What happens when solar power is cheaper than grid power?

On 10/07/2012 1:41 AM, Graham Cooper wrote:
On Jul 9, 7:59 pm, Sylvia Else <syl...@not.here.invalid> wrote:
On 9/07/2012 7:34 PM, Graham Cooper wrote:

On Jul 9, 2:53 pm, Sylvia Else <syl...@not.here.invalid> wrote:
On 9/07/2012 1:36 PM, Graham Cooper wrote:

you said 85% or 90% efficient by memory.

Previously you asserted I'd said 90%. Now it's 85% or 90%. What does
that say about your memory?

Spot on as always!

"Sylvia gave a figure of 90% last year or around there."

Herc

That would be "Sylvia gave a figure of 90% or around there last year."

I'm still waiting to see you provide any evidence.

Sylvia.

seems to be a pet topic of yours.

Results 1 - 10 of about 22 for author:else electrolysis

going through those would be like putting on a Willie Nelson tape

Herc
So not yet any evidence. The fact that I've discussed electrolysis is
not the same is saying that I've asserted a particular level of efficiency.

Sylvia.
 
On Jul 10, 8:24 am, BruceS <bruce...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 9, 1:39 am, "Clocky" <notg...@happen.com> wrote:


Graham Cooper wrote:
On Jul 9, 11:24 am, "Clocky" <notg...@happen.com> wrote:
herc.of.z...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 9, 9:28 am, "Clocky" <notg...@happen.com> wrote:
Yes but when you are trying to cool/heat a room you will soon
realise that the power required to do so using Peltier cooling (not
to mention the costs) will throw your cost effective solar powering
ideas into a festering heap.

But you won't listen to reason, so good luck with it. I would like
to see what you come up with though.

Not a room, a cool room.

of course a person producing 50W in heat isn't going to compete with
a 20W peltier!

so your INSULATION is inversely propotional to your COOLING POWER

most people off the grid buy a chest freezer and put a timer or
thermostat on it.

better insulation, and opening the door doesn't lose cool.

I might adapt some chest freezers with peltier coolers and tank of
water inside to keep thermal intertia during noon hours, running off
solar panels.

the shed is scorching in summer during afternoon, i have to get the
temperature down or I can't store ANY food!

A Peltier cooler setup that size would still likely use more energy
than a conventional freezer box which kinda defeats the purpose
doesn't it? I would insulate the shed walls and ceilings as a matter
of priority. Add some panelling to make it more homely. Should be
DIY simple and would make it more homely not to mention liveable.

yeh the compressor fridges are more efficient, but peltiers work too
and are solid state so you can leave them on for years and run at
different amps, no maintenance.

I'd be interested to see what you come up with and see how efficient,
reliable and cost effective it is.

I wouldn't' be able to use gas if I sealed the shed up.  this will
just be a weekender once I've setup the water tank I can move on..

It could be a very comfortable weekender for little outlay. Shouldn't be a
problem since you're loaded, right?

Graham lives in a shed.  It's bigger (I think) than the storage shed I
just had built, but not as nice.  Yes, he's clearly "loaded", but he
would get even more loaded if he sealed up the shed and used gas in
it.  Better yet, Graham, seal up the shed and just open the gas valve
a bit, with no flame.  Then you won't have to worry about CO
poisoning.  Happy dreams!

Easier to get a caravan or build a full house for something permanent
than do up a shed.  But water, power, resources, etc. are good to have
on stand by.

Expecting armageddon?

More like expecting the authorities.

I boarded off the gaps between the concrete slab and walls so no
spiders crawl in anymore

What about the gaps at the top? I found they came in through there and had
to seal that. Ended up doing it by hanging a ceiling made from silver cell
insulationl. Secured it using metal screws to the centre beam and let it
droop slightly and fastened it to the sides with a bit of overlap. Looked
quite neat and worked a treat. I ilaid some carpet and nsulated the sides of
the shed and put some panels on to make it into a very comfortable
workshop/office.

You just can't get much better than a person who pretends to be rich
having to go extra lengths to keep the spiders out of the shed he
lives in, and dreaming of the day he can move on up to a caravan.

huh? I could afford 3 10 room mansions on the Gold Coast next week if
I wasn't on the bad tenants list.

I don't see the point in upgrading unless it's substantial.

I have 3 graphics artists on payroll at the moment.

