  Hot dogs are sold in packs of ten, while hot dog buns are sold in packs
of eight.

That's so you can take the two leftover weiners, cut them up, and put
them in your mac&cheese. ;-)

Cheers!
Rich

 I do Mac-Chee-Tuna-Pea.

  I don't do Mac-Chee-DogBits.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text

YOU MUST HAVE INHALED TROLL GASES

GO SEE A DOCTOR

I AM PROTEUS

 Go away, stupid troll.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

YOU ARE CONFUSED

AND YES YOU DO BELONG IN A CELL

I AM PROTEUS

It is a reference to a spreadsheet, you absolute fucking total retard.
 
On Oct 22, 8:53 pm, CellShocked
<cellshoc...@thecellvalueattheendofthespreadsheet.org> wrote:
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 04:45:37 -0700 (PDT), Proteus IIV





proteus...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 21, 7:26 am, CellShocked
cellshoc...@thecellvalueattheendofthespreadsheet.org> wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 03:11:06 -0700 (PDT), Proteus IIV

proteus...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 20, 8:35 pm, CellShocked
cellshoc...@thecellvalueattheendofthespreadsheet.org> wrote:
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:58:11 -0700, Rich Grise <richgr...@example.net
wrote:

On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:47:18 -0700, CellShocked wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:46:43 -0500, Lostgallifreyan <no-...@nowhere.net
CellShocked <cellshoc...@thecellvalueattheendofthespreadsheet.org> wrote in

This is true, but when the point is to think in terms of a pairing as
default state that would be like having to always explicitly specify
multiples of the scissor, or the trouser.

When's the last time you needed a schematic of a scissor or a trouser? ;-)

Why do they wear a pair of panties but only one bra? ;-)

  Then, there is the hot dogs / buns thing.

Double entendre? Or is that just the single entendre?

  Hot dogs are sold in packs of ten, while hot dog buns are sold in packs
of eight.

That's so you can take the two leftover weiners, cut them up, and put
them in your mac&cheese. ;-)

Cheers!
Rich

 I do Mac-Chee-Tuna-Pea.

  I don't do Mac-Chee-DogBits.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text

YOU MUST HAVE INHALED TROLL GASES

GO SEE A DOCTOR

I AM PROTEUS

 Go away, stupid troll.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

YOU ARE CONFUSED

AND YES YOU DO BELONG IN A CELL

I AM PROTEUS

 It is a reference to a spreadsheet, you absolute fucking total retard.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
YOU WANT TO SPREAD YOUR SHITHOLE TOO ?

OKAY

I WILL PROBE YOUR ANAL APERTURE

RIGHT AFTER I COMPLETE PROBING YOUR BOYFREIND ARCHI

I AM PROTEUS
 
On 00:12 16 Oct 2009, Lostgallifreyan wrote:

Eddie <dummy@invalid.com> wrote in
news:Xns9CA5B35E7A5FA91F3A2@feeder.eternal-september.org:

[...]

Here's an idea...
For mono, do the usual, the circle and bar. If you were using
it in a block diagram you'd get by with one pin coming off the
circle at the point opposite the bar's contact with the circle,
otherwise two, each slightly offset from that position, and
parallel.

For stereo, use the two overlapping circles, and a bar joining
tangents on each and extending to a point at each end
coexistent with a tangent on the points most distant from each
other on the double-circle pattern. (Bar is this same length
now). Add one pin to each circle as before, for block diagrams,
and for schematics, a third extending from the circle
intersection point out to a point halfway between the outer
ends of the other pins.

Stereo mics do exist, so this symbol makes sense, it fits
existing conventions, and isn't going to get confused with a
current source symbol because that has no bar, and its pins are
in line, not offset.

I could have just drawn this, but I have no file hosting
arranged, and figuring that out is a lot harder than saying
this stuff..
Hello Lostgallifreyan, thank you for the detailed reply. I'm the
original poster. (Sorry for the delay in replying.) I'm not sure I
can see what you are describing.

(A) What does the following mean?

