B
Bob Parker
Guest
Mark was interested in powering a microcontroller circuit under
fairly extreme conditions for a long time, so lithiums seemed to be a
reasonable readily-available choice for that application.
For more mundane uses, quite likely alkalines would be a more
cost-effective choice.
Bob
On Mon, 29 May 2006 18:30:01 +1000, "Mr.T" <MrT@home> wrote:
fairly extreme conditions for a long time, so lithiums seemed to be a
reasonable readily-available choice for that application.
For more mundane uses, quite likely alkalines would be a more
cost-effective choice.
Bob
On Mon, 29 May 2006 18:30:01 +1000, "Mr.T" <MrT@home> wrote:
"Bob Parker" <bobp.deletethis@bluebottle.com> wrote in message
news:jfld72teipfkiqv1lgar0hcslii54glfal@4ax.com...
They reckon lithium cells are best for lowest self discharge and
handling temperature extremes (and having very high energy density).
But the claims don't match reality IME, admittedly limited, since I can't
justify the expense of buying any more.
The extra performance certainly didn't match the extra expense.
MrT.