I'm ordering 10 15W amorphous panels today ($1000) to bring me up to
300W total, although the Mono's barely work in winter due to the low
slope on the shed roof. And 300AH in batteries ($1400) and not sure
what inverter, might get a $2000 inverter charger computer controlled
system so I know how to expand later.

It's just open plan living, septic loo in the corner, 12V shower on a
mat, spray the place with a huge dose of cochroach surface spray once
a month!

No point getting a $10K caravan now, take me a couple months to save
$50K, may as well get a mortgage.

Herc
 
On 10/07/2012 1:36 AM, Graham Cooper wrote:

The H2 engine gives off WATER VAPOUR for exhaust! It's clean!
An H2 burning air breathing internal combustion engine gives of oxides
of nitrgoen.

Sylvia.
 
On 10/07/2012 3:18 AM, Graham Cooper wrote:
On Jul 9, 6:41 pm, Sylvia Else <syl...@not.here.invalid> wrote:

One needs to take a pragmatic view. Some people may be willing to adjust
their lives to address CO2 emissions, but most people will simply follow
the path of least financial resistance.

The Government needs to ensure that that path doesn't represent an
increase in total cost without a commensurate environmental gain. As
things stand, that's very much in doubt.


Right, but if you could afford to pay 3-5 years power bill upfront
you can make substantial savings by investing on top of your roof!
If the consequence of your doing that is only that the price of grid
power rises, but without any reduction in CO2 emissions, then all you've
achieved is to transfer some of your power costs to other people. It's a
form of economic parasitism.

Sylvia.
 
In sci.physics Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.here.invalid> wrote:
On 10/07/2012 1:36 AM, Graham Cooper wrote:

The H2 engine gives off WATER VAPOUR for exhaust! It's clean!

An H2 burning air breathing internal combustion engine gives of oxides
of nitrgoen.

Sylvia.
And LOTS of them due to the flame temperatures.
 
On 10/07/12 09:12, Graham Cooper wrote:

I'm ordering 10 15W amorphous panels today ($1000)
Why?
A 120W/12v panel is only $300, although that is wholesale.
to bring me up to 300W total, although the Mono's
barely work in winter due to the low > slope on the shed roof.
You can get brackets to mount the panels at greater slope than the roof.

And 300AH in batteries ($1400)
Erk, I picked up 445AmpHrs (@12V) for under $1100 and that was retail.
Hint, forklift battery suppliers(or at least he was). Also, I ever buy
gel except for robust mobile applications.

and not sure
what inverter, might get a $2000 inverter charger computer controlled
system so I know how to expand later.
Whatever for? You get the inverter for whatever you are running off it
so they match and are thus the most efficent.
Firstly there s no point in paying the 50-100% extra for a full sine
wave if gear will work well off a modidifed sine water inverter.




It's just open plan living, septic loo in the corner, 12V shower on a
mat, spray the place with a huge dose of cochroach surface spray once
a month!
Slow form of self poisoning?


No point getting a $10K caravan now, take me a couple months to save
$50K, may as well get a mortgage.
The beauty of a mortgage is that you (usually) only pay them off once.

 
On 10/07/12 00:22, Clocky wrote:
terryc wrote:
On 09/07/12 17:32, Clocky wrote:

Yes, but as revs increase the torque tapers off to nothing making
them completely useless for towing (beyond taking off perhaps where
maximum torque is available at 0 revs) or high speed acceleration.

Isn't that a bit like saying a porche is useless for shipping freight.

You can buy a Porsche quite capable of towing. You can't buy any electric
car suitable for towing or long range driving load carrying.

electric cars are generally solf for a particular use.

Restricted by their inherent problems from other uses you mean.
Nope,

In any case, it is simply a matter of designing the control circuits
to handle the situation.

Electric motors don't produce torque at high revs,that's a fundamental
design limitation. If you use gearing you then increase the load and power
consumption, reducing their range.
1) Same as in a conventional IC motor vehicle.
2) Oh, you want everything, hint wiring. Shrug, it works for trains.

So you end up with a light weight chassis, incapable of towing and bloody
expensive to produce.
Shrug, in practical terms, the electric cars I see around(not the wanker
symbols) are all standard vehcile bodies retofitted.

Any modern car body is "expensive to produce" if you are producing low
numbers.The advantage of modern pressed car frames is their lightweight.
Suitability to towing is a trade off. Keep them long enough and/or do
enough towing and you bend them.
 