"bar joining tangents on each"

Does it mean a bar which passes thru the intersection of many pairs
of tangents where each tangents in a pair is drawn from a points
which is situated as if it were the mirror image of the other? This
would be a bar drawn down the middle of the overlapping circles.

(B) I'm not sure about this other part of our description:

"extending to a point at each end coexistent with
a tangent on the points most distant from each
other on the double-circle pattern"

Those "Points on the double circle pattern most distant from each
other" would presumably be those points on the 'outer edges' of the
double-circle. I don't see a single tangent which passes through
those two points. Perhaps you mean a tangent which touches each
circle at the point(s) which are the furtherest possible from one
other while still permitting the existence a common tangent.

(C) What about the overlap of the circles? Do your circles overlap
by a radius? (Such that one circle goes through the other's centre).
Or is the overlap more like half a radius?

Can you give us a drawing. It must be easier to understand than any
more of this? In the end I only want to know see what symbol you're
suggesting for stereo!
 
On 05:49 17 Oct 2009, Proteus IIV wrote:

On Oct 15, 12:37 pm, Eddie <du...@invalid.com> wrote:
I want to write (by hand) if some voice recordings of mine are
in mono or stereo.

Are there some standard symbols used for a mono mic and a
stereo mic?  

Are there mono/stereo mic symbols used in schematic circuit
diagrams which could be used?

--------------------------------

I've seen two overlapping circles used for stereo. But for
some reason a mono mic is one circle PLUS a short bar

http://tinyurl.com/ykdar8p

THERE ARE OVER 10 SYMBOLS TO DEPICT A MICROPHNOE IN DIAGRAMS
DEPENDING ON IT'S TYPE

IT IS SOMEWHAT SIMILAR TO THE SYMBOL FOR A SPEAKER BUT FOR THE
CONE OR AIR EXPANSION/CONTACT AREA WITH IS USUALLY CONCAVE FOR
A MIKE AND FLAT FOR A SPEAKER THE COIL IS USUALLY ENCLOSED
WITHIN THE MIKE SYMBOL AND OFFSET OFF THE CONE IN A SPEAKER
THOUGH THAT IS JUST A ROUGH GENERAL DISCRIPT IT SHOULD HELP YOU
DECIDE WHICH ONE TO USE

I AM PROTEUS
I am the OP. If I understand you correctly, that symbol would be
tricky to draw by hand and if it was not drawn accurately it
might look strange.

OTOH maybe I've misunderstood you. Do you have a link to an image
of what you have in mind?
 
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 03:33:58 -0400, Eddie <invalid@mail.com> wrote:

On 05:49 17 Oct 2009, Proteus IIV wrote:

On Oct 15, 12:37 pm, Eddie <du...@invalid.com> wrote:
I want to write (by hand) if some voice recordings of mine are
in mono or stereo.

Are there some standard symbols used for a mono mic and a
stereo mic?  

Are there mono/stereo mic symbols used in schematic circuit
diagrams which could be used?

--------------------------------

I've seen two overlapping circles used for stereo. But for
some reason a mono mic is one circle PLUS a short bar

http://tinyurl.com/ykdar8p

THERE ARE OVER 10 SYMBOLS TO DEPICT A MICROPHNOE IN DIAGRAMS
DEPENDING ON IT'S TYPE

IT IS SOMEWHAT SIMILAR TO THE SYMBOL FOR A SPEAKER BUT FOR THE
CONE OR AIR EXPANSION/CONTACT AREA WITH IS USUALLY CONCAVE FOR
A MIKE AND FLAT FOR A SPEAKER THE COIL IS USUALLY ENCLOSED
WITHIN THE MIKE SYMBOL AND OFFSET OFF THE CONE IN A SPEAKER
THOUGH THAT IS JUST A ROUGH GENERAL DISCRIPT IT SHOULD HELP YOU
DECIDE WHICH ONE TO USE

I AM PROTEUS

I am the OP. If I understand you correctly, that symbol would be
tricky to draw by hand and if it was not drawn accurately it
might look strange.