On 10/07/2012 9:12 AM, Graham Cooper wrote:
On Jul 10, 8:24 am, BruceS <bruce...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 9, 1:39 am, "Clocky" <notg...@happen.com> wrote:


Graham Cooper wrote:
On Jul 9, 11:24 am, "Clocky" <notg...@happen.com> wrote:
herc.of.z...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 9, 9:28 am, "Clocky" <notg...@happen.com> wrote:
Yes but when you are trying to cool/heat a room you will soon
realise that the power required to do so using Peltier cooling (not
to mention the costs) will throw your cost effective solar powering
ideas into a festering heap.

But you won't listen to reason, so good luck with it. I would like
to see what you come up with though.

Not a room, a cool room.

of course a person producing 50W in heat isn't going to compete with
a 20W peltier!

so your INSULATION is inversely propotional to your COOLING POWER

most people off the grid buy a chest freezer and put a timer or
thermostat on it.

better insulation, and opening the door doesn't lose cool.

I might adapt some chest freezers with peltier coolers and tank of
water inside to keep thermal intertia during noon hours, running off
solar panels.

the shed is scorching in summer during afternoon, i have to get the
temperature down or I can't store ANY food!

A Peltier cooler setup that size would still likely use more energy
than a conventional freezer box which kinda defeats the purpose
doesn't it? I would insulate the shed walls and ceilings as a matter
of priority. Add some panelling to make it more homely. Should be
DIY simple and would make it more homely not to mention liveable.

yeh the compressor fridges are more efficient, but peltiers work too
and are solid state so you can leave them on for years and run at
different amps, no maintenance.

I'd be interested to see what you come up with and see how efficient,
reliable and cost effective it is.

I wouldn't' be able to use gas if I sealed the shed up. this will
just be a weekender once I've setup the water tank I can move on..

It could be a very comfortable weekender for little outlay. Shouldn't be a
problem since you're loaded, right?

Graham lives in a shed. It's bigger (I think) than the storage shed I
just had built, but not as nice. Yes, he's clearly "loaded", but he
would get even more loaded if he sealed up the shed and used gas in
it. Better yet, Graham, seal up the shed and just open the gas valve
a bit, with no flame. Then you won't have to worry about CO
poisoning. Happy dreams!

Easier to get a caravan or build a full house for something permanent
than do up a shed. But water, power, resources, etc. are good to have
on stand by.

Expecting armageddon?

More like expecting the authorities.

I boarded off the gaps between the concrete slab and walls so no
spiders crawl in anymore

What about the gaps at the top? I found they came in through there and had
to seal that. Ended up doing it by hanging a ceiling made from silver cell
insulationl. Secured it using metal screws to the centre beam and let it
droop slightly and fastened it to the sides with a bit of overlap. Looked
quite neat and worked a treat. I ilaid some carpet and nsulated the sides of
the shed and put some panels on to make it into a very comfortable
workshop/office.

You just can't get much better than a person who pretends to be rich
having to go extra lengths to keep the spiders out of the shed he
lives in, and dreaming of the day he can move on up to a caravan.


huh? I could afford 3 10 room mansions on the Gold Coast next week if
I wasn't on the bad tenants list.

I don't see the point in upgrading unless it's substantial.

I have 3 graphics artists on payroll at the moment.

I'm ordering 10 15W amorphous panels today ($1000) to bring me up to
300W total, although the Mono's barely work in winter due to the low
slope on the shed roof. And 300AH in batteries ($1400) and not sure
what inverter, might get a $2000 inverter charger computer controlled
system so I know how to expand later.

It's just open plan living, septic loo in the corner, 12V shower on a
mat, spray the place with a huge dose of cochroach surface spray once
a month!

No point getting a $10K caravan now, take me a couple months to save
$50K, may as well get a mortgage.

Herc
Why is it that your status as a wealthy person is always just around the
corner?

What happened to all the income you claimed you were getting in the past?

Sylvia.
 
On 10/07/12 03:18, Graham Cooper wrote:

Right, but if you could afford to pay 3-5 years power bill upfront
you can make substantial savings by investing on top of your roof!
In theory. In practise it is different.
I pay a package rate for electricity,with an offpeak hotwater heavy
discount.

If I put PV on my roof(not fully suitable), I instantly move to time of
day metering on all electricity usage, but have no capacity to time
shift any consumption.


Now, if I put stuff on my roof for my use only, I need a storage system.
The only practical economical storage system is deep discharge lead acid
batteries(Not gel or agm, or Nicad, or Lipoly, etc).

It costs about $300 to regulate up to 20amps and about $800 to regulate
up to 200(?)amps going into the battery bank. That is based on a 12v
battery bank.

IME gear for higher voltages is proportionally higher in cost

Probably $10/metre for cabling/copper bars. Hint, higher currents need
anchored cables/bars.

Now, your battery bank will beed to be somewhere from 200ampHrs to
4,000AmpHrs. I use the C/20 for minimal charge/discharge rates for
longest battery life(idealy 10+ years/>3,653 cycles)

So I'll suggest $500 for 200Amphrs @12V. you can work out capital cost, etc.

At something like 200amps feed, you will probably be doing a water level
check weekly and consuming 20L of distilled water each time.
Better cost in a new set of clothes every three months because no matter
how careful you are, there is always acid holes.

You can work out your own inverters.

Now,if you want relability,then you need "generators". Plural in case
one breaks down. You also need to keep sufficent fuel to run them for
24, 48, etc up to say the occassinal week(make the neighbours really
happy there). You also need the battery chargers to convert generator
output into the battery.

Bottom line, it isn't simple and easy.
 
In sci.physics Graham Cooper <grahamcooper7@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 10, 12:04 pm, j...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
In sci.physics Sylvia Else <syl...@not.here.invalid> wrote:

On 10/07/2012 1:36 AM, Graham Cooper wrote:

The H2 engine gives off WATER VAPOUR for exhaust!  It's clean!

An H2 burning air breathing internal combustion engine gives of oxides
of nitrgoen.

Sylvia.

And LOTS of them due to the flame temperatures.

not mentioned in Wikipedia.
Basic chemistry of nitrogen.
 
On 10/07/2012 12:31 PM, Graham Cooper wrote:
On Jul 10, 11:20 am, Sylvia Else <syl...@not.here.invalid> wrote:
On 10/07/2012 3:18 AM, Graham Cooper wrote:

On Jul 9, 6:41 pm, Sylvia Else <syl...@not.here.invalid> wrote:

One needs to take a pragmatic view. Some people may be willing to adjust
their lives to address CO2 emissions, but most people will simply follow
the path of least financial resistance.

The Government needs to ensure that that path doesn't represent an
increase in total cost without a commensurate environmental gain. As
things stand, that's very much in doubt.

Right, but if you could afford to pay 3-5 years power bill upfront
you can make substantial savings by investing on top of your roof!

If the consequence of your doing that is only that the price of grid
power rises, but without any reduction in CO2 emissions, then all you've
achieved is to transfer some of your power costs to other people. It's a
form of economic parasitism.

Sylvia.


You should know! but your theory is utterly absurd.

It relies on 2 dubious premises.

Dubious Premise 1: A varying load on the Power Station can be cheaply
accomplished with a less efficient generation method.
More cheaply. I've explained how this comes about. If it weren't for
that mechanism, all our power would be generated by coal, rather than
just the base load.

Dubious Premise 2: The Govt. will willingly save a few bucks at the
expense of burning more coal to generate less power.
Appears to be entirely irrelevant.

Sylvia.
 
On 10/07/2012 12:43 PM, Graham Cooper wrote:
On Jul 10, 12:04 pm, j...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
In sci.physics Sylvia Else <syl...@not.here.invalid> wrote:

On 10/07/2012 1:36 AM, Graham Cooper wrote:

The H2 engine gives off WATER VAPOUR for exhaust! It's clean!

An H2 burning air breathing internal combustion engine gives of oxides
of nitrgoen.

Sylvia.

And LOTS of them due to the flame temperatures.

not mentioned in Wikipedia.
Try

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_internal_combustion_engine_vehicle

Sylvia.
 
On 10/07/2012 1:02 PM, Graham Cooper wrote:
On Jul 10, 12:38 pm, Sylvia Else <syl...@not.here.invalid> wrote:
No point getting a $10K caravan now, take me a couple months to save
$50K, may as well get a mortgage.

Herc

Why is it that your status as a wealthy person is always just around the
corner?

I uploaded 50 cloud pictures last year from 5 different beach front
apartments.



What happened to all the income you claimed you were getting in the past?

Sylvia.



I just wrote 20 reasons, but too much detail for public forum.