OTOH maybe I've misunderstood you. Do you have a link to an image
of what you have in mind?
You are attempting to converse with a total retard.

But then... you are the idiot that wants to put a schematic symbol that
no one else will even recognize onto discs where a SIMPLE TEXT label will
suffice, and will convey the info CORRECTLY.

So, you are only about two steps above the twit you are responding to.
 
Eddie <invalid@mail.com> wrote in news:Xns9CB423AEF2856F3QA2@feeder.eternal-
september.org:

Can you give us a drawing. It must be easier to understand than any
more of this? In the end I only want to know see what symbol you're
suggesting for stereo!
Ok, I haven't got picture (or any) hosting so you'll need to tell me
somewhere to send it.

If someone can remind me what the right group is called for this I'll try
sending it there too.
 
Lostgallifreyan wrote:
Eddie <invalid@mail.com> wrote in news:Xns9CB423AEF2856F3QA2@feeder.eternal-
september.org:

Can you give us a drawing. It must be easier to understand than any
more of this? In the end I only want to know see what symbol you're
suggesting for stereo!



Ok, I haven't got picture (or any) hosting so you'll need to tell me
somewhere to send it.

If someone can remind me what the right group is called for this I'll try
sending it there too.

news:alt.binaries.schematics.electronics


--
The movie 'Deliverance' isn't a documentary!
 
"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote in
news:LuGdncKZWZqAnnbXnZ2dnUVZ_udi4p2d@earthlink.com:

Lostgallifreyan wrote:

Eddie <invalid@mail.com> wrote in
news:Xns9CB423AEF2856F3QA2@feeder.eternal- september.org:

Can you give us a drawing. It must be easier to understand than any
more of this? In the end I only want to know see what symbol you're
suggesting for stereo!



Ok, I haven't got picture (or any) hosting so you'll need to tell me
somewhere to send it.

If someone can remind me what the right group is called for this I'll
try sending it there too.


news:alt.binaries.schematics.electronics
Ta. :) I googled a.b.s.e hoping they would tell me the full name, but no.. I
wish Google had an exact string search.
 
Lostgallifreyan wrote:
"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote in
news:LuGdncKZWZqAnnbXnZ2dnUVZ_udi4p2d@earthlink.com:


Lostgallifreyan wrote:

Eddie <invalid@mail.com> wrote in
news:Xns9CB423AEF2856F3QA2@feeder.eternal- september.org:

Can you give us a drawing. It must be easier to understand than any
more of this? In the end I only want to know see what symbol you're
suggesting for stereo!



Ok, I haven't got picture (or any) hosting so you'll need to tell me
somewhere to send it.

If someone can remind me what the right group is called for this I'll
try sending it there too.


news:alt.binaries.schematics.electronics



Ta. :) I googled a.b.s.e hoping they would tell me the full name, but no.. I
wish Google had an exact string search.

Google is so screwed up anymore that it isn't funny.


--
The movie 'Deliverance' isn't a documentary!
 
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 05:31:01 -0500, Lostgallifreyan <no-one@nowhere.net>
wrote:

Eddie <invalid@mail.com> wrote in news:Xns9CB423AEF2856F3QA2@feeder.eternal-
september.org:

Can you give us a drawing. It must be easier to understand than any
more of this? In the end I only want to know see what symbol you're
suggesting for stereo!


Ok, I haven't got picture (or any) hosting so I'll risk trying to attach a
PNG image here. It's as small as I can get it so if gets through it should do
it without raising hackles, but this group isn't meant for this.

If someone can remind me what the right group is called for this I'll try
sending it there too.

These are ok for block diagrams or making labels for sticking on things, but
would need a bit of pin modification for schematics if you extended them to
that.
That covers OMNI mikes. Ther are other symbols for cardioid and
hypercardioid, and Supercardioid.

Jeez, you DOPEY FUCKS, just put a TEXT label on the fucking disks!

Only the DOPE that puts the UNKNOWN symbol on the disks will understand
it.

In other words, do not make the jump from dopey fucktard to total
retard by actually printing stupid schematic symbol labels for your
disks.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top