Too many middlemen I have no control of means ad profits don't readily
scale.
You mean the money never actually arrived in your hands. Leaving aside
the reasons, I think this is what most of us believed - and still believe.

Sylvia.
 
On Jul 10, 11:20 am, Sylvia Else <syl...@not.here.invalid> wrote:
On 10/07/2012 3:18 AM, Graham Cooper wrote:

On Jul 9, 6:41 pm, Sylvia Else <syl...@not.here.invalid> wrote:

One needs to take a pragmatic view. Some people may be willing to adjust
their lives to address CO2 emissions, but most people will simply follow
the path of least financial resistance.

The Government needs to ensure that that path doesn't represent an
increase in total cost without a commensurate environmental gain. As
things stand, that's very much in doubt.

Right, but if you could afford to pay 3-5 years power bill upfront
you can make substantial savings by investing on top of your roof!

If the consequence of your doing that is only that the price of grid
power rises, but without any reduction in CO2 emissions, then all you've
achieved is to transfer some of your power costs to other people. It's a
form of economic parasitism.

Sylvia.

You should know! but your theory is utterly absurd.

It relies on 2 dubious premises.

Dubious Premise 1: A varying load on the Power Station can be cheaply
accomplished with a less efficient generation method.

Dubious Premise 2: The Govt. will willingly save a few bucks at the
expense of burning more coal to generate less power.

It's akin to not using pimple cream incase it causes more pimples by
being attracted to girls and catching herpes.

Herc
 
On Jul 10, 12:04 pm, j...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
In sci.physics Sylvia Else <syl...@not.here.invalid> wrote:

On 10/07/2012 1:36 AM, Graham Cooper wrote:

The H2 engine gives off WATER VAPOUR for exhaust!  It's clean!

An H2 burning air breathing internal combustion engine gives of oxides
of nitrgoen.

Sylvia.

And LOTS of them due to the flame temperatures.
not mentioned in Wikipedia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_vehicle

The drawbacks of hydrogen use are low energy content per unit volume,
high tankage weights, very high storage vessel pressures, the storage,
transportation and filling of gaseous or liquid hydrogen in vehicles,
the large investment in infrastructure that would be required to fuel
vehicles, and the inefficiency of production processes.



Herc
 
On Jul 10, 12:38 pm, Sylvia Else <syl...@not.here.invalid> wrote:
No point getting a $10K caravan now, take me a couple months to save
$50K, may as well get a mortgage.

Herc

Why is it that your status as a wealthy person is always just around the
corner?
I uploaded 50 cloud pictures last year from 5 different beach front
apartments.



What happened to all the income you claimed you were getting in the past?

Sylvia.


I just wrote 20 reasons, but too much detail for public forum.

Too many middlemen I have no control of means ad profits don't readily
scale.

Herc
 
On 10/07/2012 7:12 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 7/9/2012 7:49 PM, keithr wrote:
On 9/07/2012 2:21 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 7/9/2012 2:02 PM, terryc wrote:
On 09/07/12 06:39, Trevor Wilson wrote:

**Thinking outside the box over the weekend. Let's say you plonk a
dirty
great PV array on your roof in a year or two. Then you buy yourself a
Holden Volt. During the day, you plug your Volt into the power
supplied
by the PV array.

Umm, what is the point of having the Volt?

**You would need to ask the people who the Volt that question. For many
owners, no petrol will be required, except under unusual circumstances.

Is this for people who are at home during the day?


**I merely supplied a scenario where the Volt could be charged, with no
extra burdens placed on the grid and at no cost to the owners. Many
vehicles are garaged during the day and used to (say) drop the (lazy)
kids at school, do the shopping, etc.

With the Volt going to cost $60k plus the cost of the panels, the
economics are highly suspect.



**Now, that is true. Do you imagine that it will always be the case?

In 1908, the average US automobile cost US$3,000.00. In 1909, Henry Ford
introduced mass production techniques to the US auto industry and lower
the price to $850.00. Further refinements and economies of scale allowed
Ford to reduce the price of the Model T to $550.00.

Right now, electric automobiles represent a miniscule proportion of
production. Witness the Telsa Roadster. It's performance approximates
that of a cheap(?) Ferrari. It is priced similarly. It is built in
similar numbers. It is reasonable to accume that, when EVs are built in
huge numbers, that costs will fall.

What do you think people will be driving when fuel hits 5 Bucks a Litre?
Australian fuel prices have not gone up that much over the years
compared to the rest of the world. In 1998 petrol was about 85c per
litre, I moved to the US that year and was paying 90c/US gall. Now, even
here 500Km from Sydney we are paying $1.40/litre less than double,
meanwhile the yanks are now paying $3/US gall more than 3 times the
price. That's still significantly cheaper than here, but the
differential is closing.
 
On 9/07/2012 11:43 PM, terryc wrote:
On 09/07/12 19:49, keithr wrote:

With the Volt going to cost $60k plus the cost of the panels, the
economics are highly suspect.

Yep, these cars are sold at status symbols.
Every time I see a Prius, it is being driven like fury obviously not
being driven in a green manner. If you really want to save fuel and cut
emissions, buy a VW "Blue Motion" diesel Golf
 
On 7/10/2012 4:43 PM, keithr wrote:
On 10/07/2012 7:12 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 7/9/2012 7:49 PM, keithr wrote:
On 9/07/2012 2:21 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 7/9/2012 2:02 PM, terryc wrote:
On 09/07/12 06:39, Trevor Wilson wrote:

**Thinking outside the box over the weekend. Let's say you plonk a
dirty
great PV array on your roof in a year or two. Then you buy yourself a
Holden Volt. During the day, you plug your Volt into the power
supplied
by the PV array.

Umm, what is the point of having the Volt?

**You would need to ask the people who the Volt that question. For many
owners, no petrol will be required, except under unusual circumstances.

Is this for people who are at home during the day?


**I merely supplied a scenario where the Volt could be charged, with no
extra burdens placed on the grid and at no cost to the owners. Many
vehicles are garaged during the day and used to (say) drop the (lazy)
kids at school, do the shopping, etc.

With the Volt going to cost $60k plus the cost of the panels, the
economics are highly suspect.



**Now, that is true. Do you imagine that it will always be the case?

In 1908, the average US automobile cost US$3,000.00. In 1909, Henry Ford
introduced mass production techniques to the US auto industry and lower
the price to $850.00. Further refinements and economies of scale allowed
Ford to reduce the price of the Model T to $550.00.

Right now, electric automobiles represent a miniscule proportion of
production. Witness the Telsa Roadster. It's performance approximates
that of a cheap(?) Ferrari. It is priced similarly. It is built in
similar numbers. It is reasonable to accume that, when EVs are built in
huge numbers, that costs will fall.

What do you think people will be driving when fuel hits 5 Bucks a Litre?

Australian fuel prices have not gone up that much over the years
compared to the rest of the world. In 1998 petrol was about 85c per
litre, I moved to the US that year and was paying 90c/US gall. Now, even
here 500Km from Sydney we are paying $1.40/litre less than double,
meanwhile the yanks are now paying $3/US gall more than 3 times the
price. That's still significantly cheaper than here, but the
differential is closing.
**Perhaps I should ask:

When do you think petrol will hit 5 Bucks a Litre?

--
Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
 
On Jul 10, 1:54 pm, Sylvia Else <syl...@not.here.invalid> wrote:
On 10/07/2012 1:02 PM, Graham Cooper wrote:

Too many middlemen I have no control of means ad profits don't readily
scale.

You mean the money never actually arrived in your hands. Leaving aside
the reasons, I think this is what most of us believed - and still believe..

Sylvia.

Yeh it's steady $4K a week last few months.

Started breaking $1000/day end of financial year so will be over $5K/
week next month.


3 Jul 2012 PROCEEDS OVERSEAS TELEGRAPHIC TRANSFER
0106566 USD4426.26@1.0539 FIC INC 4,199.89

26 Jun 2012 PROCEEDS OVERSEAS TELEGRAPHIC TRANSFER
0167556 USD3810.48@1.0288 FIC INC 3,703.81

19 Jun 2012 PROCEEDS OVERSEAS TELEGRAPHIC TRANSFER
0157347 USD4143.91@1.0406 FIC INC 3,982.23

12 Jun 2012 PROCEEDS OVERSEAS TELEGRAPHIC TRANSFER
0126350 USD4446.61@1.0142 FIC INC 4,384.35

If only the Aussie dollar was 60c again!

That's a $30/day ad budget. Accounting won't let me scale it up!

Anyway, I have a 1500W solar power grid to install!


Herc
--
http://CamGirls.com
http://CamAffiliate.com
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top